Demonstrating the clinical and cost effectiveness of adhesion reduction strategies

Comparison of the preventive effect of colchicine versus diphenhydramine, prednisolone, and a combination therapy on intraperitoneal adhesion bands: an experimental study in rats

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal adhesion formation is an inevitable consequence of abnormal repair of the peritoneum following different peritoneal injuries of intra-abdominal operations with the subsequent morbidity that they represent. Vast efforts have been made to elucidate the cause and prevent the development of abdominal adhesions. The aim of our study is to compare the capability of colchicine versus diphenhydramine (DPH) and methylprednisolone (MP), and also prednisolone in adhesion prevention.

METHODS

Sixty-one male Wistar stock rats were divided into four groups. The first group attended as the control group. Groups 2, 3, and 4 received oral combination of MP + DPH solution (20 mg/kg), colchicine (0.02 mg/kg), and prednisolone (1 mg/ kg), respectively. Adhesion bands were induced by standardized abrasion of the peritoneum through a midline laparotomy. All rats were sacrificed on the 15^th-day post medication administration and the subjects underwent an exploratory laparotomy. The presence of adhesions was evaluated with the modified using Nair's classification.

RESULTS

The proportion of the control group with substantial adhesion bands (73.3%) was significantly higher than that of the MP + DPH (13.3%), colchicine (33.3%), and prednisolone (31.3%) groups. There were significant differences between the scores of the control and the MP + DPH, colchicine, and prednisolone groups (P = 0.001, 0.028, and 0.019, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference to favor colchicine against MP + DPH (P = 0.390) or MP + DPH against prednisolone (P = 0.394).

CONCLUSIONS

Both colchicine and combination of DPH + MP prevented postoperative abdominal adhesions separately in our study. However, the lowest adhesion formation rate was observed in the DPH + MP group, even lower than the prednisolone group.

Adhesions in abdomino-pelvic surgeries: A real economic impact?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the epidemiologic and economic burden related to adhesions and their complications for the French healthcare system.

DESIGN

A descriptive and economic retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Medicalized information system program (PMSI), national scale of costs.

PATIENTS

Female patients operated on to treat adhesions related complications in 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients with coded adhesiolysis acts were selected in order to identify the characteristics of Diagnosis related groups (DRG) and compare them with the general DRGs. Then, a sub-analysis on surgery types (laparoscopy or open procedures) was performed to evaluate impact adhesions development and Length of Stay. Lastly, direct costs of adhesions for the healthcare system were quantified based upon adhesiolysis acts coded as main diagnosis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

26.387 adhesiolysis procedures were listed in France in 2019 through 8 adhesiolysis acts regrouping open surgeries and laparoscopic procedures. Adhesiolysis was coded in up to 34% in some DRGs for laparoscopic procedures. 1551 (1461 studied in our study) surgeries have been realized in 2019 with main procedure: adhesiolysis. These surgeries were associated with an expense of €4 million for the healthcare system for rehospitalizations and reoperations only. Social costs such as sick leaves, drugs and other cares haven't been taken in consideration.

CONCLUSION

Adhesions related complications represent a massive burden for patients and an expensive problem for society. These difficulties may likely to be reduced by a broader use of antiadhesion barriers, at least in some targeted procedures.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of uterine fibroids: does HIFU significantly increase the risk of pelvic adhesions?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of pelvic adhesions in patients with uterine fibroids after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment, then analyze the influencing factors of pelvic adhesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2010 to March 2020, a total of 2619 patients with uterine fibroids underwent either hysterectomy, myomectomy, or cesarean section in Suining Central Hospital of Sichuan province. Of the 2619 patients, 810 were excluded because of a documented history of either pelvic infections, endometriosis, prior abdominopelvic surgery, or gynecological malignancies; 1809 patients were enrolled and the data were retrospectively assessed for the prevalence and patterns of pelvic adhesions. Among them, 96 patients with uterine fibroids had had prior HIFU treatment (HIFU group), 1713 patients had not had HIFU or surgical treatments (control group).

RESULTS

Among the 96 patients in the HIFU group, adhesions were detected in 42 patients, the incidence of pelvic adhesion being 43.75%; the 1713 patients in the control group, adhesions were detected in 619 patients, the prevalence of pelvic adhesion being 36.14%. No statistically significant difference in the incidence of adhesion between the two groups was observed (p = .132), no significant difference in location of pelvic adhesions between the two groups and no significant difference in the severity of adhesions between the two groups was observed (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results with limited numbers, we concluded that HIFU treatment did not significantly increase the risk of pelvic adhesions.

Efficacy and safety of Seprafilm for preventing intestinal obstruction after gastrointestinal neoplasms surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

It was controversial that hyaluronate-carboxy-methylcellulose-based membrane (Seprafilm) could prevent intestinal obstruction after gastrointestinal neoplasms operation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Seprafilm in preventing postoperative intestinal obstruction of gastrointestinal neoplasms patients.

METHODS

A systematic research of multiple databases was performed to identify relevant studies, and the studies satisfying the inclusion criteria were included. Risk ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

2937 patients from 10 studies who were enrolled in this meta-analysis were divided into the Seprafilm group (n = 1334) and the control group (n = 1603). The Seprafilm group had lower incidence of intestinal obstruction (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.70; p < .0001), reoperation rates due to intestinal obstruction (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28 - 0.80; p = .005), incidence of overall complications (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97; p = .03) and higher serum creatinine on postoperative day 5 (WMD, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.25; p = .003). There were no differences regarding time to intestinal obstruction after operation, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, white blood cell count results on day 5 and 7, serum creatinine on day 7, hospital stay, and incidence of intra-abdominal infection, wound infection, anastomotic leakage between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provided valuable evidence-based support for the efficacy and safety of Seprafilm in preventing postoperative intestinal obstruction of gastrointestinal neoplasms patients. However, more multicenter randomized controlled trials from different countries are needed.

