Immunosuppression and reactivation of hepatitis B in the lamivudine era: opportunities for prevention and exploitation?

Lamivudine therapy for prevention of immunosuppressive-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers

Viral reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy is well documented. To evaluate the role of lamivudine prophylaxis in Hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers treated with immunosuppression for nonhepatic disorders, we reviewed our experience between 1997 and 2000 at Hadassah University Hospital (Jerusalem, Israel). Controls were patients who were HBV carriers and who, between 1990 and 1995, were treated for hematological malignancies but were not treated with lamivudine. Eighteen HBsAg-positive patients were treated with immunosuppression. Fourteen were males, with a mean age of 48 years. Eleven patients had lymphoma; 2 had colonic adenocarcinoma; and 5 had cryoglobulinemia, enophthalmitis, vasculitis, malignant histocytosis, or ulcerative colitis. Fourteen patients were treated with chemotherapy, and 4 with prolonged high-dose corticosteroids. All patients were HBsAg-positive; 4 had hepatitis B e antigen, and 10 had HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Lamivudine was administered to 13 patients in the treatment group 1 to 60 days (mean, 15 days) before immunosuppressive treatment and continued 0.5 to 24 months (mean, 7 months) following initiation of immunosuppression. Mean follow-up after lamivudine administration was 21 months. Three patients died of lymphoma complications and 10 (77%) survived. None of the patients had clinical or serological evidence of HBV reactivation during or after lamivudine prophylaxis. Of 6 patients who presented with liver function test disturbances, 5 improved during combined lamivudine and immunosuppression treatment. At the end of follow-up, HBV DNA became undetectable in 2 of 10 patients. In 2 patients, seroconversion from HBsAg to anti-HBs was observed. In contrast, 2 of 5 control patients had HBV reactivation. Lamivudine prophylaxis in HBsAg carriers receiving immunosuppressive therapy may prevent HBV reactivation and hepatic failure.

Management of viral hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health concern and is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The natural history and clinical outcomes of chronic HBV infection are determined by the viral replication cycle and the host immune responses. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B is directed at interrupting the natural history by suppressing HBV replication before development of any significant irreversible liver cell damage. Effective antiviral therapies should be followed by sustained suppression of HBV-DNA, normalization of transaminases levels and a stable stage of HBeAg seroconversion with persistence of circulating anti-HBeAg antibodies. Two major classes of antiviral therapeutic agents that have been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulating agents (i.e. interferon) and the nucleoside analogs (i.e. lamivudine). A 4-6 month course of interferon-alpha has resulted in improvement of survival in 20%-30% of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had elevated serum ALT levels without hepatic decompensation. Interferon-alpha therapy is associated with HBeAg seroconversion; normalization of ALT levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon can also be used with caution in patients with early compensated cirrhosis. A 12-month course of lamivudine has been shown to be well tolerated and effective. Lamivudine can be used in decompensated cirrhosis and immunosuppressed patients and for prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. The response rates after 3 years of lamivudine therapy account for 40-65%. A major problem of antiviral treatment is the emergence of drug resistance conferred by mutations in the YMDD motif of HBV reverse transcriptase. The prevalence of YMDD mutations increases with longer durations of antiviral therapies and this has been detected in 20% of immunocompetent patients receiving lamivudine per year. Contentious issues remain when to stop the treatment if HBeAg seroconversion does not occur. Many new immunomodulatory therapies and antiviral agents are in various stages of clinical development and have shown some promise. Among newer HBV antivirals, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, emtricitabine, DAPD and clevudine appear to be at least as potent as lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication. In vitro studies have shown that YMDD mutations confer cross-resistance between lamivudine and emtricitabine. However, adefovir, dipivoxil, lobucavir, DAPD and possibly clevudine suppress replications of both YMDD mutants and wild types of HBV. Immunomodulatory approaches for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are conceptually attractive, but newer agents used to date (thymosin-alpha, interleukin-12, therapeutic vaccines) have not demonstrated sufficient efficacy for widespread use. Combinations of an immunomodulatory agent and nucleoside analog may improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the emergence of drug resistance. Nevertheless, combinations of interferon and lamivudine therapies do not confer such additional benefits. The next challenge for HBV treatment is to use antivirals in combination and/or in cyclical therapy to minimize the emergence of drug resistance and increase efficacy, particularly to achieve sustainable post-treatment suppression of HBV. Randomized prospective control trials of combined antiviral therapies given simultaneously or sequentially are needed to establish safe and effective combined regimens that can be recommended for future treatment strategies.

