Male-to-female transsexualism: a technique, results and long-term follow-up in 66 patients

Rectal Injury During Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence, management, and outcomes of rectal injury (RI) and subsequent rectovaginal fistula (RVF) during gender-affirming vaginoplasty (GAV) at a high-volume transgender surgery center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of preoperative, intraoperative and post-operative findings of all patients with RI during GAV from January 2016 to September 2022. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

RI occurred in 9 of 1011 primary GAV and colorectal surgery (CRS) consulted in 5 cases, which included sigmoidoscopy with an air leak test in 4 and with temporary bowel diversion in 2. Of the 9, 6 proceeded with full-depth GAV, and 3 were converted to minimal-depth vaginoplasty. Two had bulbospongiosus muscle interposition and none had a concomitant urethral injury. 1/9 patients with RI developed a RVF which occurred in a patient with prior perineal surgery and no intraoperative sigmoidoscopy. Three (50%) with full-depth GAV developed vaginal stenosis postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

RI during primary GAS in experienced hands is uncommon with an incidence of 0.89% in our series of 1011. Unusual tissue dissection planes were a risk factor. If injuries were identified intraoperatively, repaired with multilayer closure and evaluated by CRS, patients did well without the development of RVF despite completion of full-depth GAV. It is reasonable to complete the full-depth vagina, but patients should be advised of a significant risk of post-operative vaginal stenosis.

Prevalence of Regret in Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Gender-affirmation surgeries are a rapidly growing set of procedures in the field of plastic surgery. This study is novel in that a thorough analysis has not been performed quantifying, identifying, and recognizing the reasons and factors associated with regret in a largely US population.

METHODS

A systematic review of several databases was conducted. After compiling the articles, we extracted study characteristics. From the data set, weighted proportions were generated and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 24 articles were included in this study, with a population size of 3662 patients. A total of 3673 procedures were conducted in the United States, 514 in European nations, 97 in Asian nations, which included only Thailand, and 19 in South American nations, which included only Brazil. The pooled prevalence of regret was 1.94%. The prevalence of transfeminine regret was 4.0% while the prevalence of transmasculine regret was 0.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Both transfeminine and transmasculine patients had significantly lower rates of regret in the United States when compared with the rest of the world. Our study largely excluded facial gender-affirming surgeries as most of its articles did not fall into our inclusion search criteria. To our knowledge, this is the most recent review performed on the topic of regret among gender-affirming surgery patients with an emphasis on a US cohort. This analysis can help shed light on better ways to enhance patient selection and surgical experience.

"Modified" Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: First Case Series of a Turkish Single Center

Purpose

The aim of this study was to share our outcomes, including complications and their management, of a "modified" penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) technique applied to transgender individuals, which we presume to be the first reported case series of a single center from Turkey.

Methods

A cross-sectional study, including adult transgender cases who underwent male to female gender-affirming surgery in our institution, between January 2015 and December 2019, was planned. The same "modified" PIV technique, in which the spatulated urethra was incorporated to the penile skin flap, was applied to all cases. Demographic data including case characteristics, medical history with prior operative details, and complications detected during follow-up examination were collected prospectively.

Results

The mean age of 30 cases included in the study was 31.03±7.05 years. The mean length of hospitalization after the surgical procedures was 10.13±2.24 days. The mean vaginal depth measured at postoperative 1st year follow-up examination was 14.2±2.95 cm. Satisfactory neovaginal moistening was reported by 24 (80%) cases. In 8 (26.6%) of 30 cases, no complication was reported at all. Intraoperative (rectal injury) and postoperative (meatal stenosis, vaginal narrowing, scars, infections, etc.) complications occurred in 22 (63.4%) cases. Postoperative satisfaction rates including mental, physical, and social health in general were found to be 81.84% (66-98%).

Conclusion

The "modified" PIV can be used as a preferred technique showing high satisfactory outcomes, especially in cases with short penile skin or circumcision, due to the achievable lubricity and vaginal width/depth.

[The history of vaginoplasty: Technical and sociological advances]

Technical advances in gender-affirming genital surgery have allowed the modern surgeon to create a vagina, vulva and clitoris from a male sex. This surgery, commonly known as vaginoplasty, should in fact be identified as aidopoiesis, since it is not a question of improving an already existing vagina but of creating a female sex. Numerous technical advances made since 1930 throughout the world now offer a safe and proven surgical strategy for female genital gender affirmation. Most of these techniques are derived from advances in intersex genital surgery. The first vaginoplasties described in the context of gender affirmation were performed in Berlin in the 1930s. After the Second World War, the greatest advances in vaginoplasty were made in Denmark. It was not until Geroges Burou in Casablanca and Harold Gillies, aided by Ralph Millard in England, in the mid-fifties that the modern technique of invagination of the penile skin took over from neo-vaginal grafting techniques. The creation of the clitoris from the glans penis and a more aesthetic vulva were the major advances from the 1970s. Other flap or intestinal transplant techniques were also developed, often to correct the failure of penile skin invagination. Some of the patients who benefited from these early technical advances, such as Lili Elbe and Christine Jorgensen later on, helped to make this surgery, which had long remained taboo, popular with the general public. Pioneers such as the gynaecologist Georges Burou in Casablanca have contributed, with the greatest discretion, to the well-being of gender-affirmed people by improving these techniques. Today, this hard-won heritage cannot be ignored by surgeons interested in vaginoplasty.

Principles and outcomes of gender-affirming vaginoplasty

Vaginoplasty is the most frequently performed gender-affirming genital surgery for gender-diverse people with genital gender incongruence. The procedure is performed to create an aesthetic and functional vulva and vaginal canal that enables receptive intercourse, erogenous clitoral sensation and a downward-directed urine stream. Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is a single surgical procedure involving anatomical component rearrangement of the penis and scrotum that enables many patients to meet these anatomical goals. Other options include minimal-depth, peritoneal and intestinal vaginoplasty. Patient quality of life has been shown to improve drastically after vaginoplasty, but complication rates have been documented to be as high as 70%. Fortunately, most complications do not alter long-term postoperative clinical outcomes and can be managed without surgical intervention in the acute perioperative phase. However, major complications, such as rectal injury, rectovaginal fistula, and urethral or introital stenosis can substantially affect the patient experience. Innovations in surgical approaches and techniques have demonstrated promising early results for reducing complications and augmenting vaginal depth, but long-term data are scarce.

