Comparative in vitro activity of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Penetration of Ertapenem Into Different Pulmonary Compartments of Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery

Ertapenem is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but its in vivo penetration into lung tissue (LT), epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar cells (AC) is unknown. Fifteen patients undergoing thoracotomy were treated with 1 g intravenously for perioperative prophylaxis. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed 1, 3, and 5 hours after ertapenem infusion. Normal LT was sampled at the time of lung extraction. Blood was collected before and at different time points up to 24 hours after infusion. Mean concentrations of ertapenem in plasma, ELF, and AC were at 1.0 hour, 63.1, 4.06, 0.004 mg/L; at 3.0 hours, 39.7, 2.59, 0.003 mg/L; and at 5.0 hours, 27.2, 2.83, 0.007 mg/L. Mean (range) concentration in LT was 7.60 (2.5-19.4) mg/kg tissue 1.5 to 4.5 hours after infusion. In plasma, ertapenem exhibited a Cmax of 94.7 +/- 23.3 mg/L and an AUC(0-last) of 501.1 +/- 266.3 mg x h/L. These results, combined with the reported (MIC)90 of most CAP bacteria, support the previously observed clinical efficacy of ertapenem in the treatment of CAP.

Ertapenem versus cefepime for initial empirical treatment of pneumonia acquired in skilled-care facilities or in hospitals outside the intensive care unit

The study presented here compared the efficacy and safety of ertapenem and cefepime as initial treatment for adults with pneumonia acquired in skilled-care facilities or in hospital environments outside the intensive care unit (ICU). Non-ventilated patients developing pneumonia in hospital environments outside the ICU, in nursing homes, or in other skilled-care facilities were enrolled in this double-blind non-inferiority study, stratified by APACHE II score (<or=15 vs >15) and randomized (1:1) to receive cefepime (2 g every 12 h with optional metronidazole 500 mg every 12 h) or ertapenem (1 g daily). After 3 days of parenteral therapy, participants demonstrating clinical improvement could be switched to oral ciprofloxacin or another appropriate oral agent. Probable pathogens were identified in 162 (53.5%) of the 303 randomized participants. The most common pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus, isolated from 59 (19.5%), 39 (12.9%), and 35 (11.6%) participants, respectively. At the test-of-cure assessment 7-14 days after completion of all study therapy, pneumonia had resolved or substantially improved in 89 (87.3%) of 102 clinically evaluable ertapenem recipients and 80 (86%) of 93 clinically evaluable cefepime recipients (95% confidence interval for the difference, -9.4 to 11.8%), fulfilling pre-specified criteria for statistical non-inferiority. The frequency and severity of drug-related adverse events were generally similar in both treatment groups. In this study population, ertapenem was as well-tolerated and efficacious as cefepime for the initial treatment of pneumonia acquired in skilled-care facilities or in hospital environments outside the ICU.

Ertapenem: the new carbapenem 5 years after first FDA licensing for clinical practice

Ertapenem, a parenteral broad-spectrum 1-beta-methyl-carbapenem, was licensed 5 years ago for clinical practice in the US and Europe. The substance has a good in vitro activity against many common aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Its in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae carrying plasmid- or chromosomal-mediated beta-lactamases, including AmpC- and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, is especially clinically significant. Advantages concerning in vitro activity and low potential for so-called 'collateral damage', and development of own resistance during therapy, as shown in several randomized, controlled clinical trials, make ertapenem an excellent treatment choice for complicated aerobic and anaerobic mix infections caused by ertapenem-sensitive bacteria. On the other hand, due to its limited activity against Acinetobacter spp., enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it is less suitable for late-onset nosocomial infections. International guidelines recommend the initial empirical use of ertapenem for intra-abdominal infections, skin and skin-structure infections, acute pelvic infections, complicated urinary tract infections and pneumonia (both community-acquired and 'early-onset' nosocomial) in a dose of 1.0 g administered once daily. However, recent results from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling studies in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and adipose volunteers with a body mass index of > or = 20 kg/m(2) showed that the standard dose of 1.0 g/day may not provide adequate free, protein-unbound drug concentrations in plasma and organ tissues. Therefore, a shortening of the dosage interval or continuous infusion of ertapenem should be considered to ensure optimal free concentrations in these particular populations.

