Spectrum of portal vein thrombosis in the West

Portal vein thrombosis in a patient on semaglutide

Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are modern-day pandemics that have a significant impact on global healthcare. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) semaglutide is a novel treatment for both tbl2DM and obesity, but can be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Case presentation: This case report describes a 59-year-old woman with tbl2DM who received semaglutide to manage glycemic levels, and also experienced the additional benefit of weight reduction. Within six months of initiating GLP1-RA, the patient experienced low back pain associated with nausea and poor oral intake. She had no known risk factors for venous thromboembolism or thrombophilia and had no history of significant illness in her family. Her physical examination revealed no significant findings. Only mild leukocytosis and neutrophilia were noted. She underwent an abdominal computed tomography scan, which revealed intrahepatic portal vein thrombosis without evidence of liver cirrhosis or abdominal malignancy. Her symptoms improved with oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban). The result of thrombophilia examination was negative for inherited or acquired thrombophilia, except for a Janus kinase 2 mutation, which may increase the risk of thrombosis. Conclusions: The use of GLP1-RA is increasing due to the growing desire for weight loss medications. Therefore, it is important that physicians better understand the possible risks of thrombosis before initiating GLP1-RA treatment.

Asymptomatic Extrahepatic Portal Venous Obstruction: A Case Report

This report describes a case of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) with esophageal varices that would have led to significant bleeding if left untreated or inadequately managed. A 56-year-old diabetic and hypothyroid female visited our medical outpatient clinic to be assessed for pancytopenia and easy fatiguability. She experienced acute calculus cholecystitis 24 years ago, which was treated with a partial cholecystectomy. The laboratory tests showed indications of hypersplenism, characterized by anemia, leucopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The MRI results showed signs of long-term blockage of the portal vein outside the liver, with the liver tissue seeming normal. The upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed grade IV esophageal varices, gastroesophageal varices 1, fundal varices, isolated gastric varices 2, and antral varices. The patient was diagnosed with EHPVO, and banding was performed as a preventive measure against upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Additionally, she was treated using conservative management techniques such as beta blockers. Endoscopic treatment is the standard of care for treating acute varices, while beta blockers are given as a secondary preventive measure. Despite cholelithiasis being a cause and/or sequelae to portal venous thrombosis, a clear explanation has not been offered to this patient while taking consent for cholecystectomy or thereafter. EHPVO is not frequently detected, and there is still a dearth of appropriate guidelines for managing this illness, even though it is a frequent cause of acute calculus cholecystitis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to portal hypertension in a patient with primary myelofibrosis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency that has a 10% hospital mortality rate. According to the etiology, this disease can be divided into acute varicose veins and nonvaricose veins. Bleeding from esophageal varices is a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. Portal hypertension is a clinical syndrome defined as a portal venous pressure that exceeds 10 mmHg. Cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension, and thrombosis of the portal system not associated with liver cirrhosis is the second most common cause of portal hypertension in the Western world. Primary myeloproliferative disorders are the main cause of portal venous thrombosis, and somatic mutations in the Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2 V617F) can be found in approximately 90% of polycythemia vera, 50% of essential thrombocyrosis and 50% of primary myelofibrosis.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a rare case of primary myelofibrosis with gastrointestinal bleeding as the primary manifestation that presented as portal-superior-splenic mesenteric vein thrombosis. Peripheral blood tests revealed the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation. Bone marrow biopsy ultimately confirmed the diagnosis of myelofibrosis (MF-2 grade).

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding due to portal hypertension and vein thrombosis without cirrhosis, the possibility of myeloproliferative neoplasms should be considered, and the JAK2 mutation test should be performed.

Portal Vein Thrombosis: State-of-the-Art Review

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare disease with an estimated incidence of 2 to 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The most common predisposing conditions for PVT are chronic liver diseases (cirrhosis), primary or secondary hepatobiliary malignancy, major infectious or inflammatory abdominal disease, or myeloproliferative disorders. Methods: PVT can be classified on the basis of the anatomical site, the degree of venous occlusion, and the timing and type of presentation. The main differential diagnosis of PVT, both acute and chronic, is malignant portal vein invasion, most frequently by hepatocarcinoma, or constriction (typically by pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma). Results: The management of PVT is based on anticoagulation and the treatment of predisposing conditions. The aim of anticoagulation in acute thrombosis is to prevent the extension of the clot and enable the recanalization of the vein to avoid the development of complications, such as intestinal infarction and portal hypertension. Conclusions: The treatment with anticoagulant therapy favors the reduction of portal hypertension, and this allows for a decrease in the risk of bleeding, especially in patients with esophageal varices. The anticoagulant treatment is generally recommended for at least three to six months. Prosecution of anticoagulation is advised until recanalization or lifelong if the patient has an underlying permanent pro-coagulant condition that cannot be corrected or if there is thrombosis extending to the mesenteric veins.

