Potential acuity meter results in cataract patients

Prediction of postoperative visual acuity in patients with age-related cataracts using macular optical coherence tomography-based deep learning method

Background

To predict postoperative visual acuity (VA) in patients with age-related cataracts using macular optical coherence tomography-based deep learning method.

Methods

A total of 2,051 eyes from 2,051 patients with age-related cataracts were included. Preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were collected. Five novel models (I, II, III, IV, and V) were proposed to predict postoperative BCVA. The dataset was randomly divided into a training (n = 1,231), validation (n = 410), and test set (n = 410). The performance of the models in predicting exact postoperative BCVA was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The performance of the models in predicting whether postoperative BCVA was improved by at least two lines in the visual chart (0.2LogMAR) was evaluated using precision, sensitivity, accuracy, F1 and area under curve (AUC).

Results

Model V containing preoperative OCT images with horizontal and vertical B-scans, macular morphological feature indices, and preoperative BCVA had a better performance in predicting postoperative VA, with the lowest MAE (0.1250 and 0.1194LogMAR) and RMSE (0.2284 and 0.2362LogMAR), and the highest precision (90.7% and 91.7%), sensitivity (93.4% and 93.8%), accuracy (88% and 89%), F1 (92% and 92.7%) and AUCs (0.856 and 0.854) in the validation and test datasets, respectively.

Conclusion

The model had a good performance in predicting postoperative VA, when the input information contained preoperative OCT scans, macular morphological feature indices, and preoperative BCVA. The preoperative BCVA and macular OCT indices were of great significance in predicting postoperative VA in patients with age-related cataracts.

Predicting postoperative visual outcomes in cataract patients with maculopathy

Purpose:

To assess the accuracy of the potential acuity meter (PAM) in predicting postcataract surgery visual acuity outcome in patients with healed inactive maculopathies.

Study Design:

Prospective interventional clinical trial.

Patients and Methods:

Patients scheduled for phacoemulsification had preoperative and 1 month postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), PAM test, fluorescein angiography, and macular optical coherence tomography. Patients were grouped to following preoperative BCVA: PRE1: 0.29 and better, PRE2: 0.25–0.13, and PRE3: 0.1 or worse; age: G1 <60, G2 = 60–70, and G3 >70 years. PAM accuracy was divided into: Grade 1: Postoperative BCVA ≤1 or less line error of the PAM score, Grade 2: Between 1 and 2 lines error, and Grade 3: ≥3 lines or more error.

Results:

This study enrolled 57 patients with a mean age of 71.05 ± 6.78 years where 34 were females. There were 21 (36.84%) patients with diabetic maculopathy and 36 (63.16%) with age-related macular degeneration. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.198 ± 0.12 (0.1–0.5). The mean PAM score was 0.442 ± 0.24 (0.1–1.3). The mean postoperative BCVA was 0.4352 ± 0.19 (0.17–1.00). The PAM score was in Grade 1, 2, and 3 in 46 (80.7%), 54 (94.7%), and 56 (98.2), respectively. There was a highly significant correlation between the PAM score and the postoperative BCVA (P < 0.001, Chi-square test). There was no correlation between the PAM test accuracy and age, gender, diagnosis, and preoperative BCVA (P = 0.661, 0.667, 0. 0.991, 0.833, Chi-square test; respectively).

Conclusion:

The PAM is an accurate method of predicting postoperative visual acuity for eyes with nuclear cataracts Grade I and II and inactive maculopathies.

Clinician versus potential acuity test predictions of visual outcome after cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the ability of potential vision tests and clinical judgement to predict postoperative visual acuity after uneventful cataract surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-two subjects (median, 74.5 years) were included in the study. Preoperative measurements included a clinical judgement prediction (based on case history and ocular examination alone), 2 super-illuminated pinhole techniques (distance and near), Potential Acuity Meter and interferometer. Postoperative visual acuity was used as the outcome measure to evaluate the accuracy of the preoperative predictions.

