Combined use of sphenoidal electrodes and the dipole localization method for the identification of the mesial temporal focus

A method for the inclusion of sphenoidal electrodes in realistic EEG source imaging

SUMMARY

Although EEG source imaging (ESI) has become more popular over the last few years, sphenoidal electrodes (SPE) have never been incorporated in ESI using realistic head models. This is in part because of the true locations of these electrodes are not exactly known. In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of determining the true locations of SPE and incorporating this information into realistic ESI. The impact of including these electrodes in ESI in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy is also discussed. Seventeen patients were retrospectively selected for this study. To determine the positions of SPE in each case, two orthogonal x-rays (sagittal and coronal) of the SPE needle stilette were taken in the presence of previously digitized scalp electrodes. An in-house computer program was then used to find the locations of the tip of the needle stilette relative to the surface electrodes. These locations were then incorporated in a realistic head model based on the finite element method. EEG source imaging was then performed using averaged spikes for included patients suspected of having mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Including SPE significantly shifted the ESI result even in the presence of subtemporal electrodes, resulting in an inferior and mesial displacement.

Integrating dense array EEG in the presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose. To evaluate the clinical utility of dense array electroencephalography (dEEG) for detecting and localizing interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Methods. Simultaneous invasive and noninvasive recordings were performed across two different groups. (1) The first group underwent both noninvasive recording with 128 channels of (scalp) dEEG and invasive sphenoidal electrode recording. (2) The second group underwent both noninvasive recording with 256 channels of (scalp) dEEG and invasive intracranial EEG (icEEG) involving coverage with grids and strips over the lateral and mesial temporal lobe. A noninvasive to noninvasive comparison was made comparing the overall spike detection rate of the dEEG to that of conventional 10/20 EEG. A noninvasive to invasive comparison was made comparing the spike detection rate of dEEG to that of conventional 10/20 EEG plus sphenoidal electrodes. And finally, a noninvasive to invasive evaluation measuring the source localization ability of the dEEG using the icEEG as validation. Results. In the 128-channel dEEG study (1), 90.4% of the interictal spikes detected by the dEEG were not detected in the 10/20 montage. 91% of the dEEG-detected spikes were accurately localized to the medial temporal lobe. In the 256-channel dEEG study (2), 218 of 519 interictal spikes (42%) were detected by dEEG. 85% of these spikes were accurately localized to the medial temporal lobe, close to the position confirmed by subdural electrodes. Conclusion. Dense array EEG may provide more precise information than conventional EEG and has a potential for providing an alternative to sphenoidal electrode monitoring in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

Sphenoidal electrodes significantly change the results of source localization of interictal spikes for a large percentage of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

Although scalp EEG is a very useful tool for presurgical evaluation in epilepsy, the 10-20 system of electrodes in many cases fails to accurately localize the source of the epileptic seizures. One suggested solution to this problem is to use additional electrodes. Sphenoidal electrodes especially have been suggested to be helpful in identifying the irritative and seizure onset zones in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. However, the value of these electrodes has been debated, and in many epilepsy centers they are not used. In this study, we investigate the impact of sphenoidal electrodes by comparing the results of EEG source localization with and without sphenoidal recordings. We retrospectively selected patients with temporal lobe epilepsy based on their clinical semiology and electrophysiologic data. For each patient, a prototype spike was used as a template for an automatic pattern search to find similar activities. The identified spikes were then averaged and analyzed by fitting a dipole to the data. The recordings from sphenoidal electrodes were then excluded and the analysis was repeated. It was found that in more than half of the patients inclusion of sphenoidal electrodes resulted in a shift of more than 2 cm in the location of the fitted dipole, and in some cases moved the dipole from the frontal lobe or the insula to the temporal lobe. Our results suggest that sphenoidal electrodes are helpful in the analysis of the EEG recordings of patients suspected of having temporal lobe epilepsy.

Usefulness of intracranial EEG in the decision process for epilepsy surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In patients with discordant results, non-localizing EEG, or bitemporal seizure onset, intracranial monitoring is done to confirm the seizure onset. Our aim was to assess the yield of intracranial recordings in patients with different clinical scenarios.

METHODS

The records of all patients who underwent prolonged intracranial EEG monitoring (IEM) at the London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, Canada, between 1993 and 1999, identified using our EEG patient database in continuous use since December 1972, were reviewed. Patients were analyzed in the following groups according to perceived increasing degrees of uncertainty of epileptic zone localization-group 1: lesion on MRI congruent with focal ictal and interictal scalp EEG, but findings are subtle and of low level of certainty (n=13), group 2: focal MRI, focal ictal and multifocal interictal scalp EEG (n=11), group 3: focal MRI, non-localizing or incongruent scalp EEG (n=73), group 4: normal of multifocal MRI, focal ictal scalp EEG (n=11), group 5: multifocal MRI, non-localizing scalp EEG (n=18), and group 6: normal MRI, multifocal scalp EEG (n=36).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy one patients underwent IEM at the London Health Sciences Centre between 1993 and 1999. All patients had localization-related epilepsy, plus or minus secondary generalization. IEM was helpful overall in 86% of patients, in 69% of group 1, 36% of group 2, 90% of group 3, 81% of group 4, 100 of group 5 and 92% of group 6.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the yield of the IEM was higher in the groups of patients with lack of congruence between the MRI and the scalp EEG. The yield was lower in patients with congruent but subtle or uncertain scalp EEG and MRI findings.