Postoperative adverse events following gender-affirming vaginoplasty: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study

BACKGROUND

As a part of gender-affirming care, many transgender women undergo vaginoplasty surgery, which is increasingly being performed in the United States. There are considerable knowledge gaps about adverse events associated with vaginoplasty as most published articles report single-center results.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe severe and overall 30-day adverse events after gender-affirming vaginoplasty using a large multicenter database.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of transgender women who underwent vaginoplasty between 2011 and 2019 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Cases were initially identified by diagnosis codes for gender identity disorders and procedure codes for male-to-female vaginoplasty. Adverse events at 30 days were identified, including unplanned reoperation or readmission, blood transfusion, wound dehiscence, surgical site infections, thromboembolic disease, sepsis, cerebrovascular or cardiac events, and urinary tract infection. Surgical procedures were further stratified by Clavien-Dindo grade, a standardized classification system for registering surgical complications. A score of 0 is given if there is no adverse event, whereas scores of 1 and 2 refer to deviations from the normal postoperative course, which may include additional pharmacologic treatment, bedside-managed wound complications, and blood transfusions. Clavien-Dindo grades of 3 to 4 include surgical interventions or life-threatening complications requiring intensive care unit management. A Clavien-Dindo grade of 5 is given for any complication resulting in death.

RESULTS

A total of 488 cases were eligible for inclusion in this study. The mean age of the cohort was 37.5 years, and race distribution was as follows: 71.1% White, 15.2% Black, 5.5% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 8.2% other. Of the cohort, 18.6% were Hispanic. Surgeries were performed by plastic surgeons (87.9%), urologists (8.6%), gynecologists (1.8%), and other specialists (1.6%). Concurrent nongenital surgery was performed in 17% of cases. The median operative time for all cases was 271 minutes (interquartile range, 214-344). There was no reported death in the 30-day period (Clavien-Dindo grade 5), and 27 cases (5.5%) had a Clavien-Dindo grade of 3 to 4. On multivariate analysis, body mass index and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class were associated with higher odds of having a Clavien-Dindo grade of 3 to 4 (adjusted odds ratios, 2.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.21; P=.01] and 1.23 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-2.57; P=.05], respectively). Wound dehiscence, superficial surgical site infection, or deep surgical site infection occurred in 46 cases (9.0%). The readmission rate was 4.3% (n=21). Several preoperative factors had higher odds of readmission: body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 9.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-22.13; P=.005), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (adjusted odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-9.03; P=.003), diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio, 5.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-20.45; P=.006), and hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 3.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-10.47; P=.01). The reoperation rate was 4.7% (n=23), with no significant patient factor associated with this complication. Of the reoperations, 68.2% of cases were due to wound problems, vaginal bleeding, or hematoma.

CONCLUSION

In transgender women undergoing vaginoplasty for gender affirmation, severe postoperative complications were rare, occurring in 1 of 20 patients. Most patients experienced minor complications or no complication after surgery.

Outcome measures reported following feminizing genital gender affirmation surgery for transgender women and gender diverse individuals: A systematic review

Background

Feminizing genital gender affirmation surgery (fgGAS) may be an essential adjunct in the care of some transgender women and gender diverse individuals with gender incongruence. However, the comparison of different techniques of fgGAS may be confounded by variable outcome reporting and the use of inconsistent outcomes in the literature. This systematic review provides the most in-depth examination of fgGAS studies to date, and summarizes all reported outcomes, definitions, and the times when outcomes were assessed following these surgical interventions. Aims/Methods: This work intends to quantify the levels of outcome variability and definition heterogeneity in this expanding field and provides guidance on outcome reporting for future study authors. Candidate studies for this systematic review were sourced via an electronic, multi-database literature search. All primary, clinical research studies of fgGAS were included with no date limits. Paired collaborators screened each study for inclusion and performed data extraction to document the outcomes, definitions, and times of outcome assessment following fgGAS.

Results

After screening 1225 studies, 93 studies proceeded to data extraction, representing 7681 patients. 2621 separate individual outcomes were reported, 857 (32.7%) were defined, and the time of outcome assessment was given for 1856 outcomes (70.8%) but relied on nonspecific ranges of follow-up dates. "Attainment of orgasm", "Neovaginal stenosis", and "Neovaginal depth/length" were among the most commonly reported outcomes. Profound heterogeneity existed in the definitions used for these and for all outcomes reported in general.

Discussion

The results demonstrate a need for clear outcomes, agreed definitions, and times of outcome assessment following fgGAS in transgender women and gender diverse individuals. The adoption of a consistent set of outcomes and definitions reported by all future studies of fgGAS (a Core Outcome Set) will aid in improving treatment comparisons in this patient group. This review is the first step in that process.

Factors that drive mental health disparities and promote well-being in transgender and nonbinary people

Transgender (or trans) is an umbrella term for individuals who experience their gender differently from what is associated with the sex they were assigned at birth. Individuals who are nonbinary experience their gender outside binary conceptions of gender. Although research has predominantly focused on negative mental health outcomes for transgender and non-binary (TNB) individuals, an emergent literature has begun to explore protective and health-promoting factors and dimensions of psychological well-being. In this Review, we discuss the sociocultural context for TNB people, beginning with a brief history of TNB identity before highlighting frameworks for understanding the higher prevalence of certain mental health concerns among TNB individuals. Next, we summarize the predictive factors associated with higher rates of depression, anxiety, suicidality, trauma-related concerns, disordered eating behaviours and substance use. We also review TNB coping, resilience and resistance to anti-trans stigma, as well as psychological well-being, flourishing and gender euphoria. Tying these topics together, we discuss affirming interventions for reducing mental health disparities and promoting psychological health in TNB individuals and communities. We conclude by discussing future research directions.

