Immunosuppressive medications for renal transplantation: a multiple choice question

History of organ transplantation and the development of key immunosuppressants

The history of organ transplantation is limited to the last century. To overcome the barrier of the host immune system, which results in transplant rejection, the pioneers of transplantation achieved their first success by performing a kidney transplantation between identical twins. This achievement led the transplant clinicians to perform transplantations with immunological barriers present. Strategies such as whole-body irradiation combined with steroids yielded success in kidney transplantation between non-identical twins and siblings. However, owing to the toxicity related to irradiation, the paradigm shifted to the use of immunosuppressants. Azathioprine, steroids, and anti-lymphocyte globulin became the first multiple immunosuppressive regimens. With the introduction of cyclosporine, the 1-year survival rate increased by more than 80%. Cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids became the new standard maintenance regimens until the introduction of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, which replaced cyclosporine and azathioprine, respectively. The most recent change in immunosuppressants was the development of monoclonal antibodies with specific binding sites, such as CD20 (rituximab) and CD25 (basiliximab). With the innovation of molecular engineering and new insights into the costimulatory pathways, new molecules are under investigation in the field of transplantation.

Monitoring cellular immune function of renal transplant recipients based on adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production by mitogen-induced CD4+ T helper cells

Maintaining the balance between over- and under-immunosuppression has a critical role for successful immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation. We studied the predictive value of our functional immune assay, which works based on adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels, in determining risk of infection and rejection among renal transplant recipients (RTRs). A total of 65 RTRs with less than 1 month (RTRL1) and 48 RTRs with more than 6 months (RTRM6) of post-transplant time, and 56 healthy individuals were included. Upon lymphocyte activation by phytohemagglutinin (PHA), CD4+ T cells were separated using magnetic beads (Dynabeads), the intracellular ATP (iATP) concentrations were measured by luciferin-luciferase reaction, and compared within and between the groups. Activated CD4+ cells iATP production directly correlated with post-transplant time (r = 0.32, P = 0.011). The iATP levels were significantly lower in both RTRL1 and RTRM6 groups compared to control (P < 0.001), and in the RTRL1 group compared to the RTRM6 (P < 0.05). The iATP concentrations were significantly lower in patients who suffered from infection versus the RTRs with stable graft function (SGF). However, the iATP levels were higher in those with allograft rejection episode (ARE). Our optimization experiments showed that best iATP levels cutoffs were 472.5 and 572.5 ng/ml for predicting risk of ARE, and 218.5 and 300.5 ng/ml for predicting risk of developing infection in RTRL1 and RTRM6 patients, respectively. iATP levels measured by immune function assay might be a promising predictive tool for identifying RTRs who are at risk of developing infection or allograft rejection.

Correlation Between Survival Interval and CD4+ T-Cell Intracellular ATP Levels in Liver Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to analyze the potential correlation between post-liver transplantation survival interval and CD4⁺ T-cell intracellular ATP (iATP) levels, and to describe the distribution of CD4⁺ T-cell iATP levels in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data of 273 patients who underwent liver transplantation from July 2010 to October 2012 in our center and achieved long-term stable survival. CD4⁺ T-cell iATP level was detected using Cylex ImmuKnow assay. Post-liver transplantation survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

CD4⁺ T-cell iATP level significantly differed among patients with different post-liver transplantation survival intervals. The peak CD4⁺ T-cell iATP levels typically occurred within the first 3 postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-liver transplantation survival interval is correlated with CD4⁺ T-cell iATP levels.

Development of an immune function assay by measuring intracellular adenosine triphosphate (iATP) levels in mitogen-stimulated CD4+ T lymphocytes

We developed an immune function assay for monitoring CD4+ T cells activity based on changes in intracellular adenosine triphosphate (iATP) levels after phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulation. Blood samples were obtained from 40 healthy subjects and 30 RTRs and incubated with 5 µg/mL of PHA for 15-18 hr at 37°C and 5% CO2. Afterward, the CD4+ T cells were separated by antibody-coated magnetic beads and lysed. Then, iATP content in unstimulated and stimulated conditions was measured by luciferin-luciferase reaction using a log-log standard curve. The iATP levels showed significant increase in CD4+ T cells in both healthy persons (mean: 550 ± 142 ng/mL vs. 109 ± 54 ng/mL) and RTRs (mean: 394 ± 160 ng/mL vs. 52 ± 37 ng/mL) after PHA stimulation (P < 0.001). However, the iATP production in RTRs was significantly lower than that in healthy individuals; both prior to and after stimulation with PHA (P < 0.001). No gender-specific difference in iATP production was observed between women and men subjects. This rapid and low-cost assay reflects the degree of immune cell function through assessment of CD4+ T cells activation. Thus, it can be used for evaluation of immune system status in immunodeficient individuals as well as in immunosuppressed transplant recipients who needs drug adjustment.

Effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation: risk factors and early and long-term outcomes in a single center

INTRODUCTION

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) causes a high rate of delayed graft function (DGF), the most frequent complication in the immediate postoperative period after cadaveric donor kidney transplantation. Herein we evaluated the impact of donor and recipient characteristics on DGF development in terms of the incidence of acute rejection episodes, hospital stay, renal function, and long-term graft and patient survivals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 1998 and July 2011, 761 patients underwent cadaveric donor kidney transplantations. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis in the first week. Patients were subdivided according to initial graft function as immediate graft function (IGF) or DGF.

RESULTS

DGF observed in 241 patients (31.6%) was associated independently with expanded criteria donors, extended cold ischemia time, Karpinsky histological score, and prior dialysis duration both univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of acute rejection episodes was 18.1% among the DGF group versus 1.3% in the IGF group (P < .01). DGF significantly reduced both graft and patient survivals at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months.

CONCLUSION

DGF was responsible for a longer hospital stay, worse early and long-term renal function, a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as reduced graft and patient survivals.

[Immunosuppressive agents in Dermatology]

Immunosupressants are drugs that act in cell division and have anti-inflammatory effects. Therefore, they are essentially prescribed in the prevention of transplant rejection and in the treatment of autoimmune disorders and chronic inflammatory diseases, whose main example in Dermatology is psoriasis. In this work the most important immunosuppressive drugs and orientation to properly administer them are going to be described.

The accumulated experience with the use of mycophenolate mofetil in primary glomerulonephritis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been extended from renal transplantation to the treatment of glomerulonephritis. MMF has been used in patients with steroid- and ciclosporin A (CsA)-dependent or -resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and in patients with deteriorating renal function or adverse reactions to other drugs. MMF has been also used in patients with membranous and IgA nephropathy after failure of other regimens as well as initial treatment.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The rationale of MMF treatment in primary glomerulonephritis is based in its antifibrotic and antiproteinuric effects. The mechanism of action is described; the results of cohort and randomized trials in minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, idiopathic membranous nephropathy and IgA nephropathy are presented along with the adverse reactions profile and the expert opinion.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This is an up-to-date review providing insight on this novel agent that is increasingly used in the therapeutics of primary glomerulonephritis.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Although the results are conflicting, MMF seems to be effective at least in some patients, who do not respond to corticosteroids, ciclosporin or cytotoxic drugs. However, the experience with MMF in primary glomerulonephritis is limited and further research is required in order to establish MMF in the treatment of patients with glomerular disease.

Role of Maintenance Immunosuppressive Regimen in Kidney Transplant Outcome

Data of long-term immunosuppressive protocol comparison are lacking. The goal of this study was to compare kidney transplant outcome using three common immunosuppressive protocols. A retrospective study was performed of the graft and recipient survival using US Renal Data System data (n = 31,012) between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1999, with the follow-up through December 31, 2000, on prednisone + cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil (PCM; n = 17,108), prednisone + tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (PTM; n = 7225), or prednisone + cyclosporine + azathioprine (PCA; n = 6679). Compared with PCM, there is an increased risk for allograft failure associated with PTM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09; P < 0.05) and PCA (HR 1.15; P < 0.001). Similar associations were demonstrated in the following subgroups: Early (before 1997) and late (in or after 1997) transplant periods, in living-donor transplants, and in adult and kidney-only recipients. This association also was found between PCA regimen and graft survival in the entire patient population (HR 1.15; P < 0.001) and in the studied subgroups. PCA (HR 1.15; P < 0.005), but not PTM (HR 1.01; P = 0.816), regimen was associated with increased recipient mortality in the entire patient population and in patient subgroups. Secondary outcomes (serum creatinine values at given time points, acute rejection rate, and posttransplantation malignancies) are also discussed. These data suggest that a PCM regimen is associated with lower risk for graft failure compared with a PTM regimen and with lower risk for graft failure and recipient death compared with a PCA regimen.

FTY720-induced lymphocyte homing modulates post-transplant preservation/reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

A novel immunomodulator, FTY720, modulates lymphocyte migration to injured tissues via enhanced lymphocyte sequestration to secondary lymphoid organs. We tested whether or not single-dose FTY720 (0.5 mg/kg) pretreatment rescues renal grafts from post-transplant preservation/reperfusion injury.

METHODS

Rat renal grafts were cold-preserved in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution for 4 hours and then transplanted into syngeneic or allogeneic recipients that received a single dose of FTY720 24 hours before transplantation. Flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood and lymph nodes was performed to confirm the biologic effect of FTY720. Grafts were harvested after 24 hours. Renal sections were examined histologically and stained for intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), platelet endothelial cellular adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, and inflammatory cells. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) production was determined in renal protein extracts.

RESULTS

FTY720 pretreatment significantly increased CD3+ T-cell sequestration to lymph nodes in the face of peripheral lymphopenia. Isografts and allografts from the FTY720-treated groups did not develop increased creatinine (0.55 +/- 0.12 in isografts and 0.62 +/- 0.08 mg/dL in allografts), compared with vehicle controls (2.28 +/- 0.20 in isografts and 2.24 +/- 0.18 mg/dL in allografts). Kidneys from FTY720-treated groups also showed lower acute tubular damage scores. Furthermore, FTY720 decreased neutrophil influx, although circulating neutrophils were unchanged. FTY720 also prevented postischemic IL-1 intragraft production not affecting infiltration with recipient ED-1+ macrophages and MHC class II-positive cells. Expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and PECAM did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSION

FTY720 ameliorated morphologic and functional consequences of post-transplant reperfusion injury. Thus, FTY720-induced peripheral T-cell absence may influence intragraft IL-1 production and neutrophil infiltration, despite proadhesive endothelial properties. FTY720 may broaden the utility in renal transplantation as a pretreatment strategy against preservation/reperfusion injury.

