1
|
Heidenberg DJ, Choudry MM, Briggs LG, Ahmadieh K, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Katariya NN, Cheney SM. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Kidney Transplant Ureteral Strictures. Urology 2024; 193:186-191. [PMID: 38729270 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.04.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate outcomes of robotic-assisted transplant ureteral repair (RATUR) for the management of kidney transplant ureteral strictures (TUS). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients who underwent RATUR for TUS at multiple tertiary referral centers between January 2016 and December 2022. RATUR was performed utilizing a robotic-assisted transperitoneal approach. The primary outcome was stricture recurrence rate and secondary outcomes included postoperative complicate rate, determining factors impacting with allograft functional recovery, and rate of conversion to open surgery. Categorical and continuous variables are displayed as total number (Percentage) or median [Interquartile Range], respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient was utilized to assess categorical variable correlation with creatinine. RESULTS The median age was 56years [44,66]. The female-to-male ratio was 1.1:1. Approximately 66% of patients were dialysis-dependent prior to kidney transplantation. TUS was identified at a median time of 4months [2, 15.5] following kidney transplant. Median stricture length was 2 cm [1.22, 2.9 cm]. There were no TUS recurrences with a median follow-up of 36months [24,48]. There were 3 Clavien grade 2 and 1 Clavien grade 3 complications (9.5%). No baseline characteristics or preoperative diagnostics were correlated with a long-term decline in renal allograft function. CONCLUSION RATUR has excellent and durable outcomes with low complication rates. These findings encourage the use of a minimally invasive definitive repair as a first-line treatment option for the management of TUS.
Collapse
|
2
|
Transplant Kidney Retrograde Ureteral Stent Placement and Exchange: Overcoming the Challenge. Urology 2017; 111:220-224. [PMID: 28965862 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present a reliable technique for fluoroscopic controlled, large-bore, ureteral stent placement and exchange in transplant kidneys with persistent ureterovesical strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the medical charts of all patients who underwent kidney transplant with persistent ureterovesical strictures who underwent ureteral stent placement or exchange at our institution between 2005 and 2015 using the new technique. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of the study cohort were analyzed. RESULTS Ureteral stent insertion or stent exchange, using this technique, was performed in 32 renal transplant units. Median operating time was 24 minutes (interquartile range, 21-36.75 minutes). The overall success rate of the technique at first attempt was 96.9%. In 1 patient, drainage of the transplanted kidney with a nephrostomy tube was indicated after procedure failure. No other local or systemic complications were encountered, and no stent encrustation was noted in this cohort of patients. Renal function remained stable in all patients during a median follow-up of 59 months (interquartile range, 28-61 months). CONCLUSION Herein, we present in detail a step-by-step technique for the insertion and exchange of large-bore ureteral stents in transplanted kidneys. The technique was shown to be safe, effective, and highly successful.
Collapse
|
3
|
Complications chirurgicales de la transplantation rénale. Prog Urol 2016; 26:1066-1082. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.09.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
4
|
Sabnis RB, Singh AG, Ganpule AP, Chhabra JS, Tak GR, Shah JH. The development and current status of minimally invasive surgery to manage urological complications after renal transplantation. Indian J Urol 2016; 32:186-91. [PMID: 27555675 PMCID: PMC4970388 DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.185100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In the past, urological complications after renal transplantation were associated with significant morbidity. With the development and application of endourological procedures, it is now possible to manage these cases with minimally invasive techniques. Materials and Methods: A MEDLINE search for articles published in English using key words for the management of urological complications after renal transplantation was undertaken. Forty articles were selected and reviewed. Results: The incidence of urological complications postrenal transplantation was reported to be 2–13%. Ureteric leaks occurred in up to 8.6%, and 55% were managed endourologically. The incidence of lymphocele was as high as 20%, and less that 12% of the cases required treatment. Ureteric stricture was the most common complication, and endourological management was successful in 50–70%. The occurrence of complicated vesicoureteral reflux was 4.5%, and 90% of low-grade reflux cases were successfully treated with deflux injections. Stones and obstructive voiding dysfunction occurred in about 1% of kidney transplant recipients. Conclusion: Minimally invasive techniques have a critical role in the management of urological complications after renal transplantation. Urinary leakage should be managed with complete decompression. Percutaneous drainage should be the first line of treatment for lymphocele that is symptomatic or causing ureteric obstruction. Laparoscopic lymphocele deroofing is successful in aspiration-resistant cases. Deflux is highly successful for the management of complicated low-grade kidney transplant reflux. The principles of stone management in a native solitary kidney are applied to the transplanted kidney. Early identification and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after renal transplantation can prevent urinary leakage and obstructive uropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravindra B Sabnis
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Abhishek G Singh
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Arvind P Ganpule
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Jaspreet S Chhabra
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Gopal R Tak
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Jaimin H Shah
