Use and overuse of sumatriptan. Pharmacoepidemiological studies based on prescription register and interview data

Effects of Chronic Sumatriptan and Zolmitriptan Treatment on 5-HT1 Receptor Expression and Function in Rats

Triptans are commonly used anti-migraine drugs and show agonist action mainly at serotonin 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptors. It is not known whether frequent or long-term treatment with these drugs would alter 5-HT receptor function. We investigated the effects of protracted (14-18 days) sumatriptan and zolmitriptan treatment in rats on 5-HT1 receptor mRNA expression and function in tissues related to migraine pathophysiology. RT-PCR analysis revealed that 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptor mRNA was reduced in the trigeminal ganglion after treatment with either triptan (reduction by: sumatriptan 39% and zolmitriptan 61% for 5-HT1B; 60% vs 41% for 5-HT1D; 32% vs 68% for 5-HT1F). Sumatriptan attenuated 5-HT1D receptor mRNA by 49% in the basilar artery, whereas zolmitriptan reduced 5-HT1B mRNA in this tissue by 70%. No change in 5-HT1 receptor mRNA expression was observed in coronary artery and dura mater. Chronic triptan treatment had no effect in two functional assays [sumatriptan mediated inhibition (50 mg/kg, i.p.) of electrically induced plasma protein extravasation in dura mater and 5-nonyloxytryptaminestimulated [35S]guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding in substantia nigra]. Furthermore, vasoconstriction to 5-HT in isolated basilar artery was not affected by chronic triptan treatment, while it was slightly reduced in coronary artery. We conclude that, although our treatment protocol altered mRNA receptor expression in several tissues relevant to migraine pathophysiology, it did not attenuate 5-HT1 receptor-dependent functions in rats.

Need for Analgesics/drugs of Abuse: A Comparison Between Headache Patients and Addicts by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ)

Our aim was to compare the need for analgesics/drugs of abuse between headache patients—chronic and episodic headache sufferers—and addicts, by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). This is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. We administered the LDQ questionnaire to 122 chronic daily headache (CDH) sufferers who had been taking one dose of analgesic drug every day for at least 1 year; 71 subjects suffering from episodic headache (EH) using analgesics only occasionally; 115 consecutive drug addicts (DA) with a diagnosis of substance dependence. The mean LDQ total score was similar in the CDH (11.58 ± 6.35) and DA (10.37 ± 6.51) groups, and for both it was significantly higher than the score in the EH (5.61 ± 3.00) group ( P < 0.001). The CDH group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the DA group (Z = −8.18, P < 0.001) in item 8, assessing the primacy of effect over the kind of analgesic used, and in item 10 (Z = −5.03, P < 0.001), asking if it is difficult to live without the analgesic; the DA group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the CDH group, in item 9 (Z = −5.07, P < 0.001) addressing the need for the continued administration of the drug to maintain well-being, and in item 3 (Z =−2.39, P < 0.05), exploring compulsion to start the use of the drug. The EH group had lower scores in all items ( P < 0.05) except for item 9, where there was no difference from CDH group; the EH group had also lower scores ( P < 0.001) than the DA group, except for item 8, where, instead, the score was higher than in the DA group (Z = −5.33, P < 0.001). A strong link develops between chronic headache patients and the analgesics they use. This sort of ‘dependence’ appears to be a consequence of headache, originating from the necessity for the analgesic to cope with everyday life.

Treatment of medication-overuse headache: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this review is to provide an evidence-based discussion of different treatment strategies for medication-overuse headache (MOH).

METHOD

We searched PubMed for articles discussing the treatment and prognosis of MOH published between 2004 and August 2014. Titles, abstract and articles were reviewed systematically. The level of evidence provided by each study of the included articles was determined according to the American Academy of Neurology Clinical practice guideline manual. We discuss the level of evidence to support the early discontinuation/withdrawal of overused medications, the level of evidence to support the use of preventive treatment, the short- and long-term prognosis, and the outcome according to the class of drug overused in patients diagnosed with MOH.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 1313 articles; 68 articles met our inclusion criteria and were discussed. The level of evidence to support early discontinuation of overused medications alone is low due to the absence of controlled studies. Adding preventive medication to early discontinuation led to a better outcome than early discontinuation alone. For patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse (MO), there are large randomized control trials supporting the use of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate without early discontinuation of overuse; however, the evidence is limited since data were obtained from post hoc analysis.