RESULTS

Subjects were categorized as follows: (a) moderate cataract (N = 25); (b) moderate cataract and comorbidity (N = 18), and (c) advanced cataract (N = 19). Preoperative predictions within 2 lines of the postoperative visual acuity were as follows (a, b, and c respectively): clinical judgement (92%, 72%, 58%), super-illuminated pinhole distance (96%, 100%, 21%), super-illuminated pinhole near (92%, 78%, 26%), Potential Acuity Meter (72%, 67%, 21%), and interferometer (56%, 61%, 37%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the preoperative predictions above, none of the potential vision tests was useful compared with the clinical judgement in the advanced cataract group. The super-illuminated pinhole (distance) provided additional information beyond clinical judgement in the moderate cataract subgroup. The Potential Acuity Meter and interferometer were inaccurate even in the presence of moderate cataract, and this and other recent findings suggest they should no longer be considered adequate for potential vision assessment.

Comparison of adapted Vryghem macular function test and Lotmar-light interferometer in predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of a newly described macular function test (Vryghem macular function test) adapted to our examination equipment and to compare it to the Lotmar-light interferometer for the preoperative evaluation of cataract patients at the University Eye Clinic, Geneva, Switzerland.

METHODS

This prospective study included 71 consecutive patients (72 eyes) who were undergoing uneventful cataract surgery. Testing with the Lotmar-light interferometer and an adapted form of Vryghem macular function test (AVMFT) using a Birkhauser reading chart, a hyperaddition of +8 D and halogen illumination were performed to assess macular function and to predict postoperative visual acuity (VA). The duration of each test and the density and location of lens opacities were also noted. Best-corrected postoperative VA was compared to the predicted values of each test.

RESULTS

The positive predictive value was 94.2% for AVMFT compared to 92.2% for the Lotmar-light interferometer. The negative predictive value was 50% for AVMFT compared to 42.9% for the Lotmar-light interferometer. The sensitivity was 83.1% for AVMFT and 79.7% for the Lotmar-light interferometer. The specificity was 76.9% for AVMFT and 69.2% for the Lotmar-light interferometer. The correlation coefficient for AVMFT and preoperative Lotmar results (both in LogMAR) with postoperative best-corrected VA (poBCVA; LogMAR) were similar (0.74 and 0.77 respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that AVMFT is as reliable as the Lotmar-light interferometer in predicting postoperative VA after uneventful cataract surgery. The correlation coefficients with postoperative VA were 0.74 and 0.77, respectively. Both tests showed a high positive (94.2% and 92.2%, respectively) but a low negative (50.0% and 42.9%, respectively) predictive value.

Predictions of postoperative visual outcome in subjects with cataract: a preoperative and postoperative study

AIM

To assess the ability of critical flicker frequency (CFF) and optimal reading speed (ORS) to predict the potential vision in patients with cataract with and without ocular comorbidity.

METHODS

The two novel tests were compared with two well established potential vision tests (PVTs), the potential acuity meter (PAM) and the laser interferometer (LI). Measurements were made preoperatively in 1 eye of 88 subjects using the battery of 4 PVTs. Postoperative measurements were made with the CFF and the ORS. The subjects studied were consecutive cases over a 12-month period who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and agreed to participate in this study.

RESULTS

CFF was the PVT most resistant to the presence of cataract. Both CFF and ORS give a similar predictive precision in the presence of cataract and ocular comorbidity, although CFF seems more precise when the cataract is dense.

CONCLUSIONS

The PAM and the LI showed a limited clinical capability in predicting postoperative visual acuity, particularly with dense opacities. The CFF shows the most promise as a PVT, particularly with dense cataract. Further evaluation is required for both CFF and ORS.

Capabilities of potential vision test measurements

PURPOSE

To determine the usefulness of a battery of potential vision tests (PVTs) including potential acuity meter (PAM), laser interferometer (LI), critical flicker/fusion frequency (CFF), superilluminated pinhole at distance (SPH(d)) and near (SPH(n)), and optimal reading speed (ORS) by their independence of the effects of cataracts and sensitivity to macular disease (MD).

SETTING

Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom.

METHODS

Potential vision test measurements were determined in 76 patients with age-related cataract and no other eye disease, 52 patients with MD and clear ocular media, and 28 patients with normal, healthy eyes.

