Delayed presentation of a neonatal long line incident

The reliability of 2D and colour Doppler ultrasound in localising longline position

BACKGROUND

The position of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (longlines) in neonates is critical, as malpositioned longlines are associated with potentially fatal complications.

AIM

To determine if cardiac ultrasound (two-dimensional (2D) and colour Doppler) is useful in evaluating longline position, when compared with the position identified by contrast radiography.

SETTING

Single level 3 neonatal unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-four neonates undergoing insertion of 24-gauge silastic longlines between July 2004 and September 2005.

METHODS

Infants who had a longline inserted underwent echocardiography by a novice and an experienced operator. Operators identified longline position using a 2D then colour Doppler echocardiography during a rapid bolus infusion of saline. The position was identified from contrast radiography by two independent observers.

RESULTS

Using 2D echocardiography, the novice and experienced operators could identify 41 and 59% of longlines, respectively. However, only 34% of longlines were identified by both operators. In 15 infants whose longline positions were identified by both operators, there was agreement in only eight infants (53%). Colour Doppler improved the experienced operator's success but did not assist the novice operator. For radiographs, there was 68% agreement on longline position between observers. The experienced echocardiographer located three (7%) longlines within the heart that from radiographs were thought to be in a proximal central vessel.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique is experience-dependent and complements rather than replaces the use of contrast radiography. However, some infants with an apparently acceptable longline position on contrast radiography have longlines located within the heart on echocardiography.

Digital imaging does not improve localization of percutaneously inserted central lines in neonates

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of digital imaging improves the localization of percutaneously inserted central (PIC) line tips compared to standard radiographs, with contrast being used in both cases.

METHODS

Digital radiographs taken for localization of PIC lines between October 2002 and September 2003 were identified from the neonatal database. Two reporters independently reviewed the radiographs and stated (i) whether the tip could confidently be seen and (ii) the position. The observers were encouraged to use all the image modification modalities available. The formal radiology report was taken as the third 'reporter'.

RESULTS

Overall 117 digital radiographs from 98 infants were reviewed. Reporter 1 identified the tip in 83 (71%); reporter 2 in 84 (72%); and the radiologist in 95 (81%), although all agreed that the tip could be identified in only 55 (47%) radiographs. In radiographs where the reporters agreed that the tip could be identified, they agreed on the position in 37 (67%) cases. In 61 (52%) radiographs the reporters did not agree that the tip could be seen, but they agreed on its position in 36 (59%) cases. The kappa coefficient for agreement on line position was 0.63. The level of agreement between reporters in this study using digital imaging was not significantly different from our previous findings using standard radiography with contrast (74/117, 63% vs 57/96, 59%).

CONCLUSION

The use of digital imaging, with its ability to manipulate images in order to identify PIC line tips, is not significantly better than using standard radiography with contrast.

Central venous lines in neonates: a study of 2186 catheters

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of percutaneously inserted silicone central venous lines (CVLs) in neonates at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia.

DESIGN

Data for all infants admitted from 1 January 1984 until 31 December 2002 who had a CVL were examined in the neonatal database, completed from paper records and patient charts where necessary. Autopsy reports of all babies who died with a catheter in place were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 18,761 admissions, 2186 catheters in 1862 babies for a total of 35,159 days (median 14 days, range 1-99 days). The tip was in the right atrium for 1282 (58.6%) of the catheters. A total of 142 babies (7.6%) died with a CVL in place, 89 (4.8%) with the catheter tip in the right atrium. Thirty two of these 89 babies had an autopsy. No autopsies reported tension in the pericardium or milky fluid resembling intralipid. One case (0.05% of catheters) of non-lethal pericardial effusion occurred in a baby whose catheter was inappropriately left coiled in the right atrium. There were no cases of pleural effusion related to CVL use. Most (1523, 69.7%) were removed electively. Septicaemia occurred during the life of 116 catheters (5.3%).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest series of percutaneously inserted silicone central venous catheters reported. It illustrates the safety of these catheters in this context. It highlights the value of keeping prospective records on such catheters. Catheters with their tips in the right atrium and not coiled did not cause pericardial effusion. Strict insertion and management principles for CVLs should be adhered to.