Prophylactic anticoagulants for non-hospitalised people with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted healthcare systems worldwide. Multiple reports on thromboembolic complications related to COVID-19 have been published, and researchers have described that people with COVID-19 are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulants have been used as pharmacological interventions to prevent arterial and venous thrombosis, and their use in the outpatient setting could potentially reduce the prevalence of vascular thrombosis and associated mortality in people with COVID-19. However, even lower doses used for a prophylactic purpose may result in adverse events such as bleeding. It is important to consider the evidence for anticoagulant use in non-hospitalised people with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of prophylactic anticoagulants versus active comparators, placebo or no intervention, or non-pharmacological interventions in non-hospitalised people with COVID-19.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 18 April 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic anticoagulants with placebo or no treatment, another active comparator, or non-pharmacological interventions in non-hospitalised people with COVID-19. We included studies that compared anticoagulants with a different dose of the same anticoagulant. We excluded studies with a duration of under two weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, VTE (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)), and major bleeding. Our secondary outcomes were DVT, PE, need for hospitalisation, minor bleeding, adverse events, and quality of life. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs with up to 90 days of follow-up (short term). Data were available for meta-analysis from 1777 participants. Anticoagulant compared to placebo or no treatment Five studies compared anticoagulants with placebo or no treatment and provided data for three of our outcomes of interest (all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and adverse events). The evidence suggests that prophylactic anticoagulants may lead to little or no difference in all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 3.61; 5 studies; 1777 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably reduce VTE from 3% in the placebo group to 1% in the anticoagulant group (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.85; 4 studies; 1259 participants; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 50; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in major bleeding (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.78; 5 studies; 1777 participants; low-certainty evidence). Anticoagulants probably result in little or no difference in DVT (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.46; 3 studies; 1009 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but probably reduce the risk of PE from 2.7% in the placebo group to 0.7% in the anticoagulant group (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.79; 3 studies; 1009 participants; NNTB 50; moderate-certainty evidence). Anticoagulants probably lead to little or no difference in reducing hospitalisation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.75; 4 studies; 1459 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may lead to little or no difference in adverse events (minor bleeding, RR 2.46, 95% CI 0.90 to 6.72; 5 studies, 1777 participants; low-certainty evidence). Anticoagulant compared to a different dose of the same anticoagulant One study compared anticoagulant (higher-dose apixaban) with a different (standard) dose of the same anticoagulant and reported five relevant outcomes. No cases of all-cause mortality, VTE, or major bleeding occurred in either group during the 45-day follow-up (moderate-certainty evidence). Higher-dose apixaban compared to standard-dose apixaban may lead to little or no difference in reducing the need for hospitalisation (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.17 to 20.58; 1 study; 278 participants; low-certainty evidence) or in the number of adverse events (minor bleeding, RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.54; 1 study; 278 participants; low-certainty evidence). Anticoagulant compared to antiplatelet agent One study compared anticoagulant (apixaban) with antiplatelet agent (aspirin) and reported five relevant outcomes. No cases of all-cause mortality or major bleeding occurred during the 45-day follow-up (moderate-certainty evidence). Apixaban may lead to little or no difference in VTE (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.65; 1 study; 279 participants; low-certainty evidence), need for hospitalisation (RR 3.20, 95% CI 0.13 to 77.85; 1 study; 279 participants; low-certainty evidence), or adverse events (minor bleeding, RR 2.13, 95% CI 0.40 to 11.46; 1 study; 279 participants; low-certainty evidence). No included studies reported on quality of life or investigated anticoagulants compared to a different anticoagulant, or anticoagulants compared to non-pharmacological interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low- to moderate-certainty evidence from five RCTs that prophylactic anticoagulants result in little or no difference in major bleeding, DVT, need for hospitalisation, or adverse events when compared with placebo or no treatment in non-hospitalised people with COVID-19. Low-certainty evidence indicates that prophylactic anticoagulants may result in little or no difference in all-cause mortality when compared with placebo or no treatment, but moderate-certainty evidence indicates that prophylactic anticoagulants probably reduce the incidence of VTE and PE. Low-certainty evidence suggests that comparing different doses of the same prophylactic anticoagulant may result in little or no difference in need for hospitalisation or adverse events. Prophylactic anticoagulants may result in little or no difference in risk of VTE, hospitalisation, or adverse events when compared with antiplatelet agents (low-certainty evidence). Given that there were only short-term data from one study, these results should be interpreted with caution. Additional trials of sufficient duration are needed to clearly determine any effect on clinical outcomes.

Natural History and Outcomes of Cavernous Transformation of the Portal Vein in Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cavernous transformation of the portal vein can occur after portal vein thrombosis (PVT). In this study, we investigated clinical complications associated with cavernous transformation in the context of cirrhosis and PVT.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort analysis, 204 patients with cirrhosis and PVT with or without cavernous transformation were identified using MUSC's Clinical Data Warehouse between January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019. Complete demographic data, clinical history, and laboratory tests were abstracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Of 204 patients, 41 (20%) had cavernous transformation. MELD, Child-Pugh, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were similar among groups. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of esophageal varices (with or without bleeding), splenomegaly, or hepatic encephalopathy in patients with and without cavernous transformation, although ascites tended to be lower in patients with cavernous transformation (31/41 (76%) vs 142/163 (87%), p = 0.06). Patients with cavernous transformation were significantly less likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (13/41 (32%) vs 81/163 (50%), p < 0.05) and had significantly lower APRI (1.4 vs 2.0, p < 0.05) and Fib-4 (4.7 vs 6.5, p < 0.05). Patients with cavernous transformation had lower 5-year mortality (12/41 (29%) vs 81/163 (49%) died, p = 0.06). The 10-year mortality of patients with cavernous transformation without HCC was significantly lower than in those without cavernous transformation (8/28 (29%) vs 46/82 (56%), respectively, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cavernous transformation appeared to have better outcomes than those without cavernous transformation.

