Clinical features of renal cell carcinoma less than 25 millimeters in diameter

Development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnostics and impact on prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate imaging methods and prognoses between small renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and larger tumours according to the era of diagnostics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 784 consecutive patients diagnosed with RCC between 1964 and 1997 at the Pirkanmaa Hospital District in Finland were included. Patients were divided into two groups: tumours of ≤3.0 and >3.0 cm in diameter. Prognosis was analysed according to the era of diagnostics: (i) pre-computed tomography (CT) and pre-ultrasound (US), (ii) US era and (iii) CT era.

RESULTS

Small tumours became more common: in the pre-CT and pre-US era, only 4.4% of tumours were small; however, in the CT era 16% were small tumours. More diagnostic methods were used in studying small tumours. CT proved to be the most reliable method, although it was actually better at diagnosing large tumours. Relapses occurred less frequently among patients with small tumours; more than half of the tumours that developed distant metastases (16.0%) already evinced them at the time of diagnosis. There were no relapses after 14 years of follow-up among small tumours, whereas large tumours relapsed within that time. RCC was the cause of death in 14.9% of patients with small tumours vs 50.7% with large tumours. The best prognosis was among patients with small tumours diagnosed with CT.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with small tumours, prognosis has improved along with better diagnostics, although some showed relapse during a surveillance period of up to 14 years.

Renal cell carcinoma as a cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States: patient characteristics and survival

BACKGROUND

The patient characteristics and mortality associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as a cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have not been characterized for a national population.

METHODS

An historical cohort study of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted from April 1, 1995, to December 31, 1999. Included were 360,651 patients in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) who were initiated on ESRD therapy with valid causes of ESRD.

RESULTS

Of the study population, 1646 patients (0.5%) had RCC. The mean age of patients with RCC was 66.8 +/- 14.6 years versus 61.3 +/- 16.4 years for patients with other causes of ESRD (P < 0.01 by Student t test). The unadjusted 3-year survival (censored at the date of renal transplantation) of patients with RCC during the study period was 23% versus 36% in all other patients [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.19, P = 0.019 by Cox regression]. However, patients with RCC who underwent nephrectomy (bilateral or unilateral) had significantly better survival compared to RCC patients who did not (AHR, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.63-0.85, P < 0.01), and their survival was not significantly different in comparison with nondiabetic ESRD patients. Bilateral nephrectomy (vs. unilateral) was not associated with any difference in adjusted mortality.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with ESRD, the demographics of those with RCC were similar to those of patients with RCC in the general population. Overall, patients with RCC had decreased survival compared to patients with other causes of ESRD; those who underwent nephrectomy had significantly better survival than those who did not, with survival comparable to patients with nondiabetic ESRD.