Use of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in patients with advanced germ cell tumour following chemotherapy: single-centre experience with long-term follow up*

The evolution of PET imaging in renal, bladder, upper urinary tract urothelial, testicular and penile carcinoma - Today's impact, tomorrow's potential

INTRODUCTION

The advancement of hybrid PET/CT or PET/MRI imaging for non-prostate genitourinary cancers has not experienced the rapid progress of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, these neoplasms are aggressive and reliable imaging plays a pivotal role in enhancing patients' quality of life and prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

the main evidence regarding [18F]FDG and non-[18F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in non-prostate uro-oncological malignancies are summarized and discussed. Moreover, potential future directions concerning PET imaging in these neoplasms are debated, with the aim to stimulate future research projects covering these fields.

EXPERT OPINION

In Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), [18F]FDG PET/CT demonstrates varying efficacy in staging, restaging, and prognostic stratification, but PSMA PET/CT is emerging as a potential game-changer, particularly in advanced, high-grade aggressive clear cell RCC. [18F]FDG PET/CT may see an increased use in N and M-staging of bladder cancer, as well as for detecting recurrence and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Preliminary data regarding [68Ga]-FAPI also looks promising in this context. [18F]FDG PET/MRI could be useful for the T-staging of bladder cancer, while upper tract urothelial carcinoma still lacks of molecular imaging literature reports. In testicular and penile cancer [18F]FDG PET/CT has demonstrated its usefulness in several clinical settings, although experiences with non-[18F]FDG radiotracers are lacking.

Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are malignancies with a unique biology, pathology, clinical appearance, and excellent outcomes. A correct radiographic assessment of GCTs is extremely important for the clinical management in several typical scenarios. Advancements in the field of diagnostic medicine bring an increasing number of sophisticated imaging methods to increase the performance of imaging studies. The conventional computed tomography (CT) remains the mainstay of diagnostic imaging in the management of GCTs. While certain improvements in the sensitivity and specificity are suggested with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with lymphotrophic nanoparticles in evaluating retroperitoneal lymph nodes during the staging procedure, further exploration in larger prospective studies is needed. A common diagnostic dilemma is assessing the post-chemotherapy residual disease in GCTs. Several studies have consistently shown advantages in the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in post-chemotherapy residual retroperitoneal lymph nodes in patients with seminoma, but not with non-seminoma. Recommendations suggest that seminoma patients with a residual disease in the retroperitoneum larger than 3 cm should be subjected for PET scanning with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose. Relatively high sensitivity, specificity and a negative predictive value (80-95%) may guide clinical decision to spare these patients of high morbidity of an unnecessary surgery. However, a positive predictive value of around 50% renders PET scanning difficult to interpret in the case of positive finding. These patients often require extremely difficult surgical procedures with the high risk of post-operative morbidity. Therefore, seminoma patients with PET positive residual masses larger than 3 cm still remain a serious challenge in the decision making of nuclear medicine specialist, oncologists, and urologic surgeons. In this article, we aim to summarize data on controversial dilemmas in staging procedures, active surveillance, and post-chemotherapy assessment of GCTs based on the available published literature.

Role of F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a single-center experience with long term follow-up

INTRODUCTION

¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) is a diagnostic tool widely used in oncology, but to date there are no established recommendations for its use in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans performed in patients diagnosed with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors treated at the gynecology department of San Gerardo Hospital (Monza, Italy) from June 2006 to December 2016. Data collected included clinical history, radiological, biochemical and pathological evaluation, treatment, follow-up, outcome, and clinical indication for the PET/CT scan. PET/CT findings were categorized as negative/normal (no abnormal FDG uptake or physiological uptake), positive/abnormal (FDG uptake considered to indicate active germ cell malignancy), or equivocal (FDG uptake of uncertain significance, not clearly correlated to neoplastic disease).