CONCLUSION

Considering current available evidence and the systemic toxicity of overusing acute headache medication, we suggest discontinuation of the overused medication with the addition of preventive medication. Appropriately sized, randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and long-term efficacy of preventive medication plus early discontinuation of overuse vs preventive medication alone vs early discontinuation of overuse alone are needed.

Prescription pain medications and chronic headache in Denmark: implications for preventing medication overuse

PURPOSE

The aim of the present paper is to study which prescription pain medications are most commonly dispensed to people with chronic headache (CH), particularly those with medication-overuse headache (MOH).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analysed prescription pain medications dispensed within 1 year to 68,518 respondents of a national health survey. Participants with headache ≥ 15 days per month for 3 months were classified as having CH. Those with CH and over-the-counter analgesic use ≥ 15 days per month or purchase of ≥ 20 or ≥ 30 defined daily doses (DDDs) of prescription pain medication per month (depending on the drug) were classified as having MOH. Associations between CH and other chronic pain conditions were analysed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among those with CH (adjusted prevalence 3.3%, CI 3.2-3.5%), pain medications most commonly dispensed were paracetamol, tramadol, ibuprofen and codeine. CH was associated with osteoarthritis, back pain, and rheumatoid arthritis. Among those with MOH, 32.4% were dispensed an opioid at least once within 1 year. Only 5.1% of people with CH were dispensed triptans.

CONCLUSIONS

High prevalence of opioid use among people with CH may be due to inappropriate headache treatment or development of MOH among those treated for other pain conditions. While there were cases of triptan overuse, triptans remain underutilized among those with CH, suggesting that migraine may be under-recognized and inappropriately treated, leading to overuse of other medications. Education of physicians on appropriate headache management is essential for MOH prevention. There is a need to increase universal awareness about MOH as an adverse effect of long-term analgesic use.

Treatment adherence among new triptan users: a 2-year cohort study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The persistence of triptan use among newly prescribed users is low in the United States and European countries. However, triptan refill patterns in Asian primary care practices have not been well described.

METHODS

Data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan were used to conduct a retrospective cohort analysis from 2005 to 2008. All participants were followed for 2 years after receiving a new triptan prescription. Refill and 2-year retention rates of newly prescribed triptans were calculated, and predictors of the first triptan refill and 2-year retention were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 13,951 participants with a new triptan prescription (99.9% sumatriptan), 67.4% were prescribed by a neurologist, 67.4% were prescribed at least one prophylactic agent for migraine. Of them, 34.3% adhered to the newly prescribed triptan at the first refill, 0.01% switched to another triptan, and 40.9% switched to a non-triptan acute migraine medication. The 2-year retention rate was 4.0%. The frequency of headache-related neurologic visits for 1 year before the index date, first prescription of triptan or other acute medications, first triptan prescription by a neurologist, and prophylactic use were associated with higher first refill rates. The frequency of headache-related neurologic visits 1 year before the index date and first triptan prescription by a neurologist were related to higher 2-year retention rates. Diabetes mellitus and first triptan prescription at a local medical clinic were associated with reduced probability of continued triptan use at the first refill and 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to Western societies, the refill and 2-year retention rates were low in new users of triptans. Frequency of neurologic visits and triptan prescription by a neurologist were significant predictors of adherence.

Reference programme: diagnosis and treatment of headache disorders and facial pain. Danish Headache Society, 2nd Edition, 2012

