Discordant performance of assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen in relation to the early detection of prostate cancer

Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Managing the Gap between Clinical and Laboratory Practice

BACKGROUND

Current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for early detection of prostate cancer recommend for clinical decision-making a personalized prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based management to improve the risk-benefit ratio of the screening strategy. Some important critical issues regarding the PSA determination in the clinical framework are, however, still neglected in current guidelines and a major focus of recommendations on those aspects would be needed to improve their effectiveness.

CONTENT

Evidence sources in the available literature concerning the interchangeability of total PSA results measured with different commercial methods were critically appraised. We discuss how the heterogeneity of the measurand, the intermethod bias, and the design and selectivity of immunoassays may affect the diagnostic accuracy of selected PSA thresholds, and how knowledge of the analytical characteristics of assays in service, such as the recognized PSA circulating forms and the cross-reactivity with PSA homologs, is basic for improving both clinical decision-making in cancer screening and the reliability of the clinical interpretation of results at the individual level.

SUMMARY

Current CPGs ignore the poor interchangeability of PSA results obtained from different assays and the substantial role of laboratory issues in clinical performance of PSA testing. Involved stakeholders should contribute to fill the existing gap by: (a) preparing commutable reference materials for immunoassay calibration; (b) providing analytical characteristics that may explain the different performance of assays; (c) deriving outcome-based analytical performance specifications for PSA measurement; and (d) giving more focus on laboratory items when CPGs are prepared.

Systematic Differences Between Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunoassays: Comparison Using Passing and Bablok Regression

Recent studies have shown that there are systematic differences among total and free prostate-specificantigen (PSA) immunoassays. In this study we analyzedintermethod differences in total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA(fPSA) measurement using ARCHITECT i2000SR (Abbott Diagnostics) and COBAS E601 (Roche Diagnostics). A number of 160 blood samples were tested for tPSA and 50 samples for fPSA (selecting only sampleswith tPSA: 4.1-10.0 μg/L). Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to compare the two analytical methods fortPSA, fPSA and percentage of fPSA (%fPSA). A strong correlation was noticed between ARCHITECT i2000SR and COBAS E601 for tPSA, fPSA and %fPSA (r between 0.94 and 0.99). Concentrations of tPSA and fPSA measured by COBAS E601 were higher thanthose measured by ARCHITECT i2000SR with a bias of 0.8 μg/L for tPSA and 0.14 μg/L for fPSA. Analyzing therelative difference between methods for fPSA and %fPSA, COBAS E601 exceed a 10% relative difference limit. Our study confirms that there are differences in measured concentrations of tPSA and fPSA byvarious commercial methods. Because clinical judgment on subsequent diagnostic procedures, such as prostatebiopsy, is based on tPSA and fPSA results, tests harmonization should be a priority.

Interchangeability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Assays for Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen: Two not Always Related Items

The variation between different PSA assays seems to influence the interpretation of individual PSA values and the clinical decisions about prostate cancer. One reason for this variability could be the different reactivity of antibodies for the various molecular forms of serum PSA; as a result, samples containing the same amount of tPSA but different proportions of fPSA can produce very different values. In this study, serum samples were collected prospectively from 152 consecutive patients referred to 2 institutions (Regional Hospital, Venice, 90 subjects; San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, 62 subjects) for PSA elevation and/or symptoms. Serum samples were assessed according to the manufacturers’ instructions on the following 2 analyzers: the Immulite 2000 assay (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, USA), which measures tPSA and fPSA, and the ADVIA Centaur (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, USA), which assays tPSA and cPSA. cPSA values were transformed into fPSA by the equation fPSA=tPSA-cPSA. When taking Immulite tPSA and f/tPSA values as 100%, ADVIA Centaur values were 92.6% and 122%, respectively, which means that 20% of patients would be classified differently according to the traditional biopsy cutoff. In conclusion, there are considerable differences between the 2 methods, which could affect clinical decisions.

20–25% Lower Concentrations of Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) after Calibration of PSA Assays to the WHO Reference Materials – Analysis of 1098 Patients in Four Centers

Aim

To examine the potential clinical implications of the recalibration of total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard materials.

Material and methods

Data from 1098 patients with or without clinically detected prostate cancer (PCa) from four independent cohort studies were compared using commercial assays calibrated to the traditional Hybritech® PSA (PSA-Hyb) and fPSA (fPSA-Hyb) standards and to the WHO 96/670 (PSA-WHO) and 96/668 (fPSA-WHO) standards. The Access® Immunoassay System (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) was used in all studies.