Impact of past surgical history on perioperative outcomes in gynecologic surgery

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if past surgical history is associated with perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single, tertiary, academic health system of women who underwent hysterectomy from May 2016 - May 2017. Past surgical history (PSH) involving any abdominal or pelvic surgery, baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected. For purposes of analyses, PSH was defined using three algorithms: 1) any prior abdominopelvic surgery, 2) having had abdominopelvic surgeries likely to cause adhesive disease, 3) anatomic location of prior PSH (none; pelvic; abdominal; or abdominal+pelvic). Descriptive, bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

1256 patients underwent hysterectomy. In adjusted analyses, PSH defined by any prior abdominopelvic surgery was associated with length of stay (LOS) (2.1 days (95%CI 1.9, 2.2) vs. 1.8 (95%CI 1.6, 2.0), (p=0.02)). PSH of procedures likely to cause adhesive disease was associated with greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (243.2 mL (95%CI 208.1, 278.3) vs. 189.0 (95%CI 1734, 204.7), (p=0.01)), longer LOS (2.5 days (95%CI 2.2, 2.8) vs. 1.9 (95%CI 1.7, 2.0), (p<0.01)), and more readmissions (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.3, 4.5) (p<0.01). PSH defined by anatomic location revealed a trend (p=0.07) towards greater EBL in those with prior pelvic or abdominal+pelvic surgery compared to none or abdominal only, whereas LOS, readmissions and operative times did not differ. Increased total number of prior open surgeries was associated with operative time (p<0.0001), EBL (p<0.0001), hospital LOS (p<0.0001) and readmission (p=0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior abdominopelvic surgery is associated with worse perioperative outcome measures in women undergoing hysterectomy.

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery

BACKGROUND

Adhesions are fibrin bands that are a common consequence of gynaecological surgery. They are caused by conditions that include pelvic inflammatory disease and endometriosis. Adhesions are associated with comorbidities, including pelvic pain, subfertility, and small bowel obstruction. Adhesions also increase the likelihood of further surgery, causing distress and unnecessary expenses. Strategies to prevent adhesion formation include the use of fluid (also called hydroflotation) and gel agents, which aim to prevent healing tissues from touching one another, or drugs, aimed to change an aspect of the healing process, to make adhesions less likely to form.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fluid and pharmacological agents on rates of pain, live births, and adhesion prevention in women undergoing gynaecological surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Epistemonikos to 22 August 2019. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials investigating the use of fluid (including gel) and pharmacological agents to prevent adhesions after gynaecological surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence using GRADE methods. Outcomes of interest were pelvic pain; live birth rates; incidence of, mean, and changes in adhesion scores at second look-laparoscopy (SLL); clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy rates; quality of life at SLL; and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 trials (3492 women), and excluded 11. We were unable to include data from nine studies in the statistical analyses, but the findings of these studies were broadly in keeping with the findings of the meta-analyses. Hydroflotation agents versus no hydroflotation agents (10 RCTs) We are uncertain whether hydroflotation agents affected pelvic pain (odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52 to 2.09; one study, 226 women; very low-quality evidence). It is unclear whether hydroflotation agents affected live birth rates (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.58; two studies, 208 women; low-quality evidence) compared with no treatment. Hydroflotation agents reduced the incidence of adhesions at SLL when compared with no treatment (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.55, four studies, 566 women; high-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that in women with an 84% chance of having adhesions at SLL with no treatment, using hydroflotation agents would result in 54% to 75% having adhesions. Hydroflotation agents probably made little or no difference to mean adhesion score at SLL (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.06, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.09; four studies, 722 women; moderate-quality evidence). It is unclear whether hydroflotation agents affected clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.14; three studies, 310 women; moderate-quality evidence) compared with no treatment. This suggests that in women with a 26% chance of clinical pregnancy with no treatment, using hydroflotation agents would result in a clinical pregnancy rate of 11% to 28%. No studies reported any adverse events attributable to the intervention. Gel agents versus no treatment (12 RCTs) No studies in this comparison reported pelvic pain or live birth rate. Gel agents reduced the incidence of adhesions at SLL compared with no treatment (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.57; five studies, 147 women; high-quality evidence). This suggests that in women with an 84% chance of having adhesions at SLL with no treatment, the use of gel agents would result in 39% to 75% having adhesions. It is unclear whether gel agents affected mean adhesion scores at SLL (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -1.09 to 0.09; four studies, 159 women; moderate-quality evidence), or clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02 to 2.02; one study, 30 women; low-quality evidence). No studies in this comparison reported on adverse events attributable to the intervention. Gel agents versus hydroflotation agents when used as an instillant (3 RCTs) No studies in this comparison reported pelvic pain, live birth rate or clinical pregnancy rate. Gel agents probably reduce the incidence of adhesions at SLL when compared with hydroflotation agents (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.83; three studies, 538 women; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that in women with a 46% chance of having adhesions at SLL with a hydroflotation agent, the use of gel agents would result in 21% to 41% having adhesions. We are uncertain whether gel agents improved mean adhesion scores at SLL when compared with hydroflotation agents (MD -0.79, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.76; one study, 77 women; very low-quality evidence). No studies in this comparison reported on adverse events attributable to the intervention. Steroids (any route) versus no steroids (4 RCTs) No studies in this comparison reported pelvic pain, incidence of adhesions at SLL or mean adhesion score at SLL. It is unclear whether steroids affected live birth rates compared with no steroids (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.62; two studies, 223 women; low-quality evidence), or clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.55; three studies, 410 women; low-quality evidence). No studies in this comparison reported on adverse events attributable to the intervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Gels and hydroflotation agents appear to be effective adhesion prevention agents for use during gynaecological surgery, but we found no evidence indicating that they improve fertility outcomes or pelvic pain, and further research is required in this area. It is also worth noting that for some comparisons, wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect meant that clinical harm as a result of interventions could not be excluded. Future studies should measure outcomes in a uniform manner, using the modified American Fertility Society score. Statistical findings should be reported in full. No studies reported any adverse events attributable to intervention.