Headache and facial pain are among the most common, disabling and costly disorders in Europe. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important for achieving a high quality of care. As a national organisation whose role is to educate and advocate for the needs of patients with primary headaches, the Danish Headache Society has set up a task force to develop a set of guidelines for the diagnosis, organisation and treatment of the most common types of headaches and for trigeminal neuralgia in Denmark. The guideline was published in Danish in 2010 and has been a great success. The Danish Headache Society decided to translate and publish our guideline in English to stimulate the discussion on optimal organisation and treatment of headache disorders and to encourage other national headache authorities to produce their own guidelines. The recommendations regarding the most common primary headaches and trigeminal neuralgia are largely in accordance with the European guidelines produced by the European Federation of Neurological Societies. The guideline provides a practical tool for use in daily clinical practice for primary care physicians, neurologists with a common interest in headache, as well as other health-care professionals treating headache patients. The guideline first describes how to examine and diagnose the headache patient and how headache treatment is organised in Denmark. This description is followed by individual sections on the characteristics, diagnosis, differential diagnosis and treatment of each of the major headache disorders and trigeminal neuralgia. The guideline includes many tables to facilitate a quick overview. Finally, the particular problems regarding headache in children and headache in relation to female hormones and pregnancy are described.

Triptan overuse in the Dutch general population: A nationwide pharmaco-epidemiology database analysis in 6.7 million people

Introduction: A population-based observational study was used to assess the prevalence, demographics, risk factors, and costs of triptan overuse, defined as more than 30 (International Headache Society criteria) or 54 (stringent criteria) defined daily doses per 3 months.

Methods: Analysis of the Dutch Health Care Insurance Board Database for 2005, which included prescriptions for 6.7 million people (46% of the total Dutch population).

Results: Triptans were used by 85,172 (1.3%) people; of these, 8,844 (10.4%; 95% CI 10.2–10.6) were overusers by International Headache Society and 2,787 (3.3%; 95% CI 3.2–3.4) were overusers by stringent criteria. The triptan-specific odds ratios for the rate of International Headache Society overuse compared with sumatriptan were: 0.26 (95% CI 0.19–0.36) for frovatriptan; 0.34 (95% CI 0.32–0.37) for rizatriptan; 0.76 95% CI 0.68–0.85) for naratriptan; 0.86 (95% CI 0.72–1.02) for eletriptan; 0.97 (95% CI 0.88–1.06) for zolmitriptan; and 1.49 (95% CI 1.31–1.72) for almotriptan. Costs for overuse were 29.7 million euros; for the International Headache Society criteria this was 46% of total costs and for stringent criteria it was 23%.

Discussion: In the Dutch general population, 1.3% used a triptan in 2005, of which 10.3% were overusers and accounted for half of the total costs of triptans. Users of frovatriptan, rizatriptan and naratriptan had a lower level of overuse.

Triptans: low utilization and high turnover in the general population

Studies performed in selected populations have shown a poor utilization of triptans for migraine. Our study was aimed at establishing patterns of triptans utilization in a large community using the pharmaceutical prescriptions database of two consecutive years in a regional Health Authority in Italy. About 0.5% of the population observed received triptans prescriptions in a year, but > 50% of the cases received only one prescription. On the other hand, 46% of triptan users did not receive a triptan prescription in the following year (past users): in 80% of cases, patients received only 1-2 triptan packages. The evaluation of the discontinued triptan type has shown percentages varying between 30 and 70%. The percentage of triptan users who received a triptan prescription for the first time in the successive year of study (new users) was 52%. These findings together highlight a high turnover in triptans utilization. Less than 15% of subjects received more than one triptan product in the 2 years. In conclusion, we observed a low percentage of triptan users and a low rate of utilization, associated with a high percentage of discontinuation and new utilization (high turnover), without any substantial increase in triptans utilization during the years. All these data probably do not support optimal satisfaction with triptan therapy.

Drug dependence associated with triptans and ergot derivatives: a case/non-case study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this case/non-case study was to assess and compare the risk of drug dependence associated with different migraine-specific drugs, i.e., ergot derivatives and triptans, using the French pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

Reports on drug side effects recorded in this database between January 1985 and June 2007 were analyzed, and triptans (almotriptan, eletriptan, naratriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan) as well as ergot derivatives used in acute migraine were examined. For all reports, cases were defined as those reports corresponding to "drug abuse," "physical or mental drug dependence," and "pharmacodependence," whereas "non-cases" were defined as all the remaining SED reports. The method's reliability was assessed by calculating the risk associated with a negative (amoxicillin) and a positive (benzodiazepines) control. The risk of dependence associated with each drug and control was evaluated by calculating the odds ratio (OR) with a confidence interval of 95%.