RESULTS

Potential vision tests were independent of the degrading effects of cataract up to a visual acuity (VA) level of 20/200 or worse (CFF), 20/125 (ORS and SPH), and 20/40 (PAM and LI). A high degree of association was found between PVT scores and distance VA in the MD group for SPH(d) (r2 = 0.93), SPH(n) (r2 = 0.89), and PAM (r2 = 0.71). A moderate correlation was found for LI (r2 = 0.55), CFF (r2 = 0.50), and ORS (r2 = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Potential acuity meter and LI showed very limited independence to moderate/dense cataracts and inaccurate predictions in patients with MD. Superilluminated pinhole was relatively unaffected by moderate/dense cataract and yet provided accurate predictions in the presence of MD and clear ocular media. Critical flicker/fusion frequency showed the greatest ability to bypass cataracts, although its ability to predict VA in patients with early MD was limited. The ORS was relatively unaffected by moderate/dense cataract, but its poor ability to predict VA in MD may limit its clinical suitability as a PVT.

Comparison of the potential acuity meter and the visometer in cataract patients

PURPOSE

To compare the Guyton-Minkowski Potential Acuity Meter (PAM) and the Haag-Streit Lotmar Visometer (Visometer) in their ability to predict postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in cataract surgery.

SETTING

University of British Columbia/Vancouver General Hospital Eye Care Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

METHODS

In total, 292 eyes (223 patients) of subjects with cataracts and no known macular or optic nerve pathology were recruited over 6 months. Preoperative predictions of postoperative BCVA were compared with actual postoperative BCVA. The usefulness of these instruments as a 'diagnostic test' for predicting true surgical success (defined as postoperative BCVA of 20/40 or better) from predicted surgical success (PAM or Visometer predicted acuity 20/40 or better) was analysed.

RESULTS

Neither the PAM nor the Visometer predictions were statistically significant predictors of postoperative BCVA. The sensitivities of PAM and Visometer for predicting surgical success were 84.7% and 96.1%, respectively. The specificity of the PAM and Visometer for predicting surgical success was 27.3% and 9.1%, respectively. Overall, 92.7% of patients had 'successful surgery'. Given a predicted success from the PAM or Visometer the post-test probability of success was 93.5% and 93.1%, respectively. Given a predicted failure from the PAM or Visometer there was a post-test probability of surgical success of 87.5% and 84.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found no clinical benefit to support using the PAM or Visometer in the preoperative assessment of cataract patients with no known retinal or optic nerve pathology.

A comparison of the potential acuity meter (PAM) and the illuminated near card (INC) in patients undergoing phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of the potential acuity meter (PAM) and the illuminated near card (INC) in patients undergoing phacoemulsification.

METHODS

During presurgical evaluations, both PAM and INC were tested on each study patient following dilation. Patients then rated the subjective ease of use of each test. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was recorded at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. McNemar's chi(2) test for paired associations was used to analyse categorical data; paired t-tests were used for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Overall, the INC was more likely than the PAM to predict BSCVA within one Snellen line (P=0.002), but this difference decreased for accuracy within two lines. The PAM predicted BSCVA within one line in 87 (70.7%) eyes, as compared to 102 (82.9%) eyes by the INC. The PAM was accurate within two lines in 109 (88.6%) eyes; the INC was accurate in 115 (93.5%) eyes. The PAM was more likely to underpredict potential acuity (P<0.001), while the INC was more likely to overpredict (P=0.004) or give exact predictions of BSCVA (P<0.001). Accuracy of the INC declined in eyes with macular comorbidity. The PAM and INC were rated as 'easy' tests by 54 (45.4%) and 93 (78.2%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the PAM and the INC were useful for predicting BSCVA after phacoemulsification, but the PAM was more likely to underestimate potential acuity. The INC was easier for patients to use, and had better accuracy than the PAM in patients without macular comorbidity, but was more likely to overestimate potential acuity.

Comparison of the potential acuity meter and pinhole tests in predicting postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of potential acuity meter (PAM) and pinhole (PH) tests in predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of the Philippines, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, and Asian Eye Institute, Makati, Philippines.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 64 eyes with mild to moderate cataract that had uneventful phacoemulsification. The PAM and PH tests were performed to predict postoperative visual acuity. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 4 weeks after surgery was compared with the predicted visual acuity. The number of lines of inaccuracy was calculated by subtracting the BCVA from the predicted visual acuity. The variables analyzed were type of predictive test and preoperative BCVA. The eyes were divided according to preoperative BCVA as follows: Group 1, 20/20 to 20/50; Group 2, 20/60 to 20/100; Group 3, 20/200 or worse.

