Concerted stimulation and deactivation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins by chimeric G protein-coupled receptor-regulator of G protein signaling 4 fusion proteins: analysis of the contribution of palmitoylated cysteine residues to the GAP activity of RGS4

Pharmacological Characterization of Human Histamine Receptors and Histamine Receptor Mutants in the Sf9 Cell Expression System

A large problem of histamine receptor research is data heterogeneity. Various experimental approaches, the complex signaling pathways of mammalian cells, and the use of different species orthologues render it difficult to compare and interpret the published results. Thus, the four human histamine receptor subtypes were analyzed side-by-side in the Sf9 insect cell expression system, using radioligand binding assays as well as functional readouts proximal to the receptor activation event (steady-state GTPase assays and [35S]GTPγS assays). The human H1R was co-expressed with the regulators of G protein signaling RGS4 or GAIP, which unmasked a productive interaction between hH1R and insect cell Gαq. By contrast, functional expression of the hH2R required the generation of an hH2R-Gsα fusion protein to ensure close proximity of G protein and receptor. Fusion of hH2R to the long (GsαL) or short (GsαS) splice variant of Gαs resulted in comparable constitutive hH2R activity, although both G protein variants show different GDP affinities. Medicinal chemistry studies revealed profound species differences between hH1R/hH2R and their guinea pig orthologues gpH1R/gpH2R. The causes for these differences were analyzed by molecular modeling in combination with mutational studies. Co-expression of the hH3R with Gαi1, Gαi2, Gαi3, and Gαi/o in Sf9 cells revealed high constitutive activity and comparable interaction efficiency with all G protein isoforms. A comparison of various cations (Li+, Na+, K+) and anions (Cl-, Br-, I-) revealed that anions with large radii most efficiently stabilize the inactive hH3R state. Potential sodium binding sites in the hH3R protein were analyzed by expressing specific hH3R mutants in Sf9 cells. In contrast to the hH3R, the hH4R preferentially couples to co-expressed Gαi2 in Sf9 cells. Its high constitutive activity is resistant to NaCl or GTPγS. The hH4R shows structural instability and adopts a G protein-independent high-affinity state. A detailed characterization of affinity and activity of a series of hH4R antagonists/inverse agonists allowed first conclusions about structure/activity relationships for inverse agonists at hH4R. In summary, the Sf9 cell system permitted a successful side-by-side comparison of all four human histamine receptor subtypes. This chapter summarizes the results of pharmacological as well as medicinal chemistry/molecular modeling approaches and demonstrates that these data are not only important for a deeper understanding of HxR pharmacology, but also have significant implications for the molecular pharmacology of GPCRs in general.

Fusion proteins as model systems for the analysis of constitutive GPCR activity

In many cases, the coexpression of GPCRs with G-proteins and/or regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS-proteins) allows a successful reconstitution of high-affinity agonist binding and functional responses. However, in some cases, coexpressed GPCRs and G-proteins interact inefficiently, resulting in weak [³⁵S]GTPγS- and steady-state GTPase assay signals. This may be, for example, caused by a rapid dissociation of the G-protein from the plasma membrane, as has been reported for Gα(s). Moreover, for a detailed characterization of GPCR/G-protein interactions, it may be required to work with a defined GPCR/G-protein stoichiometry and to avoid cross-interaction with endogenous G-proteins. Cross-talk to endogenous G-proteins has been shown to play a role in some mammalian expression systems. These problems can be addressed by the generation of GPCR-Gα fusion proteins and their expression in Sf9 insect cells. When the C-terminus of the receptor is fused to the N-terminus of the G-protein, a 1:1 stoichiometry of both proteins is achieved. In addition, the close proximity of GPCR and G-protein in fusion proteins leads to enhanced interaction efficiency, resulting in increased functional signals. This approach can also be extended to fusion proteins of GPCRs with RGS-proteins, specifically when steady-state GTP hydrolysis is used as read-out. GPCR-RGS fusion proteins optimize the interaction of RGS-proteins with coexpressed Gα subunits, since the location of the RGS-protein is close to the site of receptor-mediated G-protein activation. Moreover, in contrast to coexpression systems, GPCR-Gα and GPCR-RGS fusion proteins provide a possibility to imitate physiologically occurring interactions, for example, the precoupling of receptors and G-proteins or the formation of complexes between GPCRs, G-proteins and RGS-proteins (transducisomes). In this chapter, we describe the technique for the generation of fusion proteins and show the application of this approach for the characterization of constitutively active receptors.