RESULTS

Among the 309,178 reports recorded in the database, drug dependence accounted for 0.8% (2,489) of the reports, with 10.9% (449) involving a triptan, and 9.33% (332) an ergot derivative. The risk of dependence was similar for triptans and ergot derivatives and did not differ from that of benzodiazepines. In the triptan group, the risk (odds ratio [95% CI]) ranged from 10.3 [4.8-22.3] for sumatriptan to 21.5 for eletriptan [10.1-45.6], while in the ergot derivative group, it ranged from 12 [8-17.9] for ergotamine to 20.6 [8-53] for dihydroergotamine.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the hypothesis that triptans and ergot derivatives are associated with an increased risk of drug dependence.

The effects of chronic administration of sumatriptan and dipyrone on serotonergic system in the rat brain: an immunohistochemical study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of chronic high dose sumatriptan and dipyrone treatment on central serotonergic system in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (seven per group) were daily injected with sumatriptan (3 mg/kg), dipyrone (400 mg/kg) or saline for 30 days. The brains of animals were surgically removed and immunohistochemically stained for serotonin. Serotonin-positive stained cells were counted automatically by using a computerized image analysis program. Statistical analysis carried out using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in serotonin-positive cells in the brainstem was observed after chronic sumatriptan administration while chronic use of dipyrone induced a significant increase in serotonin-positive cells both in the cortex and midbrain.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that central serotonergic system might be modified by chronic use of sumatriptan and dipyrone.

History of the Use of Ergotamine and Dihydroergotamine in Migraine From 1906 and Onward

Dale showed in 1906 in a seminal work that ergot inhibits the pressor effect of adrenaline. Stoll at Sandoz isolated ergotamine from ergot in 1918. Based on the belief that migraine was due to increased sympathetic activity, ergotamine was first used in the acute treatment of migraine by Maier in Switzerland in 1925. In 1938 Graham and Wolff demonstrated the parallel decrease of temporal pulsations and headache after ergotamine i.v. This inspired the vascular theory of Wolff: an initial cerebral vasoconstriction followed by an extracranial vasodilation. Dihydroergotamine (DHE) was introduced as an adrenolytic agent in 1943. It is still in use parenterally and by the nasal route. Before the triptan era ergotamine and DHE had widespread use as the only specific antimigraine drugs. From 1950 the world literature on ergotamine was dominated by two adverse events: ergotamine overuse headache and the relatively rare overt ergotism. Recently, oral ergotamine, which has an oral bioavailability of < 1%, has been inferior to oral triptans in randomized clinical trials. A European Consensus in 2000 concluded that ergotamine is not a drug of first choice. In an American review of 2003 it was suggested that ergotamine may be considered in the treatment of selected patients with moderate to severe migraine.

Triptans in the Italian population: a drug utilization study and a literature review

Previous studies performed in selected populations show a poor utilization of triptans for migraine. The objectives of our study were to establish patterns of triptans utilization in a large sample, covering 1/10 of Italian population (5.57 millions), and to perform a review of published studies on this topic. We investigated drug prescription database collected during 2006 from 33 health authorities distributed in 8 different regions. About 0.6% of the subjects received at least one prescription of triptans in 1 year: 77.7% were females and 22.3% males. Age distribution shows that 9.5% of patients were aged above 65, and received prescriptions for 8.2% of packages. The review of the literature suggests that these percentages of utilization are common to several countries, and shows that occasional triptan users who received only one prescription in 1 year are a large percentage (40-60%); moreover, a minor population of triptan users utilize a large amount of total triptans. Finally triptans are frequently prescribed in people aged above 65 years, a population in which triptans are contraindicated or not recommended. Our study and the analyzed ones indicate suboptimal treatment of migraine patients with triptans and also an incorrect use in some patients (triptan abusers, elderly).

Over-the-counter triptans for migraine : what are the implications?