RESULTS

The PH predicted visual acuity was correct in 5% of eyes and the PAM predicted acuity, in 17%. The PH predicted acuity was accurate within 1, 2, and 3 lines of BCVA in 23%, 40%, and 54% of eyes, respectively, and the PAM predicted acuity, in 64%, 81%, and 92% of eyes, respectively. The mean number of lines of inaccuracy was significantly less with the PH than with the PAM (3.47 lines +/- 2.42 [SD] and 1.60 +/- 1.55 lines, respectively) (P=.0005). The mean lines of inaccuracy in Group 1 were 2.49 +/- 1.52 for the PH and 1.14 +/- 0.99 for the PAM (P=.027); in Group 2, 3.17 +/- 1.99 PH and 1.65 +/- 1.80 PAM (P=.642); and in Group 3, 6.58 +/- 3.03 PH and 2.67 +/- 2.10 PAM (P=.240).

CONCLUSIONS

The PAM was more accurate than the PH in predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery. The accuracy of both tests decreased in patients with poorer preoperative visual acuity.

Potential vision testing--the relationship between visual acuity and Vernier acuity in the presence of simulated cataract

To evaluate the utility of a computer controlled two-bar Vernier acuity measurement as a predictor of visual function in the presence of cataract we measured logMAR visual acuity and Vernier acuity in a group of 40 young normal observers under various levels of dioptric blur (0-3 D in dioptre steps). The Vernier thresholds were resistant to dioptric blur up to 2 D, but performance degraded with blur of 3 D for non-optimised Vernier stimulus parameters. The stimulus parameters, bar length and bar separation, were further investigated in two subjects under conditions of blur. By extending the Vernier bar length and increasing the bar separation the effect of blur could be further reduced even under the most blurred condition. The relationship between visual acuity and Vernier acuity was determined. Vernier acuity was measured in the presence of Vistech cataract simulating lenses and a prediction of visual acuity was made for three observers, two with no ocular abnormality and one with age-related maculopathy. The cataract simulating lenses affected the measured visual acuity in all three subjects, but had less effect on Vernier acuity. Predicted visual acuities were all within six letters (0.12 log units) of the visual acuity without the simulated cataract. As expected, the subject sufferng from age-related maculopathy, whilst showing similar levels of Vernier acuity to the two ocularly healthy subjects at 1.5 degrees of retinal eccentricity, showed much poorer Vernier acuity for stimuli presented at fixation.

Effects of pseudophakic lens capsule opacification on optical coherence tomography of the macula

PURPOSE

To report observations on the influence of posterior lens capsule opacification on optical coherence tomographic imaging quality and measurements of macular thickness.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 13 eyes in 12 patients of which 2 eyes had a healthy macula and 11 eyes had maculopathy. In all eyes posterior lens capsule fibrosis was present. A clinical examination including biomicroscopy of the macula and an in-vivo macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after YAG-laser membranotomy had been performed.

RESULTS

Foveal retinal thickness before and after membranotomy were highly correlated (R = 0.98), and no systematic difference was found between values obtained before vs. after membranotomy (mean thickness 318.7 +/- 92.7 microm vs. 322.2 +/- 97.4 microm; p = 0.221). The signal-to-noise ratio increased in 11 out of 13 eyes after membranotomy (mean signal-to-noise ratio before 47.1 +/- 6.6 dB vs. 52.6 +/- 4.0 dB after; p = 0.004, the change ranging from -1.5 dB to 17 dB).

CONCLUSIONS

The qualitative effect of the posterior lens capsule opacification on the OCT-scan consists primarily of a loss of signal and consequently of intraretinal detail, whereas total foveal retinal thickness seems to be reliably assessed even when posterior lens capsule opacification interfering with the biomicroscopic evaluation of retinal edema are present. YAG-laser membranotomy results in a measurable improvement in the OCT signal-to-noise ratio, but OCT seems to yield reliable measurements of foveal retinal thickness before treatment. Consequently the OCT seems to reliably diagnose a macular thickening although not the type of this until after removal of the posterior lens capsule opacification.