Complications after discharge for surgical patients

The Pain Medicine Curriculum Framework-structured integration of pain medicine education into the medical curriculum

Medical practitioners play an essential role in preventing pain, conducting comprehensive pain assessments, as well as promoting evidence-based practices. There is a need for the development of innovative, interprofessional and integrated pain medicine curricula for medical students. The Pain Medicine Curriculum Framework (PMCF) was developed to conceptualise a purposeful approach to the complex process of curriculum change and to prioritise the actions needed to address the gaps in pain medicine education. The PMCF comprises four dimensions: (1) future healthcare practice needs; (2) competencies and capabilities required of graduates; (3) teaching, learning and assessment methods; and (4) institutional parameters. Curricula need to meet the requirements of registration and accreditation bodies, but also equip graduates to serve in their particular local health system while maintaining the fundamental standards and values of these institutions. The curriculum needs to connect knowledge with experience and practice to be responsive to the changing needs of the increasingly complex health system yet adaptable to patients with pain in the local context. Appropriate learning, teaching and assessment strategies are necessary to ensure that medical practitioners of the future develop the required knowledge, skills and attitudes to treat the diverse needs of patients' experiencing pain. The historical, political, social and organisational values of the educational institution will have a significant impact on curriculum design. A more formalised approach to the development and delivery of a comprehensive pain medicine curriculum is necessary to ensure that medical students are adequately prepared for their future workplace responsibilities.

Analysis of predictors of opioid-free analgesia for management of acute post-surgical pain in the United States

OBJECTIVES

Utilization of opioid-free analgesia (OFA) for post-surgical pain is a growing trend to counter the risks of opioid abuse and opioid-related adverse drug events (ORADEs). However, utilization patterns of OFA have not been examined. In this study, we investigated the utilization patterns and predictors of OFA in a surgical population in the United States.

METHODS

Analysis of the Cerner Health Facts database (January 2011 to December 2015) was conducted to describe hospital and patient characteristics associated with OFA. Baseline characteristics, such as age, gender, race, discharge status, year of admission and chronic comorbidities at index admission were collected. Hospital characteristics and payer type at index admission were collected as reported in the electronic health record database. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to identify statistically significant predictors of OFA on patient and institutional levels.

RESULTS

The study identified 10,219 patients, from 187 hospitals, who received post-surgical OFA and 255,196 patients who received post-surgical opioids. OFA rates varied considerably by hospital. Patients more likely to receive OFA were older (OR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.03, 1.10]; p < .001), or had neurological disorders (OR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.10, 1.39]; p < .001), diabetes (OR = 1.20, 95% CI [1.08, 1.33]; p = .001) or psychosis (OR = 1.18, 95% CI [1.01, 1.37]; p = .030). Patients with obesity and depression were less likely to receive OFA (OR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.67, 0.95]; p = .010 OR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.73, 0.98]; p = .030, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of post-surgical OFA was limited overall and was not favored in some patient groups prone to ORADEs, indicating missed opportunities to reduce opioid use and ORADE incidence. A substantial proportion of OFA patients was contributed by a few hospitals with especially high rates of OFA, suggesting that hospital policies, institutional structure and cross-functional departmental commitment to reducing opioid use may play a large role in the implementation of OFA.

Examining the Occurrence of Adverse Events within 72 hours of Discharge from the Intensive Care Unit

Adverse events have negative consequences for patients, including increased risk of death or permanent disability. Reports describe suboptimal patient care on hospital wards and reasons for readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) but limited data exists on the occurrence of adverse events, their characteristics and outcomes in patients recently discharged from the ICU to the ward. This prospective observational study describes the incidence and outcomes of adverse events within 72 hours of discharge from an Australian ICU over 12 weeks in 2006. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to ICU after booked surgery or uncomplicated drug overdose, were discharged from ICU to the high dependency unit or had a ‘do-not-resuscitate’ order. Clinical antecedents and preventability were determined for each event. Seventeen (10%) of the 167 discharges that met the inclusion criteria were associated with an adverse event, with nine (52%) judged as probably preventable. Seven adverse events occurred from discharges between 1700 and 0700 hours and seven were on weekends. The most common adverse events were related to fluid management (47%). Outcomes included three ICU readmissions, two high dependency unit admissions and two required one-to-one ward nursing. Two adverse events resulted in temporary disability, seven resulted in prolonged hospital stays and two were associated with death. Delay in taking action for abnormal physiological signs and infrequent charting were evident. Whilst the adverse event rate compared favourably with other reports, 64% of the events were considered preventable. A review of support systems and processes is recommended to better target transition from the ICU.