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kwong J, Schiefer D, Aboalsamh G, Archambault J, Luke PP, Sener A. Optimal management of distal ureteric strictures following renal transplantation: a systematic review. Transpl Int 2016; 29:579-88. [PMID: 26895782 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Revised: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Our objective was to define optimal management of distal ureteric strictures following renal transplantation. A systematic review on PubMed identified 34 articles (385 patients). Primary endpoints were success rates and complications of specific primary and secondary treatments (following failure of primary treatment). Among primary treatments (n = 303), the open approach had 85.4% success (95% CI 72.5-93.1) and the endourological approach had 64.3% success (95% CI 58.3-69.9). Among secondary treatments (n = 82), the open approach had 93.1% success (95% CI 77.0-99.2) and the endourological approach had 75.5% success (95% CI 62.3-85.2). The most common primary open treatment was ureteric reimplantation (n = 33, 81.8% success, 95% CI 65.2-91.8). The most common primary endourological treatment was dilation (n = 133, 58.6% success, 95% CI 50.1-66.7). Fourteen complications, including death (4 weeks post-op) and graft loss (12 days post-op), followed endourological treatment. One complication followed open treatment. This is the first systematic review to examine the success rates and complications of specific treatments for distal ureteric strictures following renal transplantation. Our review indicates that open management has higher success rates and fewer complications than endourological management as a primary and secondary treatment for post-transplant distal ureteric strictures. We also outline a post-transplant ureteric stricture evaluation and treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Kwong
- Division of Urology in the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Schiefer
- Matthew Mailing Center for Translational Transplant Research, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ghaleb Aboalsamh
- Division of Urology in the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jason Archambault
- Division of Urology in the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick P Luke
- Division of Urology in the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Matthew Mailing Center for Translational Transplant Research, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alp Sener
- Division of Urology in the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Matthew Mailing Center for Translational Transplant Research, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Putz J, Leike S, Wirth MP. [Management of urological complications after renal transplantation]. Urologe A 2015; 54:1385-92. [PMID: 26459581 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-015-3908-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Urological complications after kidney transplantation can cause a major reduction in renal function. Surgical complications like urinary leakage and ureteral obstruction need to be solved by a specialist in the field of endourological procedures and open surgical interventions. The article summarizes this and other common urological problems after kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Putz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - S Leike
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - M P Wirth
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Duty BD, Barry JM. Diagnosis and management of ureteral complications following renal transplantation. Asian J Urol 2015; 2:202-207. [PMID: 29264146 PMCID: PMC5730752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2015] [Revised: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
When compared with maintenance dialysis, renal transplantation affords patients with end-stage renal disease better long-term survival and a better quality of life. Approximately 9% of patients will develop a major urologic complication following kidney transplantation. Ureteral complications are most common and include obstruction (intrinsic and extrinsic), urine leak and vesicoureteral reflux. Ureterovesical anastomotic strictures result from technical error or ureteral ischemia. Balloon dilation or endoureterotomy may be considered for short, low-grade strictures, but open reconstruction is associated with higher success rates. Urine leak usually occurs in the early postoperative period. Nearly 60% of patients can be successfully managed with a pelvic drain and urinary decompression (nephrostomy tube, ureteral stent, and indwelling bladder catheter). Proximal, large-volume, or leaks that persist despite urinary diversion, require open repair. Vesicoureteral reflux is common following transplantation. Patients with recurrent pyelonephritis despite antimicrobial prophylaxis require surgical treatment. Deflux injection may be considered in recipients with low-grade disease. Grade IV and V reflux are best managed with open reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D Duty
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - John M Barry
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The current role of endourologic management of renal transplantation complications. Adv Urol 2013; 2013:246520. [PMID: 24023541 PMCID: PMC3760203 DOI: 10.1155/2013/246520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2013] [Revised: 07/20/2013] [Accepted: 07/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Complications following renal transplantation include ureteral obstruction, urinary leak and fistula, urinary retention, urolithiasis, and vesicoureteral reflux. These complications have traditionally been managed with open surgical correction, but minimally invasive techniques are being utilized frequently. Materials and Methods. A literature review was performed on the use of endourologic techniques for the management of urologic transplant complications. Results. Ureterovesical anastomotic stricture is the most common long-term urologic complication following renal transplantation. Direct vision endoureterotomy is successful in up to 79% of cases. Urinary leak is the most frequent renal transplant complication early in the postoperative period. Up to 62% of patients have been successfully treated with maximal decompression (nephrostomy tube, ureteral stent, and Foley catheter). Excellent outcomes have been reported following transurethral resection of the prostate shortly after transplantation for patients with urinary retention. Vesicoureteral reflux after renal transplant is common.