Sf9 cells: a versatile model system to investigate the pharmacological properties of G protein-coupled receptors

The Sf9 cell/baculovirus expression system is widely used for high-level protein expression, often with the purpose of purification. However, proteins may also be functionally expressed in the defined Sf9 cell environment. According to the literature, the pharmacology of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) functionally reconstituted in Sf9 cells is similar to the receptor properties in mammalian cells. Sf9 cells express both recombinant GPCRs and G-proteins at much higher levels than mammalian cells. Sf9 cells can be grown in suspension culture, providing an inexpensive way of obtaining large protein amounts. Co-infection with various baculoviruses allows free combination of GPCRs with different G-proteins. The absence of constitutively active receptors in Sf9 cells provides an excellent signal-to background ratio in functional assays, allowing the detection of agonist-independent receptor activity and of small ligand-induced signals including partial agonistic and inverse agonistic effects. Insect cell Gα(i)-like proteins mostly do not couple productively to mammalian GPCRs. Thus, unlike in mammalian cells, Sf9 cells do not require pertussis toxin treatment to obtain a Gα(i)-free environment. Co-expression of GPCRs with Gα(i1), Gα(i2), Gα(i3) or Gα(o) in Sf9 cells allows the generation of a selectivity profile for these Gα(i/o)-isoforms. Additionally, GPCR-G-protein combinations can be compared with defined 1:1 stoichiometry by expressing GPCR-Gα fusion proteins. Sf9 cells can also be employed for ligand screening in medicinal chemistry programs, using radioligand binding assays or functional assays, like the steady-state GTPase- or [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay. This review shows that Sf9 cells are a versatile model system to investigate the pharmacological properties of GPCRs.

RGS9-2 mediates specific inhibition of agonist-induced internalization of D2-dopamine receptors

Regulator of G protein signaling 9-2 (RGS9-2), a member of the RGS family of GTPase accelerating proteins, is expressed specifically in the striatum, a brain region involved in controlling movement, motivation, mood and addiction. RGS9-2 can be found co-localized with D(2)-class dopamine receptors in medium spiny striatal neurons and altered functioning of both RGS9-2 and D(2)-like dopamine receptors have been implicated in schizophrenia, movement disorders and reward responses. Previously we showed that RGS9-2 can specifically co-localize with D(2)-dopamine receptors (D2R). Here we provide further evidence of the specificity of RGS9-2 for regulating D2R cellular functions: the expression of RGS9-2 inhibits dopamine-mediated cellular internalization of D2R, while the expression of another RGS protein, RGS4, had no effect. In addition, the agonist-mediated internalization of the G protein coupled delta opioid receptor was unaffected by RGS9-2 expression. We utilized mutant constructs of RGS9-2 to show that the RGS9-2 DEP (for Disheveled, EGL-10, Pleckstrin homology) domain and the GTPase accelerating activity of RGS9-2 were necessary for mediating specific inhibition of D2R internalization.

Histamine H(4) receptor-RGS fusion proteins expressed in Sf9 insect cells: a sensitive and reliable approach for the functional characterization of histamine H(4) receptor ligands

The human histamine H(4) receptor (hH(4)R), co-expressed with Galpha(i2) and Gbeta(1)gamma(2) in Sf9 cells, is highly constitutively active. In the steady-state GTPase assay, the full agonist histamine (HA) induces only a relatively small signal (approximately 20-30%), resulting in a low signal-to background ratio. In order to improve this system for ligand screening purposes, the effects of the regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) RGS4 and RGS19 (GAIP) were investigated. RGS4 and GAIP were fused to the C-terminus of hH(4)R or co-expressed with non-fused hH(4)R, always combined with Galpha(i2) and Gbeta(1)gamma(2). The non-fused RGS proteins did not significantly increase the relative effect of HA. With the hH(4)R-RGS4 fusion protein the absolute GTPase activities, but not the relative HA-induced signal were increased. Fusion of hH(4)R with GAIP caused a selective increase of the HA signal, resulting in an enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. A detailed characterization of the hH(4)R-GAIP fusion protein (co-expressed with Galpha(i2) and Gbeta(1)gamma(2)) and a comparison with the data obtained for the non-fused hH(4)R (co-expressed with Galpha(i2) and Gbeta(1)gamma(2)) led to the following results: (i) the relative agonist- and inverse agonist-induced signals at hH(4)R-GAIP are markedly increased. (ii) Compared to the wild-type hH(4)R, standard ligands show unaltered potencies and efficacies at hH(4)R-GAIP. (iii) Like hH(4)R, hH(4)R-GAIP shows high and NaCl-resistant constitutive activity. (iv) hH(4)R-GAIP shows the same G-protein selectivity profile as the non-fused hH(4)R. Collectively, hH(4)R-GAIP provides a sensitive test system for the characterization of hH(4)R ligands and can replace the non-fused hH(4)R in steady-state GTPase assays.

Chronic cold exposure increases RGS7 expression and decreases alpha(2)-autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons

Chronic stress exposure alters the central noradrenergic neurons originating from the locus coeruleus (LC). Previously, we demonstrated that evoked increases in the firing rate of LC neurons and their release of norepinephrine are enhanced following chronic cold exposure. In the present studies, we tested the hypothesis that reduced feedback inhibition of LC neurons might underlie these alterations in LC activity by examining the effect of alpha(2)-autoreceptor stimulation on LC activity in chronically stressed rats using in vivo and in vitro single unit recordings. Given that regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins can impact the coupling of alpha(2)-autoreceptors to downstream signaling cascades, we also explored the expression of several RGS proteins following chronic stress exposure. We observed that the alpha(2)-autoreceptor-evoked inhibition of LC neurons was reduced and that the expression of RGS7 was increased following chronic stress exposure. Finally, we demonstrated that intracellular administration of RGS7 via patch clamp electrodes mimicked the stress-induced decrease in clonidine-evoked autoreceptor-mediated inhibition. These novel data provide a mechanism to explain how chronic stress-induced alterations in receptor coupling can result in changes in alpha(2)-autoreceptor control of noradrenergic function throughout the central nervous system, potentially leading to alterations in anxiety-related behaviors, and may suggest novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders.