Portal cavernoma cholangiopathy: Update and recommendations on diagnosis and management

Portal cavernoma cholangiopathy is defined as an obstruction of the biliary system due to distended veins surrounding bile ducts that mainly occur in patients with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. The periductal venous plexuses encircling the ducts can cause morphological changes which may or may not become symptomatic. Currently, non-invasive techniques such as ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance images are being used to diagnose this disorder. Only a few patients who have symptoms of biliary obstruction require drainage which might be accomplished using endoscopic stenting, decompression of the portal venous system usually via a lienorenal shunt, a difficult direct hepaticojejunostomy, and rarely a liver transplant.

Direct portal vein recanalization with stenting associated with embolization of esophagogastric varices in a patient with portal vein thrombosis

Introduction

Chronic extrahepatic non-tumoral thrombotic portal vein occlusion in non-cirrhotic patients is a rare condition, affecting 5–10% of patients with portal hypertension.

Presentation of case

The present study reports the case of a young patient without previous comorbidities who presented with portal hypertension secondary to chronic extrahepatic non-tumoral thrombotic occlusion of the portal vein. He underwent portal recanalization with a 12 × 80 mm nitinol self-expandable stent and embolization of esophagogastric varices with fibrous springs and cyanoacrylate via transparieto-hepatic access. Immediate resolution of the trans-lesion pressure gradient was obtained transoperatively, while complete remission of esophagogastric varices was verified by endoscopic control during outpatient follow-up.

Discussion

Chronic portal vein occlusion is associated or not with liver cirrhosis. The chronic phase is characterized by cavernomatous transformation of the portal vein, which consists of the formation of multiple collaterals that bypass the lesion. This phase usually courses with portal hypertension and consequent variceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Decompression of the portal system through direct recanalization (angioplasty with stenting) is one therapeutic options.

Conclusion

We conclude that, in the present case, resolving portal hypertension by direct portal recanalization was a good therapeutic option, as it decompressed the portal system while maintaining the hepatopetal flow.

•

Chronic extrahepatic non-tumoral thrombotic portal occlusion is a rare condition.

•

Portal recanalization with stent for resolution of portal hypertension.

•

Transparieto-hepatic access is the approach of choice among non-cirrhotics.

Meso-Rex bypass for the management of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in adults (with video)

BACKGROUND

Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) results in severe portal hypertension (PHT) leading to severely compromised quality of life. Often, pharmacological and endoscopic management is unable to solve this problem. Restoring hepatic portal flow using meso-Rex bypass (MRB) may solve it. This procedure, uncommon in adult patients, is considered the treatment of choice for EHPVO in children.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2018, 8 male and 6 female adults, with a median age of 51 years (range 22-66) underwent MRB procedure for EHPVO at the University Hospitals Saint-Luc in Brussels, Belgium. Symptoms of PHT were life altering in all but one patient and consisted of repetitive gastro-intestinal bleedings, sepsis due to portal biliopathy, and/or severe abdominal discomfort. The surgical technique consisted in interposition of a free venous graft or of a prosthetic graft between the superior mesenteric vein and the Rex recess of the left portal vein.

RESULTS

Median operative time was 500 min (range 300-730). Median follow-up duration was 22 months (range 2-169). One patient died due to hemorrhagic shock following percutaneous transluminal intervention for early graft thrombosis. Major morbidity, defined as Clavien-Dindo score ≥ III, was 35.7% (5/14). Shunt patency at last follow-up was 64.3% (9/14): 85.7% (6/7) of pure venous grafts and only 42.9% (3/7) of prosthetic graft. Symptom relief was achieved in 85.7% (12/14) who became asymptomatic after MRB.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult EHPVO represents a difficult clinical condition that leads to severely compromised quality of life and possible life-threatening complications. In such patients, MRB represents the only and last resort to restore physiological portal vein flow. Although successful in a majority of patients, this procedure is associated with major morbidity and mortality and should be done in tertiary centers experienced with vascular liver surgery to get the best results.