Results

All studies showed 20% to 25% lower PSA and fPSA test results with the WHO-standardized assays. No significant change in %fPSA (fPSA/PSA × 100) was observed. Continuing to use the traditional clinical PSA cutoffs obtained with the Hybritech standard after changing to the PSA-WHO standard could result in up to one-third of prostate cancer cases being missed. Conclusions: Manufacturers should fully inform laboratories about a calibration change and its clinical impact. Laboratory reports for PSA measurements should indicate the assay's manufacturer and which calibration standard was used to avoid misleading information concerning PCa risk

Prostate Specific Antigen as a Tumor Marker in Prostate Cancer: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects

In this chapter the use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a tumor marker for prostate cancer is discussed. The chapter provides an overview of biological and clinical aspects of PSA. The main drawback of total PSA (tPSA) is its lack of specificity for prostate cancer which leads to unnecessary biopsies. Moreover, PSA-testing poses a risk of overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment. Many PSA-based markers have been developed to improve the performance characteristics of tPSA. As well as different molecular subforms of tPSA, such as proPSA (pPSA) and free PSA (fPSA), and PSA derived kinetics as PSA-velocity (PSAV) and PSA-doubling time (PSADT). The prostate health index (phi), PSA-density (PSAD) and the contribution of non PSA-based markers such as the urinary transcripts of PCA3 and TMPRSS-ERG fusion are also discussed. To enable further risk stratification tumor markers are often combined with clinical data (e.g. outcome of DRE) in so-called nomograms. Currently the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection and staging of prostate cancer is being explored.

Analytical performance of the VITROS® Immunodiagnostic Products total PSA II and free PSA assays

OBJECTIVES

To assess the precision and the performance of the VITROS(®) total PSA II (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays on the VITROS(®) ECi/ECiQ Immunodiagnostic system.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The precision of the tPSA and fPSA assays was evaluated following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-guideline EP5-A2. During a 20-day period, 2 runs of 5 quality control (QC) samples were performed daily. Results of tPSA (n=292) and fPSA (n=289) were compared between VITROS(®) ECi/ECiQ Immunodiagnostic system and Roche Cobas 8000 e602 system (Cobas tPSA and fPSA assays). A modified CLSI-guideline EP9-A2 was used to correlate the results based on a Deming regression correlation study.

RESULTS

A within-run and within-calibration imprecision of ≤2% was obtained for all 5 QC concentration levels for both tPSA and fPSA. Method comparison revealed a constant bias of 17% for tPSA and 6% for fPSA. These values are within the desirable bias of 18.7% suggested by the Westgard Biological Variation Database Specifications. A high agreement was found between the two methods, with correlation coefficients of 0.997 and 0.993 for tPSA and fPSA respectively.

CONCLUSION

The VITROS(®) tPSA and fPSA assays showed an excellent precision and bias and a good correlation with the Roche method.

Clinical Impact of New Prostate-Specific Antigen WHO Standardization on Biopsy Rates and Cancer Detection

Background: Clinicians may be unaware that replacement of the historical total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) standard with the WHO 96/670 international standard leads to difficulties in interpreting tPSA results. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between the Hybritech and WHO calibrations of the Beckman Coulter tPSA assay, and to assess the impact on prostate cancer (PCa) detection.

Methods: tPSA concentrations were measured in 106 serum samples with both Hybritech and WHO calibrations. The established relationships were used for an in silico experiment with a cohort of 5865 men. Differences in prostate biopsy rates, PCa detection, and characteristics of missed cancers were calculated at biopsy thresholds of 3.0 and 4.0 μg/L.

Results: A linear relationship was observed between the 2 calibrations, with a 20.3% decrease in tPSA values with the WHO standard compared with the Hybritech calibration. Applying the WHO calibration to the cohort of 5865 men yielded a 20% or 19% decrease in prostate biopsies and a 19% or 20% decrease in detected cancers compared with the Hybritech calibration, at a cutoff for biopsy of 3.0 or 4.0 μg/L, respectively. The decrease in detected cancers declined to 9% or 11% if an abnormal result in a digital rectal examination or a transrectal ultrasound evaluation was used as trigger for prostate biopsy (cutoff of 3.0 or 4.0 μg/L, respectively).