Individuals who are transgender or nonbinary experience a higher prevalence of certain mental health concerns, including depression, anxiety and disordered eating behaviours. In this Review, Tebbe and Budge discuss these disparities along with factors that protect these individuals from negative outcomes and promote well-being.

Achieving Correct Axis and Good Depth in Gender Affirming Vaginoplasties by Penile-Perineoscrotal Flap Vaginoplasty

Objectives Vaginoplasty as a part of feminizing genitoplasty (FG) in transwomen helps alleviate gender dysphoria and improves mental health, sexual and psychosocial functioning, and quality of life in these individuals. Penile inversion technique (PSFV) remains the gold standard procedure for FG with least morbidity but has inherent limitations often resulting in inadequate depth and incorrect (posteroinferior) vaginal axis, precluding sexual intercourse.

Material and Methods Over the past 27 years, the senior author has refined his technique considerably incorporating several modifications penile perineo-scrotal flap vaginoplasty (PPSFV) to overcome the limitations in PSFV. Most of these modifications were in place by March 2015. Out of 630 primary FGs, retrospective review of all PPSFV with minimum 6 months follow-up operated during the period March 2015 to July 2020 was done for intra and postoperative complications.

Results There were 183 patients who underwent PPSFV during the study period. Average follow-up was 31 (6–62) months. There were no cases of injury to bladder, rectum, urethral stenosis, or neovaginal prolapse. Average operative time was 4 hours and eight (4.37%) patients required blood transfusion. The vaginal depth was 13 to 14 cm or more in 159 (86.88%), 10 to 12 cm in 17 (9.29%), and 7.5 to 9 cm in seven (3.82%) patients. Ten (5.46%) patients complained of intravaginal hair growth. Touch up procedures in the form of anterior commissure and labia plasty were required in 13 (7.10%) patients. All (100%) patients had good clitoral sensitivity and preserved posterosuperior vaginal axis. One-hundred thirty nine (75.96%) patients were able to have satisfactory penetrative sexual intercourse, while 39 (21.31%) had not attempted intercourse and five (2.73%) complained of poor sexual experience on account of inadequate vaginal dimensions.

Conclusion PPSFV addresses the limitations in PSFV and results in good vaginal depth and posterosuperior axis, which facilitates penetrative sexual intercourse, at the same time, avoiding potential complications of procedures such as intestinal vaginoplasties.

External Genital Revisions after Gender-Affirming Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: Surgical Assessment, Techniques, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Following gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty or vulvoplasty, patients may seek vulvar revision procedures for a variety of common aesthetic and functional concerns. These indications for revision and accompanying techniques are not well-described in the literature.

METHODS

Patients who underwent vulvar revision surgery at the authors' institution were identified, and patient demographics, surgical indications, operative details, and complications were described. Common complaints requiring external genital revision were sorted into four categories: clitoral, labial, introital, and urethral.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a history of vaginoplasty underwent vulvar revision between May of 2017 and December of 2019. The mean age at surgical correction was 38.9 years. Ten patients (28.6 percent) had undergone prior secondary procedures (range, 1 to 3). Mean follow-up after revision surgery was 10.7 ± 8.7 months (range, 0 to 30.6 months). The majority of patients underwent concurrent revisions in multiple "categories". Labial aesthetic concerns were most common (n = 27, 77.1 percent), followed by clitoral (n = 20, 57.1 percent), urologic (n = 17, 48.6 percent), and introital complaints (n = 12, 34.3 percent). Twelve patients (34.3 percent) had canal stenosis requiring concurrent robot-assisted canal revision with peritoneal flaps. Complications included labial abscess (n = 1) and deep vein thrombosis (n = 1). Three patients (8.6 percent) underwent subsequent external genital revisions. Management approaches and surgical techniques for each of these common revision categories are provided.

CONCLUSION

As more individuals seek vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty, surgeons must be prepared to address a range of common aesthetic and functional complaints requiring vulvar revision.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Digestive Health in Sexual and Gender Minority Populations

It has been over 50 years since the Stonewall Inn Riots in June 1969, a seminal event for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and other sexual and gender-diverse minorities (LGBTQI+, or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and everyone else) rights movement. However, sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals still face discrimination and harassment due to their sexual orientation or gender identity. As such, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities has identified SGM communities as a "health disparity population." Broadly, there are higher rates of sexually transmitted infections, substance use and abuse, mental health conditions, obesity and eating disorders, certain cancers (breast, cervical, and anorectal), and cardiovascular disease in SGM communities. Transgender patients, especially those of color, are more likely to be uninsured, experience discrimination, and be denied health care than cisgender patients. In addition, SGM individuals have twice the risk of lifetime exposure to emotional, physical, and sexual trauma compared with heterosexuals. It is expected all these factors would negatively affect digestive health as well. This review summarizes the effects of social determinants of health and discrimination on health care access, highlights important digestive diseases to consider in the SGM population, and offers solutions to improve and prioritize the health of these communities. We aim to draw attention to SGM-specific issues that affect gastrointestinal health and spur research that is desperately lacking.

Sexual Function of Transgender Women After Gender Affirming Surgery: A Mini Review

BACKGROUND

A transgender person has a gender identity opposite to the sex assigned at birth. Transgender individuals may have altered sexual function (SF) due to psychosocial factors related to body image distortion, shame, and dissatisfaction with genital appearance, and these conditions can increase the risk of sexual dysfunction. This study aimed to characterize the SF of trans-women after gender affirming surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed the Pubmed database for studies published between January 2008 to December 2021.

RESULTS

17 studies were included, 4 were cross-sectional studies, 1 prospective study, 4 prospective cohort studies, five retrospective studies. The instruments used to evaluate the SF were Female Sexual Index (FSFI), semi-structured questionnaires, patients' opinion, Sexual Desire Inventory (SDI), Maudsley Marital Questionnaire-S, WHOQOL-100. The results of our review indicate there is weak evidence that gender affirming surgery improves the SF of trans-women.