De novo Portal Vein Thrombosis in Non-Cirrhotic Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A 9-Year Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Aims: Approximately 30-40% of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains of unknown origin. The association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and PVT is a matter of debate. This study aimed to investigate the association between PVT and NAFLD. Methods: We included 94 out of 105 consecutive NAFLD patients in this prospective cohort study in addition to 94 from the healthy control group. We evaluated biochemical, clinical, immunological, and histopathological parameters; waist circumference (WC); leptin; adiponectin; and leptin/adiponectin ratio (LAR) for all participants at baseline and every 3 years thereafter. We described the characteristics of participants at baseline and showed individual WC, LAR, and PVT characteristics. Potential parameters to predict PVT development within 9 years were determined. Results: PVT developed in eight (8.5%) patients, mainly in the portal trunk. Univariate analysis showed three PVT-associated factors: diabetes mellitus (P = 0.013), WC (P < 0.001), and LAR (P = 0.002). After adjusting multiple confounding variables, the multivariate model showed that the only significant variables were WC and LAR. By applying the receiver operating characteristic curve, WC had 98.8% specificity, 87.5% sensitivity, and 0.894 area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of PVT (P < 0.001) at cutoff values of > 105 cm. In comparison, LAR had 60.5% specificity, 87.5% sensitivity, and 0.805 AUC for PVT prediction (P < 0.001) at cutoff values of >7.5. Conclusions: This study suggests that increased central obesity and LAR were independently associated with PVT development in non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients, and they should be considered risk factors that may participate in PVT multifactorial pathogenesis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is effective in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis and variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Studies about treatment of patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis (CPVT) are still limited, especially in different types of CPVT. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in all types of CPVT with variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Patients with CPVT who received TIPS treatment between January 2011 and June 2019 were divided into four types according to the extent of thrombosis. All patients had a history of variceal bleeding. The characteristics and clinical parameters were collected and recorded. Data on procedure success rate, variation in portal vein pressure, rebleeding, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), stent stenosis, and overall mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included in this study (39 in type 1, 84 in type 2, 48 in type 3, 18 in type 4). The TIPS procedure success rate was 86.2%. The success rate was significantly different among the four types (89.7% vs. 88.1% vs. 83.3% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.001). In the TIPS success group, portal vein pressure was significantly reduced from 27.15 ± 6.59 to 19.74 ± 6.73 mmHg after the procedure (P < 0.001) and the rebleeding rate was significantly lower than that of the fail group (14.7% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.017). In addition, there were no significant differences in HE rate (30.7% vs. 26.9%, P = 0.912) or overall mortality (12.9% vs. 19.2%, P = 0.403) between the TIPS success group and the fail group. In the TIPS success group, we found that the occurrence of HE was significantly different (P = 0.020) among the four types, while there were no significant differences in rebleeding rate (P = 0.669), stent stenosis rate (P = 0.056), or overall mortality (P = 0.690).

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS was safe and effective in decreasing portal vein pressure and rebleeding rate in patients with CPVT.

Liver Transplantation

The field of liver transplantation has changed since the MELD scoring system became the most widely used donor allocation tool. Due to the MELD-based allocation system, sicker patients with higher MELD scores are being transplanted. Persistent organ donor shortages remain a challenging issue, and as a result, the wait-list mortality is a persistent problem for most of the regions. This chapter focuses on deceased donor and live donor liver transplantation in patients with complications of portal hypertension. Special attention will also be placed on donor-recipient matching, perioperative management of transplant patients, and the impact of hepatic hemodynamics on transplantation.

Portal Hypertension of a Delayed Onset Following Liver Abscesses in a 12-Month-Old Infant: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

We report a 12-month-old female infant who had a history of neonatal sepsis with liver micro-abscesses that resolved with intravenous antibiotics during neonatal period. During her neonatal admission period, no umbilical vein catheter was inserted. Also, she did not undergo any abdominal surgeries or had a postnatal history of necrotizing enterocolitis. However, the child developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding in form of hematemesis and melena secondary to esophageal varices at the age of 12 months with an extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction with cavernous transformation and portal hypertension subsequently. The child underwent a successful endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. She is now 20-month-old and has portal hypertension but otherwise asymptomatic. We are proposing the possibility of a delayed-onset portal hypertension as a complication of liver abscess and neonatal sepsis.

Recurrent acute portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis treated by rivaroxaban

Cirrhosis can occur with the development of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). PVT may aggravate portal hypertension, and it can lead to hepatic decompensation. The international guideline recommends for anticoagulation treatment to be maintained for at least 3 months in all patients with acute PVT. Low-molecular-weight-heparin and changing to warfarin is the usual anticoagulation treatment. However, warfarin therapy is problematic due to a narrow therapeutic window and the requirement for frequent dose adjustment, which has prompted the development of novel oral anticoagulants for overcoming these problems. We report a 63-year-old female who experienced complete resolution of recurrent acute PVT in liver cirrhosis after treatment with rivaroxaban.

Massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to splenoportal axis thrombosis in a patient with a tested JAK2 mutation: A case report and review literature

Portal hypertension is a clinical syndrome defined as a portal venous pressure that exceeds 10mmHg. Cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension and thrombosis of the splenoportal axis not associated with liver cirrhosis is the second cause of portal hypertension in the Western world. The primary myeloproliferative disorders are the main cause of portal venous thrombosis and somatic mutation of Janus Kinase 2 gene (JAK2 V617F) can be found in approximately 90% of polycythemia vera, 50% of essential thrombocyrosis and 50% primary myelofibrosis. A a 55-year-old man with JAK2 mutation-associated splenoportal axis hypertension and bleeding complications due to oesophageal varices is reported. A massive upper bleeding episode made an emergent surgery to be done immediatelly at seventh day. The patient was discharged home at fifteenth day after surgery.

Extrahepatic portal-vein obstruction in pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Extrahepatic portal-vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a common cause of portal hypertension in developing countries. The main risk in pregnant women with this condition is variceal bleeding, which may be life-threatening. The objective of our study was to assess the outcome of pregnancy in women with EHPVO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 21 pregnancies in 12 women with EHPVO was carried out at a tertiary hospital in India.