Conclusions: Application of the WHO standard for tPSA assays with commonly used tPSA thresholds leads to a significant decrease in PCa detection. Careful assessment of the relationship between the WHO standard and the thresholds used for prostate biopsy is hence necessary.

Toward metrological traceability in the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA): calibrating Beckman Coulter Hybritech Access PSA assays to WHO standards compared with the traditional Hybritech standards

BACKGROUND

The metrological traceability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay calibration to WHO standards is desirable to potentially improve the comparability between PSA assays. A method comparison was performed between the traditionally standardized Beckman Coulter Hybritech Access PSA and free PSA (fPSA) assays and a new alternate calibration of assays aligned to the WHO standards 96/670 and 96/668, respectively.

METHODS

Sera from 641 men with and without prostate cancer, various control materials and mixtures of different proportions of the WHO standards were measured with both assay calibrations.

RESULTS

Excellent comparability between the corresponding assay calibrations was observed, with correlation coefficients of at least 0.996. The Passing-Bablok slopes were 0.747 for total PSA (tPSA), 0.776 for fPSA and 1.02 for the percentage ratio of fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA), while the corresponding percentages of the new WHO-aligned assay results related to the traditional assays were 76.2%, 77% and 102.2%. Receiver operating characteristics revealed no differences between the two PSA assay calibrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO calibration yields results approximately 25% lower for tPSA and fPSA values when compared with the conventional Hybritech calibration. Using the WHO-aligned PSA assay, a tPSA cut-off of 3 microg/L should be considered in clinical practice, while %fPSA cut-offs could be retained.

Artificial neural network (ANN) velocity better identifies benign prostatic hyperplasia but not prostate cancer compared with PSA velocity

Background

To validate an artificial neural network (ANN) based on the combination of PSA velocity (PSAV) with a %free PSA-based ANN to enhance the discrimination between prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

The study comprised 199 patients with PCa (n = 49) or BPH (n = 150) with at least three PSA estimations and a minimum of three months intervals between the measurements. Patients were classified into three categories according to PSAV and ANN velocity (ANNV) calculated with the %free based ANN "ProstataClass". Group 1 includes the increasing PSA and ANN values, Group 2 the stable values, and Group 3 the decreasing values.

Results

71% of PCa patients typically have an increasing PSAV. In comparison, the ANNV only shows this in 45% of all PCa patients. However, BPH patients benefit from ANNV since the stable values are significantly more (83% vs. 65%) and increasing values are less frequently (11% vs. 21%) if the ANNV is used instead of the PSAV.

Conclusion

PSAV has only limited usefulness for the detection of PCa with only 71% increasing PSA values, while 29% of all PCa do not have the typical PSAV. The ANNV cannot improve the PCa detection rate but may save 11–17% of unnecessary prostate biopsies in known BPH patients.

The Clinical Impact of who Standardization of PSA Assays

The determination of serum level of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) is widely used for detection and management of prostate cancer. Analytical variability between the various PSA assays on the market has been reported. This discrepancy in the PSA results was shown to be related to non-equimolar detection of total PSA (tPSA) but also to a lack of assay standardization and could have serious clinical repercussions on the diagnostic performance of PSA testing. The recalibration of equimolar assays to common reference preparations (tPSA WHO 96/670 and fPSA 96/668) was thought to promote standardization of PSA assays and limit the clinical implication of assay variability. Comparison studies have demonstrated that PSA assay calibration to the WHO standard certainly improves the harmonisation of PSA testing, but differences between assays remain. Recent evaluations of the clinical impact of analytical variations induced by a calibration to the WHO standard reported that 15% to 30% of prostate cancer could be missed if the historical tPSA cut-off was used. In order to avoid unacceptable erosion of the clinical diagnostic performance of PSA determination for the detection of prostate cancer with WHO calibrated assays, it is critical to define new specific clinical decision points.

Assay standardization bias: different prostate cancer detection rates and clinical outcomes resulting from different assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen

OBJECTIVES

Numerous commercial assays are available for measuring total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in serum. These assays can be referenced to different laboratory standards, and interassay variability occurs. Patients and physicians might be affected by the variability between PSA assays that results from the use of different PSA standards.

