Dexamethasone pulse therapy in pemphigus

Pharmacokinetics of Dexamethasone in Children and Adolescents with Obesity

Dexamethasone is a synthetic glucocorticoid approved for treating disorders of various organ systems in both adult and pediatric populations. Currently, approved pediatric dosing recommendations are weight-based, but it is unknown whether differences in dexamethasone drug disposition and exposure exist for children with obesity. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for dexamethasone with data collected from children with obesity. Dexamethasone was given as either IV or oral/enteral administration, and a salt factor correction was used for dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection. A PopPK analysis using dexamethasone plasma concentration versus time was performed using the software NONMEM. A virtual population of 1000 children with obesity across three age groups was generated for dosing simulations. Data from 59 study participants with 82 PK plasma samples were used in the PopPK analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and the inclusion of total body weight as a covariate characterized the data. No other covariates were included in the PopPK model. Single and multiple IV dose(s) of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg every 8 h resulted in 68% or more of virtual children with obesity attaining simulated exposures that were within exposure ranges previously reported in adult studies. In conclusion, this was the first study to characterize dexamethasone's PopPK in children with obesity. Simulation results suggest that virtual children with obesity receiving oral doses of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg had generally comparable dexamethasone exposures as adult estimates. Additional studies are needed to characterize the dexamethasone's target exposure in children.

[Therapy of pemphigus]

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus diseases are a heterogeneous group of potentially life-threatening autoimmune bullous disorders. Therefore, rapidly acting and effective therapeutic approaches are essential.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, current therapeutic options in line with available guidelines are presented and new therapeutic approaches are discussed.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed.

RESULTS

Treatment of pemphigus is based on systemic glucocorticosteroids, frequently combined with potentially corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid. Recently, the impressive efficacy of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown in a prospective randomized trial. In severe or treatment-refractory cases, immunoadsorption or high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are recommended. Adjuvant immunoadsorption also seems to be useful within the first 8-12 weeks of therapy in patients with very high autoantibody levels. A variety of new therapeutic approaches is currently evaluated in phase IIa studies.

CONCLUSION

Therapy of pemphigus has been greatly improved by the employment of rituximab. The use of glucocorticosteroids, associated with a high number of adverse events and elevated mortality, could be reduced by the additional use of rituximab. After approval of rituximab for the treatment of pemphigus by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, licensing in Europe is expected in 2019.

Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects of Dermatologic Medications

Severe, recalcitrant dermatologic conditions often require systemic treatment. Although efficacious, these medications have been associated with wide-ranging adverse reactions. Some are reversible, predictable, and either dose-dependent or treatment length-dependent, while others are unpredictable, irreversible, and potentially fatal. This review examines the neuropsychiatric adverse effects associated with US FDA-approved medications for treatment of the following dermatologic pathologies that typically require systemic therapy: autoimmune dermatoses, acne, psoriasis, and melanoma. A search of the literature was performed, with adverse effects ranging from mild headaches and neuropathy to severe encephalopathies. The medications associated with the most serious reactions were those used to treat psoriasis, especially the older non-biologic medications such as cyclosporine A and methotrexate. Given the importance of these systemic dermatologic therapies in treating severe, recalcitrant conditions, and the wide variety of potentially serious neuropsychiatric adverse effects of these medications, neurologists, psychiatrists, dermatologists, oncologists, and primary care providers must be aware of the potential for these neuropsychiatric adverse reactions to allow for appropriate counseling, management, and medication withdrawal.

Diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus

Pemphigus is an autoimmune bullous disease, in which autoantibodies react with the cell–cell adhesion structures, desmosomes, causing blisters and erosions on the oral mucosa and skin. Pemphigus is divided into two major subtypes: pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Oral corticosteroids are the primary treatment modality for pemphigus, while other therapeutic options, such as steroid pulse therapy, immunosuppressants, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, are occasionally employed. Immunosuppressants used to treat pemphigus include azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and mizoribine. In this review, we summarize the current concepts of immunotherapy for the treatment of pemphigus in the Japanese population.

Successful immunoapheresis of bullous autoimmune diseases: pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigoid gestationis

BACKGROUND

Immunoapheresis/immunoadsorption is a specific tool to remove immunoglobulins and immune complexes from the circulation. Immunoapheresis is successfully used in various autoantibody-mediated diseases (such as autoimmune renal disease and others). In dermatology immunoapheresis is increasingly applied as an adjuvant treatment for severe autoimmune bullous diseases.

CASE REPORT

We successfully employed adjuvant immunoapheresis to treat a 57-year-old man with life-threatening pemphigus vulgaris and a 30-year-old pregnant woman with severe pemphigoid gestationis. Immunoapheresis induced a rapid improvement and almost complete clearance of clinical symptoms without notable side effects. The clinical improvement was paralleled by a decline of the pathologic circulating autoantibodies. Following stabilization of his disease with immunoapheresis, the pemphigus vulgaris patient was continued on rituximab and remained almost free of symptoms for the next 12 months. The patient with pemphigoid gestationis was subsequently treated with systemic corticosteroids until the symptoms of her self-limited disease ceased.