CONCLUSION

We thus recommend that future studies use questionnaires that are validated for the assessment of the SF of trans-women to better determine the impact of genital surgery in this population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Penile Flap Inversion Vaginoplasty in Transgender Women: Contemporary Morbidity and Learning-Curve Analysis From a High-Volume Reconstructive Center

Objectives

Numbers of PIV are rising. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical learning-curve (LC) on the grounds of perioperative complications.

Patients and Methods

108 PIVs, performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2018 have been analyzed. Learning-curve analysis was based on three factors: operating time, vaginal depth and complications.

Results

The median FU was 6.3 months. Median age at surgery was 36 years, median time of hormone treatment was 36 months. The median CI was 0.3 and the median BMI was 25 kg/cm3. Median CCI® was 8.08. 40.7% of the patients developed short-term complications, more than half of which were Clavien I. Overall only 1.9% had Clavien IIIb complications. There were no Clavien IV or V complications. 17.6% of patients had wound infections, 13% wound dehiscence, 9.3% introitus strictures, 13.9% suffered from atrophy of the neovagina, i.e. loss of depth or width, and 8.3% from meatus urethrae strictures. Duration of hormonal therapy, BMI and CI had no impact on surgical outcome. Age had a significant impact on CCI®, as younger patients had a higher risk for complications. Use of scrotal skin and surgeries performed had a significant influence. LC analysis via CUSUM analysis showed that after 32 surgeries, the PIV is performed safely.

Conclusion

The PIV is a safe GAS-technique, associated with minor complications leading to low rates of revision surgery. Younger age, the use of scrotal skin and surgeon's experience has significant impact on complications. Duration of hormonal therapy, circumcision and BMI has no impact on complications.

The assessment of sexual wellbeing in treatment-seeking transgender individuals: a systematic review of the medical literature

Sexual-wellbeing is recognized as an important aspect of quality-of-life. Yet, no overview exists of which aspects of sexual-wellbeing have been assessed in trans individuals seeking or undergoing medical treatment, nor is it clear what tools are used to evaluate the effect of medical treatment on sexual-wellbeing. First, to identify which topics pertaining to sexual-wellbeing have been assessed in transgender individuals in a medical context. Second, to determine which tools have been used for measuring aspects of sexual-wellbeing. A conceptual framework of sexual-wellbeing, was used as reference. A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) was performed up to March 10th, 2020. Studies that assessed aspects of sexual-wellbeing in transgender individuals' medical context were included in this review. Specific sexual topics addressed in each study were extracted by two independent reviewers. Thematic analysis was performed to identify sexual themes. Additionally, tools used to measure topics related to sexuality in transgender individuals were identified. In 172 papers, a total of 178 topics related to sexual-wellbeing were identified. Ten overarching themes were identified; sexuality, enacted sexual script, sexual activities, sexual relations, sexual response cycle, genital function, sexual function, sexual pleasure, sexual satisfaction, and quality-of-sex-life. Functional aspects of sexuality are assessed most frequently. A variety of methods was used to evaluate aspects related to sexual-wellbeing in trans individuals and over 50 different tools were identified. Self-developed questionnaires were used most frequently (n = 80), followed by chart reviews (n = 50), self-developed structured interviews (n = 37) and physical examination (n = 13). 23 previously developed questionnaires were used, all of which were developed for a cisgender population. Many studies in trans individuals touch on topics related to sexual-wellbeing, however, a comprehensive conceptualisation of (10 themes of) sexual-wellbeing is still lacking. Still, no valid tool exists for assessing sexual-wellbeing in the trans population, but is much needed.

ESSM Position Statement "Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery"

Introduction

Much has been published on the surgical and functional results following Gender Affirming Surgery (‘GAS’) in trans individuals. Comprehensive results regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS, however, are generally lacking.

Aim

To review the impact of various GAS on sexual wellbeing in treatment seeking trans individuals, and provide a comprehensive list of clinical recommendations regarding the various surgical options of GAS on behalf of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.

Methods

The Medline, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were reviewed on the results of sexual wellbeing after GAS.

Main Outcomes Measure

The task force established consensus statements regarding the somatic and general requirements before GAS and of GAS: orchiectomy-only, vaginoplasty, breast augmentation, vocal feminization surgery, facial feminization surgery, mastectomy, removal of the female sexual organs, metaidoioplasty, and phalloplasty. Outcomes pertaining to sexual wellbeing- sexual satisfaction, sexual relationship, sexual response, sexual activity, enacted sexual script, sexuality, sexual function, genital function, quality of sex life and sexual pleasure- are provided for each statement separately.

Results

The present position paper provides clinicians with statements and recommendations for clinical practice, regarding GAS and their effects on sexual wellbeing in trans individuals. These data, are limited and may not be sufficient to make evidence-based recommendations for every surgical option. Findings regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS were mainly positive. There was no data on sexual wellbeing following orchiectomy-only, vocal feminization surgery, facial feminization surgery or the removal of the female sexual organs. The choice for GAS is dependent on patient preference, anatomy and health status, and the surgeon's skills. Trans individuals may benefit from studies focusing exclusively on the effects of GAS on sexual wellbeing.

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests positive results regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS. We advise more studies that underline the evidence regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS. This position statement may aid both clinicians and patients in decision-making process regarding the choice for GAS. Özer M, Toulabi SP, Fisher AD, et al. ESSM Position Statement “Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery”. Sex Med 2022;10:100471.

Sexual Dysfunction in Transgender People: A Systematic Review

Transgender people may choose to affirm their gender identity with gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and/or gender-affirming surgery (GAS). The effects of GAHT and GAS on sexual health in transgender people have not been well elucidated. This systematic review aimed to appraise the current scientific literature regarding sexual desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, and satisfaction in transmen and transwomen before, during, and after gender transition. Overall, sexual dysfunction is common in both transmen and transwomen. GAHT and GAS may help to improve sexual satisfaction. More studies that focus on sexual health in the transgender population are urgently needed.