METHODS

We prospectively compared the free and total PSA measurements obtained using two commercially available PSA assays in 103 participants from a prostate cancer screening program in Caracas, Venezuela. We recommended biopsy to men with a total PSA level of 3 to 10 ng/mL and a free/total PSA ratio of 20% or less with either assay. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance index between the two assays to assess the effects of interassay variability on the cancer detection rate and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Although the total PSA results were similar between the assays, the free PSA level was significantly greater with one assay. Therefore, the free/total PSA ratio was discordant between the two assays, resulting in different biopsy recommendations and cancer detection rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a free/total PSA ratio of 20% or less as the threshold for biopsy, the differences in assay sensitivity and specificity for detecting prostate cancer are significant. Commercially available assays for PSA and its derivatives are not necessarily interchangeable, and these differences might lead to different clinical outcomes. When using free and total PSA measurements to make clinical decisions, patients and physicians should be aware of the potential standardization bias and which assay is being used.

PSA and new biomarkers within multivariate models to improve early detection of prostate cancer

This review gives an overview of the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and percent free-PSA (%fPSA)-based artificial neural networks (ANNs) and logistic regression models (LR) to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. There is a clear advantage in including clinical data such as age, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) variables like prostate volume and PSA density as additional factors to tPSA and %fPSA within ANNs and LR models. There is also positive impact of tPSA and fPSA assays on the outcome of ANNs. New markers provide additional value within ANNs but to prove their clinical usefulness further testing is necessary.

Point-of-care PSA testing: an evaluation of PSAwatch

We present a new quantitative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay using a portable, point-of-care test (PSAwatch) and reader system (BioScan) for measuring PSA concentrations in the range from 0.5 to < or =25 microg/l. Blood samples from patients (n=199) were submitted for laboratory PSA and also evaluated using PSAwatch and the BioScan system. PSA concentrations in 188 men were < or =25 microg/l and studied. Correlation between the two methods was good (R(2)=0.88) with a standard error of 1.588. The regression line had a bias of -0.02 at the concentration of 4.00 microg/l. This is the first report of a quantitative, portable, point-of-care PSA test and reader system. PSAwatch may reduce the number of hospital visits for patients with prostate disease.

Different prostate-specific antigen assays give different results on the same blood sample: an obstacle to recommending uniform limits for prostate biopsies

OBJECTIVE

To show the effect of different results for total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and percentage free/total PSA (%fPSA) obtained with different assays for differentiating between benign and malignant prostate diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were used for tPSA and fPSA levels from 596 patients with prostate cancer (314) or no evidence of cancer (282) within the PSA range 0.5-10 ng/mL, analysed with assays from Abbott (AxSYM), Beckman Coulter (Access), DPC (Immulite 2000), and Roche (Elecsys 2010), and with tPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA) assays from Bayer (ADVIA Centaur), as already reported. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC), specificities at assay-dependent and fixed thresholds, and the percentages of correct classification rates of patients were calculated.

RESULTS

Whereas the areas under the ROC curves were no different among all tPSA assays, the assay-specific thresholds at 90% sensitivity were 2.5-3.1 ng/mL. When using fixed 2.5 or 4 ng/mL tPSA thresholds there was a wide sensitivity range, with significant differences among almost all assays, resulting in significantly different classification rates of patients. These differences were even larger when using fixed %fPSA thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

The current situation of differences among PSA values measured with different assays do not allow the recommendation of uniform PSA limits as biopsy criteria. For that purpose, better harmonization of PSA values between the different PSA test systems must be realized.

Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2-10 ng/ml in 4,480 men

Use of percent free PSA (%fPSA) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) can eliminate unnecessary prostate biopsies. In a total of 4,480 patients from five centers with PSA concentrations in the range of 2-10 ng/ml an IMMULITE PSA-based ANN (iANN) was compared with other PSA assay-adapted ANNs (nANNs) to investigate the impact of different PSA assays. ANN data were generated with PSA, fPSA (assays from Abbott, Beckman, DPC, Roche or Wallac), age, prostate volume, and DRE status. In 15 different ROC analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) in the PSA ranges 2-4, 2-10, and 4-10 ng/ml for the nANN was always significantly larger than the AUC for %fPSA or PSA. The nANN and logistic regression models mostly also performed better than the iANN. Therefore, for each patient population, PSA assay-specific ANNs should be used to optimize the ANN outcome in order to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Comparison of 6 automated assays for total and free prostate-specific antigen with special reference to their reactivity toward the WHO 96/670 reference preparation

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays have historically produced different results. Our aim was to investigate the comparability of assay results of selected commercially available assay methods designed to measure total, free, or complexed PSA (tPSA, fPSA, and cPSA).