RESULTS

The mean age of pregnant women with EHPVO was 25.3 years, and the mean duration of disease since diagnosis was 6.1 ± 1.2 years. All the patients had chronic EHPVO, and two patients were diagnosed in the index pregnancy. The incidence of abortion, preterm deliveries, and small for gestational age fetus was 23.8%, 18.7%, and 12.5%, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was found to complicate 61.9% of the pregnancies, while anemia was detected in 40% of the pregnancies. Variceal bleeding occurred in one woman, who was diagnosed during pregnancy and was managed successfully with endoscopic sclerotherapy. None of the patients who were diagnosed prenatally had variceal bleeding during pregnancy. The outcome in nine pregnancies, in which prenatal endoscopic variceal ligation was done, was compared with eight pregnancies, in which endoscopic sclerotherapy was done. No significant difference between the two groups in terms of pregnancy outcome and complications was found. There were no stillbirths or maternal mortality.

CONCLUSION

Women with EHPVO who have been diagnosed and treated prenatally have a good pregnancy outcome. They should be managed in a tertiary care center with a multidisciplinary approach.

Central obesity is associated with non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

30-40% of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains of unknown origin. An association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and peripheral vein thrombosis has been reported but not with PVT, to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between MetS and PVT.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2014, all consecutive patients with non-cirrhotic PVT were prospectively included. Patient's characteristics and risks factors were recorded at the time of inclusion. Controls were selected by random in the general population and were matched 1/1 according to age and sex.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients with PVT were included: 40 present with at least one risk factor for PVT (SPVT) and 39 were found to be idiopathic (IPVT). The prevalence of MetS was 25.6% in SPVT group vs. 47.4% in IPVT group and 17.9% in controls from the general population (C-IPVT: p=0.01). The waist circumference and body mass index were higher in the IPVT group than in the SPVT group (105 vs. 93cm, p=0.004 and 29.4 vs. 25.0kg/m(2), p=0.004) and in the C-IPVT group (105 vs. 92cm, p=0.001 and 29.4 vs. 25.8kg/m(2), p=0.003). Overweight was observed in 82.0% of patients in the IPVT group vs. 44% in the SPVT group (p=0.002) and 51% in the C-IPVT group (p=0.01). The mean visceral fat area was higher in IPVT than in SPVT (18,223mm(2)vs. 12,690mm(2), p=0.02). In multivariate analyses, an increase in waist circumference was the strongest parameter associated with idiopathic PVT.

CONCLUSION

Central obesity is associated with PVT and could become one of the main risk factors for digestive thromboses.

Tamoxifen-associated portal vein thrombosis causing severe oesophageal variceal bleeding

A 46-year-old woman with medical history of breast cancer on tamoxifen presented with syncope. On arrival to the hospital, the patient developed massive haematemesis and a subsequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed oesophageal varices without any known history of liver disease. Further evaluation identified portal vein thrombosis probably caused by tamoxifen use.

Efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant drug, danaparoid sodium, in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant drug, danaparoid sodium, in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

A consecutive 26 cirrhotic patients with PVT were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The etiologies of cirrhosis were hepatitis B virus-related, hepatitis C virus-related, alcoholic and cryptogenic in five, 14, three and four patients, respectively. Child-Pugh grade A, B and C was noted in 13, eight and five patients, respectively. Patients were treated with 2 weeks' administration of danaparoid sodium followed by the evaluation of PVT reduction and adverse events.

RESULTS

All patients experienced reduction of PVT through the treatment. The median volume of PVT before and after treatment was 2.40 cm(3) (range, 0.18-16.63) and 0.37 cm(3) (range, 0-5.74), respectively. The median reduction rate of PVT volume was 77.3% (range, 18-100%). According to the reduction rate, complete reduction (CR), partial reduction (PR, ≥50%) and stable disease (SD, <50%) were observed in four (15%), 16 (62%) and six patients (23%), respectively. The median volume of PVT before treatment was significantly different between CR + PR and SD (2.09 vs 4.35 cm(3) , P = 0.045). No severe adverse events such as bleeding symptoms (e.g. gastrointestinal bleeding and cerebral hemorrhage) and thrombocytopenia were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Danaparoid sodium for the treatment of PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis was safe and effective. Therefore, anticoagulation therapy with danaparoid sodium could have potential as one of the treatment options in PVT accompanied by cirrhosis.

Portal Hypertensive Biliopathy: An Infrequent Cause of Biliary Obstruction

Introduction

Biliary obstruction is usually caused by choledocholithiasis. However, in some circumstances, alternative or concurring unusual ethiologies such as portal hypertensive biliopathy (PHB) must be considered.

Clinical case

We present the case of a 36-year-old female complaining of jaundice and pruritus. Liver function tests were compatible with biliary obstruction and the ultrasound scan of the abdomen showed dilatation of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, a dilated common bile duct (CBD) and biliary calculi. The computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a portal cavernoma encasing the CBD.

Discussion

Portal cavernoma, the hallmark of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction, can cause PHB. When symptomatic, chronic cholestasis is present if a dominant stricture exists whereas biliary pain and acute cholangitis occur when choledocholithiasis prevails. Management must be individualized and usually includes endoscopic therapy to address choledocholithiasis and shunt surgery for definitive treatment.