Vaginoplasty in Male to Female transgenders: single center experience and a narrative review

Vaginoplasty in Male to Female (M to F) transgenders is a challenging procedure, often accompanied by numerous complications. Nowadays the most commonly used technique involves inverted penile and scrotal flaps. In this paper the data of 47 M to F patients who have undergone sex affirmation surgery at the Department of Urology of the University of Trieste, Italy since 2014, using our modified vaginoplasty technique with the "Y" shaped urethral flap, have been retrospectively reviewed. Moreover, a non structured review of the literature with regards to short and long-term complications of vaginoplasty has been provided. All patients followed a standardized neo-vaginal dilation protocol. At follow up 2 patients were lost. At 12 months 88.9% of patients (40/45) were able to reach climax, 75.6% (34/45) were having neo-vaginal intercourses and median neo-vaginal depth was 11 cm (IQR 9-13.25): no statistically significant decrease in depth was found at follow up. Only one patient was dissatisfied with aesthetic appearance at 12 months. Our technique provided excellent cosmetic and functional results without severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3). The review of the literature has highlighted the need to standardize a postoperative follow up protocol with particular regard to postoperative dilatation regimen. Further, larger randomized clinical trials are pending to draw definitive conclusions.

Penile inversion vaginoplasty outcomes: Complications and satisfaction

Penile inversion vaginoplasty helps to alleviate gender dysphoria and improve quality of life in many transgender individuals. Overall, the procedure is associated with high post-operative satisfaction, even when complications occur. Adverse events related to vaginoplasty are commensurate with other genitourinary reconstructive procedures performed for other diagnoses (ie, cancer or congenital issues). Here, we explore the incidence of complications following vaginoplasty, emphasizing the challenges in defining and managing these adverse events. In addition, outcome measures to assess patient satisfaction will be reviewed.

Male-to-Female Gender-Affirming Surgery: 20-Year Review of Technique and Surgical Results

Purpose: Gender dysphoria (GD) is an incompatibility between biological sex and personal gender identity; individuals harbor an unalterable conviction that they were born in the wrong body, which causes personal suffering. In this context, surgery is imperative to achieve a successful gender transition and plays a key role in alleviating the associated psychological discomfort. In the current study, a retrospective cohort, we report the 20-years outcomes of the gender-affirming surgery performed at a single Brazilian university center, examining demographic data, intra and postoperative complications. During this period, 214 patients underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty. Results: Results demonstrate that the average age at the time of surgery was 32.2 years (range, 18-61 years); the average of operative time was 3.3 h (range 2-5 h); the average duration of hormone therapy before surgery was 12 years (range 1-39). The most commons minor postoperative complications were granulation tissue (20.5 percent) and introital stricture of the neovagina (15.4 percent) and the major complications included urethral meatus stenosis (20.5 percent) and hematoma/excessive bleeding (8.9 percent). A total of 36 patients (16.8 percent) underwent some form of reoperation. One hundred eighty-one (85 percent) patients in our series were able to have regular sexual intercourse, and no individual regretted having undergone GAS. Conclusions: Findings confirm that it is a safety procedure, with a low incidence of serious complications. Otherwise, in our series, there were a high level of functionality of the neovagina, as well as subjective personal satisfaction.

Sexual health after vaginoplasty: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Vaginoplasty is a gender-affirming procedure for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients who experience gender incongruence. This procedure reduces mental health concerns and enhances patients' quality of life. A systematic review investigating the sexual health outcomes of vaginoplasty has not been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate sexual health after gender-affirming vaginoplasty for TGD patients.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases were searched, unrestricted by dates or study design.

METHODS

We included primary literature that incorporated TGD patients, reported sexual health outcomes after vaginoplasty intervention and were available in English. Outcomes included at least one of these sexual health parameters: sexual desire, arousal, sensation, activity, secretions, satisfaction, pleasure, orgasm, interferences, or aids.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 140 studies with 12 different vaginoplasty surgical techniques and 6,953 patients. The majority of these studies were cross-section or retrospective cohort observational studies (66%). 17.4%-100% (median 79.7%) of patients (n = 2,384) were able to orgasm postoperatively regardless of revision or primary vaginoplasty techniques. Female Sexual Function Index was the most used standardized questionnaire (17 studies, ranging from 16.9 to 28.6). 64%-98% (median 81%) of patients were satisfied with their general sexual satisfaction. The most common interference of sexual activity was dyspareunia.

CONCLUSIONS

The heterogenous methods of measuring sexual outcomes reflect the difficulty in comparing single-center surgical outcomes, encouraging the need for a standardized and validated metric for reporting sexual health after vaginoplasty for TGD patients. The most common sexual health parameter reported is sexual activity while therapeutic aids and pleasure were the least reported parameters. Future studies are needed to improve and expand methods of measuring sexual health, including prospective studies, validated questionnaires, and inclusive metrics. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO 01/01/2021: CRD42021224014.

Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes in Transfemale Vaginoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Vaginoplasty aims to create a functional feminine vagina, sensate clitoris, and labia minora and majora with acceptable cosmesis. The upward trend in the number of transfemale vaginoplasties has impacted the number of published articles on this topic. Herein, we conducted an updated systematic review on complications and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods:

A update on our previous systematic review was conducted. Several databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were assessed. Random effects meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results:

After compiling the results of the update with the previous systematic review, a total of 57 studies pooling 4680 cases were included in the systematic review, and 52 studies were used in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled data including any surgical technique showed rates of 1% [95% confidence interval (CI) <0.1%–2%] of fistula, 11% (95% CI 8%–14%) of stenosis and/or strictures, 4% (95% CI 1%–9%) of tissue necrosis, and 3% (95% CI 1%–4%) of prolapse. Overall satisfaction was 91% (81%–98%). Regret rate was 2% (95% CI <1%–3%). Average neovaginal depth was 9.4 cm (7.9–10.9 cm) for the penile skin inversion and 15.3 cm (13.8–16.7 cm) for the intestinal vaginoplasty.

Conclusions:

Transfemale vaginoplasty is a key component of the comprehensive surgical treatment of transfemale patients with gender dysphoria. Over time, we will see an increased demand for these procedures, so adequate surgical training, clinical/surgical experience, and research outcomes are required, as we continue to strive to provide the best care possible for a population in need.

