Accuracy and limitations of continuous oesophageal aortic blood flow measurement during general anaesthesia for children: comparison with transcutaneous echography-Doppler

Cardiac Output Assessments in Anesthetized Children: Dynamic Capnography Versus Esophageal Doppler

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare esophageal Doppler cardiac output (COEDM) against the reference method effective pulmonary blood flow cardiac output (COEPBF), for agreement of absolute values and ability to detect change in cardiac output (CO) in pediatric surgical patients. Furthermore, the relationship between these 2 methods and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) parameters was evaluated.

METHODS

Fifteen children American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II (median age, 8 months; median weight, 9 kg) scheduled for surgery were investigated in this prospective observational cohort study. Baseline COEPBF/COEDM/NIBP measurements were made at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 3 cm H2O. PEEP was increased to 10 cm H2O and COEPBF/COEDM/NIBP was recorded after 1 and 3 minutes. PEEP was then lowered to 3 cm H2O, and all measurements were repeated after 3 minutes. Finally, 20-µg kg-1 intravenous atropine was given with the intent to increase CO, and all measurements were recorded again after 5 minutes. Paired recordings of COEDM and COEPBF were examined for agreement and trending ability, and all parameters were analyzed for their responses to the hemodynamic challenges.

RESULTS

Bias between COEDM and COEPBF (COEDM - COEPBF) was -17 mL kg-1 min-1 (limits of agreement, -67 to +33 mL kg-1 min-1) with a mean percentage error of 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25-37) and a concordance rate of 71% (95% CI, 63-80). The hemodynamic interventions caused by PEEP manipulations resulted in significant decrease in COEPBF absolute numbers (155 mL kg-1 min-1 [95% CI, 151-159] to 127 mL kg-1 min-1 [95% CI, 113-141]) and a corresponding relative decrease of 18% (95% CI, 14-22) 3 minutes after application of PEEP 10. No corresponding decreases were detected by COEDM. Mean arterial pressure showed a relative decrease with 5 (95% CI, 2-8) and 6% (95% CI, 2-10) 1 and 3 minutes after the application of PEEP 10, respectively. Systolic arterial pressure showed a relative decrease of 5% (95% CI, 2-10) 3 minutes after application of PEEP 10. None of the recorded parameters responded to atropine administration except for heart rate that showed a 4% relative increase (95% CI, 1-7, P = .02) 5 minutes after atropine.

CONCLUSIONS

COEDM was unable to detect the reduction of CO cause by increased PEEP, whereas COEPBF and to a minimal extent NIBP detected these changes in CO. The ability of COEPBF to react to minor reductions in CO, before noticeable changes in NIBP are seen, suggests that COEPBF may be a potentially useful tool for hemodynamic monitoring in mechanically ventilated children.

Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry

BACKGROUND

Continuous and non-invasive measurement of cardiac output (CO) may contribute helpful information to the care and treatment of the critically ill pediatric patient. Different methods are available but their clinical verification is still a major problem.

AIM

Comparison of reliability and safety of two continuous non-invasive methods with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for CO measurement: electric velocimetry technique (EV, Aesculon) and transesophageal Doppler (TED, CardioQP). METHODS/MATERIAL: In 26 infants and children who had undergone corrective cardiac surgery at a median age of 3.5 (1-17) years CO and stroke volume (SV) were obtained by EV, TED and TTE. Each patient had five measurements on the first day after surgery, during mechanical ventilation and sedation.

RESULTS

Values for CO and SV from TED and EV correlated well with those of TTE (r = 0.85 and r = 0.88), but mean values were significantly lower than the values of TTE for TED (P = 0.02) and EV (P = 0.001). According to Bland-Altman analysis, bias was 0.36 l/min with a precision of 1.67 l/min for TED vs. TTE and 0.87 l/min (bias) with a precision of 3.26 l/min for EV vs. TTE. No severe adverse events were observed and the handling of both systems was easy in the sedated child.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients non-invasive measurement of CO and SV with TED and EV is useful for continuous monitoring after heart surgery. Both new methods seem to underestimate cardiac output in terms of absolute values. However, TED shows tolerable bias and precision and may be helpful for continuous CO monitoring in a deeply sedated and ventilated pediatric patient, e.g. in the operating room or intensive care unit.

The transesophageal Doppler and hemodynamic effects of epidural anesthesia in infants anesthetized with sevoflurane and sufentanil

BACKGROUND

It is thought that pediatric epidural anesthesia (EA) provides hemodynamic stability in children. However, when compared with information relating to adults, little is known about the hemodynamic effects of epidural EA on cardiac output (CO) in infants.

METHODS

Using transesophageal Doppler to monitor CO, we prospectively studied 14 infants <10 kg who were scheduled for abdominal surgery. During sevoflurane general anesthesia, CO transesophageal Doppler monitoring was performed before and after lumbar EA with 0.75 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1:200,000 adrenaline. CO, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were measured before and 5, 15, and 20 min after performance of EA.

