Nociceptive temporalis inhibitory reflexes evoked by CO2-laser stimulation in tension-type headache

Pathophysiology of hypnic headache

Background

Hypnic headache (HH) is a rare primary headache disorder that is characterized by strictly sleep related headache attacks.

Purpose

The underlying pathophysiology of HH is mainly enigmatic but some clinical characteristics such as circadian rhythmicity and caffeine responsiveness may point toward possible underlying mechanisms.

Method

Current studies that deal with the pathophysiology of HH are summarized. Data on cerebral imaging, sleep, electrophysiology studies, effectiveness of drugs, and symptomatic headache types are discussed to illuminate underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Conclusion

HH can be clearly differentiated by its clinical presentation as well as imaging and electrophysiological study results from other primary headaches such as migraine or cluster headache. The underlying pathophysiology is still enigmatic but a hypothalamic involvement seems to be likely.

Pearls and pitfalls: electrophysiology for primary headaches

BACKGROUND

Primary headaches are functional neurological diseases characterized by a dynamic cyclic pattern over time (ictal/pre-/interictal). Electrophysiological recordings can non-invasively assess the activity of an underlying nervous structure or measure its response to various stimuli, and are therefore particularly appropriate for the study of primary headaches. Their interest, however, is chiefly pathophysiological, as interindividual, and to some extent intraindividual, variations preclude their use as diagnostic tools.

AIM OF THE WORK

This article will review the most important findings of electrophysiological studies in primary headache pathophysiology, especially migraine on which numerous studies have been published.

RESULTS

In migraine, the most reproducible hallmark is the interictal lack of neuronal habituation to the repetition of various types of sensory stimulations. The mechanism subtending this phenomenon remains uncertain, but it could be the consequence of a thalamocortical dysrythmia that results in a reduced cortical preactivation level. In tension-type headache as well as in cluster headache, there seems to be an impairment of central pain-controlling mechanisms but the studies are scarce and their outcomes are contradictory. The discrepancies between studies might be as a result of methodological differences as well as patients' dissimilarities, which are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Electrophysiology is complementary to functional neuroimaging and will undoubtedly remain an important tool in headache research. One of its upcoming applications is to help select neurostimulation techniques and protocols that correct best the functional abnormalities detectable in certain headache disorders.

Nociceptive blink reflex and pain-related evoked potentials in hypnic headache

Background: Central facilitation of trigeminal pain processing and deficient habituation was observed in different headache and facial pain disorders. This overactivation seems to be primarily associated with chronic pain states.

Objective: To investigate the function of the trigeminal nociceptive system in patients with hypnic headache (HH).

Methods: Fifteen HH patients according International Classification of Headache Disorders II criteria and 15 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were investigated using the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) and trigeminal pain-related evoked potentials (PREP).

Results: nBR and PREP responses showed no significant differences comparing HH patients and healthy controls. Moreover, no habituation deficit was detected in HH patients.

Conclusion: Central facilitation and change in habituation do not seem to be a crucial part in the pathophysiology of HH despite the chronic nature of this disease. Facilitation or habituation deficit does not seem to be exclusively related to chronic pain disorders in general. Further research is needed to illuminate the pathophysiology of HH.

Modulation of human trigeminal and extracranial nociceptive processing by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex

Objective: The study was conducted to investigate the after-effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the human primary motor cortex (M1) on trigeminal and extracranial nociceptive processing.

Basic procedures: Nineteen healthy volunteers were stimulated using cathodal, anodal (both 1 mA) or sham tDCS for 20 minutes. Pain processing was assessed by recording trigeminal and extracranial pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs) following electrical stimulation of the contralateral forehead and hand at baseline, 0, 20 and 50 minutes post-tDCS.

Main findings: Cathodal tDCS resulted in decreased peak-to-peak amplitudes (PPAs) by 18% while anodal tDCS lead to increased PPAs of PREPs by 35% ( p < .05).

Principal conclusions: The decreased PPAs suggest an inhibition and the increased PPAs of PREPs suggest an excitation of trigeminal and extracranial pain processing induced by tDCS of the M1. These results may provide evidence for the effectiveness of tDCS as a therapeutic instrument in treating headache disorders.

Tension-type headache: current research and clinical management

Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common form of headache, and chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) is one of the most neglected and difficult types of headache to treat. The pathogenesis of TTH is multifactorial and varies between forms and individuals. Peripheral mechanisms (myofascial nociception) and central mechanisms (sensitisation and inadequate endogenous pain control) are intermingled: the former predominate in infrequent and frequent TTH, whereas the latter predominate in CTTH. Acute therapy is effective for episodes of TTH, whereas preventive treatment--which is indicated for frequent and chronic TTH--is, on average, not effective. For most patients with CTTH, the combination of drug therapies and non-drug therapies (such as relaxation and stress management techniques or physical therapies) is recommended. There is clearly an urgent need to improve the management of patients who are disabled by headache. This Review summarises the present knowledge on TTH and discusses some of its more problematic features.

Central sensitization of the trigeminal and somatic nociceptive systems in medication overuse headache mainly involves cerebral supraspinal structures

Trigeminal and somatic nociceptive systems were studied in controls (n=15), episodic migraine (n=16), analgesics (n=14) and triptan-induced medication overuse headache (MOH) (n=15) before and after withdrawal. Patients with MOH and comorbid depressive symptoms and depression without headache were studied to investigate the influence of depression. Trigeminal nociception was studied by simultaneous registration of pain-related cortical potentials (PREP) and nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) following nociceptive-specific electrical stimulation of the forehead. Somatic nociception was evaluated using PREP of upper limbs. We found facilitation of both trigeminal and somatic PREP but not of nBR in MOH, which normalized after withdrawal. No differences were found comparing analgesics vs. triptan MOH. No differences were observed between controls and patients with episodic migraine and depression without headache. A transient facilitation was found of trigeminal and somatic nociceptive systems in MOH, which was more pronounced on a supraspinal level.