Evaluation of a nurse-led intervention to improve adherence to recommended guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism for hip and knee arthroplasty patients: A quasi-experimental study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To measure adherence to a nurse-led evidence-based venous thromboembolism prevention programme (intervention) compared to usual care in hip and knee arthroplasty patients and associated clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism morbidity and mortality of hospitalised patients is a major concern for health professionals. Venous thromboembolism prevention guidelines have been developed; however, adherence to guidelines is variable.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 410 potential participants who were adult patients that were booked for elective hip or knee arthroplasty at the two study sites during a 2-year period (2011-2013). Of these, 27 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and the remainder were eligible for inclusion in the study (intervention site n = 196 and control site n = 187, total population n = 383).

METHODS

This study adopted a quasi-experimental design, using an intervention and control study site, conducted in two private hospitals in a regional area in Australia.

RESULTS

The intervention group had a mean compliance score of 11.09, higher than the control group score of 7.19. This is equivalent to a compliance rate of 85% and 55%, respectively, and indicates that adherence at the study site was significantly higher. Patient adherence and outcomes in the postdischarge period were not significantly different between the study sites.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a nurse-led intervention achieved high adherence with translating evidence-based guidelines into routine patient care for hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Nurses can be critical to implementing clinical practice guidelines and adopting preventive programmes in acute care to improve patient outcomes and reduce postoperative venous thromboembolism in arthroplasty patients.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This research demonstrates the capacity of nurses to lead the translation of evidence-based practice guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism into routine patient care.

User-centered design of discharge warnings tool for colorectal surgery patients

Objectives

Readmission following colorectal surgery, typically due to surgery-related complications, is common. Patient-centered discharge warnings may guide recognition of early complication signs after colorectal surgery.

Materials and Methods

User-centered design of a discharge warnings tool consisted of iterative health literacy review and a heuristic evaluation with human factors and clinical experts as well as patient end users to establish content validity and usability.

Results

Literacy evaluation of the prototype suggested >12th-grade reading level. Subsequent revisions reduced reading level to 8th grade or below. Contents were formatted during heuristic evaluation into 3 action-oriented zones (green, yellow, and red) with relevant warning lexicons. Usability testing demonstrated comprehension of this 3-level lexicon and recognition of appropriate patient actions to take for each level.

Discussion

We developed a discharge warnings tool for colorectal surgery using staged user-centered design. The lexicon of surgical discharge warnings could structure communication among patients, caregivers, and clinicians to improve post-discharge care.

Patient experience with discharge instructions in postdischarge recovery: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

We examined the role of discharge instructions in postoperative recovery for patients undergoing colorectal surgery and report themes related to patient perceptions of discharge instructions and postdischarge experience.

DESIGN

Semistructured interviews were conducted as part of a formative evaluation of a Project Re-Engineered Discharge intervention adapted for surgical patients.

SETTING

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, a tertiary referral centre in Houston, Texas.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Interviews were conducted at the two-week postoperative appointment.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated understanding of the content in the discharge instructions. During the interviews, participants reported several positive roles for discharge instructions in their postdischarge care: a sense of security, a reminder of inhospital education, a living document and a source of empowerment. Despite these positive associations, participants reported that the instructions provided insufficient information to promote access to care that effectively addressed acute issues following discharge. Participants noted difficulty reaching providers after discharge, which resulted in the adoption of workarounds to overcome system barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite concerted efforts to provide patient-centred instructions, the discharge instructions did not provide enough context to effectively guide postdischarge interactions with the healthcare system. Insufficient information on how to access and communicate with the most appropriate personnel in the healthcare system is an important barrier to patients receiving high-quality postdischarge care. Tools and strategies from team training programmes, such as team strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety, could be adapted to include patients and provide them with structured methods for communicating with healthcare providers post discharge.