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis is an important cause of portal hypertension. PVT occurs in association with cirrhosis or as a result of malignant invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma or even in the absence of associated liver disease. With the current research into its genesis, majority now have an underlying prothrombotic state detectable. Endothelial activation and stagnant portal blood flow also contribute to formation of the thrombus. Acute non-cirrhotic PVT, chronic PVT (EHPVO), and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis are the three main variants of portal vein thrombosis with varying etiological factors and variability in presentation and management. Procoagulant state should be actively investigated. Anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy for acute non-cirrhotic PVT, with supporting evidence for its use in cirrhotic population as well. Chronic PVT (EHPVO) on the other hand requires the management of portal hypertension as such and with role for anticoagulation in the setting of underlying prothrombotic state, however data is awaited in those with no underlying prothrombotic states. TIPS and liver transplant may be feasible even in the setting of PVT however proper selection of candidates and type of surgery is warranted. Thrombolysis and thrombectomy have some role. TARE is a new modality for management of HCC with portal vein invasion.

Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction and portal vein thrombosis in special situations: Need for a new classification

Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is a vascular disorder of liver, which results in obstruction and cavernomatous transformation of portal vein with or without the involvement of intrahepatic portal vein, splenic vein, or superior mesenteric vein. Portal vein obstruction due to chronic liver disease, neoplasm, or postsurgery is a separate entity and is not the same as extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction are generally young and belong mostly to Asian countries. It is therefore very important to define portal vein thrombosis as acute or chronic from management point of view. Portal vein thrombosis in certain situations such as liver transplant and postsurgical/liver transplant period is an evolving area and needs extensive research. There is a need for a new classification, which includes all areas of the entity. In the current review, the most recent literature of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is reviewed and summarized.

The collateral caval shunt as an alternative to classical shunt procedures in patients with recurrent duodenal varices and extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding episodes from variceal structures are severe complications in patients with portal hypertension. Endoscopic sclerotherapy and variceal ligation are the treatment options preferred for upper variceal bleeding owing to extrahepatic portal hypertension due to portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Recurrent duodenal variceal bleeding in non-cirrhotic patients with diffuse porto-splenic vein thrombosis and subsequent portal cavernous transformation represent a clinical challenge if classic shunt surgery is not possible or suitable.

In this study, we represent a case of recurrent bleeding of duodenal varices in a non-cirrhotic patient with cavernous transformation of the portal vein that was successfully treated with a collateral caval shunt operation.

Gastric and ectopic varices

Although often considered together, gastric and ectopic varices represent complications of a heterogeneous group of underlying diseases. Commonly, these are known to arise in patients with cirrhosis secondary to portal hypertension; however, they also arise in patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension, most often secondary to venous thrombosis of the portal venous system. One of the key initial assessments is to define the underlying condition leading to the formation of these portal-collateral pathways to guide management. In the authors' experience, these patients can be grouped into distinct although sometimes overlapping conditions, which can provide a helpful conceptual basis of management.

Current role of surgery in portal hypertension

Treatment for portal hypertension (PHT) has evolved from surgery being the only option during the 1970s to the wide range of options currently available. Surgery has not vanished from the therapeutic armamentarium, but its role has changed and is constantly evolving. The present review primarily focuses on the role of surgery in tackling patients with PHT and varices with regard to the Indian scenario and also looks at its relevance, given the availability of a host of other therapeutic options.

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can be a difficult clinical problem to assess and manage. A high index of suspicion is needed for a PVT diagnosis given the subtle presentation and potentially serious long-term complications. It should be considered a clue to the presence of one or several underlying disorders, including prothrombotic disorders, whether or not a local precipitating factor is identified. The accruing evidence shows that acute PVT can and probably should be treated with anticoagulation or thrombolytic agents in an effort to prevent extension of thrombus, mesenteric vessel occlusion, and portal hypertension. However, chronic PVT should be treated conservatively with measures to control major consequences related to portal hypertension. Anticoagulation therapy duration should be tailored to the identified predisposing factors.

Extra hepatic portal vein obstruction and pregnancy outcome: largest reported experience

AIM

Evaluate pregnancy outcome in women with extra hepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO).

MATERIAL & METHODS

A total of 26 pregnancies in 14 women with EHPVO were evaluated for maternal and perinatal outcomes in a tertiary centre of Northern India. Fourteen pregnancies were evaluated prospectively while the details of 12 previous pregnancies in the same women were studied retrospectively.

RESULTS

Mean age of pregnant women with EHPVO was 24.5 years and approximately one-third were primigravidae. Only one patient was diagnosed as EHPVO in the index pregnancy. The presenting event was hematemesis in 71% of the patients; others presented with thrombosis, pain abdomen and jaundice or incidental splenomegaly. The incidence of abortion, preterm deliveries and still births was 20%, 15.4% and 7.7%, respectively. Underlying hypercoagulable and prothrombotic state was diagnosed in around one-fifth of the patients. Half of these women required platelet transfusion in the intrapartum period due to hypersplenism resulting in thrombocytopenia. Anemia was seen in 40% of the patients; however, no other major complications were seen as a result of EHPVO. The vaginal delivery rate and obstetrical outcome were similar as in general population.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy outcome is expected to be successful in women with EHPVO if disease is adequately controlled prior to pregnancy.