RESULTS

In patients anesthetized with sevoflurane and sufentanil, EA resulted in an increase in stroke volume by 29% (P < 0.0001) and a decrease in heart rate by 13% (P < 0.0001). EA also induced a significant decrease in systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, and systemic vascular resistance by 11%, 18%, 15%, and 25%, respectively. Conversely, CO remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in stroke volume observed is probably explained by optimization of afterload because of the sympathetic blockade induced by EA. These results confirm that EA provides hemodynamic stability in infants weighing <10 kg and supports the use of EA in this pediatric population.

The effects of spread of block and adrenaline on cardiac output after epidural anesthesia in young children: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study

Epidural anesthesia is considered to be without significant hemodynamic consequence in young children. However, conversely to adults, few studies have investigated cardiac output. Using transesophageal Doppler monitoring of cardiac output, we prospectively investigated hemodynamic alterations in 48 children (median age, 22.5 mo) receiving sevoflurane general anesthesia combined with caudal or thoracolumbar epidural anesthesia. They were randomly assigned to receive 0.8 mL/kg of plain local anesthetic mixture (lidocaine 1% + bupivacaine 0.25% (50/50) + 1 microg/mL of fentanyl) or 1 mL/kg of the same mixture with 5 microg/mL of adrenaline. No significant hemodynamic alteration was elicited in caudal and thoracolumbar groups receiving the plain mixture except a moderate decrease in heart rate. Conversely, a mixture with adrenaline added provoked a significant decrease in mean arterial blood pressure by 14% and 17%, in systemic vascular resistance by 24% and 40%, and an increase in cardiac output by 20% and 34% in caudal and thoracolumbar groups, respectively. The adrenaline effect was greater by the thoracolumbar than the caudal approach. In young children, epidural anesthesia induces an increase in cardiac output only when adrenaline is added to local anesthetics, probably through its systemic absorption from the epidural space.

IMPLICATIONS

Epidural anesthesia may induce significant hemodynamic changes, well documented in adults. Using noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in children, we reported an increase in cardiac output and a decrease in arterial blood pressure only when epinephrine was added to epidurally-injected local anesthetics.

Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Review of the accuracy and repeatability of Doppler cardiac output (CO) measurements in children.

DESIGN

Publications in the scientific literature retrieved using a computerized Medline search from 1982-2002 and a manual review of article bibliographies. Studies comparing Doppler flow measurements with thermodilution, Fick, or dye dilution methods in the pediatric critical care setting were identified to assess the bias, precision, and intra- and interobserver repeatability of Doppler CO measurement. Where results were not suitable for comparison and the original measurements available, data were re-analyzed using appropriate statistical methods and presented in comparative tables.

RESULTS

The precision of pediatric Doppler CO measurements compared to thermodilution, dye dilution, or Fick methods is around 30% and repeatability varies from less than 1% to 22%. Bias is generally less than 10% but varies considerably.

CONCLUSIONS

The bias, precision, and repeatability from study to study indicate that Doppler CO measurements are acceptably reproducible in children, with best results when used to track changes rather than absolute values, and using the transesophageal approach.

Measurement of cardiac output and tissue perfusion

Recent technologic innovations have allowed a greater scope for cardiac output measurement in critically ill children. There is a move toward both less invasive and continuous methods, several of which also offer novel measures of preload. Many of the new methods are still undergoing preliminary evaluation in the pediatric population and will be summarized in this article.

The hemodynamic effects of pediatric caudal anesthesia assessed by esophageal Doppler

Pediatric caudal anesthesia is an effective method with an infrequent complication rate. However, little is known about its cardiovascular consequences. Transesophageal Doppler, a noninvasive method, provides the opportunity for a reappraisal of the hemodynamic effects of this technique. After parental informed consent, we studied 10 children aged 2 mo to 5 yr who were scheduled for lower abdominal surgery. General anesthesia was induced using sevoflurane and was followed by the insertion of a transesophageal Doppler probe. Caudal anesthesia was performed using 1 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine. Hemodynamic variables were collected before and after caudal anesthesia. No complications arose during insertion of the probe. The mean time between the two sets of measurements was 15 min. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures were not modified by caudal anesthesia. Descending aortic blood flow increased significantly from 1.14 to 1.92 L/min. (P = 0.0002). Aortic ejection volume increased from 8.5 to 14.5 mL (P = 0.0002). Aortic vascular resistances decreased from 6279 to 3901 dynes. s(-1) x m(-5) (P = 0.005). Caudal anesthesia did not affect heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure but induced a significant increase in descending aortic blood flow.

IMPLICATIONS

Although pediatric caudal anesthesia does not alter heart rate nor arterial blood pressure, significant changes occur in regional blood flow distribution. Descending aortic blood flow increases significantly after caudal anesthesia, whereas lower body vascular resistances decrease.