Chinese expert consensus on the prevention of abdominal pelvic adhesions after gynecological tumor surgeries

Adhesion is a postoperative complication that has plagued gynecologists for many years, as 60-90% of gynecological patients develop adhesions after abdominopelvic surgeries. Abdominopelvic adhesions could lead to chronic pelvic pain, infertility, intestinal obstruction, and complicated reoperations. Adhesions might also increase the risk of postoperative chemoradiotherapy failure and endanger patients' lives, especially after surgeries for gynecological malignant tumors. The aim of this consensus was to review the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of adhesions and to summarize various surgical procedures and preventive measures that can reduce the occurrence of adhesions after gynecological tumor surgeries based on a discussion among well-known domestic gynecology specialists.

Cost-effectiveness of the prevention of adhesions and adhesive small bowel obstruction after colorectal surgery with adhesion barriers: a modelling study

Background

Adhesion barriers have proven to reduce adhesion-related complications in colorectal surgery. However, barriers are seldom applied. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of adhesion barriers in colorectal surgery.

Methods

A decision-tree model was developed to compare cost-effectiveness of no adhesion barrier with the use of an adhesion barrier in open and laparoscopic surgery. Outcomes were incidence of clinical consequences of adhesions, direct healthcare costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per adhesion prevented. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

Adhesion barriers reduce adhesion incidence and incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in open and laparoscopic surgery. Adhesion barriers in open surgery reduce costs compared to no adhesion barrier ($4376 versus $4482). Using an adhesion barrier in laparoscopic procedures increases costs by $162 ($4482 versus $4320). The ICER in the laparoscopic cohort was $123. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed 66% and 41% probabilities of an adhesion barrier reducing costs for open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery, respectively.

Conclusion

The use of adhesion barriers in open colorectal surgery is cost-effective in preventing adhesion-related problems. In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, an adhesion barrier is effective at low costs.

Marine-derived collagen biomaterials from echinoderm connective tissues

The use of marine collagens is a hot topic in the field of tissue engineering. Echinoderms possess unique connective tissues (Mutable Collagenous Tissues, MCTs) which can represent an innovative source of collagen to develop collagen barrier-membranes for Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR). In the present work we used MCTs from different echinoderm models (sea urchin, starfish and sea cucumber) to produce echinoderm-derived collagen membranes (EDCMs). Commercial membranes for GTR or soluble/reassembled (fibrillar) bovine collagen substrates were used as controls. The three EDCMs were similar among each other in terms of structure and mechanical performances and were much thinner and mechanically more resistant than the commercial membranes. Number of fibroblasts seeded on sea-urchin membranes were comparable to the bovine collagen substrates. Cell morphology on all EDCMs was similar to that of structurally comparable (reassembled) bovine collagen substrates. Overall, echinoderms, and sea urchins particularly, are alternative collagen sources to produce efficient GTR membranes. Sea urchins display a further advantage in terms of eco-sustainability by recycling tissues from food wastes.

Risk factors for future repeat abdominal surgery

PURPOSE

Today, 40 to 66 % of elective procedures in abdominal surgery are reoperations. Reoperations show increased operative time and risk for intraoperative and postoperative complications, mainly due to the need to perform adhesiolysis. It is important to understand which patients will require repeat surgery for optimal utilization and implementation of anti-adhesive strategies. Our aim is to assess the incidence and identify risk factors for repeat abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This is the long-term follow-up of a prospective cohort study (Laparotomy or Laparoscopy and Adhesions (LAPAD) study; clinicaltrials.gov NCT01236625). Patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were included. Primary outcome was future repeat abdominal surgery and was defined as any operation where the peritoneal cavity is reopened. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Six hundred four (88 %) out of 715 patients were included; median duration of follow-up was 46 months. One hundred sixty (27 %) patients required repeat abdominal surgery and underwent a total of 234 operations. The indication for repeat surgery was malignant disease recurrence in 49 (21 %), incisional hernia in 41 (18 %), and indications unrelated to the index surgery in 58 (25 %) operations. Older age (OR 0.98; p 0.002) and esophageal malignancy (OR 0.21; p 0.034) significantly reduced the risk of undergoing repeat abdominal surgery. Female sex (OR 1.53; p 0.046) and hepatic malignancy as indication for surgery (OR 2.08; p 0.049) significantly increased the risk of requiring repeat abdominal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

One in four patients will require repeat surgery within 4 years after elective abdominal surgery. Lower age, female sex, and hepatic malignancy are significant risk factors for requiring repeat abdominal surgery.

Adhesive small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is considered that laparoscopic surgery is associated with a much lower rate of postoperative formation of adhesions than open surgery. This meta-analysis assessed the incidence of adhesion-related readmissions and surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Multiple comprehensive databases were searched systematically to identify relevant studies and meta-analysis was done.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed that laparoscopic surgery was associated with a lower rate of adhesive SBO, both for randomized clinical trials (relative risk [RR] .26, 95% confidence interval [CI] .10 to .67, I(2)=41%) and nonrandomized studies (RR .49, 95% CI .32 to .76, I(2)=91%). Laparoscopic surgery was also associated with a lower rate of subsequent surgery for adhesive SBO, both for randomized clinical trials (RR .25, 95% CI .06 to .96, I(2)=0%) and nonrandomized studies (RR .56, 95% CI .33 to .94, I(2)=77%).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery significantly reduced the rates of adhesive SBO and subsequent surgery for adhesive SBO, compared with open surgery.

Epidemiology and Prevention of Postsurgical Adhesions Revisited

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of recent epidemiologic data on the burden of adhesion-related complications and adhesion prevention. Second, we elaborate on economic considerations for the application of antiadhesion barriers.

BACKGROUND

Because the landmark SCAR studies elucidated the impact of adhesions on readmissions for long-term complications of abdominal surgery, adhesions are widely recognized as one of the most common causes for complications after abdominal surgery. Concurrently, interest in adhesion prevention revived and several new antiadhesion barriers were developed. Although these barriers have now been around for more than a decade, adhesion prevention is still seldom applied.

METHODS

The first part of this article is a narrative review evaluating the results of recent epidemiological studies on adhesion-related complications and adhesion prevention. In part II, these epidemiological data are translated into a cost model of adhesion-related complications and the potential cost-effectiveness of antiadhesion barriers is explored.