Comparative Review of the Carbapenems

The carbapenems are beta-lactam antimicrobial agents with an exceptionally broad spectrum of activity. Older carbapenems, such as imipenem, were often susceptible to degradation by the enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 (DHP-1) located in renal tubules and required co-administration with a DHP-1 inhibitor such as cilastatin. Later additions to the class such as meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem demonstrated increased stability to DHP-1 and are administered without a DHP-1 inhibitor. Like all beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, carbapenems act by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to and inactivating penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). Carbapenems are stable to most beta-lactamases including AmpC beta-lactamases and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Resistance to carbapenems develops when bacteria acquire or develop structural changes within their PBPs, when they acquire metallo-beta-lactamases that are capable of rapidly degrading carbapenems, or when changes in membrane permeability arise as a result of loss of specific outer membrane porins. Carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, doripenem) possess broad-spectrum in vitro activity, which includes activity against many Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria; carbapenems lack activity against Enterococcus faecium, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Compared with imipenem, meropenem and doripenem, the spectrum of activity of ertapenem is more limited primarily because it lacks activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus spp. Imipenem, meropenem and doripenem have in vivo half lives of approximately 1 hour, while ertapenem has a half-life of approximately 4 hours making it suitable for once-daily administration. As with other beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, the most important pharmacodynamic parameter predicting in vivo efficacy is the time that the plasma drug concentration is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC). Imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem have been studied in comparative clinical trials establishing their efficacy in the treatment of a variety of infections including complicated intra-abdominal infections, skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, complicated urinary tract infections, meningitis (meropenem only) and febrile neutropenia. The current role for imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem in therapy remains for use in moderate to severe nosocomial and polymicrobial infections. The unique antimicrobial spectrum and pharmacokinetic properties of ertapenem make it more suited to treatment of community-acquired infections and outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy than for the treatment of nosocomial infections. Doripenem is a promising new carbapenem with similar properties to those of meropenem, although it appears to have more potent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa than meropenem. Clinical trials are required to establish the efficacy and safety of doripenem in moderate to severe infections, including nosocomial infections.

In vitro activities of ertapenem against drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and other respiratory pathogens from 12 Asian countries

In vitro activities of ertapenem and 11 other comparator agents were tested against 1025 isolates of respiratory pathogens collected from 12 Asian countries. Resistance rate to ertapenem was 1.2% in 602 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC(50), 0.06/MIC(90), 1 microg/mL). Ertapenem was also very active against penicillin-, ciprofloxacin-, erythromycin-, and multidrug-resistant pneumococcal isolates (resistance rate: 3.5%, 2.7%, 1.9%, and 2.7%, respectively). Ertapenem-resistant pneumococcal isolates were found only in Vietnam and Korea. Ertapenem resistance was not found in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. In vitro data suggest that ertapenem could be a useful treatment option for community-acquired pneumonia.

Pharmacokinetics and lung concentrations of ertapenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a prospective, open-label study to determine the steady-state serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations of unbound ertapenem administered once daily to critically ill patients with early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, open-label study in an intensive care unit and research ward in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifteen patients with VAP received 1-h intravenous infusions of 1 g ertapenem once daily.

INTERVENTIONS

After 2 days of therapy the steady-state serum and ELF concentrations of free ertapenem were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) free ertapenem peak (C(max)), intermediate (C(12)), and trough (C(min)) concentrations (mg/l) 1, 12, and 24 h after the end of infusion were 30.3 (27.1-37.8), 4.8 (3.9-6.4), and 0.8 (0.5-1.2) in serum and 9.4 (8.0-10.7), 2.0 (1.1-2.5), and 0.3 (0.2-0.4) in ELF, respectively, showing a median free ertapenem percentage penetration in ELF of approx. 30%. The median (interquartile range) serum area under concentration-time curve of free ertapenem during the observational period was 226.7 mg h(-1) l(-1) (202.2-263.9).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows satisfactory results, with unbound ertapenem concentrations both in serum and ELF exceeding the MIC(90) values of most of the causative pathogens encountered in early-onset VAP during 50-100% time. This suggests that 1 g intravenous ertapenem administered once daily should be effective during the treatment of early-onset VAP in critically ill patients with no known risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Comparison of In Vitro Activities of Tigecycline with Other Antimicrobial Agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis in Taiwan