Deflux injection has been shown to resolve reflux in up to 90% of patients with low-grade disease in the absence of high pressure voiding. Donor-gifted and de novo transplant calculi may be managed with shock wave, ureteroscopic, or percutaneous lithotripsy. Conclusions. Recent advances in equipment and technique have allowed many transplant patients with complications to be effectively managed endoscopically.
Collapse
|
9
|
Retrograde endoureterotomy for persistent ureterovesical anastomotic strictures in renal transplant kidneys after failed antegrade balloon dilation. Urology 2012; 80:255-9. [PMID: 22497983 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2011] [Revised: 02/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term outcomes and complications of retrograde endoureterotomy for persistent ureterovesical anastomotic strictures in renal transplant patients after percutaneous balloon dilation failure. METHODS From January 2000 to May 2010, 26 (2.6%) of 1004 renal transplant patients developed ureterovesical anastomotic stricture after surgery. Seven of these patients and five additional referred patients with similar characteristics were treated with retrograde endoureterotomy after ≥1 previous unsuccessful attempt at percutaneous balloon dilation. All strictures treated were <1 cm in length. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Success was defined as the absence of symptoms and the resolution of obstruction on imaging after the procedure. RESULTS The median interval from initial treatment to endoureterotomy was 2.9 months (range 1.3-62.1). Before endoscopic treatment, 8 patients (67%) were treated with a single trial of balloon dilation and 4 (33%) with multiple trials. Endoureterotomy was performed using cold knife, holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser, and Bugbee electrode in 9, 2, and 1 patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 44.4 months (range 2.4-68.6). Recurrent stricture developed in 2 patients during a mean follow-up of 4.7 months. Thus, the overall success rate was 83%. Postoperative complications appeared in 3 patients (25%) with culture-positive urinary tract infection. One graft failure occurred but was not related to a recurrent stricture. CONCLUSION After failure of antegrade percutaneous balloon dilation, retrograde endoureterotomy is an effective salvage procedure for well-selected cases of renal transplant patients with a short ureterovesical anastomotic stricture.
Collapse
|
10
|
He Z, Li X, Chen L, Zeng G, Yuan J, Chen W, Zhang C. Endoscopic incision for obstruction of vesico-ureteric anastomosis in transplanted kidneys. BJU Int 2008; 102:102-6. [PMID: 18341628 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07604.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report our experience of endoscopic incision for obstruction of vesico-ureteric anastomosis (VUA) in transplanted kidneys. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between February 2001 and March 2006, six men and two women (mean age 38 years, range 27-57) with VUA obstruction in their transplanted kidneys were treated by percutaneous nephrostomy and endoscopic incision. After the anastomosis was completely cut, two JJ stents were placed in the ureter for 4-6 weeks. During the follow-up, serum urea, creatinine and uric acid levels were measured, and urine culture, ultrasound examination and washout renal scintigraphy were performed every month for the first 6 months, then every 3 months. RESULTS In all, 12 procedures of endoureterotomy were performed and all procedures resulted in successful incision of the obstruction. There were no complications during or after the procedures. The retrograde and antegrade endoureterotomies were performed with four procedures in two patients and eight procedures in six patients, respectively. At a mean (range) follow-up of 16 (4-45) months, five of the eight patients had ureteric patency and stable renal function. In three patients there was a recurrence of obstructive uropathy, immediately after JJ stent removal, which finally required open surgical correction. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous nephrostomy and endoscopic incision is safe and effective for obstruction of VUA in transplanted kidney, and it can be the initial therapy for ureteric obstruction in transplanted kidneys; however, open surgical reconstruction should be considered if the initial endoscopic incision procedure fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui He
- Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burmeister D, Noster M, Kram W, Kundt G, Seiter H. Urologische Komplikationen nach Nierentransplantation. Urologe A 2006; 45:25-31. [PMID: 16292481 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-005-0960-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Between August 1981 and May 2005, 1065 consecutive kidney transplants were performed at our center; 393 patients (36.9%) developed urological complications in the first 60 postoperative days. Urinary tract infections occurred in 28.5% of all patients. The major urological problems seen were urinary leakage and ureteral obstruction in 6.2% and 1.4% of the patients. Two grafts were lost due to severe urinary leakage. No patient death occurred due to urological complications. The incidence of urological complications is mainly influenced by the surgical procedure of organ retrieval and ureteroneocystostomy. With double-J stenting of the extravesical ureteroneocystostomy, we observed a significantly lower rate of urinary leakage but a higher rate of urinary tract infections in our series. Early diagnosis and treatment of urological complications may prevent further morbidity of our transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Burmeister
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität, E.-Heydemann-Strasse 6, 18055 Rostock.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Literature watch. J Endourol 2004; 18:397-405. [PMID: 15259189 DOI: 10.1089/089277904323056979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|