RESULTS

New epidemiologic data warrant a shift in our understanding of the socioeconomic burden of adhesion-related complications and the indications for adhesion prevention strategies. Increasing evidence from cohort studies and systematic reviews shows that difficulties during reoperations, rather than small bowel obstructions, account for the majority of adhesion-related morbidity. Laparoscopy and antiadhesion barriers have proven to reduce adhesion formation and related morbidity. The direct health care costs associated with treatment of adhesion-related complications within the first 5 years after surgery are $2350 following open surgery and $970 after laparoscopy. Costs are about 50% higher in fertile-age female patients. Application of an antiadhesion barriers could save between $328 and $680 after open surgery. After laparoscopy, the costs impact ranges from $82 in expenses to $63 of savings.

CONCLUSIONS

Adhesions are an important cause for long-term complications in both open and laparoscopic surgery. Adhesiolysis during reoperations seems to impact adhesion-related morbidity most. Routine application of antiadhesion barriers in open surgery is safe and cost-effective. Application of antiadhesion barriers can be cost-effective in selected cases of laparoscopy. More research is needed to develop barriers suitable for laparoscopic use.

The incidence and risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Early postoperative small bowel obstruction is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality but has not been well documented in the era of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer were studied.

RESULTS

In total, 1787 patients (105 with and 1682 without early postoperative small bowel obstruction) with colorectal cancer requiring laparoscopic colorectal surgery were evaluated in this study. Ten patients (0.56% among the total patient population, 9.5% among patients who experienced early postoperative small bowel obstruction) who did not respond to conservative treatment for more than 14 days required surgical intervention. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.27), combined operation (AOR=2.23), and diverting stoma (AOR=4.79) were associated with a higher early postoperative small bowel obstruction rate. For factors related to surgical difficulty, open conversion (AOR=2.85), blood transfusion (AOR=3.51), and an operation time longer than 180 minutes (AOR=1.91) were independent factors associated with an increased early postoperative small bowel obstruction rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Early postoperative small bowel obstruction following laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer occurred in 5.9% of patients. Factors for predicting the development of early postoperative small bowel obstruction in patients with colorectal cancer are variables reflective of a more difficult surgery, rather than pathologic disease severity or anatomical location. In addition, most patients with early postoperative small bowel obstruction improved with conservative treatment, and surgical treatment was rarely needed.

Adhesion prevention agents for gynaecological surgery: an overview of Cochrane reviews

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal adhesions are associated with considerable co-morbidity and have large financial and public health repercussions. They have secondary effects that include chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, subfertility and bowel obstruction. In women with adhesions, subsequent surgery is more difficult, often takes longer, and is associated with a higher complication rate (Broek 2013). The significant burden of adhesions has led to the development of several anti-adhesion agents, although there is disagreement as to their relative effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise evidence derived from Cochrane systematic reviews on the clinical safety and effectiveness of solid agents, gel agents, liquid agents and pharmacological agents, used as adjuvants to prevent formation of adhesions after gynaecological pelvic surgery.

METHODS

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched using the keyword 'adhesion' up to August 2014. The Cochrane information management system was also searched for any titles or protocols of reviews in progress. Two review authors independently extracted information from the reviews, with disagreements being resolved by a third review author. The quality of the included reviews was described in a narrative manner, and the AMSTAR tool was used to formally assess each review included in this overview. The quality of evidence provided in the original reviews was described using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two reviews, one with 18 studies comparing solid agents (oxidised regenerated cellulose expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose, and fibrin sheets) with control or with each other. The other review included 29 studies which compared liquid agents (4% icodextrin, 32% dextran, crystalloids), gel agents (carboxymethylcellulose and polyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycol gels, hyaluronic acid based gel, 0.5% ferric hyaluronate gel, sodium hyaluronate spray) and pharmacological agents (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, reteplase plasminogen activator, N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan, steroid agents, intraperitoneal noxytioline, intraperitoneal heparin, systemic promethazine) with control or each other. Both reviews met all of the criteria of the AMSTAR assessment.The reviews included as outcomes both the primary outcomes of this overview (pelvic pain, pregnancy, live birth rate and quality of life (QoL)) and our secondary outcomes (adverse effects, presence or absence of adhesions at second-look laparoscopy (SLL) and adhesion score). However, neither of the reviews identified any primary studies of solid, gel or pharmacological agents that reported any of our primary outcomes. The only studies in either review that reported any of our primary outcomes were studies comparing liquid agents versus control (saline or Hartmann's solution), which reported pelvic pain (two studies), live birth (two studies) and pregnancy (three studies).An external source of funding was stated for 25 of the 47 studies across both reviews; in 24 of these studies the funding was commercial. Solid agents (18 studies)None of our primary outcomes were reported. Adverse events were reported as an outcome by only 9 of the 18 studies. These reported no adverse events. Liquid agents (nine studies)There was no evidence of a difference between liquid agents and control (saline or Hartmann's solution) with respect to pelvic pain (odds ratio (OR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 1.14, 1 study, n = 286, moderate quality evidence), pregnancy rate (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.14, 3 studies, n = 310, moderate quality evidence) or live birth rate (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.58, 2 studies, n = 208, moderate quality evidence). No studies of liquid agents reported QoL. Adverse events were not reported as an outcome by any of the nine studies. Gel agents (seven studies)None of our primary outcomes were reported. Adverse events were not reported as an outcome by any of the seven studies. Pharmacological agents (seven studies)None of our primary outcomes were reported. Adverse events were reported as an outcome by only one of the seven primary studies. This study reported no evidence of difference in ectopic pregnancy rates between intraperitoneal noxytioline and no treatment (OR 4.91, 95% CI 0.45 to 53.27, 1 study, n = 33, low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to allow us to draw any conclusions about the effectiveness and safety of anti-adhesion agents in gynaecological surgery, due to the lack of data on pelvic pain, fertility outcomes, quality of life or safety. A substantial proportion of research in this field has been funded by private companies that manufacture these agents, and further high powered, independent trials will be needed before definitive conclusions can be made.