METHODS

We measured tPSA, fPSA, and cPSA in 70 samples and in the WHO PSA 96/670 reference preparation with 6 assays (Beckman-Coulter Access, Abbott ARCHITECT and AxSYM, Bayer Advia Centaur, DPC IMMULITE 2000, and Roche Modular Analytics E170). We also calculated the fPSA/tPSA ratio.

RESULTS

The mean deviations from the expected tPSA and fPSA values for the WHO 96/670 reference preparation were 0.37 (range, 0.01-1.32) and 0.19 (range, 0.05-0.49) microg/L, respectively. When plotted against the expected WHO 96/670 reference preparation value, regression slopes varied from 0.99 to 1.22 and r2 from 0.9996 to 1.000. When total PSA was measured in mixtures of sera with high and low tPSA concentrations, the mean (SD) slope of regression of different assays against an in-house method was 1.04 (0.09). In these specimens, the fPSA/tPSA ratio was 0.11-0.14 with different methods. The tPSA and fPSA values in patient samples measured in different assays and plotted against ARCHITECT gave regression slopes from 0.88 to 0.97. The results of the studied assays for tPSA in serum samples agreed within 15%, from each other, and all results for the WHO 96/670 reference preparation were within 6.8% (confidence interval, 1.7%-15.2%) of the expected value. The results for fPSA were more diverse.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences among PSA assays appear to have decreased since introduction of the WHO 96/670 reference preparation, but further efforts are needed to harmonize fPSA assays.

Relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in Korean men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate volume (PV) in Korean men, as PV is a key predictor of both disease progression and response to medical therapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and PSA has been suggested as a proxy marker to estimate the total PV, mainly in Caucasians.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1999 to 2004, men aged 50-79 years with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and BPH were enrolled into this multicentre study. The analyses included 5716 patients presenting to 11 medical centres with LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score >8, peak urinary flow rate <15 mL/s); they had a mean age of 64.3 years, mean baseline PV of 36.9 mL, and mean baseline PSA level of 2.2 ng/mL. Men with a baseline PSA of >10 ng/mL were excluded, to reduce the likelihood of including occult prostate cancer. A biopsy was taken in those with suspicious findings on a digital rectal examination or serum PSA level of >4 ng/mL, to exclude prostate cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of serum PSA to predict threshold PV in men with BPH.

RESULTS

The PV and serum PSA level had an age-dependent log-linear relationship, the strength of which increased with age. The ROC curve analysis showed that PSA had good predictive value for various prostate volume thresholds (30, 40 and 50 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The PSA-PV relationship in Korean men is similar to that in Caucasians, but Korean men have a slightly lower PSA level and a smaller PV than Caucasians. The approximate age-specific criteria for detecting Korean men with a PV of >40 mL were a PSA level of >1.3 ng/mL, >1.7 ng/mL and >2.0 ng/mL for men with BPH in their sixth, seventh and eighth decade, respectively.

Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update

BACKGROUND

The comparability of total and free prostate-specific antigen (tPSA and fPSA) results among commercial PSA assays has been suggested to be improved by calibration to WHO PSA reference materials and the development of equimolar-response assays. To characterize the current situation, we assessed 5 frequently used commercial assay combinations for tPSA and fPSA regarding the interchangeability of the PSA values and the ratio of fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA), equimolar characteristics, and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Sera from 314 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and 282 men with no evidence of prostate cancer (NPCa) were measured with tPSA and fPSA assays from Abbott (AxSYM), Beckman Coulter (Access), Diagnostic Products Corporation (Immulite 2000), and Roche (Elecsys 2010) and with tPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA) assays from Bayer (ADVIA Centaur).

RESULTS

Method comparisons (Passing and Bablok regressions; Bland-Altman plots) showed assay-dependent results for tPSA, fPSA, and %fPSA. With the Access tPSA values taken as 100%, tPSA concentrations varied from 87% (AxSYM and ADVIA Centaur) to 115% (Immulite), leading to different numbers of patients classified according to the commonly recommended tPSA cutoffs for performing a biopsy. Different %fPSA values also led to assay-dependent ROC analysis results, a finding that shows the importance for the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Interchangeability of tPSA, fPSA, and %fPSA values obtained by commercial PSA assays remains inadequate, but attention to this issue may minimize the misinterpretation of PSA results obtained by different assays.