Mammalian RGS proteins: Multifunctional regulators of cellular signalling

Regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins are a large and diverse family initially identified as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) of heterotrimeric G-protein Galpha-subunits. At least some can also influence Galpha activity through either effector antagonism or by acting as guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). As our understanding of RGS protein structure and function has developed, so has the realisation that they play roles beyond G-protein regulation. Such diversity of function is enabled by the variety of RGS protein structure and their ability to interact with other cellular molecules including phospholipids, receptors, effectors and scaffolds. The activity, sub-cellular distribution and expression levels of RGS proteins are dynamically regulated, providing a layer of complexity that has yet to be fully elucidated.

A Key Serine for the GTPase-Activating Protein Function of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins Is Not a General Target for 14-3-3 Interactions

Mammalian regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are highly conserved within the RGS domain. Of amino acids that are universal, a serine residue at the C terminus of this domain has been described as the binding site in RGS7 for 14-3-3 proteins. However, studies with the related RGS3 indicate that the site of interaction is not within the RGS domain. We confirm that the interaction of RGS3 with 14-3-3tau and 14-3-3zeta requires Ser264 and not the RGS domain and show both that mutation of the conserved RGS domain serine, Ser496 in RGS3, to either alanine or aspartate does not prevent binding of 14-3-3 proteins and that 14-3-3 proteins do not inhibit GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). However, mutation of Ser496 does directly impair the action of RGS3 as a GAP against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). We mutated the equivalent serine residue in the family B/R4 RGS proteins RGS1 and RGS16. Using two distinct assay formats, conversion to aspartate virtually abolished GAP activity, whereas conversion to alanine decreased potency 20-fold. Neither alteration modulated interactions with 14-3-3tau or 14-3-3zeta, but the 14-3-3 proteins did not modulate the GAP activity of the wild-type or mutant RGS proteins. Although interactions between 14-3-3 proteins and many RGS proteins can be observed, this does not involve this conserved serine and does not inherently modify GAP function.

Activation of an alpha2A-adrenoceptor-Galphao1 fusion protein dynamically regulates the palmitoylation status of the G protein but not of the receptor

Post-translational thio-acylation of a fusion protein between the alpha2A-adrenoceptor and the alpha subunit of the G protein G(o1) is both dynamic and regulated by agonist binding. Incorporation of [3H]palmitate into the fusion protein was reduced substantially in the presence of the agonist adrenaline. This was dependent on the concentration of adrenaline and correlated with occupancy of the ligand binding site. Both the receptor and G-protein elements of the fusion construct incorporated [3H]palmitate but this occurred more rapidly for the G-protein element and regulation of acylation by the agonist occurred only for the G protein. The kinetics of de-palmitoylation of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor-Galpha(o1) fusion were accelerated markedly by agonist. Again, this reflected modulation of the G protein but not of the receptor. Agonist-induced regulation of the kinetics of thio-acylation of the G protein was abolished, however, in a mutant unable to bind guanosine 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTP[S]) in response to adrenaline. Despite the dynamic nature of the post-translational acylation and its regulation by agonist, the ability of adrenaline to activate the G protein, monitored by stimulation of the binding of [35S]GTP[S] to such fusion constructs, was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either the receptor or G-protein element.

Increased baclofen-stimulated G protein coupling and deactivation in rat brain cortex during development

The number and affinity of GABA(B) receptors (assayed by the specific antagonist [(3)H]CGP54626A) was unchanged when compared in carefully washed cerebrocortical membranes from young (12-day-old) and adult (90-day-old) rats. In contrast, high-affinity GTPase activity, both basal and baclofen-stimulated was significantly higher (by 45% and 56%, respectively) in adult than in young rats. Similar results were obtained by concomitant determination of agonist (baclofen)-stimulated GTP gamma S binding. Under standard conditions, baclofen-stimulated GTPase activity was further considerably enhanced by exogenously added regulator of G protein function, RGS1, but not by RGS16. RGS16 was able to affect agonist-stimulated GTPase activity only in the presence of markedly increase substrate (GTP) concentrations. RGS1 alone slightly increased GTPase activity in adult rats, but neither RGS1 nor RGS16 influenced GTPase activity in membrane preparations isolated from young animals. These findings indicate increasing functional activity of trimeric G protein(s) involved in GABAergic transmission in the developing rat brain cortex and suggest a high potential of RGS1 in regulation of high-affinity GTPase activity.