Safety and efficacy of postoperative continuous intra-peritoneal wash with lactated Ringer's for minimizing post-myomectomy pelvic adhesions: a pilot clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety of post-operative intra-peritoneal wash with lactated Ringer's for 48h after myomectomy in reduction of adhesions compared to routine intra-operative irrigation. Study design A prospective, randomized trial that included 52 eligible participants who had undergone abdominal myomectomy. Participants were randomly allocated to a treatment group (n=26) which was subjected to continuous peritoneal wash for 48h via two intraperitoneal drains, and a control group (n=26). The incidence of de novo adhesions and their severity and extent were scored at a second-look laparoscopy 8-10 weeks postoperatively. Adhesions were graded using the local adhesion barrier scoring system score. Adverse effects were also assessed and reported.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in duration of hospital stay or in the incidence of adverse events. A significantly higher proportion of adhesion-free patients was found in the treatment group [11/23, 47.8%] compared to the control group [4/21, 19%] (P<0.01). The mean number of pelvic sites covered by adhesions was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (2.2±0.3 versus 4.6±0.8, P<0.05). The total adhesion score was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (2.1±0.5 versus 4.8±1.4, P<0.05) and the adhesion score was significantly lower at most of the individual anatomical sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of postoperative intraperitoneal wash with lactated Ringer's solution for 48h may have reasonable safety and efficacy in minimizing postoperative pelvic de novo adhesions following abdominal myomectomy.

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery

BACKGROUND

Adhesions are fibrin bands that are a common consequence of gynaecological surgery. They are caused by various conditions including pelvic inflammatory disease and endometriosis. Adhesions are associated with considerable co-morbidity, including pelvic pain, subfertility and small bowel obstruction. Patients may require further surgery-a fact that has financial implications.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of fluid and pharmacological agents used as adjuvants in preventing formation of adhesions after gynaecological surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

The following databases were searched up to April 2014: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PsycINFO. Studies involving hydroflotation, gel and such pharmacological agents as steroids, noxytioline, heparin, promethazine, N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists were evaluated.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials investigating the use of fluid and pharmacological agents to prevent adhesions after gynaecological surgery. Gels were defined as fluid agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs) or standard mean differences (SMDs) as appropriate, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-nine trials were included (3227 participants), and nine were excluded. One study examined pelvic pain and found no evidence of a difference between use of hydroflotation agents and no treatment. We found no evidence that any of the antiadhesion agents significantly affected the live birth rate. When gels were compared with no treatment or with hydroflotation agents at second-look laparoscopy (SLL), fewer participants who received a gel showed a worsening adhesion score when compared with those who received no treatment (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.57, P value 0.005, two studies, 58 women, I(2) = 0%, moderate-quality evidence) and with those given hydroflotation agents (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.66, P value 0.003, two studies, 342 women, I(2) = 0%, high-quality evidence). Participants who received steroids were less likely to have a worsening adhesion score (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.58, P value 0.0008, two studies, 182 women, I(2) = 0%, low-quality evidence). Participants were less likely to have adhesions at SLL if they received a hydroflotation agent or gel than if they received no treatment (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.55, P value < 0.00001, four studies, 566 participants, I(2) = 0%, high-quality evidence; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.56, P value 0.0006, four studies, 134 women, I(2) = 0%, high-quality evidence, respectively). When gels were compared with hydroflotation agents, participants who received a gel were less likely to have adhesions at SLL than those who received a hydroflotation agent (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.67, P value 0.001, two studies, 342 women, I(2) = 0%, high-quality evidence). No studies evaluated quality of life. In all studies apart from one, investigators stated that they were going to assess serious adverse outcomes associated with treatment agents, and no adverse effects were reported.Results suggest that for a woman with a 77% risk of developing adhesions without treatment, the risk of developing adhesions after use of a gel would be between 26% and 65%. For a woman with an 83% risk of worsening of adhesions after no treatment at initial surgery, the chance when a gel is used would be between 16% and 73%. Similarly, for hydroflotation fluids for a woman with an 84% chance of developing adhesions with no treatment, the risk of developing adhesions when hydroflotation fluid is used would be between 53% and 73%.Several of the included studies could not be included in a meta-analysis: The findings of these studies broadly agreed with the findings of the meta-analyses.The quality of the evidence, which was assessed using the GRADE approach, ranged from low to high. The main reasons for downgrading of evidence included imprecision (small sample sizes and wide confidence intervals) and poor reporting of study methods.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Gels and hydroflotation agents appear to be effective adhesion prevention agents for use during gynaecological surgery, but no evidence indicates that they improve fertility outcomes or pelvic pain, and further research is required in this area. Future studies should measure outcomes in a uniform manner, using the modified American Fertility Society (mAFS) score. Statistical findings should be reported in full.

Minimal-access colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe national intermediate-term admission rates for incisional hernia or clinically apparent adhesions following colorectal surgery, and to compare rates following laparoscopic and open approaches.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary colorectal resection between 2002 and 2008 were included from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Subsequent inpatient admissions were extracted for up to 3 years after the initial operation or to the end of the study period. Outcomes examined were admissions with a diagnosis of, or operative interventions for, incisional hernia or adhesions.

RESULTS

A total of 187 148 patients were included between 2002 and 2008, with median follow-up of 31·8 (interquartile range 13·1-35·3) months. Some 8885 (4·7 per cent) of these patients were admitted with a diagnosis of, or underwent a repair of, an incisional hernia. In multiple regression analysis, use of laparoscopy was not a predictor of operative intervention for incisional hernia (odds ratio 1·09, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·99 to 1·21; P = 0·083). Some 15 125 (8·1 per cent) of the patients were admitted with a diagnosis of adhesions or had a procedure for division of adhesions. Overall, 3·5 per cent (6637 of 187 148) of patients underwent adhesiolysis. Patients selected for a laparoscopic procedure had lower rates of admission for adhesions (6·3 per cent (692 of 11 013) for laparoscopic versus 8·2 per cent (14 433 of 176 135) for open surgery; P < 0·001) and reintervention for adhesions (2·8 per cent (305 of 11 013) versus 3·6 per cent (6325 of 176 135) respectively; P < 0·001) than those undergoing an open procedure. In multiple regression analysis, patients selected for a laparoscopic procedure had lower subsequent intervention rates for adhesions (odds ratio 0·80, 95 per cent c.i. 0·71 to 0·90; P < 0·001).

