Genetic factors in chemically-induced transitional cell bladder cancer

Combined GSTM1-Null, GSTT1-Active, GSTA1 Low-Activity and GSTP1-Variant Genotype Is Associated with Increased Risk of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate specific glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene variants as determinants of risk in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC), independently or simultaneously with established RCC risk factors, as well as to discern whether phenotype changes reflect genotype-associated risk. GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genotypes were determined in 199 cRCC patients and 274 matched controls. Benzo(a)pyrene diolepoxide (BPDE)-DNA adducts were determined in DNA samples obtained from cRCC patients by ELISA method. Significant association between GST genotype and risk of cRCC development was found for the GSTM1-null and GSTP1-variant genotype (p = 0.02 and p<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, 22% of all recruited cRCC patients were carriers of combined GSTM1-null, GSTT1-active, GSTA1-low activity and GSTP1-variant genotype, exhibiting 9.32-fold elevated cRCC risk compared to the reference genotype combination (p = 0.04). Significant association between GST genotype and cRCC risk in smokers was found only for the GSTP1 genotype, while GSTM1-null/GSTP1-variant/GSTA1 low-activity genotype combination was present in 94% of smokers with cRCC, increasing the risk of cRCC up to 7.57 (p = 0.02). Furthermore, cRCC smokers with GSTM1-null genotype had significantly higher concentration of BPDE-DNA adducts in comparison with GSTM1-active cRCC smokers (p = 0.05). GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTA1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms might be associated with the risk of cRCC, with special emphasis on GSTM1-null and GSTP1-variant genotypes. Combined GSTM1-null, GSTT1-active, GSTA1 low activity and GSTP1-variant genotypes might be considered as "risk-carrying genotype combination" in cRCC.

GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to smoking-related bladder cancer: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of enzymes involved in detoxification. Genes encoding for GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 proteins are polymorphic, which can result in complete or partial loss of enzyme activity. Previous studies have associated polymorphisms of GSTA1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 genes with a higher risk of bladder cancer, but this is still controversial. Potential role of GSTA1 polymorphism in susceptibility to bladder cancer in Whites is lacking. We examined association between GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 gene variants and bladder cancer risk and evaluated whether they were modified by smoking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A hospital-based case-control study recruited 201 incidence cases and 122 age-matched controls. Deletion polymorphism of GSTM1 and GSTT1 was identified by polymerase chain reaction method. Single nucleotide polymorphism of GSTA1 and GSTP1 was identified by restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Uniconditional multivariate logistic regression was applied to model association between genetic polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk, as well as effect modification by smoking.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the distributions of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTA1, and GSTP1 gene variants between patients and controls. None of the examined polymorphisms was significantly associated with bladder cancer risk independently. The results of gene-smoking interaction analyses indicated a significant combined effect of smoking and all common GST polymorphisms tested (P for trend = 0.001). However, the most significant effect on bladder cancer risk was observed in smokers carrying lower activity GSTA1-AB/BB and GSTM-null genotype (OR = 3.5, P < 0.05) compared with GSTA1-AA and GSTM1-active non-smokers. Overall, the risk observed did not significantly differ with respect to quantity of cigarettes smoked. However, heavy smokers with GSTM1-null genotype had 2 times higher risk of bladder cancer than GSTM1-null light smokers (OR = 4.8 vs. OR = 2.0) when GSTM1-active non-smokers served as reference group. Smokers carrying both GSTM1-null and GSTA1-AB + BB genotypes exhibited the highest risk of bladder cancer (OR = 2.00, P = 0.123).

CONCLUSIONS

Null or low-activity genotypes of the GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 did not contribute independently towards the risk of bladder cancer in our patients. However, in association with smoking, both low activity GSTA1 and GSTM1-null genotype increase individual susceptibility to bladder cancer.

GSTM1-null and GSTA1-low activity genotypes are associated with enhanced oxidative damage in bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between gene variants of the detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes glutathione transferase M1 (GSTM1) and glutathione transferase A1 (GSTA1) and the extent of oxidative damage in patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary bladder.

METHODS

GSTM1 deletion polymorphism was identified by polymerase chain reaction, and the restriction fragment length polymorphism method was used for the single nucleotide polymorphism of GSTA1. Enzyme immunoassay was used to determine markers of DNA (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, 8-OHdG) and lipid (8-epiprostaglandin F2α) oxidative damage in the urine of 80 TCC patients and 60 age-matched controls.

RESULTS

Urinary 8-OHdG and 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α concentrations in TCC patients were significantly higher than in controls (P=0.043 and 0.001, respectively). GSTM1 and GSTA1 polymorphisms influence vulnerability to both DNA and lipid oxidation, with the GSTM1-null gene variant having a more pronounced effect. A significant effect of combined GSTM1 and GSTA1 genotypes on the extent of oxidative damage was found only for 8-OHdG (P=0.018). In addition, TCC patients with the most malignant tumors exhibited significantly higher frequencies of GSTM1-null or GSTA1-low activity genotypes, associated with a twofold increase in urinary 8-OHdG concentration (P=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that absent GSTM1 or reduced GSTA1 antioxidant activity may increase the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage, thereby contributing to the malignant potential of TCC.

