DDDR pacing driven by contractility versus DDI pacing in vasovagal syncope: a multicenter, randomized study

Therapeutic options for neurocardiogenic syncope: a meta-analysis of randomised trials with and without blinding

BACKGROUND

Neurocardiogenic syncope is a common condition with significant associated psychological and physical morbidity. The effectiveness of therapeutic options for neurocardiogenic syncope beyond placebo remains uncertain.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the risk ratio (RR) of spontaneously recurring syncope following any therapeutic intervention. We also examined the effect of blinding on treatment efficacy. We identified all randomised trials which evaluated the effect of any pharmacological, device-based or supportive intervention on patients with a history of syncope. A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, PubMed databases and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials from 1950 to 25 April 2023. Event rates, their RRs and 95% CIs were calculated, and a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for each intervention. Data analysis was performed in R using RStudio.

RESULTS

We identified 47 eligible trials randomising 3518 patients. Blinded trials assessing syncope recurrence were neutral for beta blockers, fludrocortisone and conventional dual-chamber pacing but were favourable for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.63, p<0.001), midodrine (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94, p=0.016) and closed-loop stimulation (CLS) pacing (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.35, p<0.001). Unblinded trials reported significant benefits for all therapy categories other than beta blockers and consistently showed larger benefits than blinded trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Under blinded conditions, SSRIs, midodrine and CLS pacing significantly reduced syncope recurrence. Future trials for syncope should be blinded to avoid overestimating treatment effects.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022330148.

Pacing for Patients Suffering From Cardioinhibitory Vasovagal Syncope Using the Closed-Loop System

One in three vasovagal syncope (VVS) patients has syncopal recurrence after diagnosis, despite the standard recommendations for the avoidance of a recurrence, and one in five patients has more than one syncopal recurrence in the medium term. Given the high prevalence of VVS, there is a large population that continues to need effective treatment. There are numerous studies that use the implantable loop recorder (ILR) to document a cardioinhibitory response during VVS, with one study, ISSUE-3, demonstrating the efficacy of pacing using the rate-drop-response algorithm to trigger pacing and prevent syncopal recurrence in this population. There are more uncertainties in the studies that have used head-up tilt test (HUT) to select the population for pacing. We have recently performed the SPAIN randomized, controlled clinical trial using HUT to select the patients for pacing. The conclusion of the study was that, with the closed-loop system to introduce pacing, there was a significant reduction in the burden of syncope and a seven-fold increase in the time to first recurrence of syncope, which was greater than in the ISSUE-3 study. Since the completion of the SPAIN trial and its inclusion in the European guidelines, in our daily clinical practice, the use of this therapy is still recommended with caution in the context of the available literature, but it has increased our confidence in so doing. One in five patients with VVS needs treatment because of a high syncopal load. If an ILR is used to select the patients for pacing, the rate-drop-response algorithm can be recommended. In patients who have asystole on HUT, pacing with the closed-loop system has higher success and must now be considered as a tenable option for VVS patients.

Are treatments for vasovagal syncope effective? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Therapies used to treat vaso-vagal syncope (VVS) recurrence have not been proven effective in single studies.

METHODS

Comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases of published trials was done. Randomized or non-randomized studies, comparing the intervention of interest to control group(s), with the endpoint of spontaneous recurrence or syncope on head-up tilt test, were included. Data were extracted on an intention-to-treat basis. Study heterogeneity was analyzed by Cochran's Q statistics. A random-effect analysis was used.

RESULTS

α-adrenergic agonists were found effective (n=400, OR 0.19, CI 0.06-0.62, p<0.05) in preventing VVS recurrence. β-blockers were not found to be effective when only randomized studies comparing β-blockers to non-pharmacologic agents were assessed (9 studies, n=583, OR 0.48, CI 0.22-1.04, p=0.06). Tilt-training had no effect when only randomized studies were considered (4 studies, n=298, OR 0.47, CI 0.21-1.05, p=0.07). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found effective (n=131, OR 0.28, CI 0.10-0.74, p<0.05), though the analysis contained only 2 studies. Pacemakers were found effective in preventing syncope recurrence when all studies were analyzed (n=463, OR 0.13, CI 0.05-0.36, p<0.05). However, studies comparing active pacemaker to sensing mode only did not show benefit (3 studies, n=162, OR 0.45, CI 0.09-2.14, p=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis highlights the totality of evidence for commonly used medications used to treat VVS, and the requirement for larger, double-blind, placebo controlled trials with longer follow-up.