Venous thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease

Patients with chronic liver disease are susceptible to bleeding and thrombotic complications of their disease, but the incidence of thrombosis and what predisposes them to thrombotic disease is largely unknown. One hundred and eight patients with chronic liver disease admitted with a first episode of venous thromboembolism, matched with patients of similar age, sex, and cause of liver disease without thrombosis were compared in a retrospective, case-control study over a 4-year period at two academic hospitals in Rhode Island. Incidence was determined from all admissions of patients with chronic liver disease during the specified time. Minimum and maximum values of complete blood counts, liver and kidney function tests, and coagulation tests during admission were compared between cases and controls. Incidence of new venous thrombosis in patients admitted with chronic liver disease was 0.73%. Patients with thromboses were more likely to have a lower albumin (2.77 vs. 3.49; P < 0.01) and hematocrit (37.7 vs. 40.2; P < 0.01) and higher platelet counts (143 vs. 109; P = 0.03), bilirubin (1.71 vs. 1.11; P < 0.01) and activated partial thromboplastin time (87 vs. 60.3; P < 0.01) as compared with controls. Although the incidence of thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease is lower than the general medical population, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and hyperbilirubinemia may confer increased risk of thrombosis whereas thrombocytopenia may be protective. Elevation of traditional markers of coagulation such as the prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time does not safeguard against thrombotic events.

Portal vein thrombosis and liver transplant survival benefit

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) complicates the liver transplant operation and potentially affects waiting list survival. The implications on calculations of survival benefit, which balance both waiting list and posttransplant survival effects of PVT, have not been determined. The objective of this study is to describe the effect of PVT on the survival benefit of liver transplantation. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on adult liver transplant candidates wait-listed between September 2001 and December 2007, Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to estimate the covariate-adjusted effect of PVT on transplant rate, waiting list survival, and posttransplant survival. We then used sequential stratification to estimate liver transplant survival benefit by cross-classifications defined by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and PVT status. The prevalence of reported PVT among 22,291 liver transplant recipients was 4.02% (N = 897). PVT was not a predictor of waiting list mortality (hazard ratio = 0.90, P = 0.23) but was a predictor of posttransplant mortality (hazard ratio = 1.32, P = 0.02). Overall, transplant benefit was not significantly different for patients with PVT versus without PVT (P = 0.21), but there was a shift in the benefit curve. Specifically, the threshold for transplant benefit among patients without PVT was MELD score >11 compared to MELD score >13 for patients with PVT. PVT is associated with significantly higher posttransplant mortality but does not affect waiting list mortality. Among patients with low MELD score, PVT is associated with less transplant survival benefit. Clinicians should carefully consider the risks of liver transplantation in clinically stable patients who have PVT.

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis is a condition not infrequently encountered by clinicians. It results from a combination of local and systemic prothrombotic risk factors. The presentation of acute thrombosis varies widely from an asymptomatic state to presence of life-threatening intestinal ischemia and infarction. In the chronic stage, patients typically present with variceal bleeding or other complications of portal hypertension. Abdominal ultrasound color Doppler imaging has a 98% negative predictive value, and is considered the imaging modality of choice in diagnosing portal vein thrombosis. Controlled clinical trials to assist with clinical decision-making are lacking in both acute and chronic portal vein thrombosis. Oral anticoagulant therapy is initiated if the risks of bleeding are low, but long-term anticoagulation is generally not recommended in patients with concomitant hepatic cirrhosis. The roles of invasive therapeutic approaches such as thrombolysis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt continue to evolve. This review conflates dissenting views into a rational approach of managing patients with portal vein thrombosis for the general internist.

Portal vein thrombosis and survival in patients with cirrhosis

The effects of occlusive portal vein thrombosis (PVT) on the survival of patients with cirrhosis are unknown. This was a retrospective cohort study at a single center. The main exposure variable was the presence of occlusive PVT. The primary outcome measure was time-dependent mortality. A total of 3295 patients were analyzed, and 148 (4.5%) had PVT. Variables independently predictive of mortality from the time of liver transplant evaluation included age [hazard ratio (HR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.03], Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08-1.11), hepatitis C (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.24-1.68), and PVT (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.97-3.51). Variables independently associated with the risk of mortality from the time of liver transplant listing included age (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), transplantation (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81), MELD (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10), hepatitis C (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.18-1.90), and PVT (1.99; 95% CI, 1.25-3.16). The presence of occlusive PVT at the time of liver transplantation was associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days (odds ratio, 7.39; 95% CI, 2.39-22.83). In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis complicated by PVT have an increased risk of death.

Effective endovascular stenting of malignant portal vein obstruction in pancreatic cancer

We report herein the case of a patient successfully treated by transhepatic portal venous stent placement for malignant portal vein obstruction with associated gastric and small bowel varices and repeated gastrointestinal bleeding. CT angiography and portography showed severe portal vein obstruction from recurrent pancreatic cancer 15 months following pancreaticoduodenectomy with tumor encasement and dilated collateral veins throughout the gastric and proximal small bowel wall as the suspected cause of the GI bleeding. Successful transhepatic endovascular stent placement of the splenic vein at the portal vein confluence followed by balloon dilation was performed with immediate decompression of the gastric and small bowel varices and relief of GI hemorrhage in this patient until his death four months later. The treatment for patients with this dilemma can prove to be difficult, but as we have shown endovascular stenting of the portal system is an effective treatment option.

