Analysis of Daily Variation for 3 and for 30 Days of Parasite-Specific IgG in Urine for Diagnosis of Strongyloidiasis by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Recent work has found urine analysis to be as sensitive as serology for diagnosis of strongyloidiasis. Here, we examined the daily variation of Strongyloides-specific IgG in urine by qualitative and quantitative ELISA and its effects on diagnostic accuracy and reliability. In the first part of the study, matched urine and fecal samples were collected from project participants in northeast Thailand for three consecutive days. Urine samples were analyzed for Strongyloides-specific IgG by ELISA using Strongyloides ratti as the antigen source. Performance of urine ELISA was compared with parasitological diagnosis by agar plate culture technique (APCT) and formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT). In the second part of the study, urine IgG levels were compared daily for thirty consecutive days. The prevalence of Strongyloides infection, as measured by urine ELISA for three consecutive days, was significantly higher than that found using parasitological methods (63.1% vs. 22%). There was slight daily variation in prevalence estimates according to urine ELISA while there were significant variations according to parasitological examination methods over three consecutive days. For the 3-day experiment, urine ELISA had 83-86% diagnostic sensitivity when compared with the fecal examination method or with a composite standard (combined results from fecal examination methods (APCT or FECT) and/or urine ELISA). The levels of parasite-specific IgG in urine were stable throughout both the 3-day and the 30-day studies. In conclusion, diagnosis of strongyloidiasis by urine ELISA is more sensitive than by fecal methods, with minimal daily variation for qualitative and quantitative diagnosis. Urine ELISA has potential for clinical diagnosis and population screening of strongyloidiasis.