Drugs and pacemakers for vasovagal, carotid sinus and situational syncope

BACKGROUND

Neurally mediated reflex syncope is the most common cause of transient loss of consciousness. In patients not responding to non-pharmacological treatment, pharmacological or pacemaker treatment might be considered.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of pharmacological therapy and pacemaker implantation in patients with vasovagal syncope, carotid sinus syncope and situational syncope.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), PubMed (1950 until February 2008), EMBASE on OVID (1980 until February 2008) and CINAHL on EBSCOhost (1937 until February 2008). No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel randomized controlled trials and randomized cross-over trials of pharmacological treatment (beta-blockers, fludrocortisone, alpha-adrenergic agonists, selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors, ACE inhibitors, disopyramide, anticholinergic agents or salt tablets) or dual chamber pacemaker treatment. Studies were included if pharmacological or pacemaker treatment was compared with any form of standardised control treatment (standard treatment), placebo treatment, or (other) pharmacological or pacemaker treatment. We did not include non-randomized studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias. Using a standardised data extraction form, they extracted characteristics and results of the various studies. In a consensus meeting they discussed any disagreements that had occurred during data extraction. If no agreement could be reached, a third reviewer was asked to make a decision. Summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals of treatment effect were calculated using relative risks, rate ratios or weighted means differences depending on the type of outcome reported.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 46 randomized studies, 40 on vasovagal syncope and six on carotid sinus syncope. No studies on situational syncope matched the criteria for inclusion in our review. Studies in general were small with a median sample size of 42. A wide range of control treatments were used with 22 studies using a placebo arm. Blinding of patients and treating physicians was applied in eight studies. Results varied considerably between studies and between types of outcomes.For vasovagal syncope, the occurrence of syncope upon provocational head-up tilt testing was lower upon treatment with beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and anticholinergic agents compared to standard treatment. For carotid sinus syncope, the occurrence of syncope upon carotid sinus massage was lower on midodrine treatment compared to placebo treatment in one study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of any of the pharmacological or pacemaker treatments for vasovagal syncope and carotid sinus syncope. Larger studies using patient relevant outcomes are needed.

Implications of mechanism of bradycardia on response to pacing in patients with unexplained syncope

AIM

Asystole >3 s or sinus bradycardia with a ventricular rate <40 in association with complete heart block or sinus node dysfunction are considered to be Class 1 indications for permanent cardiac pacing. Nevertheless, these phenomena may be observed in symptomatic patients with neurocardiogenic syncope, who may not respond to pacing therapy. We hypothesized that the pattern of spontaneous bradycardia in symptomatic patients would distinguish patients with sinus node dysfunction or conduction system disease who would benefit from pacing from patients with neurally-mediated syncope who would derive lesser benefit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with symptomatic spontaneous bradycardia during long-term monitoring for unexplained syncope who underwent pacemaker implantation were classified according to the ISSUE classification system and followed for recurrent syncope. Follow-up included review of medical records, pacemaker clinic visits, and telephone interviews. Loop recorder tracings were reviewed to identify characteristics potentially predicting a favourable response to pacing. Thirty-three patients (21 male; age, 70 +/- 14) were followed for 3.56 +/- 1.71 years. Six patients had a recurrence of syncope during the follow-up. All patients with recurrent syncope despite pacing demonstrated a Type 1A (n = 5) or 1B (n = 1) pattern with gradual onset of bradycardia at baseline, suggesting a neurocardiogenic mechanism. There was no difference in the severity of bradycardia or duration of asystole in baseline loop recorded events in responding and non-responding patients. Multivariate analysis using stepwise logistic regression revealed that the ISSUE classification and the absence of structural heart disease were the only independent predictors of treatment failure of cardiac pacing in patients with spontaneous symptomatic bradycardia.