DISCUSSION

Patients undergoing colorectal resection who are selected for the laparoscopic approach have a lower risk of developing clinically significant adhesions.

Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological surgery: the 2012 European field guideline

Postoperative adhesions have become the most common complication of open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery and a source of major concern because of their potentially dramatic consequences. The proposed guideline is the beginning of a major campaign to enhance the awareness of adhesions and to provide surgeons with a reference guide to adhesion prevention adapted to the conditions of their daily practice. The risk of postoperative adhesions should be systematically discussed with any patient scheduled for open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery prior to obtaining her informed consent. Surgeons should adopt a routine adhesion reduction strategy with good surgical technique. Anti-adhesion agents are an additional option, especially in procedures with a high risk of adhesion formation, such as ovarian, endometriosis and tubal surgery and myomectomy. We conclude that good surgical practice is paramount to reduce adhesion formation and that anti-adhesion agents may contribute to adhesion prevention in certain cases.

Is Patient Education About Adhesions a Requirement in Abdominopelvic Surgery?

Background: Over the past decades, our knowledge and understanding of adhesions and adhesion-related complications has increasingly grown and it has become evident that adhesions have significant implications for patients, physicians and the healthcare system. The question arises whether this has resulted in greater awareness of adhesion-related problems among practicing physicians and appropriate patient education on this topic in daily practice. The following article provides a brief overview of the important subject of adhesions, discusses current awareness of adhesions among patients and doctors and addresses the consequences of failure to provide patient education and consent from a medical perspective. Methods: Selective literature searches were conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. A patient information and consent form was developed based on several years' experience and expertise in the field of adhesions. Results: Adhesions are the most common type of complication in abdominopelvic surgery today, with devastating consequences for some patients. Surveys investigating the awareness of adhesions among physicians and patients clearly showed that even well-informed physicians fail to educate their patients adequately. Such failure could potentially lead to successful medical malpractice lawsuits against doctors. Conclusion: Considering their clear clinical impact, adhesions and related consequences should always be discussed with patients preoperatively. A newly developed consent form that specifically addresses adhesion formation may serve to thoroughly educate patients preoperatively and to adequately document the process of doing so.

[Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery: II. How can they be prevented?]

This paper is the second of a two-part publication. The initial paper provided a comprehensive overview of the evidence on adhesions to allow gynaecological surgeons to be best informed on adhesions, their development, impact on patients, health systems and surgical outcomes. There is rising evidence that surgeons can take important steps to reduce the burden of adhesions. In this second paper, we review the various strategies to reduce the impact of adhesions, improve surgical outcomes and provide some practical proposals for action on adhesions. As well as improvements in surgical technique, developments in adhesion-reduction strategies and new agents offer a realistic possibility of reducing adhesion formation and improving outcomes for patients. They should be considered for use particularly in high-risk surgery and in patients with adhesiogenic conditions. Further research into new strategies to prevent adhesions more effectively through an improved surgical environment, new and combination devices and pharmacological agents should be encouraged. Formal recommendations would ensure better prioritisation of adhesion-reduction within the French health system. Patients should also be better informed of the risks of adhesions.

[Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery: I. What should you know?]

Adhesions are the most frequent complications of abdominopelvic surgery, causing important short- and long-term problems, including infertility, chronic pelvic pain and a lifetime risk of small bowel obstruction. They also complicate future surgery with increased morbidity and mortality risk. They pose serious quality of life issues for many patients with associated social and healthcare costs. Despite advances in surgical techniques, including laparoscopy, the healthcare burden of adhesion-related complications has not changed in recent years. Adhesiolysis remains the main treatment although adhesions reform in many patients. The extent of the problem of adhesions has been underestimated by surgeons and the health authorities. There is rising evidence however that surgeons can take important steps to reduce the impact of adhesions. As well as improvements in surgical technique, developments in adhesion-reduction strategies and new agents offer a realistic possibility of reducing adhesion formation and improving outcomes for patients. This paper is the first of a two-part publication providing a comprehensive overview of the evidence on adhesions to allow gynaecological surgeons to be best informed on adhesions, their development, impact on patients, health systems and surgical outcomes. In the second paper we review the various strategies to reduce the impact of adhesions and improve surgical outcomes to assist fellow surgeons in France to consider the adoption of adhesion reduction strategies in their own practice.

A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery

Background

Adhesions lead to considerable patient morbidity and are a mounting burden on surgeons and the health care system alike. Although adhesion formation is the most frequent complication in abdominal and pelvic surgery, many surgeons are still not aware of the extent of the problem. To provide the best care for their patients, surgeons should consistently inform themselves of anti-adhesion strategies and include these methods in their daily routine.

Methods

Searches were conducted in PubMed and The Cochrane Library to identify relevant literature.

Findings

Various complications are associated with adhesion formation, including small bowel obstruction, infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Increasingly, an understanding of adhesion formation as a complex process influenced by many different factors has led to various conceivable anti-adhesion strategies. At present, a number of different anti-adhesion agents are available. Although some agents have proved effective in reducing adhesion formation in randomised controlled trials, none of them can completely prevent adhesion formation.

Conclusion

To fulfil our duty to provide best possible care for our patients, it is now time to regard adhesions as the most common complication in surgery. Further research is needed to fully understand adhesion formation and to develop new strategies for adhesion prevention. Large clinical efficacy trials of anti-adhesion agents will make it easier for surgeons to decide which agent to use in daily routine.

Topic update: effects of colorectal cancer treatments on female fertility and potential methods for fertility preservation

PURPOSE

Preservation of fertility in young females with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer is gaining increasing importance as survival rates of cancer increase. This review examines the effects of pelvic surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy on fecundity. It also discusses the options available to patients including ovarian transposition, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, embryo and ovarian cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue transplantation.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library was performed using keywords and exploded Mesh search headings and the subsequent articles were reviewed. Relevant studies were included.