Regret after Gender-affirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence

BACKGROUND

There is an unknown percentage of transgender and gender non-confirming individuals who undergo gender-affirmation surgeries (GAS) that experiences regret. Regret could lead to physical and mental morbidity and questions the appropriateness of these procedures in selected patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of regret in transgender individuals who underwent GAS and evaluate associated factors.

METHODS

A systematic review of several databases was conducted. Random-effects meta-analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies, pooling 7928 transgender patients who underwent any type of GAS, were included. The pooled prevalence of regret after GAS was 1% (95% CI <1%-2%). Overall, 33% underwent transmasculine procedures and 67% transfemenine procedures. The prevalence of regret among patients undergoing transmasculine and transfemenine surgeries was <1% (IC <1%-<1%) and 1% (CI <1%-2%), respectively. A total of 77 patients regretted having had GAS. Twenty-eight had minor and 34 had major regret based on Pfäfflin's regret classification. The majority had clear regret based on Kuiper and Cohen-Kettenis classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review, there is an extremely low prevalence of regret in transgender patients after GAS. We believe this study corroborates the improvements made in regard to selection criteria for GAS. However, there is high subjectivity in the assessment of regret and lack of standardized questionnaires, which highlight the importance of developing validated questionnaires in this population.

Labial Fat Grafting After Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty

BACKGROUND

Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) has become the most commonly performed genital surgery for transfeminine patients. However, patients undergoing this procedure may still require revisions to achieve a satisfactory result.

OBJECTIVES

The authors report on the utilization of autologous fat grafting to the labia majora to improve results after PIV and complications that may predict the need for grafting.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of a single surgeon's patients who underwent PIV between July 2014 and December 2019. Demographic information, operative information, and postoperative outcomes were abstracted from the health records. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and chi-squared test were employed for continuous variables and categorical, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 182 transfeminine and gender-diverse patients underwent PIV, with 6 patients (3.3%) eventually undergoing labial fat grafting. The most common indication for labial fat grafting was flattened labia majora (83%). All fat grafting procedures were performed concurrently with other revisions of the vaginoplasty. There were no demographic or medical history differences detected between the fat grafting and non-fat grafting groups. Patients who underwent labial fat grafting were more likely to suffer from introital stenosis (33% vs 6%, P = 0.007) and prolonged granulation tissue greater than 6 weeks after initial vaginoplasty (83% vs 32%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Labial fat grafting is a safe and effective method to address defects in the labia majora after PIV. Prolonged granulation tissue and introital stenosis may predict the need for labial fat grafting, possibly due to increased scarring and contracture at the surgical site.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Transfeminine Gender Confirmation Surgery with Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: An Initial Experience

To detail the early experience with and results of a transfeminine (TF) genital reconstruction at an established plastic surgery practice in Western New York.

Methods

Between June 2016 and June 2019, 30 patients underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty for TF gender reassignment. All patients fulfilled World Professional Association for Transgender Health and NY State criteria for reassignment surgery. All surgeries were carried out at a large, government-owned tertiary care center.

Results

There were 30 patients in this retrospective study, with a mean age of 37 years (SD 5.4) and a mean body mass index of 27.3 kg/m² (SD 3.2 kg/m²). Nineteen patients never smoked, 4 were former smokers, and 7 were current smokers. Primary surgery was an orchiectomy and modified single-stage penile inversion vaginoplasty. Mean operative time was 6.0 hours. Mean initial hospital stay was 8.2 days. Three of the 30 (10%) patients required transfusion. There were 6 (20%) complications. Three complications (10%) required reoperation: 1 patient for wound dehiscence on postoperative day 7, 1 for rectal perforation identified on postoperative day 10, and 1 for urethrovaginal fistula. All complications were addressed without sequalae. Twenty of the 30 (66%) patients have undergone revision surgery. Indications for revision were prolapse correction/deepening, labiaplasty, clitoral hood construction/revision, meatal asymmetry, urinary fistula repair, and posterior vaginal flap revision. Twenty-one of 28 (75%) revisions were outpatient surgeries. There were no complications from these procedures. Overall satisfaction via survey was 92% (24 respondents).

Conclusions

TF gender reassignment is a novel, challenging set of procedures for the specialty of plastic surgery. With appropriate consideration and technique, penile inversion vaginoplasty is a safe, effective means of achieving this goal.

Refinement Procedures for Clitorolabiaplasty in Male-to-Female Gender-Affirmation Surgery: More than an Aesthetic Procedure

BACKGROUND

Among the various steps of a penile inversion feminizing genitoplasty, reconstruction of the clitoris and labia minora remains the most challenging procedure.

AIM

This study aims to evaluate surgical outcomes of neoclitoroplasty performed before and after the introduction of the labia minora's creation in our surgical technique.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out comparing 2 groups of patients that underwent penile inversion feminizing surgery: group A (64 patients) who had labia minora and clitoral hood creation and group B (103 patients) who did not.

OUTCOMES

To describe the surgical technique and outcomes of clitorolabiaplasty in male-to-female gender-affirmation surgery.

RESULTS

Concerning overall complication rates, there were significant differences in the incidence of hemorrhage and urethral stenosis (P < .01). Hemorrhage surrounding the urethra and labia was identified in 40 patients (group A: n = 8 [12.5%]; group B: n = 32 [31%]) (P = .006). Neomeatal stenosis occurred in 17 patients (group A: n = 1 [1.5%]; group B: n = 16 [15.5%]) (P = .003). Partial necrosis of the clitoris occurred in 2 cases (group A: n = 0; group B: n = 2 [1.9%]) (P = .52). Necrosis of the labia majora occurred in 3 cases (group A: n = 0; group B: n = 3 [2.9%]) (P = .28). 5 patients (group A: n = 2 (3.1%); group B: n = 3 [2.9%]) (P = .93) developed rectovaginal fistula. 6 patients experienced neovaginal canal stricture (group A: n = 3 [4.6%]; group B: n = 3 [2.9%]) (P = .54). 2 patients (group A: n = 0; group B: n = 2 [1.9%]) (P = .52) reported introital stenosis; Persistent granulation tissue inside the neovagina that required in-office treatments occurred in 4 cases (group A: n = 2 [3.1%]; group B: n = 2 [1.9%]) (P = .62). Wound dehiscence occurred in 23 patients (group A: n = 13 [20.3%]; group B: n = 10 [9.7%]) (P = .05). 24 patients (group A: n = 3 [4.6%]; group B: n = 21 [20.3%]) (P = .004) underwent 28 different types of aesthetic refinements.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Incorporating the creation of labia minora and clitoral hood in one step is a safe and viable option in patients undergoing male-to-female gender-affirmation surgery.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Strength of the study is the large cohort of patients included and the consistent surgical technique. To our knowledge, this is the first study that compares with a control group, the introduction of labia minora creation in male-to-female gender-affirmation surgery. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of patient-reported outcomes measures.