CONCLUSION

Patients with syncope associated with abrupt bradycardia displayed a better response to cardiac pacing therapy than those with gradual onset bradycardia.

The expectation effect and cardiac pacing for refractory vasovagal syncope

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of pacing for vasovagal syncope have shown conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether permanent pacemaker therapy prevents refractory vasovagal syncope.

METHODS

Randomized trials comparing pacemaker therapy with medical therapy, usual care, placebo, or different pacing algorithms in the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope were considered. The primary endpoint was first recurrence of syncope.

RESULTS

Nine randomized trials (2 double blind, 7 open label or single blind) were included. There was significant heterogeneity when all 9 trials were pooled (P=.0009 and I(2)=69.6%), reflecting methodological diversity in blinding and the nature of the control therapy. When pooled by trial methodology, heterogeneity was no longer apparent. Permanent pacing reduced the risk of recurrent syncope in unblinded studies (odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.22) and in studies comparing pacemaker algorithms (OR 0.04, 95% CI, 0.0 to 0.23). No effect was seen in double-blinded trials (OR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.70). Awareness that a permanent pacemaker was implanted and functional was associated with a significant 'expectation' effect, which itself reduced the risk of recurrent syncope (OR 0.16, 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.40, P=.0001). Results were similar when restricted to patients with a marked cardioinhibitory response on baseline tilt table testing.

CONCLUSION

The results of small, preliminary trials have overestimated the treatment effect of pacemakers due to a lack of blinding of physicians and patients. Blinded trials suggest that the apparent response is due to a strong expectation response to pacing.

Myocardial Contractility and Cardiac Filling Measured by Impedance Cardiography in Patients with Nitroglycerine-Induced Vasovagal Syncope

OBJECTIVE

Increased myocardial contractility and inadequate cardiac filling leading to activation of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex were proposed as possible triggering mechanisms of vasovagal syncope (VVS). In the present study noninvasive hemodynamic measurements were performed in order to examine the role of myocardial contractility and cardiac filling in pathogenesis of VVS.

METHODS

Hemodynamic parameters were measured during head-up tilt test (HUT) by impedance cardiography in 46 patients with unexplained syncope. Myocardial contractility was measured as index of contractility (IC), acceleration index (ACI), and ejection fraction (EF). Afterload was measured as systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and preload was expressed as end-diastolic index (EDI). Serial measurements were done 1 minute before HUT, during HUT at 1-minute intervals, and 1 minute after completion of HUT.

RESULTS

HUT was positive in 30 patients (10 men, 20 women, mean age 36 +/- 16 years) and negative in 16 patients (8 men, 8 women, mean age 31 +/- 14 years). No significant differences were observed between HUT(+) and HUT(-) groups in hemodynamic parameters at supine rest and during HUT until the development of syncope. SVRI was lower in HUT(+) than in HUT(-) group at syncope (122.7 + 66.3 vs 185.6 + 51.4 dyn sec cm(-5)/m2, P = 0.002) and after syncope (117.0 + 61.1 vs 198.0 + 95.7 dyn sec cm(-5)/m2, P = 0.007). ACI, IC, EF, and EDI did not differ between groups at syncope. After syncope EF was higher in HUT(+) group compared to HUT(-) group (59.2 + 6.1 vs 52.7 + 9.4%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The role of increased myocardial contractility and decreased cardiac filling is not confirmed in the present study.