RESULTS

There are no studies that examine the effect of surgery for colorectal cancer on female fertility, in particular, surgery below the peritoneal reflection for rectal cancer. However, patients with familial adenomatous polyposis have a similar fecundity before and after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. These patients did significantly better than patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent the same procedure. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of open vs laparoscopic surgery on fertility. Oxaliplatin, an adjuvant therapy, has moderate gonadotoxic effects. Fluorouracil is considered to have almost no effect on human reproductive function. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are currently used to preserve female fecundity during chemotherapy. A recent update of patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma showed that significantly fewer women treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during chemotherapy exhibited premature ovarian failure. Ovarian transposition reduces the radiation dose to approximately 5% to 10% of the dose to the ovaries in their normal position. Other options are available to women with cancer who wish to preserve their germ line, including embryo and oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.

CONCLUSION

Significant advances are now allowing females to preserve their fertility after cancer treatment. It is essential that patients receive adequate fertility counseling before any intervention to give them an opportunity to consider fertility alternatives.

Risk factors for early postoperative small bowel obstruction after colectomy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) after colectomy leads to markedly lower patient quality of life, longer hospital stays, and increased hospitalization costs. From a systemic treatment point of view, early postoperative SBO is one of the major concerns of the surgery because it often delays chemotherapy in advanced cases. The goal of this single-center study was to evaluate the risk factors for early postoperative SBO.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for 1,004 patients who underwent open colectomy (OC, 421 patients) or laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC, 583 patients) for colorectal cancer between January 1997 and December 2008.

RESULTS

The overall early postoperative SBO were 45 cases (4.5%). Univariate analysis of the risk factors for early postoperative SBO showed no statistical significance between respective risk factors and occurrence of SBO for age >70 years, body mass index >25 kg/m(2), ASA score > or =3, pT stage T4, pN stage > or =N1, pM stage M1, or increased blood loss. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that OC (odds ratio (OR), 2.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34-5.13; P = 0.005), and rectal cancer (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P = 0.025) were independent risk factors for postoperative SBO after colectomy for colorectal cancer. Regarding the causes of SBO, paralytic obstruction was more frequent in the LAC group, and adhesive obstruction was more frequent in the OC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early postoperative SBO cases are more likely to occur with OC and rectal cancer. LAC is an effective surgical procedure from the perspective of reducing the incidence of early postoperative SBO after colectomy for colorectal cancer.

Low documentation of postoperative adhesions on consent forms for laparotomy

AIM

To assess the documentation of postoperative adhesions as a potential complication of laparotomy on consent forms.

METHOD

Retrospective study of hospital notes of 102 adult patients that underwent laparotomy over a two year period.

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal adhesions were documented as a postoperative risk on 10 consent forms (9.8%) only.

CONCLUSION

The results imply that most patients were not informed of this common postoperative complication and this may have medicolegal and risk management implications.

Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial

BACKGROUND

This study investigated adhesive intestinal obstruction (AIO) and incisional hernia (IH) in patients undergoing laparoscopically assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

In a case-note review of patients randomized to the Medical Research Council's Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer (CLASICC) trial, primary and key secondary endpoints were AIO and IH admission rates respectively.

RESULTS

Of 411 patients, 11 were admitted for AIO: four (3.1 per cent) of 131 patients in the open arm of the trial versus seven (2.5 per cent) of 280 in the laparoscopic arm (difference 0.6 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) - 2.9 to 4.0) per cent). Thirty-six patients developed IH: 12 (9.2 per cent) after open versus 24 (8.6 per cent) after laparoscopic surgery (difference 0.6 (95 per cent c.i. - 5.3 to 6.5) per cent). Results by actual procedure showed higher AIO and IH rates in the 24.5 per cent of patients who converted from laparoscopic to open surgery (AIO: 2.3, 2.0 and 6 per cent; IH: 8.6, 7.4 and 11 per cent-for open, laparoscopic and converted operations respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although this study has not confirmed that laparoscopic surgery reduces rates of AIO and IH after colorectal cancer surgery, trends suggest that a reduction in conversion to open surgery and elimination of port-site hernias may produce such an effect. Registration number for CLASICC trial: ISRCTN74883561 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Detection of recurrent hernia and intraabdominal adhesions following incisional hernia repair: a functional cine MRI-study

BACKGROUND

To non-invasively identify incisional hernia repair implanted synthetic meshes with MRI, and also focusing on the evaluation of postsurgical complications such as adhesions.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients underwent either laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay-mesh or open abdominal wall repair using preperitoneal layers. The patients were examined using a true-fast-imaging-with-steady-state-precession (trueFISP)-sequence in transverse/sagittal orientation with a section-by-section dynamic depiction of induced visceral slide. A 9-segment-abdominal-map was used to document the adhesion location/type. The MR-images were analysed regarding hernia relapse, layer-morphology, rectus-abdominis muscle-condition, and abdominal wall mobility. In 12 patients pre- and postsurgery-MRI was performed.

RESULTS

Time range between surgery and examination was 6-36 months. In all laparoscopy-patients the meshes were identified. For open surgery the mesh was not visualized in 20, but was seen in 6 cases. A total of 11 cases showed a recurrent hernia. Seventy intraabdominal adhesions were detected. Fifteen patients had restricted mobility. 20 patients showed an rectus-abdominis-muscle-asymmetry. Comparing pre- and post-op-MRI, 6 out of 8 patients with open repair showed thick scar-plaques. Three patients with open repair had new adhesion-formations postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Functional cine MRI is suitable for follow-up studies in patients after hernia repair to detect and evaluate the implanted meshes. Typical complications like intestinal adhesions and abdominal wall dysmotility can be assessed as well.

The effect of 4% icodextrin solution on adhesiolysis surgery time at the Hartmann's reversal: a pilot, multicentre, randomized control trial vs lactated Ringer's solution

OBJECTIVE

A pilot randomized controlled clinical multicentre trail was established to compare intraperitoneal 4% icodextrin (ID) solution with lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) on adhesion formation after Hartmann's procedure. The adhesiolysis surgery time during Hartman's reversal was used as a marker of the severity of adhesions.