GSTT1: a marker of the aggressiveness of bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Glutathione S-transferases have been implicated in the development of bladder cancer (BC). We investigated the genotype and expression of glutathione S-transferase-mu (GSTM1) and glutathione S-transferase-theta (GSTT1) in BC tissue specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor samples and matched normal mucosae were obtained from 34 patients. Genomic DNA was used to analyze GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes using multiplex polymerase chain reaction. GSTM1 and GSTT1 mRNA levels were measured using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

GSTM1 mRNA expression was lower in tumor tissues than in matched normal bladder mucosae, whereas GSTT1 mRNA expression was significantly higher. GSTT1 mRNA expression was higher in muscle-invasive BC and high-grade cancers than in non-muscle-invasive BC and lower-grade tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

GSTT1 is correlated with characteristics of aggressive BC. GSTT1 may play an important role in tumorigenesis and disease progression in patients with BC.

Isoenzyme profile of glutathione transferases in transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract

Upregulated glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) plays an important role in the resistance to apoptosis in transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary bladder (UB) and represents a potential target for chemotherapeutic agents. Our aim was to perform a systematic investigation of a glutathione S-transferase (GST) isoenzyme profile (GSTM, GSTP1, and GSTT1) in the upper urinary tract (UUT) TCC and compare it with the GST isoenzyme pattern of the UB TCC and normal urothelium. We examined GST activity spectrophotometrically by using substrates for the overall GST activity, GSTP1, and GSTT1 in the cytosolic fraction. GSTP1 and GSTM expression was analyzed by Western blotting. The results obtained have shown that the overall GST activity was significantly higher in UUT TCC in comparison with urothelium (P<0.001), which gradually increases with tumor grade (P<0.05). The mean GSTP1 and GSTT1 activities in UUT TCC were 2- and 3.6-fold higher, respectively, than in the normal urothelium (P<0.001), and these values did not differ significantly from activities found in the UB TCC. GSTM was expressed in 42% of the UUT TCC and 50% of the UB TCC specimens. The level of GSTM expression was slightly increased in the UUT TCC specimens in comparison with normal urothelium (P>0.05). We conclude that 3 major cytosolic GST classes, GSTM, GSTP1, and GSTT1, are expressed in the UUT TCC. The isoenzyme profile of GST in the UUT TCC is similar to that observed in the UB TCC; it shows essentially the same alteration of the GST phenotype in the course of cancerization. The association of GSTT1 and GSTP1 upregulation with the malignant phenotype of the UUT TCC might result in resistances to both chemotherapy and apoptosis.

Glutathione S-transferase T1-1 activity upregulated in transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic functional investigation of different glutathione S-transferase (GST) classes, including GST class Theta (GSTT) member GSTT1-1, in transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) and the surrounding normal uroepithelium of the same individuals. Recently, it was suggested that GSTT1-1 might be an important risk modulator for TCC.

METHODS

Tumor samples and surrounding normal uroepithelium were obtained from 24 patients with TCC of urinary bladder. The following substrates with differential specificities were used: 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene for overall GST activity; 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole for GST Alpha; 1,2-dichloro-4-nitro-benzene for GST Mu; 4-vinylpyridine for GST Pi 1-1(GSTP1-1); and 1,2-epoxy-3-(p-nitrophenoxy)propane for GSTT1-1.

RESULTS

GSTP1-1 and GSTT1-1 activities were demonstrated in all uroepithelial and TCC samples, and GST Mu activity was detectable in 11 of 24 patients. In the tumor specimens, significant upregulation of all expressed GST subtypes was observed. The mean GSTP1-1 and GSTT1-1 level in TCC was increased 2-fold and 3.6-fold, respectively, compared with the mean level in the normal uroepithelium (P <0.001). Tumor GSTT1-1 activities correlated statistically significantly with the tumor stage (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In tumors and adjacent normal uroepithelium of patients with TCC, three major cytosolic GST classes, Mu, Pi, and Theta, were expressed. Although the GST isoenzyme pattern in TCC was similar to that of the corresponding normal uroepithelium, during cancer progression a clear tendency toward an increase in all the GST subtypes expressed was noted. For the first time, distinct GSTT1-1 activity levels were demonstrated in human uroepithelium, as well as its pronounced upregulation in TCC.

[Perspectives for molecular diagnostics exemplified by urothelial bladder carcinoma]

The rapidly growing knowledge of molecular mechanisms will change the daily routine of clinicians in the near future. Regarding urothelial bladder carcinoma, one may expect that molecular diagnostics will identify patients susceptible to disease development by screening their genotype. Furthermore, in addition to histopathologic findings, prognostic markers will be used for disease management. In an ongoing multicenter trial, the decision on whether or not to treat patients with adjuvant chemotherapy after cystectomy is based on their p53 status. In the near future, cytostatic medications are expected to be chosen according to genetic profiles of the tumor or patient. New medications, which target tumor-specific alterations of cell-signaling cascades in bladder or other cancers, prominently inhibitors of the ERBB membrane receptor family, are currently under clinical investigation and will undoubtedly form an important part of therapeutic oncologic regimens. In conclusion, evaluation of gene profiles of tumors and patients will gain importance for clinicians.