RESULTS

A total of 69 PET/CT scans in 37 patients were evaluated. The mean age at diagnosis was 25 years (range 20-48). The majority of patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (22/37) disease and had a diagnosis of dysgerminomas (18/37). Imaging indications were initial staging before treatment (4/69, 6%), staging after inadequate staging surgery (24/69, 35%), restaging after adjuvant chemotherapy (17/69, 25%), relapse suspect (9/69, 13%), and follow-up (15/69, 21%). Pathology confirmation of PET/CT results was available in 28/69 (40.5%) studies. All negative PET/CT (15/28) cases were confirmed with laparoscopy as true negative; among 13/28 positive PET cases, histopathology confirmed 7 (54%) as true positive and 6 (46%) as false positive (5 inflammatory and 1 mature teratoma implants). Patient-based analysis showed 100% sensitivity, 71% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, 100% negative predictive value, and 79% accuracy. Clinical follow-up was available in 41 (59.4%) of 69 PET/CT images: 28/41 studies were negative and 13/41 positive. A mean follow-up of 28 months (median 15, range 5-102) confirmed negative PET/CT studies. A total of 13 positive PET/CT patients underwent chemotherapy with subsequent evidence of disease response.

DISCUSSION

PET/CT in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors was mainly performed for staging after inadequate staging surgery or for restaging after adjuvant chemotherapy. PET/CT was associated with high sensitivity and negative predictive value.

The use of F-FDG PET/CT in testicular cancer

Testicular germ cell tumors are one of the most common neoplasms in young men. After inguinal orchiectomy is performed, treatment options range from active surveillance to chemotherapy, radiation therapy or retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. For the accurate use of the different treatment options, precise imaging techniques are necessary to reduce side effects of the aggressive therapies but also to avoid undertreatment exposing the patient to the risk of recurrence. F-FDG PET/CT is already recommended in the European guidelines for the follow up of seminomas under certain conditions but conventional primary staging or restaging is still performed with CT or MRI. Recently, the importance of F-FDG PET/CT in this context has become an interesting topic of academic discussion and subject of various clinical trials which are reviewed in the following.

FDG-PET/CT in a Patient with Poor-Risk Non-Seminoma Testis with Mature Teratoma and Secondary Gliosarcoma: Multimodality Imaging for Guiding Multimodality Treatment

The value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in detecting viable tumours in patients with metastasised non-seminomatous testicular cancer and residual and new masses post chemotherapy remains to be determined. We describe the case of a 41-year-old patient with metastasised non-seminomatous testicular cancer, with both retroperitoneal and extra-retroperitoneal residual masses post chemotherapy, for whom FDG-PET/CT guided major treatment decisions. FDG-PET/CT correctly identified the locations of viable tumour, as was proved by histology, and successfully guided surgery. In conclusion, in selected cases surveillance of patients with non-seminomatous testicular cancer with FDG-PET/CT can guide major treatment decisions when considering surgery for metastatic disease.

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of testicular cancers

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the utility of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in managing testicular cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients (29 seminoma, 28 nonseminoma and five mixed) underwent 75 (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans (16 scans for primary staging, 44 for residual masses and 15 for rising tumour markers). Follow-up histology, clinical scans and tumour marker results were included for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

(i) Primary staging: eight of 11 patients with equivocal CT scans had true-negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans. Five high-risk patients with normal stage 1 CT scans had negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans, but two subsequently relapsed. (ii) Residual masses: of the 20 scans interpreted as showing viable disease, five were false positive. Nineteen scans were negative (18 true negative and one false negative). (iii) Rising tumour markers: of the 15 scans, two were false negative and 13 were true positive.

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG PET/CT is helpful when primary staging CT scans are equivocal but insufficiently sensitive to predict relapse in high-risk patients with normal CT scans. With residual masses, a negative scan is rarely associated with relapse. (18)F-FDG PET/CT is helpful in defining recurrent disease in the majority of patients with rising tumour markers and negative CT scans.

[Diagnosis and treatment of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors]

Testicular cancer currently shows excellent rates of curing and even in advanced stages of disease about 70% can be achieved. This was possible due to continuously carrying out studies. To reduce long-term toxicity the focus is now put on reduction of treatment. In nonseminomatous germ cell cancer this is discussed especially for stage I disease where different therapeutic strategies can be offered. Concerning advanced disease the aim is a further improvement of treatment results. Polychemotherapy and surgical procedures are equally important in this scenario. Concerning residual tumor resection it should always be considered that the procedure can be extended by adjuvant surgery, e.g. cava resection. Therefore, those resections should only be performed at centers where all possibly needed surgical disciplines are available.

Control of relapsed germ cell tumor and SLE nephritis by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell support remains a curative treatment option for relapsed or nonresponsive germ cell tumors, and has been applied experimentally to control severe autoimmune diseases. In the present study, we report on a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis who developed a nonseminomatous germ cell tumor that relapsed after standard chemotherapy and surgery. The patient received high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation based on its indication for relapsed germ cell tumors. Prolonged control of his relapsed germ cell tumor and systemic lupus erythematosus was attained with high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell support. An extensive literature review is provided alongside a detailed discussion of the aforementioned case.