CONCLUSION

Immunoapheresis might represent an excellent therapy for certain patients with severe pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigoid gestationis, unresponsive to conventional treatment regimens. We observed rapid improvement of clinical symptoms and no notable side effects.

Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in pemphigus: a review of 72 cases

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pemphigus is a group of severe blistering diseases. Although corticosteroids have dramatically altered the prognosis of pemphigus, morbidity and mortality resulting from the adverse effects of systemic corticosteroids remain high. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) therapy was introduced to diminish the adverse effects of prolonged conventional daily dose regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience with the use of the DCP regimen in patients with autoimmune pemphigus.

METHODS

In the period 1998-2002, 72 patients with various forms of autoimmune pemphigus treated with DCP therapy were included, of whom 36 patients were previously treated with conventional corticosteroid therapy, and 36 were newly diagnosed patients.

RESULTS

Of the 72 patients, 43 completed treatment, while 13 patients did not respond adequately to the treatment and continued with the conventional daily regimen, nine patients were lost to follow-up, and seven patients died. Two of these deaths were probably a consequence of DCP therapy.

CONCLUSION

DCP regimen is a beneficial treatment for patients with pemphigus, sparing the adverse effects of conventional regimens.

Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with Refractory Paraneoplastic Pemphigus: Case Report with Review of Novel Treatment Modalities

In this paper a patient with a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is described. PNP is a very rare, painful mucocutaneous intraepithelial blistering disease associated with occult or confirmed malignancy. Patients with PNP show severe, progressive mucocutaneous disease with a high mortality rate, because of drug-induced infectious complications. The patients sometimes benefit from high doses of oral corticosteroids. However, pulse therapy with high doses of prednisolone (or dexamethasone) in combination with other immunosuppressants induces variable and inconstant results. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been applied in different cases of PNP with encouraging results. Plasmapheresis or plasma exchange (PE) in combination with corticosteroids and/or cyclophosphamide or azathioprine showed similar rapid and beneficial results in association with decreasing auto-antibody levels in this group of refractory pemphigus. Another interesting therapeutic option is rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen, which is found on the surface of normal and malignant B-lymphocytes. Administration of rituximab for patients with PNP in combination with follicular NHL is not always successful regarding oral lesions as we report in this case. PE leading to prompt depletion of autoreactive antibodies combined with immunosuppressants or synchronisation of PE with IVIg seems the best treatment modality for this refractory group, but the therapeutic value and appropriate timing of rituximab obviously deserve further evaluation in patients with low grade NHL and PNP.

Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus

BACKGROUND

A range of interventions have been described for treatment of pemphigus, however the optimal therapeutic strategy has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of all interventions used in the management of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (October 2008), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2008), MEDLINE (2003 to October 2008), EMBASE (2005 to October 2008), LILACS (1981 to October 2008), Ongoing Trials Registers, reference lists of articles, conference proceedings from international pemphigus meetings and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of any intervention in pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data from studies. All investigators were contacted for further information. Adverse events were identified from included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total of 404 participants (337 pemphigus vulgaris, 27 pemphigus foliaceus and 40 not specified ) were identified. The quality of included studies was not high, the majority of studies did not report allocation concealment, and power was limited by very small sample sizes. Interventions assessed included prednisolone dose regimen, pulsed dexamethasone, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, dapsone, mycophenolate, plasma exchange, topical epidermal growth factor and traditional Chinese medicine. Ten studies included participants with newly diagnosed or newly active recurrent disease, and one trial included participants in maintenance phase.There was sufficient data for 4 meta-analyses, each pooling results of two studies only. For the majority of interventions, results were inconclusive. We found some interventions to be superior for certain outcomes, although we were unable to conclude which treatments are superior overall. Mycophenolate was more effective in achieving disease control than azathioprine (1 study; n=40; RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.99, NNT 3.7). There was evidence of a steroid-sparing benefit of azathioprine (1 study; n=57; MWD -3919 mg prednisolone; 95% CI -6712 to -1126) and cyclophosphamide (1 study; n=54; MWD -3355 mg prednisolone; 95% CI -6144 to -566) compared to glucocorticoids alone. Topical epidermal growth factor decreased time to control (1 study; n=20; HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.62 to 3.41).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate information available at present to ascertain the optimal therapy for pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceus. Further research is required, especially to assess the optimal glucocorticoid dose, the role of adjuvant immunosuppressive medications, and long-term adverse events to improve harm:benefit analyses.