CONCLUSION

Technical refinements of our technique led to a significative reduction in urethral stenosis and postoperative hemorrhage without an increased risk of major complications. Raigosa M, Avvedimento S, Descarrega J, et al. Refinement Procedures for Clitorolabiaplasty in Male-to-Female Gender-Affirmation Surgery: More than an Aesthetic Procedure. J Sex Med 2020;17:2508-2517.

Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review

The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the impact of gender reassignment surgery on the development of urethral complication. A systematic search in accordance the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement for original articles published up until June 2019 was performed using the Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled analyses were done when appropriate. The bibliographic search with the included terms (("Transsexualism"[Mesh])) AND ("Sex Reassignment Surgery"[Mesh]) produced a literature of 879 articles altogether. After removing papers of not interest or articles in which the outcomes could not be deduced, 32 studies were examined for a total of 3463 patients screened. Thirty-two studies met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated, and references were manually reviewed in order to include additional relevant studies in this review. Female-to-male (FtM) surgery and male-to-female (MtF) surgery was discussed in 23 and 10 studies, respectively. One study discussed both. Varying patterns of complications were observed in FtM and MtF surgeries, with increased complications in the former because of the larger size of the neourethra. Meatal stenosis is a particular concern in MtF surgery, with complication rates ranging from 4 to 40%, and usually require meatotomy for repair. Stricture and fistulization are frequently reported complications following FtM surgery. In studies reporting on fistulae involving the urethra, 19-54% of fistulae resolved spontaneously without further surgical intervention. High rates of complications are reported in the current literature, which should be understood by patients and practitioners alike. Shared decision making with patients regarding incidence and management of urethral complications including stricture disease and fistulae, particularly after FtM surgery, is critical for setting expectations and managing postoperative outcomes.

Genital Reconstructive Surgery in Male to Female Transgender Patients: A Systematic Review of Primary Surgical Techniques, Complication Profiles, and Functional Outcomes from 1950 to Present Day

CONTEXT

Genital reconstructive surgery (GRS) is a necessary part of transitioning for many transwomen, and there is evidence of positive effects on a person's well-being and sexual function. Surgical techniques have evolved, from pursuing aesthetic outcome to now functional outcome with natal females as the standard.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence, identifying the surgical techniques used in primary GRS, their complications, functional outcomes, and the tools used to assess them.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The clinical question was designed using the standard PICOS format. The search complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 statement and was performed by two independent reviewers.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Europe, USA, and Thailand favour the penoscrotal technique for vaginoplasty, whereas in the UK, the penile inversion (PI) technique predominates. Primary vaginoplasty using a segment of bowel is less common, and all three techniques have comparable rates of intraoperative rectal injury. The incidence of rectovaginal fistula is reportedly higher in the PI technique. Wound haematoma and vaginal prolapse rates are comparable. Higher rates of clitoral necrosis, urethral meatal stenosis, and wound infection are reported in PI. However, the ability to orgasm, ability to have penetrative sexual intercourse, and satisfaction with aesthetic result are better with PI.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for GRS complications and functional outcomes is of low level. Standardised nomenclature reporting of adverse events and robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are lacking. PROMs are a powerful assessment tool, and standardised definitions of adverse events and functional outcomes should be a priority of future research.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We looked at all studies published on genital reconstructive surgery from 1950 to the present day. We assessed each surgical technique and their associated complication rates, sexual and urinary function outcomes, and how they were reported. We found the evidence to be low and weak. We suggest more robust ways of reporting complications, and the impact on patients' quality of life should be investigated.

Outcomes and Predictors of Revision Labiaplasty and Clitoroplasty after Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery

BACKGROUND

Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the most common gender-affirming procedure for transfeminine patients. Patients undergoing this procedure may require revision labiaplasty and clitoroplasty. This study describes complications and outcomes from the largest reported cohort in the United States to undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty with subsequent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of a single surgeon's experience with penile inversion vaginoplasty with or without revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty between July of 2014 and June of 2016 in a cohort of gender-diverse patients assigned male at birth. Patient demographic data, complications, and quality of life data were collected. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were completed.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty. Of these, 28 patients (23.9 percent) underwent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty, with nine patients (7.7 percent) undergoing both procedures. Patients who underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty necessitating revision were significantly more likely to have granulation tissue (p = 0.006), intravaginal scarring (p < 0.001), and complete vaginal stenosis (p = 0.008). The majority of patients who underwent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty reported satisfaction with their final surgical outcome (82.4 percent) and resolution of their genital-related dysphoria (76.5 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who developed minor postoperative complications following penile inversion vaginoplasty were more likely to require revision surgery to address functional and aesthetic concerns. Patients responded with high levels of satisfaction following revision procedures, with the majority of patients reporting resolution of genital-related dysphoria. Transfeminine patients who undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty should be counseled on the possibility of revisions during their postoperative course.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Transgender vaginoplasty: techniques and outcomes

Gender affirmation surgery is paramount in the treatment of gender dysphoria for transgender individuals. For transgender women, vaginoplasty offers the opportunity for removal of masculine-appearing genitalia and replacement with a gender-congruent appearance. While numerous techniques have been described in the past, approaches have standardized considerably. Herein, we describe a technique to penile inversion vaginoplasty and focus on some of the critical steps of the procedure to try to optimize patient outcomes. We also review relevant literature regarding perioperative outcomes.