In 2006, the triptans sumatriptan 50mg and naratriptan 2.5mg were approved as over-the-counter (OTC) drugs in pharmacies in the UK and Germany, respectively. Both drugs have been used in a large number of patients with migraine and are considered to have good safety profiles. The implications of OTC triptan availability for clinical practice are that more migraine patients will use a triptan and will tend to medicate early when their headache is still mild, which should be beneficial. The problem with OTC access to triptans is medication overuse; therefore, patients should be warned of this and advised to use a triptan on fewer than 10 days per month. Pharmacists should be educated regarding migraine types and symptoms and on contraindications to triptans, so they are then able to discern the patients who should receive triptans and, as importantly, those who should not. The annual cost of migraine is euro27 billion in Europe, $US1.4 billion in the UK and $US16.6 billion in the US. By far the greatest opportunity for cost-savings comes from the potential to reduce costs associated with lost productivity from migraine. OTC availability of triptans will inevitably result in easier access to these medications, which, in turn, may result in improved treatment and lower migraine-related disability. There is currently a lack of empirical evidence that treating migraine effectively does in fact recover lost productivity; well designed studies are required to show this. The availability of triptans OTC is a logical development for the better management of a common, benign, self-limiting but nonetheless burdensome disorder that is currently grossly undertreated. We welcome this development, but recognise that advice at the point of sale is crucial for effective and safe use of these drugs.

Triptan use and risk of cardiovascular events: a nested-case-control study from the French health system database

BACKGROUND

The use of triptans (5-HT agonists) in the treatment of migraine is associated with a potential increasing risk of cardiovascular events and raises the question of the relationship between overuse and the occurrence of ischemic events.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the association between the intensity of triptan use and occurrence of an cardiac event.

METHODS

Using the reimbursed drug prescription database of the National French Health Insurance System in the Midi-Pyrenees area, we identified subjects receiving at least one triptan in the second semester of 2002. From this population, we selected new users and retrieved all reimbursed care data up to 31 December 2003. We estimated the patterns of triptan exposure by calculating the number of defined daily doses (DDD) received per 30-day period. Another reimbursed health care database was used to identify as cases of cardiac outcomes those patients receiving care for the management of a possible heart ischemic event. Each case was randomly matched on age and gender with four controls free of any cardiovascular event before the index date. A conditional logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between cardiac outcomes and exposure to triptans in the 30 days before the index date.

RESULTS

The cohort of new users of triptans included 8625 subjects, 4414 (51.18%) of whom received only one dispensation for triptans during the follow-up period (median duration: 427 days). For the remaining subjects, the peak of triptans delivery was </=8 DDD for 14.68% of the cohort, between 9 and 14 DDD for 22.17%, between 15 and 29 for 10.04% and >/=30 DDD for 1.92%. Fifty-seven users (0.66%) presented a cardiac history and 1388 patients (16.09%) had cardiovascular risk factors. We identified 155 incident cases of cardiac outcomes during the follow-up and compared these to 620 matched controls. Cases were older and presented more frequently with cardiac history or cardiovascular risk factors than the other users of triptans. The distribution exposure to triptans did not significantly differ between cases and controls with an odds ratio for an exposure </=8 DDD in the last 30 days of 0.74 [95% CI (0.31-1.77)] and that for an exposure >8 DDD equal to 1.14 [95% CI (0.58-2.27)].

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients showing an overuse of triptans (more than 15 DDD for 30 days) reached 12% in this cohort of new users of triptans. However, we did not find any relationship between the overuse of triptans and cardiac outcomes. This study also shows that some patients with cardiovascular risk factors are actually treated by triptans. These patients are more likely to present a cardiac outcome potentially related to an ischemic event after the introduction of triptan.

Intensive community pharmacy intervention had little impact on triptan consumption: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an intensive pharmaceutical care campaign targeting inappropriate use of triptans.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

22 community pharmacies in the County of Funen, Denmark.

SUBJECTS

A total of 1123 triptan users at intervention pharmacies and 1340 at control pharmacies.

INTERVENTION

Intervention pharmacy staff received information on migraine and other types of headache, detection of inappropriate triptan use and other drug-related problems, and techniques for establishing a dialogue with patients. Intervention consisted of a folder and a structured dialogue with the pharmacy staff. The folder included questions aimed at detecting overuse and inappropriate triptan use.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in average triptan consumption in doses per month measured by means of a prescription database with information on all purchases of reimbursed drugs at the level of the individual patient.

