Reliability and correlation of measurements during and after bladder neck surgery. The Continence Program for Women Research Group

Dynamic MRI after surgical repair for pelvic organ prolapse

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to compare dynamic MRI measurement results from patients with pelvic organ prolapse before and after surgical repair and to correlate postoperative MRI findings with the results of physical examination and patients' complaints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty women were included in this prospective study. Fifteen patients with uterovaginal or vaginal vault descent and 15 asymptomatic female volunteers underwent dynamic MRI using a single-shot, fast spin-echo sequence with half-Fourier data acquisition. Single-slice midsagittal images of pelvic organs were obtained at maximal pelvic strain and at perineal contraction. Dynamic MRI was repeated on all patients 2-4 months after surgical repair. Postoperative and preoperative dynamic MRIs were compared with the normal values of the volunteer group. Postoperative MRIs were correlated with the clinical findings after surgical repair.

RESULTS

Seven patients reported symptoms after surgical repair, although only two had pathologic findings on physical examination (residual urine associated with third-degree stress urinary incontinence, and bladder neck descent). MRI showed pathologic changes in five of these patients. Two patients with persistent first-degree stress incontinence had no pathologic findings on MRI.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic MRI is helpful in the evaluation of persistent patient complaints after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and detects more defects than physical examination does.

Is urethral pressure profilometry a useful diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence?

Urethral pressure profilometry is commonly used as a diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence. The objective of this article is to review the published literature on urethral pressure profilometry to summarize its usefulness. MEDLINE was used to search the published English literature from 1966 to October 2000 for full-length original research articles on urethral pressure profilometry and stress urinary incontinence in women. Terms related to urethral pressure profilometry are defined consistently but techniques are not standardized, introducing variation in test results. Reproducibility of urethral pressure profilometry parameters is poor, both because of biological variation and variation within the test procedure itself (related in part to lack of standardization). Parameters of urethral pressure profilometry do not distinguish between continent and incontinent women and do not characterize the severity of incontinence or urethral incompetence. It is, therefore, concluded that urethral pressure profilometry is not a useful diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence in women. Its use in clinical management is not supported by current evidence.

Comparison of cystourethrography and dynamic MRI in bladder neck descent

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to test whether there are statistically significant differences between dynamic MR and lateral cystourethrogram measurement results in patients with bladder neck descent.

METHOD

Twenty-seven women (39-83 years old, mean 60.6 years old) with urinary incontinence and bladder neck descent were examined by dynamic MRI using a single shot fast spin echo sequence with half-Fourier data acquisition. Bladder neck position, angle of inclination of the urethral axis, posterior vesicourethral angle, and depth of cystoceles were measured at perineal contraction and at maximal pelvic strain. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test for paired values was used to analyze whether there were statistically significant differences between lateral cystourethrogram and dynamic MR measurement results. The Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) was calculated for all parameter pairs.

RESULTS

Measurements at maximal pelvic strain showed the greatest levels of agreement between MRI and cystourethrography. The best results were attained for the cystocele measurements (p > 0.5, rs = 0.95). Bladder neck position showed the second best agreement; if MR measurements were corrected by 0.46 cm, no statistically significant difference (p > 0.2, rs = 0.92) was calculated. Measurements at perineal contraction tallied least, probably due to the different positions adopted during the two examinations.

CONCLUSION

Measurement data on dynamic MRI for the bladder neck position and the extension of cystocele at maximal pelvic strain are comparable with lateral cystourethrogram data.