Different types of antagonism by losartan and irbesartan on the effects of angiotensin II and its degradation products in rabbit arteries

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in animal models of vascular, cardiac, metabolic and renal disease

We have reviewed the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) in various animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, cardiac function, hypertrophy and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and renal function and morphology. Those of azilsartan and telmisartan have been included comprehensively whereas those of other ARBs have been included systematically but without intention of completeness. ARBs as a class lower blood pressure in established hypertension and prevent hypertension development in all applicable animal models except those with a markedly suppressed renin-angiotensin system; blood pressure lowering even persists for a considerable time after discontinuation of treatment. This translates into a reduced mortality, particularly in models exhibiting marked hypertension. The retrieved data on vascular, cardiac and renal function and morphology as well as on glucose and lipid metabolism are discussed to address three main questions: 1. Can ARB effects on blood vessels, heart, kidney and metabolic function be explained by blood pressure lowering alone or are they additionally directly related to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system? 2. Are they shared by other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, e.g. angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors? 3. Are some effects specific for one or more compounds within the ARB class? Taken together these data profile ARBs as a drug class with unique properties that have beneficial effects far beyond those on blood pressure reduction and, in some cases distinct from those of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The clinical relevance of angiotensin receptor-independent effects of some ARBs remains to be determined.

A systematic comparison of the properties of clinically used angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) have become an important drug class in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure and the protection from diabetic nephropathy. Eight ARBs are clinically available [azilsartan, candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, valsartan]. Azilsartan (in some countries), candesartan, and olmesartan are orally administered as prodrugs, whereas the blocking action of some is mediated through active metabolites. On the basis of their chemical structures, ARBs use different binding pockets in the receptor, which are associated with differences in dissociation times and, in most cases, apparently insurmountable antagonism. The physicochemical differences between ARBs also manifest in different tissue penetration, including passage through the blood-brain barrier. Differences in binding mode and tissue penetration are also associated with differences in pharmacokinetic profile, particularly duration of action. Although generally highly specific for angiotensin II type 1 receptors, some ARBs, particularly telmisartan, are partial agonists at peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. All of these properties are comprehensively reviewed in this article. Although there is general consensus that a continuous receptor blockade over a 24-hour period is desirable, the clinical relevance of other pharmacological differences between individual ARBs remains to be assessed.

Functional comparison of the antagonistic properties of some Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on the contraction elicited by Angiotensin II and thromboxane A2 on human saphenous veins

We previously described on human vascular preparations that, in addition to its antagonistic properties on Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor, losartan could also inhibit the contraction elicited by the stable thromboxane A2 mimetic U46619. The present study was designed (1) to investigate, in human vascular preparations (the saphenous veins) whether these antagonistic properties on thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 (TP) receptor were shared by some other AT1 receptor antagonists (irbesartan and valsartan) and the active metabolite of losartan EXP3174, and (2) to compare their antagonistic properties on TP receptors to their antagonistic properties on AT1 receptors. In the presence of indomethacin (10 microM) and Nomega-nitro-L-arginine (100 microM), irbesartan, valsartan, and EXP3174 induced a rightward shift of U46619- and angiotensin II-induced contraction. The inhibitory effect of irbesartan, valsartan, and EXP3174 on U46619-induced contraction was significant from 100 microM while their inhibitory effect on the contraction elicited by angiotensin II was significant from 1 nM. With regard to the plasma therapeutic concentrations of irbesartan, valsartan, and EXP3174, these data suggest that TP receptor blockade does not account for the antihypertensive effects of these AT1 receptor blockers.