Direct Comparison of a Contractility and Activity Pacemaker Sensor During Treadmill Exercise Testing

There are limited data about the chronotropic capacity of the peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) sensor. This study directly compared the chronotropic function from the PEA and the activity (ACT) sensor. The study included 18 patients (age 73 +/- 7 years) with > or = 75% pacemaker-driven heart rate (HR) and a PEA sensor and 11 healthy controls (age 67 +/- 7 years) underwent a chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP) exercise test with the pacemaker patients in VVIR mode after programming the sensors in the default setting with adjustment of the upper sensor rate as an age related maximum value (220-age). The ACT sensor was externally strapped on the thorax. Achieved exercise duration for the patients and controls was, respectively, 9.2 +/- 3 vs 18.4 +/- 4 minutes (P <0.001). The maximal achieved HR with the PEA sensor was 124 +/- 25 beats/min, versus the ACT with 140 +/- 23, versus the controls with 153 +/- 26 beats/min (P <0.001 between the groups). For the PEA, ACT, and controls, the time to peak HR was, respectively, 11 +/- 3, 7 +/- 3.6, and 18 +/- 4 (P <0.001 between groups) and HR after 10 minutes recovery was, respectively, 80 +/- 20, 65 +/- 15, and 82 +/- 4 beats/min (P <0.001 between groups). The PEA sensor functions hypochonotroop during exercise programmed as a single sensor system. It is, therefore, preferable to combine the PEA sensor with an activity-based sensor in a dual sensor system. Although both groups had normal left ventricular functions, the exercise capacity of pacemaker patients is significantly lower than in the controls.

Cardiac pacing for bradycardia support: Evidence-based approach to pacemaker selection and programming

The vast majority of pacemakers implanted in the United States for the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia are dual-chamber systems with a complex array of functions, such as rate responsiveness, dynamic atrioventricular delay, and automatic mode switching. Basic hemodynamic studies have convincingly demonstrated the superiority of maintaining atrioventricular synchrony. However, clinical trials have failed to demonstrate the impressive results expected based on physiologic data. The most recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that dual-chamber devices, when compared with single-chamber ventricular pacing, do not prevent mortality or stroke, and lead to an unexpectedly small reduction in heart failure hospitalizations. Although improvements in quality of life have not been consistently found when comparing ventricular-based versus atrial-based pacing, a reduction in the incidence of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in dual chamber-paced patients has been reported by most trials. Dual-chamber pacing has been reported to reduce pacemaker syndrome in US trials. The addition of rate modulation, in spite of attempting to replicate the normal response to exercise, has not shown a consistently positive impact on quality of life or treadmill time. The use of pacemakers for the treatment of vasovagal syncope is controversial. Adding dual-chamber sensing ability to current implanted defibrillators considerably reduces the number of inappropriate shocks but may increase mortality if not programmed to minimize ventricular stimulation.

Sleep Apnea:. A New Indication for Cardiac Pacing?

In the general adult population, prevalence of sleep apnea syndrome reaches 4% in men and 2% in women. Continuous positive airway pressure is the most efficient treatment. At the present time, although severe atrial bradycardias could occur during sleep apnea episodes, cardiac pacing has not been demonstrated as an efficient treatment for those bradycardias. Treating sleep apnea generally reduces the number of bradyarrhythmias. However, recent studies reported a beneficial effect of atrial pacing on the sleep apnea burden. The mechanisms rely on two phenomena: first to counteract nocturnal hypervagotonia, and second to treat heart failure. By increasing the heart rate, cardiac output improves, which mitigates pulmonary subedema. Consequently, stimulation of the pulmonary afferent vagal fibers is diminished, which reduces central sleep apnea incidence. During nocturnal hypervagotonia, snoring and obstructive apnea episodes are increased, mainly due to an excessive muscular relaxation of the upper airway area inducing cyclical substantial decreases in the airway caliper. In patients with a low heart rate, atrial pacing can counteract hypervagotonia by enhancing the sympathetic tone and modifying the degree of vigilance. Accordingly, in the near future, sleep apnea treatment might potentially rely on atrial pacing in bradycardic patients with hypervagotonia (with or without heart failure). The role of the physician would then be not only to diagnose sleep apnea, but also to identify potential responders to cardiac pacing.