Mucin histochemistry in primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder (of urachal or vesicular origin) and metastatic adenocarcinoma originating in the colorectum

Clinicopathological and EBV analysis of respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma

Background

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH) in residents of Southern China and to study the correlation between REAH and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

Methods

Clinicopathological data of 53 cases of REAH were retrospectively analyzed. The immunoreactivity for CK 7, CK20, CEA, p53, and Ki-67, Alcian blue–periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS) staining and in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) were carried out.

Results

REAH lesions were covered with ciliated columnar epithelium and proliferation of subepithelial glands, which were positive for CK7, and negative for CK20, CEA, and p53. Goblet cell metaplasia was stained blue by AB-PAS. The frequency of EBER positive cases in REAH located in nasopharynx was 27.78%, compared with that in the nasal cavity (15.79%) and paranasal sinuses (12.50%), there were no statistical differences.

Conclusions

REAH is an uncommon entity with distinctive morphologic features and EBV may have nothing to do with REAH.

Virtual slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here:

http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5875687401178748

Distinguishing primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder from secondary involvement by colorectal adenocarcinoma: extended immunohistochemical profiles emphasizing novel markers

Glandular neoplasms involving the urinary bladder carry a challenging differential diagnosis including primary and secondary processes. We investigated the potential diagnostic utility of cadherin-17 and GATA3 in 25 primary adenocarcinomas of the urinary bladder, as compared with other commonly used markers including β-catenin and p63. Urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation (11), colorectal adenocarcinoma secondarily involving the bladder (25), and primary colorectal adenocarcinoma (22) were also analyzed and the results were compared using a Fisher exact test. Cadherin-17 was expressed in 23/25 primary bladder adenocarcinomas (92%), 23/25 colorectal adenocarcinomas involving the bladder (92%), 21/22 primary colorectal adenocarcinomas (95%) and entirely negative (0/11) in both components of urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation (P<0.001). In urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation, positive nuclear staining for GATA3 was evident in the urothelial component for 18% (2/11) and the glandular component for 9% (1/11) with additional tumors showing only cytoplasmic staining. Nuclear reactivity for GATA3 was not present in primary bladder adenocarcinoma and primary/secondary colorectal adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). Positive nuclear and cytoplasmic immunostaining for β-catenin was evident in 21/22 primary colorectal adenocarcinomas (95%) and 23/25 cases of secondary involvement by colorectal adenocarcinoma (92%). In contrast, positive membranous and cytoplasmic staining for β-catenin was observed in 23/25 primary bladder adenocarcinomas (92%) and 11/11 urothelial carcinomas with glandular differentiation (100%, P<0.001). p63 was expressed only in the urothelial component of urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation and not in the glandular component (P<0.001). In summary, cadherin-17 is a relatively specific and sensitive marker for primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder, distinguishing it from urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation. However, it does not distinguish primary bladder adenocarcinoma from secondary involvement by colorectal adenocarcinoma. The pattern of reactivity for β-catenin remains the most useful marker for distinguishing these two tumors.

Primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: differential diagnosis and clinical relevance

CONTEXT

Glandular lesions of the urinary bladder include a broad spectrum of entities ranging from completely benign glandular lesions to primary and secondary malignancies. Common benign bladder lesions that exhibit glandular differentiation include cystitis cystica, cystitis glandularis, von Brunn nests, nephrogenic adenoma, intestinal metaplasia, urachal remnant, endometriosis, and prostatic-type polyp. The World Health Organization defines primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder as an epithelial malignancy with pure glandular differentiation without evidence of typical urothelial carcinoma. Malignant lesions that should be included in the differential diagnosis of a primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder include noninvasive and invasive urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation and secondary malignancies involving the bladder by direct extension or metastasis. The recognition and distinction of these different entities may be a challenge for pathologists, but they are of great clinical importance.

OBJECTIVE

To review features of primary bladder adenocarcinoma as well as those entities that need to be differentiated from primary bladder adenocarcinoma, with emphasis on clinical findings, pathologic characteristics, and immunoprofiles.

DATA SOURCES

Selected original articles published in the PubMed service of the US National Library of Medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

The accurate diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder is important and challenging. It has to prompt an extensive clinical workup to rule out other glandular lesions in the urinary bladder, especially the possibility of secondary involvement of the bladder by an adenocarcinoma from a different site.