We compared the in vitro activities of tigecycline to those of other agents against 300 nonduplicate isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (194 isolates), Haemophilus influenzae (60 isolates), and Moraxella catarrhalis (46 isolates) recovered from patients treated in three major hospitals in Taiwan from August through December, 2003. All of these isolates were inhibited at 0.5 mg/L of tigecycline. For S. pneumoniae isolates, 72% were not susceptible to penicillin (69% intermediate and 3% resistant) and 96% were not susceptible to azithromycin. Among the 178 isolates resistant to azithromycin, 53 isolates (30%) had the M phenotype and 70% had the cMLSB phenotype. The rate of nonsusceptibility to ertapenem, telithromycin, moxifloxacin, and quinupristindalfopristin in S. pneumoniae was 3%, 2%, 1%, and 57%, respectively. For H. influenzae, 36 (60%) were not susceptible to ampicillin, among which 31 possessed beta-lactamase. A high rate (8.3%) of H. influenzae isolates with beta-lactamase-negative and ampicillin-resistant phenotype was found. All H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to azithromycin, but 40% of them were not susceptible to clarithromycin. Ninety-eight percent (44 isolates) of M. catarrhalis possessed beta-lactamase. All three fluoroquinolones tested were highly active (MIC90 < or =0.12 mg/L) against H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis.

Ertapenem: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections

The Group 1, 1 beta-methyl carbapenem ertapenem (Invanz) is approved for parenteral use in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute pelvic infection caused by susceptible strains of certain designated organisms in both the US and the EU. Additional approved indications in the US include complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Ertapenem is approved for use in adults in both the US and the EU and in paediatric patients aged >or=3 months in the US. Ertapenem has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-negative pathogens, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-positive pathogens and anaerobic pathogens. It has similar efficacy to comparator antibacterials such as piperacillin/tazobactam in cSSSI (including diabetic foot infection), cIAI and acute pelvic infection and ceftriaxone with or without metronidazole in cIAI, cUTI and CAP. The drug has also shown efficacy in the treatment of paediatric patients with complicated community-acquired bacterial infections. Ertapenem has a convenient once-daily administration schedule and is generally well tolerated. Thus, ertapenem is an important option for the empirical treatment of complicated community-acquired bacterial infections in hospitalised patients.

Ertapenem: review of a new carbapenem

The carbapenems are beta-lactam-type antibiotics with an exceptionally broad spectrum of activity. Ertapenem is a new carbapenem developed to address the pharmacokinetic shortcomings (short half-life) of imipenem and meropenem. Ertapenem shares similar structural features with meropenem, including its stability to dehydropeptidase-1, allowing it to be administered without a dehydropeptidase-1 inhibitor. Ertapenem, like imipenem and meropenem, demonstrates broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against many Gram-positive and -negative aerobes and anaerobes and is resistant to nearly all beta-lactamases, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and AmpCs. However, it differs from both imipenem and meropenem in demonstrating limited activity against Enterococcusspp., Pseudomonasaeruginosa and other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria commonly associated with nosocomial infections. The extensive protein binding of ertapenem extends the half-life and allows for once-daily dosing. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical studies demonstrate similar clinical efficacy of ertapenem compared with other agents. Clinical trials of complicated intra-abdominal infection, acute pelvic infection, complicated skin and soft-structure infection, community-acquired pneumonia and complicated urinary tract infections demonstrated that ertapenem has equivalent efficacy and safety compared with ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Ertapenem is a promising new carbapenem with excellent efficacy and safety for the treatment of a variety of community-acquired infections. It also appears to be of great value as an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections

Ertapenem, a carbapenem antibacterial, has in vitro activity against many Gram- negative (including Enterobacteriaceae) and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria that are commonly associated with various infections.Once-daily parenteral (intravenous or intramuscular) ertapenem 1g was as effective as comparator antimicrobial agents (piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftriaxone +/- metronidazole) in patients with bacterial infections in randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials. Response rates with ertapenem were 84% and 87% (combined microbiological and clinical) in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (CIAI), 82% (clinical) in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (CSSSI), 86% and 92% (microbiological) in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (CUTI), 92% (clinical) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) associated with typical pathogens and 94% (clinical) in patients with acute pelvic infection. Respective response rates were statistically equivalent to those with comparators (81-94%). The efficacy of ertapenem was equivalent to that of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae or anaerobes and to ceftriaxone in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated by patients with bacterial infections, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. The most common ertapenem-associated adverse events were diarrhoea, infused vein complication, nausea, headache, vaginitis in females, phlebitis and/or thrombophlebitis and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

Ertapenem is a broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotic with activity against many Gram-negative (including Enterobacteriaceae) and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and is suitable for once-daily administration. Ertapenem has a role in the treatment of CAP associated with typical respiratory pathogens and is of particular value in the treatment of polymicrobial infections (such as CIAI, CSSSI, CUTI and acute pelvic infections), especially where Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobic bacteria are involved.