Quality assessment for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in relation to ERSPC: report of the PSA Committee

OBJECTIVE

To assess the application of a quality control scheme for total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as used for participants of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) during 1996-2002.

METHODS

From 1996, the first complete year being 1997, an external scheme was organized by the Dutch Quality Assessment Foundation especially for the ERSPC. This scheme consists of one control round every 2 months with two different human serum samples and is only meant to compare the recovery of methods. From 1998 an internal scheme was also applied by adding two distinct samples to every round.

RESULTS

Initially there was a wide variation (coefficient of variation of +/- 15% at threshold PSA of 4.0 ng/mL) among all ERSPC participants who were all using the Tandem assay (Hybritech Inc, USA). After introducing the internal scheme the performance of some intra-ERSPC group comparisons for PSA and the introduction of the completely automated Beckman-Access analyser in 2001 there was state-of-the-art precision for PSA of +/- 5% in the 2002 surveys.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERSPC group measurements of PSA have considerably improved since 1996 because of the application of a quality-assessment scheme and with the introduction of complete automation of the PSA assay. Both findings are in line with earlier developments in clinical chemistry.

A new modification of the Chiron ACS assay for total prostate-specific antigen achieves equimolar response characteristics and improves the detection of prostate cancer

Nonequimolar-response assays for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are criticized for overestimating total PSA in some men without prostate cancer (PCA), and underestimating total PSA in some men with PCA. We recently studied three nonequimolar-response PSA assays that had undergone modifications. While two of the studied assays achieved equimolar-response characteristics with improved areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), the modification of the Chiron ACS PSA assay (ACS PSA2, Chiron) failed to achieve this. Recently, the ACS assay underwent another modification (ACS PSA, Bayer), which we investigated. Sera from 305 men (155 without and 150 with PCA, PSA > or = 2 and < or = 30 microg/l, Tandem-E) were measured using both modifications of the ACS assay and equimolar-response reference methods (Tandem-R free and Tandem-E, Hybritech). Molar response relative to the reference method and clinical performance (comparison of AUCs) between the previous and new ACS assay modifications were studied. The new modification of the ACS assay (ACS PSA, Bayer) achieved equimolar-response characteristics but reported lower values (average 10%) than the Tandem-E assay. Compared to the previous modification (ACS PSA2, Chiron), a 3% improvement in AUC (p = 0.01) was found. Using results of the redesigned equimolar-response assay (ACS PSA, Bayer), we calculated that 6 of 155 men without PCA in this sample set could be spared unnecessary biopsy compared with the previous nonequimolar-response assay (ACS PSA2, Chiron) without missing additional PCA (90% sensitivity). These data provide additional evidence for clinical advantages of equimolar-response over nonequimolar-response PSA assay formats.

Different PSA assays lead to detection of prostate cancers with identical histological features

OBJECTIVE

Because different PSA assays still show a wide inter-assay variation, we wondered what influence these discrepancies could have on the individual tumour characteristics of the cancers that each of these assays detect in a critical low PSA range. We analysed five different PSA assays in a biopsy simulation with PSA cut-offs of 3.0 and 4.0 ng/ml.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomly taken samples of 360 men with prostate cancer and 96 with benign prostatic disease from a screened population with PSA range of 1.0-6.0 ng/ml (Tandem-E) were investigated. In all cases the diagnosis was confirmed by sextant biopsies. One hundred and thirty-seven men (38%) underwent radical prostatectomy. Variability amongst assays was illustrated in terms of missed cancers and unnecessary biopsies, and in terms of pathologic features of detected cancers at both PSA cut-offs.

RESULTS

Compared to Tandem-E, all assays, except Access, showed significant differences in PSA measurements. Furthermore, none of the assays discriminated significantly between benign and malignant prostatic disease (p>0.05). Tandem-E and Elecsys lead significantly more frequently to the detection of cancers at the cost of more unnecessary biopsies compared to the other assays. Yet, at both PSA cut-offs the proportion of cancers with a certain pathologic grade or stage that were detected by each assay were approximately the same.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the use of different PSA assays only have consequences for the number, and not for the tumour characteristics of the prostate cancers that are detected. Thus, different PSA assays detect prostate cancers with the same tumour features.