Pemphigus: a treatment update

Pemphigus is a group of rare autoimmune mucocutaneous bullous diseases with potential significant morbidity and mortality. The two main subtypes are pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF). Systemic corticosteroid use and other advances in management have dramatically decreased the mortality rate for pemphigus. At present, the primary cause of morbidity and mortality is complications from treatment. Thus, the goal of pemphigus management is to induce and maintain remission with the lowest possible doses of medication and with the fewest side effects. Although our scientific knowledge of pemphigus is advancing and our treatment options are expanding, there are still very few randomized, controlled studies to evaluate the true effectiveness of the available therapies. Here we review the available treatment options and novel therapies for pemphigus and the supporting data.

Preliminary data on Pemphigus vulgaris treatment by a proteomics-defined peptide: a case report

Background

Although described by Hippocrates in 400 B.C., pemphigus disease still needs a safe therapeutical approach, given that the currently used therapies (i.e. corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs) often provoke collateral effects. Here we present preliminary data on the possible use of a proteomics derived desmoglein peptide which appears promising in halting disease progression without adverse effects.

Methods

The low-similarity Dsg3_49–60REWVKFAKPCRE peptide was topically applied for 1 wk onto a lesion in a patient with a late-stage Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) complicated by diabetes and cataract disease. The peptide was applied as an adjuvant in combination with the standard corticosteroid-based immunosuppressive treatment.

Results

After 1 wk, the treated PV eroded lesion appeared dimensionally reduced and with an increased rate of re-epithelization when compared to adjacent non-treated lesions. Short-term benefits were: decrease of anti-Dsg antibody titer and reduction of the corticosteroid dosage. Long-term benefits: after two years following the unique 1-wk topical treatment, the decrease of anti-Dsg antibody titer persists. The patient is still at the low cortisone dosage. Adverse effects: no adverse effect could be monitored.

Conclusion

With the limits inherent to any preliminary study, this case report indicates that topical treatment with Dsg3_49–60REWVKFAKPCRE peptide may represent a feasible first step in the search for a simple, effective and safe treatment of PV.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in autoimmune blistering diseases

Autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBD) are an interesting group of rare diseases that affect the mucous membranes and the skin and are frequently or potentially fatal. The clinical presentation is significantly variable, as is the course and prognosis. The immunopathology is well characterized and the target antigens to which the autoantibodies are directed have been studied by various investigators. A significant majority of the patients respond to conventional therapy, which consists of high-dose long-term systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. This treatment program has significantly improved the prognosis in many patients. In such patients, significant side effects of the drugs may appear and produce a very poor quality of life. In patients with progressive diseases, especially those with mucous membrane pemphigoid, the significant sequela; such as blindness, aphonia, and stenosis of the anal and vaginal canals can occur. In several patients treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapy, death occurs as a consequence of prolonged immune suppression leading to opportunistic infections. In this manuscript, the published data on the use of immunoglobulins intravenous (IGIV) in patients with AMBD is presented. The most important features of IGIV in patients with AMBD are: 1) the ability to clinically control the disease; 2) the ability to induce and maintain a long-term clinical remission; 3) a lower incidence of side effects; and 4) a higher quality of life. The important characteristic of the IGIV therapy in the AMBD is two-fold. First, the therapy, when given according to a published protocol, produces a lasting and long-term clinical remission, rather than a temporary arrest of the disease. Second, the therapy, as described in the protocol, has a very definitive endpoint. Consequently, once the patients are treated and go into long-term remission, the therapy is no longer required. The significant positive results obtained with IGIV are to a large extent also due to the associated aggressive topical therapy that was used and the frequent use of sublesional injections with triamcinolone. The rapid and early detection of cutaneous and mucosal infections and their treatment with systemic antibiotics is also a very important feature of IGIV therapy. When patients are under long-term conventional therapy, the infections are often not detected because they lack the ability to mount signs of inflammation. It is also becoming increasingly clear for patients to have a successful outcome, in treatment with IGIV therapy, it is critical that the physician spends a significant amount of time with each patient, monitor the therapy closely, and be familiar with the overall health of the patient. It is also best if the therapies are instituted by a physician who has significant interest and experience in blistering diseases and IGIV therapy.

Placebo-controlled oral pulse prednisolone therapy in alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Systemic corticosteroids administered as pulse therapy have been found helpful in a wide array of diseases including alopecia areata (AA). None of the studies published so far regarding their use in AA have been randomized or placebo-controlled.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy of weekly oral prednisolone pulse therapy in a placebo-controlled trial for patients with extensive AA.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A (23 patients) were treated with oral prednisolone (200 mg once weekly, 5 40-mg tablets) and patients in group B (20 patients) were given placebo tablets on an identical schedule. The total study period was 6 months, consisting of 3 months of active therapy followed by another 3 months of observation.

RESULTS

Significant hair regrowth was obtained in 8 patients in the prednisolone-treated group. Two of the responders experienced a relapse during the observation period of 3 months. In the placebo group, none of the patients had significant hair regrowth at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

Oral prednisolone pulse therapy is useful in AA. Placebo-controlled studies with varying dosage schedules are required to standardize the dose of prednisolone used in pulse therapy, optimize the therapeutic efficacy, and minimize side effects.