Re: Effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on rate of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise: nationwide registry-based cohort study

Linked article: This Correspondence comments on Damhuis et al. Click here to view the article.

The association between intrapartum opioid fentanyl and early breastfeeding: A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Intrapartum opioids in labor may interfere with the early breastfeeding phase and cause breastfeeding difficulties. This study examines the effects of intrapartum fentanyl given intravenously (IV) or through epidural analgesia (EDA) on early breastfeeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective observational study conducted in a regional maternity unit. We included 1101 healthy mothers of term singleton babies in vertex presentation born between 2016 and 2018 (468 nulliparous and 633 multiparous). The main data were collected prospectively, and additional data were retrieved from hospital records. The main outcome measures were exclusive breastfeeding at discharge, spontaneous suckling, and breastfeeding problems after birth. We assessed the outcomes in four groups categorized by intrapartum opioid exposure: none, IV fentanyl, EDA fentanyl and IV+EDA fentanyl. We also analyzed the dose-response relation of fentanyl administered by epidural or IV and early breastfeeding. Ultimately, we dichotomized the IV fentanyl group into two groups (≤200 µg and >200 µg) to further study the effect on early breastfeeding.

RESULTS

The odds of non-exclusive breastfeeding were doubled with EDA fentanyl (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, 95% CI 1.34-4.48, p = 0.004) and four times higher with IV+EDA fentanyl (OR 4.20, 95% CI 2.49-7.09, p < 0.001) compared with no opioid exposure. Spontaneous suckling was negatively associated with intrapartum fentanyl use (p < 0.001) irrespective of mode of administration. When the IV fentanyl doses exceeded 200 µg compared with less than 200 µg, we found a reduction in exclusive breastfeeding (81% vs. 89%; p = 0.014) and spontaneous suckling (68% vs. 83%; p < 0.001) and an increase in breastfeeding problems (41% vs. 27%; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Fentanyl in labor is associated with breastfeeding difficulties. However, IV fentanyl in low doses (≤200 µg) seems to affect breastfeeding less than EDA fentanyl and is therefore a viable alternative when labor analgesia is needed. This could be most relevant for multiparous women, where a shorter labor is expected. More research is needed to determine the optimal dose and route of administration of fentanyl for labor analgesia.

Quantification of Posterior Risk Related to Intrapartum FIGO 2015 Criteria for Cardiotocography in the Second Stage of Labor

INTRODUCTION

Intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) was used for several decades to detect a stressed fetus so that delivery can be expedited to prevent birth asphyxia. The main aim of the study was to calculate the risk of neonatal acidemia (pH ≤ 7.10) according to duration of the 2nd stage of labor and occurrence of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2015 CTG classification parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study on 552 pregnancies receiving continuous CTG monitoring in labor and immediate hemogasanalysis at birth. Cases with umbilical artery (UA) pH ≤ 7.10 and controls with UA pH ≥ 7.10 were matched for parity and gestational age at delivery, with ratio 1:5. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for the expected risk in the general population, was used to calculate the baseline risk of UA pH ≤ 7.10 in the absence of any CTG pathological feature and those associated with pathological CTG patterns occurring in the 2nd stage according to FIGO 2015.

RESULTS

Seventy-three cases and 387 controls reached 2nd stage and were included in the analysis. For those reaching 2nd stage, the mean adjusted risk of acidemia associated with nonpathological CTG was 1.6%. Stratification of risk according to duration of the 2nd stage yielded risks of neonatal acidemia of 1.23, 2.08, 5.81, and 15.22% at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min, respectively. Bradycardia >10 min was associated with risk of neonatal acidemia of 9.9 and 15.8% for 2nd-stage durations of 30 and 60 min, respectively. Risks associated with 1 prolonged deceleration >5 min were 6.80, 11.08, 27.0, and 51.0% at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min, respectively. Repetitive late or prolonged decelerations >30 min were associated with risk of neonatal acidemia of 2.43, 4.14, 11.17, and 26.45% at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The risk of neonatal acidemia is directly proportional to duration of the 2nd stage, irrespective of the presence of CTG abnormalities, increasing 12-fold (1.2-15.3%) from 30 to 180 min. Occurrence of FIGO 2015 pathological CTG patterns showed a decreasing impact from bradycardia >10 min to decelerations >5 min, recurrent later or prolonged decelerations >30 min, and nonpathological CTG.

Epidural use in labour is not associated with an increased risk of maternal or neonatal morbidity when the second stage is prolonged

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia increases length of labour and risk of operative delivery (caesarean or instrumental).

AIM

This study aimed to assess the impact of epidural anaesthesia on maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes when the second stage of labour was prolonged.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women delivering at term at the Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane between 2008 and 2017. Intrapartum, maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed and dichotomised according to the presence of prolonged second stage of labour and further by epidural use. Prolonged second stage of labour was defined as: nulliparous women ≥3 h (with epidural) and ≥2 h (without); multiparous women ≥2 h (with epidural) and ≥1 h (without).

RESULTS

There were 48 352 women who met the inclusion criteria - 43 676 without and 4676 with prolonged second stage of labour. The overall epidural rate was 35.9%. Women with epidural had significantly lower odds of achieving a spontaneous vaginal birth and higher odds of an operative birth regardless of length of second stage. While rates of several adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were higher when the second stage was prolonged, after adjusting for clinically relevant confounders, epidural use was not associated with increased odds of the majority of these adverse outcomes. Indeed, epidural use was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and reduced odds of neonatal acidosis in women with prolonged second stage.

CONCLUSION

While epidural increases the risk of operative birth, this is not associated with an increase in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.