2-¹⁸fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for postchemotherapy seminoma residual lesions: a retrospective validation of the SEMPET trial

BACKGROUND

2-¹⁸fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been recommended in international guidelines in the evaluation of postchemotherapy seminoma residuals. Our trial was designed to validate these recommendations in a larger group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FDG-PET studies in patients with metastatic seminoma and residual masses after platinum-containing chemotherapy were correlated with either the histology of the resected lesion(s) or the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy seven FDG-PET results were contributed. Of 127 eligible PET studies, 69% were true negative, 11% true positive, 6% false negative, and 15% false positive. We compared PET scans carried out before and after a cut-off level of 6 weeks after the end of the last chemotherapy cycle. PET sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value were 50%, 77%, 91%, and 25%, respectively, before the cut-off and 82%, 90%, 95%, and 69% after the cut-off. PET accuracy significantly improved from 73% before to 88% after the cut-off (P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the high specificity, sensitivity, and NPV of FDG-PET for evaluating postchemotherapy seminoma residuals. When carried out at an adequate time point, FDG-PET remains a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in this clinical setting and spares patients unnecessary therapy.

Management of residual mass in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors following chemotherapy

Advanced stage nonseminomatous testis cancer is commonly treated with chemotherapy and surgical resection. Patients with retroperitoneal residual masses >1cm following induction chemotherapy with normalized tumor markers should undergo a post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Post chemotherapy retroperitoneal residual mass less than 1 cm with normal markers may be considered as complete response, although the possibility of residual teratoma and viable germ cell tumor are not definitively ruled out. Excellent long term disease free survival following surveillance may justify this option as the treatment of choice in this cohort of patients.

The role of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of residual masses after chemotherapy for advanced stage seminoma

PURPOSE

Treatment in patients with seminoma who have residual or recurrent masses following chemotherapy is still a matter of debate. Surgical resection is currently the most common recommendation for masses greater than 3 cm, resulting in overtreatment in up to 70% of those affected. We analyzed the accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography for predicting viable tumor residuals in patients with seminoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective, multicenter trial computerized tomography and FDG (2-(F-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) positron emission tomography were performed before surgical resection for residual or recurrent masses in 20 patients who had undergone chemotherapy for stage IIb, IIc or III seminoma. Histopathological findings were directly correlated with positron emission tomography results.

RESULTS

Of the patients 18 presented with residual masses and 2 had recurrent masses following chemotherapy. Histopathological assessment revealed viable tumor in 3 patients and benign lesions in 17. All patients with viable tumor were identified correctly by positron emission tomography. No false-negative results were observed but 9 patients had false-positive positron emission tomography results. This resulted in a negative predictive value of 1 (95% CI 0.63-1) and a positive predictive value of 0.25 (95% CI 0.05-0.57) for FDG-positron emission tomography in our patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that FDG-positron emission tomography is capable of excluding viable disease in residual masses, even those exceeding 3 cm. Therefore, it may be considered an additional tool to improve patient counseling. However, the decision to perform surgical resection of the residual mass should not be based exclusively on a positive positron emission tomography image since false-positive results appear to be common.

Positron emission tomography (PET) in the urooncological evaluation of the small pelvis

Positron emission tomography (PET) with the use of ((18)F)2-fluoro-D: -2-desoxyglucose (FDG) has been investigated to be a highly sensitive and specific imaging modality in the diagnostic of primary and recurrent tumors and in the control of therapies in numerous non-urologic cancers. The aim of this review is to validate the significance of PET as a diagnostic tool in malignant urological tumors of the small pelvis. A systematic review of the current literature concerning the role of PET for malignant prostate, testicular and bladder tumors was carried out. The data indicate no additional role for PET in comparison with conventional imaging in tumor detection and local staging for prostate, bladder or testicular cancer. Tumor recurrence in prostate cancer seems to be more effectively identified with acetate and choline than with FDG, but this effect is more pronounced with higher PSA values. The value of PET in the identification of metastatic disease in either tumor entity can not be finally outlined as the clinical data are partly missing, controversial or in the process of evaluation. FDG-PET can be regarded as accepted imaging modality in the restaging of seminomatous germ cell tumors after chemotherapy.