The atypical urothelial cancer patient: management of bladder cancers of non-transitional cell histology and cancers of the ureters and renal pelvis

Non-transitional cell neoplasms of the bladder and upper tract transitional cell carcinomas (ureter and renal pelvis) represent only a small fraction of urothelial carcinomas. Clinicians faced with the rare case are always confronted with management dilemmas complicated by the scarcity of published experience to guide decisions. The current review brings together the best of the limited published data in an attempt to provide some reasonable context to help in the management of these difficult neoplasms.

Colonic adenocarcinoma metastatic to the urinary tract versus primary tumors of the urinary tract with glandular differentiation: a report of 7 cases and investigation using a limited immunohistochemical panel

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a limited immunohistochemical panel can help differentiate metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma from primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract and urothelial (transitional cell) carcinoma with glandular differentiation, which appear morphologically similar but most often necessitate different treatment protocols.

DESIGN

We examined lower urinary tract tumors (5 urinary bladder, 2 urethral) from 7 patients with a history of colonic adenocarcinoma. The differential diagnoses in these cases included metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma, primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract, and urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation. An immunohistochemical panel consisting of cytokeratin 7 (CK-7), cytokeratin 20 (CK-20), and villin was evaluated in all cases. Four primary enteric-type adenocarcinomas of the urinary tract and 5 conventional urothelial carcinomas were also studied to compare morphologic features and immunohistochemical staining patterns.

RESULTS

Of the 7 cases, 6 were determined to be metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma and 1 was diagnosed as a primary urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation. All 6 metastatic colonic adenocarcinomas, 6 of the 7 primary colonic adenocarcinomas, and all 4 primary enteric-type adenocarcinomas of the urinary tract were CK-20 positive (1 was CK-20 negative), villin positive, and CK-7 negative. The single urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation and all 5 control cases of urothelial carcinoma were CK-7 and CK-20 positive, and villin negative.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that (1) villin is expressed in primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract; (2) in difficult cases, urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation can be distinguished from colonic adenocarcinoma because the former is CK-7 positive, CK-20 positive, and villin negative, whereas the latter is CK-20 positive, villin positive, and CK-7 negative; (3) clinical information is essential when evaluating lower urinary tract tumors that are clinically and morphologically similar to enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract; and (4) the similar immunohistochemical profiles of metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma and primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract may be in keeping with the hypothesis that the latter arise from intestinal metaplasia.

Immunohistochemical distinction between primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder and secondary colorectal adenocarcinoma

Primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder sometimes causes a diagnostic dilemma because it can be indistinguishable morphologically from adenocarcinoma of colorectal origin secondarily involving the bladder by metastasis or direct extension. It is much less well studied than conventional urothelial carcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma because of its rarity. The current study was specifically designed to investigate whether an important mechanism involved in the pathogenesis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, beta-catenin dysregulation, was also important for the development of primary bladder adenocarcinoma and whether these two morphologically similar tumors could be distinguished immunohistochemically. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 17 primary adenocarcinomas of the urinary bladder, 16 colorectal adenocarcinomas involving the bladder, and 10 conventional urothelial (transitional) carcinomas were included in this study. Thirteen of the primary bladder adenocarcinomas were moderately to well differentiated (enteric type) and morphologically indistinguishable from colorectal cancers. The remaining four primary tumors were poorly differentiated (two cases) or of clear cell type (two cases). Immunohistochemical studies using a panel of monoclonal antibodies demonstrated positive nuclear staining for beta-catenin expression in 13 of the 16 (81%) colorectal adenocarcinomas secondarily involving the bladder but in none of the primary adenocarcinomas or the urothelial carcinomas. Instead, positive membranous (and some cytoplasmic) staining was present in all primary bladder tumors with the exception of two poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas where no beta-catenin staining was detected. All secondary colorectal adenocarcinomas stained negatively for CK7 and thrombomodulin (TM), whereas positivity for CK20 was observed in 15 (94%) cases. All urothelial carcinomas stained positively for CK7 and TM, and four of them also for CK20. Primary adenocarcinomas of the bladder showed mixed staining patterns for CK7, CK20, and TM with a positive rate of 65%, 53%, and 59%, respectively. These data indicate that dysregulation of beta-catenin, an important aberration seen in colorectal carcinogenesis, does not appear to play a role in the pathogenesis of the bladder adenocarcinoma. In addition, our data demonstrate that a panel of immunostains, including CK7, CK20, TM, and beta-catenin, is of diagnostic value in differentiating primary bladder adenocarcinoma from secondary adenocarcinoma of colorectal origin.