Is balloon sweeping detrimental in portal biliopathy? A report of 3 cases

BACKGROUND

Portal biliopathy is characterized by biliary obstruction and is commonly caused by dilated vascular channels in the pericholedochal plexus causing choledochal varices, leading to the formation of stones in the common bile duct. Endoscopic treatment leads to severe bleeding complications because of the rupture of these vascular channels.

OBJECTIVE

We report on our management of the unique bleeding complications we faced when performing endotherapy on these patients.

DESIGN

A case series.

SETTING

Single-center experience in a tertiary care unit.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients with portal hypertension and choledochal varices, presenting with symptoms of biliary obstruction caused by gallstones, were subjected to ERCP and stone removal by use of the balloon sweeping and basket extraction techniques.

LIMITATION

Small volume case series; there is need for a randomized controlled study.

CONCLUSION

During stone removal, when compared to basket extraction, excessive bleeding was observed when balloon sweeping was used because this technique could cause squeezing of the choledochal varices.

Diameter of splenic vein is a risk factor for portal or splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy

BACKGROUND

Splenomegaly is a risk factor for post-splenectomy portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) due to large splenic vein stump. The relationship between splenic vein diameter (SVD) and PSVT has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether SVD is a risk factor for PSVT.

METHODS

Forty patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative enhanced helical computed tomographic scans were obtained in all patients, and subsequent follow-up was performed in patients with PSVT during anticoagulant therapy. SVDs at the junction of portal vein (PV) 2, 4, and 6 cm from the junction of PV were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression model.

RESULTS

PSVT was diagnosed in 52.5% (21/40) patients. Preoperative SVD was significantly larger in patients with PSVT than in those without PSVT. Seventy-two percent of patients (16/22) with PSVT in splenic veins with a diameter of >8 mm developed PSVT. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative SVD as a significant and independent determinant of PSVT. At a cutoff value of 8 mm, receiver operator characteristic analysis for prediction of PSVT provided an area under the curve of 0.8552 (95% CI 0.821-1.000).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative SVD is a risk factor for post-splenectomy PSVT. We recommend measurement of SVD preoperatively in patients elected to undergo splenectomy, and a close follow-up of patients with SVD greater than 8 mm.

[Essential thrombocythaemia as a causative agent of portal vein thrombosis--a case report]

INTRODUCTION

Thrombosis of splanchnic blood vessels is one of the most difficult complications and most frequent causes of death in patients with myeloproliferative disorders.

CASE OUTLINE

We report a 48-year-old man with recurring haemorrhage from the upper digestive tract. Doppler ultrasonography of the portal system revealed a thrombosed portal vein, with marginal flow of 10 cm/s. Peroral fiber panendoscopy of the oesophagus showed III-IV degree varices together with varices in the stomach fundus. Blood count revealed thrombocytosis (Pt. 900 x 109/l), and haematological analysis led to the diagnosis of essential thrombocythaemia. However, two years after the established diagnosis, the patient was hospitalized again for bleeding from esophageal varicosity. During haemorrhage, anticoagulant therapy was discontinued. Eight days after anticoagulant discontinuation, mesenterial thrombosis and small intestinal gangrene developed. Surgical intervention was carried out, including resection of 2.5 m of the small intestine. In spite of intensive postoperative therapy, the lethal outcome ensued.

CONCLUSION

The bleeding from oesophageal and/or gastric varicosity is often the presenting manifestation of up to that time undetected myeloproliferative disease. The following question still remains open: should anticoagulant therapy be continued in the phase of acute bleeding of these patients?

Symptomatic portal biliopathy: a single centre experience from the UK

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Biliary obstruction as a consequence of portal biliopathy, because of extrahepatic portal vein occlusion is an uncommon cause of biliary disease in the western world. We reviewed all patients presenting to the Regional Liver Transplant Unit in Birmingham, UK with symptomatic portal biliopathy between 1992 and 2005 and report the presentation, investigation, management and outcome of these complex patients.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with symptomatic portal biliopathy were followed up for a median of 2 years (range 1-18 years). Jaundice was the presenting feature in all cases and was associated with bile duct stones or debris in 77% (10 of 13) of cases. Successful treatment of biliary problems was achieved by biliary decompression in six cases (metallic stent=three, plastic stent=one, combined procedure=one and sphincterectomy=one) and portal decompression in three cases (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt=two, meso-caval shunt=one). Successful biliary drainage could not be achieved endoscopically or by portal decompression in one case that was accepted for combined liver and small bowel transplantation. Three patients had spontaneous resolution without recurrence over the follow-up period. Ten patients (77%) experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. Two deaths over the follow-up period occurred; both were associated with portal hypertensive bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management (sphincterectomy and stone extraction or stent insertion) is effective initial therapy for patients with symptomatic portal biliopathy. In the case of persistent biliary obstruction porto-systemic shunting (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or surgical) should be considered, however, the extent of vascular thrombosis precludes this in most cases.

Consensus on extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction

The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) had set up a working party on portal hypertension in 2002 with a mandate to develop consensus on various aspects of portal hypertension. The first of these consensuses has been developed on extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). It was discussed and prepared by the experts in this field from the Asian region and was presented at the annual meeting of the APASL, at Bali in August 2005. This article summarizes all the consensus statements approved by the APASL on various aspects of EHPVO.