RESULTS

Overall, intervention had no statistically significant short-term impact on patients' consumption of triptans either among incident users (intervention/control ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.12), or among prevalent users (1.02; 0.97 to 1.08). No effects were observed after 6 and 9 months, apart from a possible borderline effect after 9 months among prevalent users with intermediate triptan consumption (0.93; 0.87 to 1.00).

CONCLUSION

The pharmaceutical care campaign did not reduce the use of triptans.

Prevalence of overweight, obesity and physical inactivity in 20- to 29-year-old, Danish men. Relation to sociodemography, physical dysfunction and low socioeconomic status: the Odense Androgen Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of overweight, obesity and physical inactivity in 20- to 29-year-old men and to analyze whether sociodemography, physical dysfunction and low socioeconomic status are independent correlates of obesity and physical inactivity.

DESIGN

Population-based, cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS

Seven hundred and eighty-three Caucasian, Danish men, aged 20-29 years recruited from 2042 respondents in a questionnaire survey of 3000 men, randomly drawn from the Danish Civil Registration System.

METHODS

Questionnaire, interview and physical examination.

RESULTS

The 783 included men and the 2042 questionnaire respondents matched the background population demographically. The 783 men matched the questionnaire respondents as regards BMI, physical activity, chronic disease, medication, smoking, sociodemography and socioeconomic status. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 31.7 and 7.9%, respectively (World Health Organization criteria). Using waist circumference (WC) cutoffs of 94 and 102 cm, the prevalence was 16.2 and 10.6%, respectively; 24.4% were physically inactive. BMI and WC increased significantly from age 20 to 29 years. Physical activity decreased significantly with age and correlated inversely with WC, but not with BMI. Occupation, geography, partner status, fatherhood and tobacco exposure were independently related with obesity and physical inactivity. Obesity was also related to musculoskeletal complaints, whereas chronic diseases and low educational level were associated with physical inactivity. Age was not independently related with either outcome.

CONCLUSION

In affluent societies, sociodemographic changes may partly explain the age-related decrease in physical activity and the parallel increase in WC and BMI.

Céphalées par abus médicamenteux

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a secondary chronic daily headache resulting from overuse of symptomatic drugs in a headache-prone patient. MOH is a serious public health problem and the French national health care accreditation and evaluation agency (Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé) recently proposed MOH management guidelines. Beyond these guidelines and according to the latest data in the literature, a relevant approach to MOH requires answering questions concerning: (i) diagnostic criteria of MOH, (ii) prevalence of MOH, (iii) implication of various drugs capable of inducing and sustaining MOH, (iv) pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MOH, (v) severity of MOH and (vi) the best management strategy for MOH.

[Gordian knot: medication overuse headache]

Overuse of any kind of headache drugs may lead to the development of the medication overuse headache (MOH). Clinical features of MOH depend on the substance class that has been overused. Overuse of analgesics leads to a chronic tension-type like headache, the overuse of triptans to daily migraine-like headache or to the increase of migraine frequency. The delay between the drug overuse and onset of daily headache is shortest for triptans (1.7 years), longer for ergots (2.7 years) and longest for analgesics (4.8 years). Treatment includes withdrawal followed by structured acute therapy and initiation of specific prophylactic treatment for the underlying primary headache. The relapse rate after a successful withdrawal is about 30%. Predictors for relapse are tension-type headache and the overuse of analgesics in combination with codeine, caffeine or opioids.

Headache induced by chronic substance use: analysis of medication overused and minimum dose required to induce headache

BACKGROUND

The International Headache Society has defined the diagnostic criteria for headache induced by substance use. Recently, a revision to these criteria has been proposed.

OBJECTIVE

To consider whether the International Headache Society criteria for headache induced by substance use and the proposed revisions for the classification of daily and near-daily headache with medication abuse permit classification of patients commonly seen in a headache center.

