Mueller-Hinton agar is superior to PDM blood agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Spread of Clones of Multidrug-Resistant, Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Within a University Hospital

Objective:

To detect putative clonal dissemination of multidrug-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) in a university hospital in northern Sweden.

Methods:

All consecutive routine clinical samples from our hospital were screened during two periods (November and December 2001 and September and October 2002) for the presence of multidrug-resistant (defined as resistant to oxacillin, clindamycin, co-trimoxazole, gentamicin, and fusidic acid, but susceptible to vancomycin) isolates of CNS. Genetic similarity between isolates was analyzed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and a computer program.

Results:

Seventy multidrug-resistant isolates from 62 patients were identified, 28 during the 2001 period and 42 during the 2002 period. All isolates except one, which wasStaphylococcus haemolyticus, were identified asS. epidermidis. Multidrug-resistant CNS were isolated in samples obtained from 24 different wards. Two subgroups (group A and group B) ofS. epidermidisthat differed by approximately 40% in PFGE band similarity were identified. Group A consisted of 44 isolates with a PFGE band similarity of greater than 70% that included 6 subgroups consisting of 3 to 16 isolates that expressed a 100% similarity. These isolates were identified during both sampling periods in cultures performed in 18 different wards. A clonal origin could not be excluded for some of the remaining 26 isolates belonging to group B, but none had identical PFGE patterns, suggesting a more diverse origin.

Conclusion:

The results of this study suggest clonal spread of multidrug-resistant CNS within our hospital and that some clones are endemic in the hospital environment.

Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

These evidence-based guidelines have been produced after a literature review of the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We have considered the detection of MRSA in screening samples and the detection of reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in S. aureus. Recommendations are given for the identification of S. aureus and for suitable methods of susceptibility testing and screening for MRSA and for S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. These guidelines indicate what tests should be used but not when the tests are applicable, as aspects of this are dealt with in guidelines on control of MRSA. There are currently several developments in screening media and molecular methods. It is likely that some of our recommendations will require modification as the new methods become available.

A preliminary evaluation of a new selective agar supplemented with desferrioxamine for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of two new selective screening agars, Colombia agar supplemented with 1000 mg/L desferrioxamine, 5 mg/L amphotericin B, 16 mg/L polymyxin B, and 2 mg/L methicillin (CMDAP agar) or 0.5 mg/L oxacillin (CODAP agar), for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Both the CMDAP and the CODAP agar effectively inhibited growth of 151 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 45 of Enterobacteriaceae and six Candida spp. examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the CMDAP and CODAP agars for detection of MRSA was calculated by comparing the growth of 52 MRSA with the inhibition of 74 mecA negative S. aureus and of 151 CoNS. The performance of the new agars was compared with four previously described MRSA screening agars. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of MRSA after incubation at 35 degrees C for 24 h was 0.94 and 0.91, respectively, for the CMDAP agar, 0.60 and 0.90 for the CODAP agar, 0.98 and 0.57 for methicillin aztreonam mannitol salt agar (MAMSA), 0.23 and 0.84 for oxacillin mannitol salt agar (OMSA), 0.48 and 0.76 for oxacillin Mueller-Hinton agar (OMHA) and 0.75 and 0.77 for lithium oxacillin mannitol salt agar (LOMSA). Agars supplemented with desferrioxamine, CMDAP and CODAP, were more specific for detecting MRSA compared with agars not supplemented with desferrioxamine. The detection rate was higher for agars supplemented with methicillin than for agars supplemented with oxacillin.