METHOD

Patients scheduled for Hartmann's resection were randomized at surgery to either of the two study solutions used as an irrigant during the operation and instilled (1000 ml) at the end of surgery. During the reversal procedure, the time for small bowel adhesiolysis was recorded.

RESULTS

On completion of 17 eligible patients, an interim analysis was performed. There were no complications following the use of 4% ID solution. The mean (SD) total adhesiolysis times in patients treated with 4% ID solution and LRS were 30.8 (18.0) min and 47.6 (45.7) min, respectively. The mean reduction of 16.8 min, although greater than expected, was not statistically significant (P = 0.33) because of the large variance in adhesiolysis times. Further statistical analysis showed that to achieve significance for the observed differences and variance, a minimum of 240 patients in each group would be required.

CONCLUSION

Icodextrin treatment resulted in a decreasing trend in adhesiolysis time. The use of 4% ID solution in peritonitis patients seemed to be safe. Because of larger than expected variations in adhesiolysis times, this pilot study was underpowered to meet the study end-point and further statistical modelling estimated that significance cannot be reached within a reasonable time scale. Other models should be used to evaluate the efficacy of anti-adhesive agents.

Use of barrier products in the prevention of adhesion formation following surgery

Postoperative adhesion formation is a significant health-care problem with no universally accepted method of prevention. Barrier methods of prevention have been extensively tested and licensed, and this article examines the evidence.

Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions in gynaecological surgery

Important progress has been made in the field of post-surgical adhesion prevention with the development of consensus statements in gynaecology from the United Kingdom, Germany, the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy, Call for Action in Colorectal Surgery and a recent Technical Bulletin from The Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. These reports suggest that the application of adhesion reduction devices together with the use of microsurgical principles reduces the formation of post-operative adhesions. This commentary provides additional information to assist gynaecologists in making surgical decisions. However, variation in adhesion classifications, mode of device application, lack of uniformity in surgical approaches and variations in interpretation of results make comparative assessment of the efficacy of adhesion reduction devices and surgical techniques difficult. Considering the choice of an adhesion-reduction device, one has to evaluate the cost and its clinical impact carefully. This is particularly important if one were to support routine, prophylactic use of adhesion-reduction devices. Healthcare providers should take into account the needs of individual patients, available resources, and institutional or clinical practice limitations. Good surgical technique and perhaps the use of approved devices for adhesion reduction would give patients the best chance to benefit from reproductive and gynaecological surgery.

Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Adhesion formation is common after abdominal surgery. This study aimed to compare the extent of adhesion formation following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.

METHODS

An observational study was undertaken to identify adhesions in patients undergoing laparoscopy after previous laparoscopic or open colectomy. Adhesions were scored according to a system validated for interobserver (median kappa = 0.80) and intraobserver (kappa = 0.82) agreement. The primary endpoint was the overall adhesion score (0-10); a secondary endpoint was the adhesion score at the main incision site (0-6).

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were recruited (13 laparoscopic and 33 open colectomy). In most patients (n = 29), laparoscopy was performed for tumour staging before liver resection. The median (interquartile range) overall adhesion score was 7 (5-8) in the open group and 0 (0-3) in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). A similar difference was found for the main incision score: 6 (4-6) versus 0 (0-0) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There may be a reduction in adhesion formation following laparoscopic compared with open colectomy, although the small sample size limits this conclusion.

Practicalities and costs of adhesions

In spite of postoperative adhesions being common there appears to be a reluctance to use anti-adhesion products routinely. This article compares the incidence of adhesions with other conditions in order to identify the level of risk. The health economics surrounding adhesion-related disease are described. This combined information may be of help to convince health practitioners of the need to take a more active role in adhesion prevention. The SCAR project has identified the risk of adhesion-related disease. This is compared with published risks of other common clinical situations. An economic model first described by the author in 2002 has been revised with 2006 costs [1]. The SCAR data demonstrates a directly related risk of re-admission in certain groups of 9.4% over 5 years [2]. The frequency of including this fact in the consenting process is low (<15%) [3]. Legal precedent has identified a risk of >2% warrants inclusion in the consent process; failure to do so could be considered negligent [4]. Use of an anti-adhesion product with a cost of 130 euros with an efficacy of 25% in 1 year in the UK could save over 40 million euros over a 10-year period. Adhesion risk is frequent enough to include in consent. Failure to do this and avoidance of treatment, which may reduce adhesions will have major financial consequences on healthcare systems.

Adhesions and colorectal surgery - call for action

Mounting evidence highlights that adhesions are now the most frequent complication of abdominopelvic surgery, yet many surgeons are still not aware of the extent of the problem and its serious consequences. While many patients go through life without apparent problems, adhesions are the major cause of small bowel obstruction and a leading cause of infertility and chronic pelvic pain in women. Moreover, adhesions complicate future abdominal surgery with important associated morbidity and expense and a considerable risk of mortality. Studies have shown that despite advances in surgical techniques in recent years, the burden of adhesion-related complications has not changed. Adhesiolysis remains the main treatment even though adhesions reform in most patients. Recent developments in adhesion-reduction strategies and new anti-adhesion agents do, however, offer a realistic possibility of reducing the risk of adhesions forming and potentially improving the clinical outcomes for patients and reducing the associated onward burden to healthcare systems. This paper provides a synopsis of the impact and extent of the problem of adhesions with reference to the wider literature and also consideration of the key note papers presented in this special supplement to Colorectal Disease. It considers the evidence of the risk of adhesions in colorectal surgery and the opportunities and strategies for improvement. The paper acts as a 'call for action' to colorectal surgeons to make prevention of adhesions more of a priority and importantly to inform patients of the risks associated with adhesion-related complications during the consent process.

Impact of adhesions in colorectal surgery

The extent of the problem of adhesions is considerable and poses a significant burden on healthcare systems, the workload of surgeons and the lives of patients. This paper reviews the work undertaken and the associated evidence for the impact of adhesions. It considers the various options and strategies to reduce adhesions alongside the fundamental necessity for good surgical technique.