Lamivudine treatment for hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg carriers after organ transplantation: a 4-year experience

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of hepatitis B after organ transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers may be fatal. In this study, we reported our experience of lamivudine treatment in HBsAg carriers who had post-transplant reactivation of hepatitis B.

METHODS

The patients were 15 men and one woman. Nine received kidney transplants, six received heart transplants, and one received a lung transplant. They developed a reactivation of hepatitis B 1-101 months (median, 14 months) after transplantation. They received lamivudine 100 mg daily on a compassionate-use basis, and had regular follow ups. The median pretreatment total serum bilirubin level was 3.0 mg/dL, and the alanine aminotransferase level was 357 U/L. Four of the 16 patients were positive for HBeAg. The serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were > 3000 pg/mL in 13 (81%) patients. Three were coinfected with hepatitis C virus.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 75%. All four fatal cases had a pretreatment total serum bilirubin level of > or = 3 mg/dL. Serum HBV-DNA soon became undetectable in 12 survivors. Of the 12 survivors, after a median treatment period of 101 weeks, a lamivudine-resistant strain with variation in the YMDD motif of the HBV polymerase gene developed in three (25%). None had significant adverse reactions to lamivudine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicated that lamivudine is effective in the treatment of post-transplant hepatitis B reactivation, including patients with dual chronic hepatitis B and C. Early recognition of HBV reactivation and prompt lamivudine treatment are important to prevent mortality.

Clinical potential of emerging new agents in hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B is directed at interrupting the natural history and clinical outcomes of the disease. It needs to take into account the virology and replication cycle of the hepatitis B virus (HBV), and the host immune response to HBV. Long term follow-up of patients treated with interferon supports the paradigm that a sustained, major suppression of HBV replication, particularly that associated with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, interrupts the natural history of hepatitis B. The availability of potent but well tolerated and orally available HBV antivirals, of which lamivudine is the prototype, has allowed clearer treatment objectives to be formulated. These are: temporary or permanent reduction of hepatitis (necroinflammatory) activity, arrest of fibrotic progression, prevention of cirrhosis and liver failure, and prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. Lamivudine has good medium term efficacy in achieving each of these objectives. The only significant problem for the longer term is emergence of antiviral resistance conferred by mutations in the YMDD (tyrosine-methionine-aspartic acid-aspartic acid) motif of the HBV reverse transcriptase. As a result, contentious issues remain about defining when antiviral therapy is indicated, whether to treat for a defined interval or indefinitely, and when to stop treatment if HBeAg seroconversion is not achieved. Some personal views are expressed in this review. Among newer HBV antivirals in clinical studies, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir and emtricitabine appear to be at least as potent as lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication. Famciclovir appears less potent. In vitro studies show that YMDD mutations confer cross-resistance between lamivudine, emtricitabine and beta-L-Fd4C (L-2',3'-didehydro-dideoxy-5-fluorocytidine). However, adefovir dipivoxil, lobucavir, entecavir, DAPD (beta-D-2,6-diaminopurine dioxolane) and possibly clevudine (L-FMAU) suppress replication of YMDD mutant HBV, as well as wildtype. Preliminary studies indicate clinical efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil once resistance to lamivudine has developed. Immunomodulatory approaches to treatment of chronic hepatitis B are conceptually attractive, but newer agents used to date (thymalfasin, interleukin-12, therapeutic vaccines) have not demonstrated sufficient efficacy for widespread use. The next challenge for HBV treatment is to use antivirals in combination and/or in cyclical therapy to reduce the emergence of drug resistance and increase efficacy, particularly to achieve sustainable post-treatment suppression of hepatitis B.