Overview of surgical techniques in gender-affirming genital surgery

Gender related genitourinary surgeries are vitally important in the management of gender dysphoria. Vaginoplasty, metoidioplasty, phalloplasty and their associated surgeries help patients achieve their main goal of aligning their body and mind. These surgeries warrant careful adherence to reconstructive surgical principles as many patients can require corrective surgeries from complications that arise. Peri-operative assessment, the surgical techniques employed for vaginoplasty, phalloplasty, metoidioplasty, and their associated procedures are described. The general reconstructive principles for managing complications including urethroplasty to correct urethral bulging, vaginl stenosis, clitoroplasty and labiaplasty after primary vaginoplasty, and urethroplasty for strictures and fistulas, neophallus and neoscrotal reconstruction after phalloplasty are outlined as well.

Sigma-lead Male-to-Female Gender Affirmation Surgery: Blending Cosmesis with Functionality

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Current male-to-female (MtF) sex-reassignment-surgery techniques have not been fully successful to achieve the ideal objectives. The ordeal of multiple procedures, associated complications, and suboptimal results leads to high rate of dissatisfaction. We have tried to overcome functional inadequacy and address the esthetic issues for outer genitalia and vagina with our innovative “true shape sigma-lead SRS: Kaushik’s technique,” which has now become the technique of choice for MtF genital SRS for our patients.

Methods:

Between April 2007 and April 2017, authors performed 386 sigma-lead SRS in MtF transsexuals. Results were analyzed based on complications, resurgeries, and esthetic/functional outcomes. Corrective SRS using rectosigmoid constituted 145 cases and is not a part of this study.

Results:

Maximum follow-up was 7 years (average 34 months). Seventy-eight (20.2%) patients had complications, majority being minor (97.4%). Forty-four (11.4%) required resurgeries, 10 (2.6%) were corrective for introital stricture and mucosal prolapse, whereas 34 (8.8%) opted for optional minor esthetic enhancement. The overall satisfaction rate for cosmetic and functional outcomes was 4.7 out of 5. In addition to review of the literature, innovations in the technique have been explained.

Conclusions:

Kaushik’s sigma-lead MtF SRS technique is a step short to become the gold standard of genital SRS because it has proven to be safe and reliable. It allows faster healing, minimal dilation, and nearly natural cosmetic results in the form of clitoris/clitoral hood, labia minora, labia majora along with self-lubricating, fully deep, and sensate neovagina with orgasmic capabilities. This is perhaps the largest reported series of rectosigmoid use in transsexuals carried out for primary vaginoplasty.

Evaluation of BMI as a Risk Factor for Complications following Gender-affirming Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty

Background:

Gender affirmation surgery (GAS) has a positive impact on the health of transgender patients; however, some centers employ body mass index (BMI) as a strict selection criterion for surgical candidacy. Several single-center studies have found no clear correlation between BMI and complication rates. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study at 2 university-based centers to test the null hypothesis: obesity is not a significant determinant of the risk of acute surgical complications in patients undergoing penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV).

Methods:

This is a retrospective chart review of all adult patients at the University of Michigan and the University of Miami undergoing gender-affirming PIV with minimum follow-up time of 3 months between 1999 and 2017. A logistic regression model of analysis is used to examine the predictive factors for surgical complications and delayed revision urethroplasty in our patient sample.

Results:

One hundred and one patients met inclusion criteria for this study. The mean BMI at the time of procedure was 26.9kg/m² (range 17.8–48.2). Seventeen patients (16.8%) had major complications and 36 patients (35.6%) had minor complications. On logistic regression analysis, none of the recorded covariates were significant predictors of delayed revision urethroplasty or major, minor, or any complications.

Conclusions:

We found that obese patients can safely undergo GAS and that BMI alone should not preclude appropriately selected patients from undergoing GAS. We acknowledge that selection based on overall health and other medical comorbidities is certainly warranted for gender-affirming PIV and all other surgical procedures.

Sexual Function After Shallow and Full-Depth Vaginoplasty: Challenges, Clinical Findings, and Treatment Strategies- Urologic Perspectives

This article presents an ordered review of the role of sexual function in discussion and planning before genital gender-affirming surgery and through recovery to initiation of sexual activity after surgery. Strategies are proposed to optimize sexual function postoperatively. Clinical observations are reviewed and genital and surgical anatomy is reviewed to explain the rationale for the treatment strategies proposed. The importance of offering shallow-depth vaginoplasty to all patients is discussed. Lastly, specific strategies to maximize and enhance recovery of erogenous sensation after surgery are focused on.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Gender Confirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of patient-reported outcome measures is emphasized along with the development of patient-centered care. When implementing patient-reported outcome measures, evidence of the instrument's validity, reliability, and responsiveness in the target population is necessary to secure accurate reporting of the patient's experience. The aim of this study was to identify the literature in which structured patient-reported outcome measures have been used to evaluate the results of gender confirmation surgery, and to systematically evaluate the validity of these instruments.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature was performed to identify structured patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate the outcome of gender confirmation surgery. The identified instruments' validity in the transgender population was assessed for adherence to international guidelines for development and validation of health outcomes instruments.

RESULTS

A total of 110 instruments were identified: 64 ad hoc; six generic; 24 evaluating psychiatric, social, or psychosocial aspects; nine evaluating function but only valid in other patient groups; five ad hoc with some formal development/validation; and two specific for gender dysphoria.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of patient-reported outcome measures that are valid for the transgender population and concurrently sensitive enough to evaluate gender confirmation surgery without the influence of other gender confirming interventions. Basing research on instruments without confirmed validity decreases the validity of the study itself; thus, previous research using patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate gender confirmation surgery can be considered to have a low level of evidence. To obtain valid patient-reported outcome measures, specific for evaluating the results of gender confirmation surgery, development of new instruments or adaptation of existing instruments is needed.