Research in hospital discharge procedures addresses gaps in care continuity in the community, but leaves gaping holes for people with dementia: a review of the literature

AIM

To examine the literature on the impact of the discharge experience of patients with dementia and their continuity of care.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed and grey literature published in the English language between 1995 and 2014 were systematically searched using Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO and Cochrane library databases, using a combination of the search terms Dementia, Caregivers, Integrated Health Care Systems, Managed Care, Patient Discharge. Also reviewed were Department of Health and Ageing and Alzheimer's Australia research reports between 2000 and 2014.

RESULTS

The review found a wide range of studies that raise concerns in relation to the quality of care provided to people with dementia during hospital discharge and in transitional care.

CONCLUSION

Discharge planning and transitional care for patients with dementia are not adequate and are likely to lead to readmission and other poor health outcomes.

Ensuring safe prescribing of controlled substances for pain following surgery by developing a transitional pain service

SUMMARY 

Chronic postsurgical pain is a significant complication following major surgery, which impairs patient's quality of life. Opioid medications are the mainstay of most postoperative analgesic regimens. Growing evidence suggests inherent risks associated with opioids used for postoperative pain. Beyond common opioid-related side effects, increased mortality in the community and developing persistent opioid problems have been reported. There is a paucity of literature regarding the safe and effective management of postoperative pain as patients transition from the hospital to home/community. The introduction of a transitional pain service, whose aim is to optimize pain control, monitor and appropriately wean patients off opioid medications, prevent unnecessary readmissions post-discharge, and reduce disability associated with the development of chronic post surgical pain, will be of benefit to patients and the healthcare system.

Postdischarge problems identified by telephone calls to an advice line

BACKGROUND

Problems experienced after hospital discharge can result in rehospitalizations and unscheduled urgent and emergent care.

OBJECTIVE

To identify opportunities for improving discharge processes by examining calls to an advice line (AL).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

A 500-bed, university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients who called an AL between September 1, 2011 and September 1, 2012 and reported being hospitalized within 30 days.

INTERVENTION

None

MEASUREMENTS

Caller characteristics, timing of calls, nature of reported problems.

RESULTS

Over 1 year the AL received calls from 308 unique patients who were hospitalized or had outpatient surgery within 30 days preceding the call. Thirty-one percent and 47% of calls occurred within 24 or 48 hours of discharge, respectively. Sixty-three percent came from surgery patients despite surgery patients accounting for only 38% of the discharges. The most common issues were uncontrolled pain, questions about medications, and aftercare instructions (eg, the care of surgical wounds). The rates of 30-day readmissions and urgent or emergent care visits were higher for patients who called the AL than for those who did not (15% vs 4% and 30% vs 7%, respectively, both P < 0.0001), but sample sizes were too small to accommodate robust matching or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Problems described in calls by patients to an AL identified several aspects of our discharge processes that needed improvement. Patients calling an AL following discharge may be at increased risk for 30-day rehospitalization and urgent or emergent care visits.

Development of a Management Algorithm for Post-operative Pain (MAPP) after total knee and total hip replacement: study rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Evidence from clinical practice and the extant literature suggests that post-operative pain assessment and treatment is often suboptimal. Poor pain management is likely to persist until pain management practices become consistent with guidelines developed from the best available scientific evidence. This work will address the priority in healthcare of improving the quality of pain management by standardising evidence-based care processes through the incorporation of an algorithm derived from best evidence into clinical practice. In this paper, the methodology for the creation and implementation of such an algorithm that will focus, in the first instance, on patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement is described.