Controversies in the Management of Clinical Stage I Testis Cancer

During the last two decades, definitive primary treatments and surveillance with definitive treatment deferred until relapse have demonstrated 98% to 99% cure rates in patients with stage I testis cancer, and these options have obtained firm positions in standard management. The development of optimal management strategies in various countries were at least partly guided by available surgical expertise in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the United States, and easy access to reference hospitals in densely populated countries in Western Europe that facilitated close surveillance programs; hence, treatment preferences differ on the two sides of the Atlantic. The success of both approaches is highly dependent on the skills of the practitioner, particularly of surgery and of scrutinized surveillance. As a result, local expertise and familiarity with a chosen modality has strengthened over the years, and investigators have been reluctant to embark on randomized trials designed to compare one modality with another. Such expertise with one particular technique, with the other approach being less familiar territory, has created controversy, because both physicians and patients seek evidence-based data coming from randomized clinical trials on which to make management decisions. Moreover, the reduced risk of relapse resulting from the use of radiotherapy or carboplatin in stage I seminoma and of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage I nonseminoma must be balanced against the potential long-term adverse effects in this population of patients with a normal life expectancy. The purpose of this review is to present the currently available data and discuss the merits and the disadvantages of the various approaches, yielding to the possible conclusion that all options appear to be equal in terms of efficacy, but that modality-associated adverse effects differ.

PET: other thoracic malignancies

The vast majority of esophageal cancers are fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid; the primary use for positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with esophageal cancer is in the detection of distant metastases, because known distant metastatic disease precludes surgical resection. High standardized uptake values (SUVs) may be predictive of poor prognosis. PET findings may be used to assess therapy response and evaluate for esophageal tumor recurrence after treatment. PET findings may be non-specific in different types of thymic lesions, although thymic carcinomas tend to be extremely FDG avid. PET can be helpful in detecting distant spread from invasive thymomas and thymic carcinomas. Similarly, PET may be used to assess the extent of disease in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, thereby facilitating optimal therapy approaches.

Imaging of testicular germ cell tumours

In testicular germ cell tumour (GCT), imaging plays a central role in assessment of tumour bulk, sites of metastases, monitoring response to therapy, surgical planning and accurate assessment of disease at relapse. The primary modality used for imaging patients with GCT is computed tomography (CT) but plain film radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) may all have roles to play. This article reviews the role of imaging of testicular germ cell tumours.

The Role of Imaging in the Surveillance of Urologic Malignancies

Urologic malignancies are common, accounting for approximately 25% of all new cancer cases in the United States. Patients with urologic malignancies require long-term surveillance to detect progression or recurrence as early as possible. The urologist is faced with the task of balancing patient safety and cost-effectiveness, while finding the most practical follow-up regimen. For each urologic malignancy, this article reviews the commonly used radiologic techniques for surveillance and offers recommended follow-up schedules.

FDG-PET in the management of germ cell tumor

Germ cell tumor is the most common malignancy in young men. The cure rate of these patients has tremendously increased in the cisplatin era, and recent results have indicated that the management of patients with GCT is still improving. The use of FDG-PET in the management of patients with GCT has been recently investigated. This report attempts to comprehensively review new advances and delineate the potential applications of FDG-PET in GCT.

FDG PET is superior to CT in the prediction of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals

AIM

In advanced seminoma the management of residuals after completion of chemotherapy is controversial. Some centres routinely perform surgery for lesions > or =3 cm diameter, others recommend surgery solely if the residual fail to shrink or show even growth. This study prospectively investigates whether FDG PET can improve the prediction of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After an expansion of a previous study population, 54 patients from eight centres with metastatic seminoma and a CT-documented mass after chemotherapy were included in the study. Six patients were excluded from evaluation because of protocol violations. After PET, the patients underwent either surgery or were followed clinically. On follow-up the lesions were considered to be non-viable when there was unequivocal shrinking, or when the lesion remained morphologically stable for at least 24 months. Any lesion growth was assumed to be malignant. PET results were compared to CT discrimination (< or > or =3 cm) of the residual masses.