METHODS

One hundred fourteen consecutive patients (96 women [84.2%] and 18 men [15.8%]; mean age, 54.2 years [SD, 14]) with headache and chronic overuse of medications, admitted for detoxification to the inpatient unit of a headache center, participated in the study. The initial headache, medications and doses used, duration of daily medication use, and means of medication administration were studied.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (71%) had an initial headache of migraine without aura, 13 patients (11.4%) had migraine without aura and coexistent tension-type headache, 11 (9.7%) patients had migraine with and without aura, and 9 patients (7.9%) had episodic tension-type headache. Medications overused by patients included analgesics combined with barbiturates or other nonnarcotic substances in 39.5%, simple analgesics in 38.6%, triptans in 11.4%, and ergotamine in 10.5%. Using the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria, we were able to classify only 28.1% of our patients; the proposed revised criteria for daily and near-daily headaches with medication abuse permitted the classification of 46.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The minimum dose of medication required to induce chronic headache should be revised because a high proportion of patients are not classifiable using either the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria or the revised criteria recently proposed. A more comprehensive definition for the required minimum dose might be used. Triptan abuse can cause chronic headache and should be included in the International Headache Society classification.

Use and misuse of triptans in France: data from the GRIM2000 population survey

The extent and nature of triptan use for headache relief has been evaluated in a large epidemiological survey in the French general population. Over 25 000 individuals were screened for headache and for triptan use. Of this sample, 290 triptan users were identified from whom extensive data on headache characteristics and healthcare resource consumption were obtained. The use of triptans is relatively infrequent, 0.2% in the general population, with only 7.5% of migraine sufferers using these drugs. The majority of triptan users were female (80%) and presented headache characteristics typical of migraine (80%). The remaining 20% of subjects were thus using triptans for headache types in which the utility of these drugs has not been demonstrated. Among migraineurs, triptan consumers reported more frequent and severe headaches than non-consumers, and reported a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting. The principal determinant of triptan prescription was consultation with a general practitioner (GP), which may itself have been triggered by the severity of the headaches. GPs, rather than specialists, are the primary prescribers of triptans in France.

Incidence and determinants of antidepressant drug use in migraine patients

The purpose of this retrospective, follow-up study was to characterise the use of antidepressant medication in a defined migraine population and evaluate the determinants thereof. Data was obtained from the PHARMO-RLS prescription database. Our migraine population (2,517 people) included patients having commenced specific migraine drugs, ergotamine or sumatriptan, for the first time from January 1 1992 to December 31 1998. The corresponding date was termed the 'index date'. Non-migraine patients, those not having used any medication specific for migraine, were selected and equally matched (n=2,517). The cumulative incidence of initiating antidepressant treatment was estimated during two-year observation periods prior to and after the index date. Several demographic and comedication characteristics were assessed as potential determinants of antidepressant drug use within the migraine population. Other determinants included usage patterns ("therapeutic intensity") of ergotamine and sumatriptan, defined as the absolute number of Defined Daily Doses (DDDs) dispensed per patient during one year prior to initiation of antidepressant therapy. A total of 300 migraine patients (11.9%) and 213 non-migraine patients (8.5%) had initiated antidepressant treatment in the two-year period prior to or in the two-year period after the index date (RR adj 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.7). The cumulative incidence of initiation of antidepressant treatment for the migraine population was 3.0% per year prior to and 3.2% per year after the initiation of specific migraine analgesia. The concomitant use of benzodiazepines (RR adj 4.7; 95% CI 3.5-6.3), migraine prophylactic medication (RR adj 2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.8) and heavy therapeutic intensity use of specific migraine analgesia, defined as >/=150 DDDs per year were highly predictive of antidepressant drug use within the migraine population. In conclusion, compared to the non-migraine population, the initiation of antidepressant treatment was only slightly higher in the migraine population. A number of determinants within the latter were found to be strongly associated with antidepressant drug use, the nature of which most likely reflects an increased severity of migraine whereby therapeutic needs are higher.