METHODS

In partnership with clinicians, and based on best available evidence, the aim of the Management Algorithm for Post-operative Pain (MAPP) project is to develop, implement, and evaluate an algorithm designed to support pain management decision-making for patients after orthopaedic surgery. The algorithm will provide guidance for the prescription and administration of multimodal analgesics in the post-operative period, and the treatment of breakthrough pain. The MAPP project is a multisite study with one coordinating hospital and two supporting (rollout) hospitals. The design of this project is a pre-implementation-post-implementation evaluation and will be conducted over three phases. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) framework will be used to guide implementation. Outcome measurements will be taken 10 weeks post-implementation of the MAPP. The primary outcomes are: proportion of patients prescribed multimodal analgesics in accordance with the MAPP; and proportion of patients with moderate to severe pain intensity at rest. These data will be compared to the pre-implementation analgesic prescribing practices and pain outcome measures. A secondary outcome, the efficacy of the MAPP, will be measured by comparing pain intensity scores of patients where the MAPP guidelines were or were not followed.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes of this study have relevance for nursing and medical professionals as well as informing health service evaluation. In establishing a framework for the sustainable implementation and evaluation of a standardised approach to post-operative pain management, the findings have implications for clinicians and patients within multiple surgical contexts.

What are we missing: results of a 13-month active follow-up program at a level I trauma center

BACKGROUND

Poor follow-up by patients with trauma results in a lack of knowledge of postdischarge health-related issues. This study reports on postdischarge health-related issues discovered by a program of active postdischarge contact or follow-up.

METHODS

All patients discharged home from the trauma service were followed up in the following manner: within 4 weeks of discharge, telephonic follow-up was attempted three times followed by scanning of electronic records. Failing that, other physicians (specialists or primary care) were contacted. Once contact was established, the patient, family member, or physician was questioned about the general well-being, any specific health-related issue, and the resolution.

RESULTS

During the 13-month study period ending September 2007, a total of 1,353 patients met entry criteria. Contact was established with 692 (51%). Of these, 116 (17%) were found to have significant health issues: (1) severe uncontrolled pain, 45; (2) missed injury, 17 (spine fractures, 4; clavicle or hand or foot fractures, 6; facial bone fractures, 3; soft tissue, 3; hematuria, 1); (3) wound infections, 17; (4) other infections, 17 (urinary, 8; pulmonary, 7; blood stream, 2) (5) venous thromboembolism, 10; and (6) other, 9 (psychiatric, 6; nontraumatic, 3). One patient died at home within 24 hours of discharge. The issues were significant enough for the patients to seek medical care (outpatient, 39; emergency department visits, 52; hospitalization, 24).

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with trauma have moderate to severe health-related issues postdischarge that are often not found by the trauma team or the trauma registry. Active follow-up can identify the nature of the medical issues and help in designing system changes to reduce or eliminate them.

Continuity of care and general wellbeing of patients with comorbidities requiring joint replacement

AIM

The aim of this paper is to examine the continuity of care and general wellbeing of patients with comorbidities undergoing elective total hip or knee joint replacement.

BACKGROUND

Advances in medical science and improved lifestyles have reduced mortality rates in most Western countries. As a result, there is an ageing population with a concomitant growth in the number of people who are living with multiple chronic illnesses, commonly referred to as comorbidities. These patients often require acute care services, creating a blend of acute and chronic illness needs. For example, joint replacement surgery is frequently performed to improve impaired mobility associated with osteoarthritis.

METHOD

A purposive sample of twenty participants with multiple comorbidities who required joint replacement surgery was recruited to obtain survey, interview and medical record audit data. Data were collected during 2004 and 2005.

FINDINGS

Comorbidity care was poorly co-ordinated prior to having surgery, during the acute care stay and following surgery and primarily entailed prescribed medicines. The main focus in acute care was patient throughput following joint replacement surgery according to a prescribed clinical pathway. General wellbeing was less than optimal: participants reported pain, fatigue, insomnia and alterations in urinary elimination as the chief sources of discomfort during the course of the study.

CONCLUSION

Continuity of care of comorbidities was lacking. Comorbidities affected patient general wellbeing and delayed recovery from surgery. Acute care, clinical pathways and the specialisation of medicine and nursing subordinated the general problem of patients with comorbidities. Systems designed to integrate and co-ordinate chronic illness care had limited application in the acute care setting. A multidisciplinary, holistic approach is required. Recommendations for further research conclude this paper.