RESULTS

Fifty-two PET scans were evaluable. After adequate chemotherapy, there were 74 CT-documented residual masses ranging in size from 1 to 11 cm (median, 2.2 cm). Their dignities were confirmed histologically in 13 lesions, or by follow-up CT in 61 lesions. Four of forty-seven lesions <3 cm and 11/27 lesions > or =3 cm were viable. PET was true positive in one lesion <3 cm and in 11 lesions > or =3 cm, false negative in three lesions <3 cm, and true negative in 59 lesions (43 lesions <3 cm). No PET scan was false positive. In detecting viability the sensitivity and specificity was 73% (95% CI, 44-88), and 73% (59-83), respectively, for CT (< or > or =3 cm); and 80% (51-95), and 100% (93-100), respectively, for PET (specificity, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals, a positive PET is highly predictive for the presence of viable tumour. The specificity of PET is significantly higher than that of CT when using a > or =3 cm cut-off. A negative PET scan is excellent for the exclusion of disease in lesions > or =3 cm, with a somewhat higher sensitivity than CT (n.s.). PET can contribute to the management of residual seminoma lesions, especially in terms of avoiding unnecessary additional treatment for patients with lesions > or =3 cm.

Positronenemissionstomographie (PET) zur Diagnostik und zum Therapiemonitoring bei urologischen Tumoren

Positron emission tomography (PET) using ((18)F)2-fluoro-D-2-desoxyglucose (FDG) has been shown to be a highly sensitive and specific imaging modality in the diagnosis of primary and recurrent tumors and in the control of therapies in numerous non-urologic cancers. It was the aim of this review to validate the significance of PET as a diagnostic tool in malignant tumors of the urogenital tract. A systematic review of the current literature concerning the role of PET for malignant tumors of the kidney, testicles, prostate, and bladder was carried out. The role of FDG PET for renal cell cancer can be seen in the detection of recurrences after definitive local therapy and metastases. The higher sensitivity of PET in comparison to other therapeutic modalities (CT, ultrasound, MRI) in recurrent and metastatic renal cell cancer suggests a supplemental role of this diagnostic procedure to complement other imaging modalities.The clinical value of PET is established for the identification of vital tumor tissue after chemotherapy of seminomatous germ cell tumors. This diagnostic method has little significance for primary tumor staging and diagnosis of non-seminomatous germ cell tumor because of the high probability of false-negative results in adult teratomas. FDG PET is not sensitive enough in the diagnosis of primary or recurrent tumors in prostate or bladder cancer. Also PET did not prove to be superior to conventional bone scintigram in the detection of mostly osteoblastic metastases in prostate cancer. The recent use of alternative tracers, which are partly not eliminated by urinary secretion (acetate, choline) has increased the sensitivity and specificity of PET also in this tumor entity so that further clinical investigations are needed to validate these technical modifications in their significance for this imaging modality. PET appears to be sufficiently evaluated only for the diagnostic follow-up of patients with seminomatous germ cell tumors after chemotherapy to regard it is the diagnostic tool of first choice. For all other tumors of the urogenital tract this proof is still awaited.

The reproductive tract

Diagnostic imaging has played a major role in the evaluation of patients with the cancers of the reproductive tract. The imaging modalities have included ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, hysterosalpingography, and scintigraphy with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. Positron emission tomography (PET) with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose also has been shown to be useful in the imaging evaluation of these patients. Clinical applications have included initial staging and posttherapy restaging of disease, detecting metastatic disease, differentiating posttherapy anatomic alterations from recurrent or residual disease, and predicting and evaluating treatment response. In this article, we review the diagnostic utility of dedicated PET and combined PET-computed tomography systems in the imaging assessment of reproductive tract malignancies (excluding prostate cancer) in both sexes with an emphasis on fluorodeoxyglucose applications.

The role of positron emission tomography in germ cell cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a non-invasive tool for imaging regional metabolic processes, which adds another dimension to current anatomy-derived imaging techniques, i.e. metabolic imaging. To date, 2-(18)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has been the only tracer used for imaging germ cell tumors (GCT), which can be distinguished from normal tissue by their different glucose utilization. However, FDG PET has several limitations: (1) inflammatory and granulomatous tissues also show extensive FDG uptake, (2) lesions <1 cm in size can often not be detected, and (3) mature teratoma is indistinguishable from normal and necrotic tissue. Studies assessing the clinical role of FDG PET in GCT suggest that the technique has a place as a standard tool in evaluating post chemotherapy seminoma residuals. Whether it also improves the assessment of the risks carried by clinical stage I non-seminoma patients and the early prediction of response to salvage chemotherapy is still under investigation, or at least needs to be confirmed by further trials. In relapsing patients with a mismatch between tumor markers and imaging data, FDG PET appears to be useful whenever salvage surgery is considered, although systematic trials are not yet available.