Rizatriptan: an update of its use in the management of migraine

Rizatriptan is an orally active serotonin 5-HT(1) receptor agonist that potently and selectively binds to 5-HT(1B/1D) subtypes. Earlier clinical trials demonstrated that rizatriptan 5 or 10mg is more effective than placebo at providing pain relief and a pain-free state, relieving associated symptoms of migraine, normalising functional ability and improving patient quality of life, and showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan. More recently, rizatriptan 10mg was shown to be more effective than zolmitriptan 2.5mg or naratriptan 2.5mg at producing a pain-free state 2 hours postdose. Furthermore, compared with naratriptan, significantly more patients who received rizatriptan were pain free or had pain relief from 1 hour onwards. The number of patients with normal functional ability at 2 hours was significantly higher after rizatriptan than after naratriptan or zolmitriptan. Rizatriptan was also generally more effective than zolmitriptan or naratriptan at relieving migraine-associated symptoms. Rizatriptan is generally well tolerated and adverse events are usually mild and transient. The most common adverse events associated with rizatriptan in recent randomised trials were asthenia/fatigue, dizziness, somnolence and nausea. There was a trend towards a lower incidence of adverse events with rizatriptan compared with zolmitriptan (31.2 vs 38.8%). However, rizatriptan was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than naratriptan (39 vs 29%). The incidence of chest pain was similar after the administration of rizatriptan, zolmitriptan or naratriptan (2 to 4%).

CONCLUSION

Rizatriptan is an effective drug for the acute treatment of moderate or severe migraine. Oral rizatriptan 5 and 10mg have shown greater efficacy than placebo in providing pain relief, an absence of pain, relief from associated symptoms, normal functional ability and an improvement in patient quality of life. Earlier results showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan. More recent studies have shown that rizatriptan 10mg provides faster pain relief and a higher percentage of patients with an absence of pain and normal functional ability at 2 hours than naratriptan 2.5mg or zolmitriptan 2.5mg. The efficacy of rizatriptan is retained when used in the long term and the drug is generally well tolerated. Although well designed studies comparing rizatriptan with almotriptan, eletriptan and frovatriptan would further define the position of rizatriptan, current data suggest rizatriptan should be considered as a first-line treatment option in the management of migraine.

Medication overuse headache: a focus on analgesics, ergot alkaloids and triptans

Medication overuse headache (MOH, formerly known as drug-induced headache) is a well known disorder following the frequent use of analgesics or any other antiheadache drug including serotonin 5-HT(1B/D) agonists (triptans). Recent studies suggest clinical features of MOH depend on the substance class that has been overused. The delay between the frequent intake of any antiheadache drug and daily headache is shortest for triptans (mean 1.7 years), longer for ergot alkaloids (mean 2.7 years) and longest for analgesics (mean 4.9 years). Treatment includes withdrawal followed by structured acute therapy and initiation of specific prophylactic treatment for the underlying primary headache. The relapse rate within 6 months after successful withdrawal is about 30% and increases steadily up to 50% after 5 years.

Analgesic/abortive overuse and misuse in chronic daily headache

The frequent use (> 15 times/month) of medication for the treatment of acute migraine attacks may cause medication overuse headache. This kind of headache can be caused by the intake of combination analgesics, opioids, ergot alkaloids, and triptans. The delay between first intake and daily headache is shortest for triptans (1 to 2 years), longer for ergots (3 years), and longest for analgesics (5 years). Treatment includes drug withdrawal followed by structured acute therapy and initiation of migraine prophylactic treatment.

When should triptans be taken during a migraine attack?

The common strategy to treat a migraine attack as soon as it begins, made for classical acute antimigraine treatments such as ergotamine and analgesics, has not been transposed to the triptans. The recommendation to delay triptan intake until headache intensity is at least moderate is merely a habit generated by the protocol used in triptan trials and a nonvalidated attempt to reduce costs. It is also favoured by the few studies suggesting that sumatriptan is less effective when given early in an attack, especially during the aura phase. Recent retrospective analyses of small numbers of 'protocol violators' in controlled trials of sumatriptan suggest that the drug is more efficient when taken while the headache is mild. Pain-free responses and therapeutic gains over aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)-metoclopramide or ergotamine-caffeine combinations were increased under these conditions. The available circumstantial evidence is reviewed and discussed. Before any conclusion can be drawn and recommendation made, results are awaited from randomised controlled trials specifically addressing whether or not triptans are more efficient in mild headache. Meanwhile, there seems to be no medical reason to withhold treatment of a mild headache with a triptan as long as triptan intake does not exceed 1 or 2 doses per week. Most mild headaches in patients with migraine appear indeed to be mild migraine attacks, even when the headache characteristics are those of tension-type headache.