Validation of histopathological chronicity scores in native kidney biopsies using light microscopy and digital morphometry for predicting renal outcome

Quantitative assessment of chronicity changes in native kidney biopsies offer valuable insights in to disease prognosis, despite the strength of qualitative information. Yet, standardization and reproducibility remain challenging. The present study aims to assess and compare the prognostic utility and reproducibility of two chronicity scoring systems based on light microscopy and whole slide imaging with morphometry and also to evaluate the prognostic utility of structural measurements: cortical non-sclerotic glomerular (NSG) density and NSG area/volume. We designed a retrospective longitudinal study involving 101 adult and paediatric patients who underwent native kidney biopsies. Chronicity scoring was performed using two semi-quantitative methods: Method 1 (method proposed in PMID: 28314581) and Method 2 (method proposed in PMID: 32516862), under light microscopy as well as on whole-slide scanned images, and assessed for prognostic utility. Kidney-Failure-Risk-Equation (KFRE) was employed in combination with chronicity-scoring-methods and assessed for predictive capability. Interobserver reproducibility for the two chronicity methods was studied among three renal pathologists. Structural measurements were performed on whole-slide- scanned-images. Both the chronicity scoring methods significantly predicted decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and persistent need for renal replacement therapy in follow-up. Method 1 combined with KFRE, outperformed Method 2 in predicting renal survival. Method 2 however showed higher interobserver reproducibility. Combined KFRE plus histopathological scoring methods showed better predictive accuracy. The study validates the precision of chronicity scoring using whole slide scanned images. The morphometric structural measurements showed significant correlations with follow-up eGFR, thereby providing supplementary prognostic information.

Is it necessary to stop antiplatelet agents before a native renal biopsy?

BACKGROUND

The practice of advising patients to stop antiplatelet agents before an elective renal biopsy is widespread. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of bleeding complications in two centres that have different policies regarding the ongoing use of antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing an elective renal biopsy. Neither centre routinely checks bleeding time before renal biopsy. A secondary aim, therefore, was to compare complication rates from this cohort with those reported in the literature where screening for prolonged bleeding time is standard practice.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 1120 biopsies performed by nephrologists under direct ultrasound guidance in the two renal units in Glasgow, Scotland (Jan 2000 to May 2007) was undertaken. Antiplatelet agents were stopped 5 days before biopsy in one centre but continued in the other. Bleeding time was not measured before biopsy and pro-coagulants were not routinely administered. Major bleeding was defined as the need for blood transfusion, surgical or radiological intervention. Minor bleeding was defined as an >or=1.0 g/dL fall in haemoglobin following biopsy without the need for transfusion or intervention.

RESULTS

Haemoglobin fell by >or=1.0 g/dL in 221 (19.7%) patients. There were 21 (1.9%) major bleeding complications. No patient died or required nephrectomy. Gender, advancing age or worse renal impairment was not associated with an increased likelihood of bleeding. Bleeding complications in 75 patients continuing antiplatelet agents were compared with those occurring in 60 patients whose antiplatelet agents were discontinued. Minor complications were commoner in the first group (31.0 versus 11.7%; P = 0.008), though there was no difference in the rate of major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of major bleeding following a native renal biopsy under ultrasound guidance is low. Stopping antiplatelet agents before biopsy was associated with a lower rate of minor complications but there was no difference in the rate of major complications. Complication rates compare favourably with other published series in which bleeding time was checked and corrected.