The effect of maintenance immunosuppression medication on the change in kidney allograft function

BACKGROUND

The optimum maintenance immunosuppression regimen for kidney transplant recipients is uncertain. In this study we determined the effect of maintenance immunosuppression medications on the rate of kidney allograft function loss defined by the annualized change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

METHODS

We studied 40,963 first kidney only transplant recipients between 1987 and 1996 with allograft survival of at least two years in the United States Renal Data System. Linear regression methods were applied to serial GFR estimates after transplantation to determine the annualized change in GFR. Patients were classified according to the type of maintenance calcineurin and purine metabolism inhibitor received after transplantation. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the independent effect of maintenance immunosuppression medications on the annualized change in GFR (mL/min/1.73m2/year).

RESULTS

Compared to patients who received cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), a slower decline in GFR was observed in tacrolimus-treated patients (1.60 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 1.22-1.97, P < 0.001) and patients who did not receive calcineurin inhibitors (0.82 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 0.08-1.56, P= 0.03). In contrast, compared to compared to patients who received Neoral, a faster decline in GFR was observed in patients who received the original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine (Sandimmune) (-0.16 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.003 to -0.32, P= 0.04) and patients with unknown calcinuerin inhibitor exposure (-2.11 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -2.27 to -1.95, P < 0.001). Compared to patients who received azathioprine, patients who received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) had a slower decline in GFR (0.61 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 0.14-1.08, P= 0.01) and patients with unknown purine metabolism inhibitor exposure had a faster decline in GFR (-0.61 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.47, P < 0.001.) In a subgroup analysis of patients who received a transplant after 1993, the decline in GFR was slower for tacrolimus compared to neoral treated patients (1.64 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 1.15-2.14, P < 0.001) but was not different for MMF compared to azathioprine-treated patients (0.24 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.38-0.85, P= 0.45).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus and MMF were the calcineurin inhibitor and purine metabolism inhibitor associated with the most favorable effects on rates of change in allograft function. Because most transplant recipients establish a low baseline level of allograft function, the effect of immunosuppression medication on GFR decline should be considered when selecting a maintenance immunosuppression regimen.

Allocation of deceased donor kidneys: past, present, and future

The manner in which deceased donor kidneys are allocated has broad relevance to the care of patients with end-stage renal disease. An algorithm governing the allocation of deceased donor kidneys has been applied in the United States since 1987. Adjustments were made to facilitate the national sharing of highly matched kidneys, but the main components of the algorithm remained largely unchanged. In ensuing years, the number of patients on the waiting list has increased steadily while the supply of kidneys has remained constant. The waiting time for an organ now is measured in years, and the allocation of organs has become unpredictable. As of October 2002, several important changes have been made to the algorithm. These changes are designed to increase the relative number of minority patients who undergo transplantation and the use of extended-criteria donor kidneys. They also have practical implications for the management of patients on the waiting list. The rationale behind these changes is discussed in the context of the ethical underpinnings of kidney allocation.

Immune cell function testing: an adjunct to therapeutic drug monitoring in transplant patient management

Each year, 55 000 organ transplants are performed worldwide. Cumulatively, the number of living organ recipients is now estimated to be over 300 000. Most of these transplant recipients will remain on immunosuppressive drugs for the remainder of their lives to prevent rejection episodes. Controlled doses of these drugs are required to prevent over-medication, which may leave the patient susceptible to opportunistic infection and drug toxicity effects, or under-dosing, which may lead to shortened graft survival because of rejection episodes. This paper describes the result of a multicenter study conducted at the Universities of Pittsburgh, Alabama and Maryland to evaluate an in vitro assay (CylexTM Immune Cell Function Assay) for the measurement of global immune response in transplant patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. The assay uses a whole blood sample to maintain the presence of the drug during incubation. Following overnight incubation of blood with phytohemagglutinin (PHA), CD4 cells are selected using paramagnetic particles coated with a monoclonal antibody to the CD4 epitope. The CD4-positive cells are targeted as major immunosuppressive drugs are designed to specifically inhibit T-cell activation which has been implicated in rejection. The data generated at these three sites were submitted in support of an Food and Drug Association (FDA) application for the use of this assay in the detection of cell-mediated immunity in an immunosuppressed population. The assay was cleared by the FDA on April 2, 2002. This cross-sectional study was designed to establish ranges for reactivity of this bioassay in the assessment of functional immunity for an individual solid organ recipient at any point in time.

Influence of the new immunosuppressive combinations on arterial hypertension after renal transplantation

Arterial hypertension is highly prevalent after renal transplantation and may contribute to the risk of cardiovascular disease. Also, arterial hypertension has been reported to be an independent risk factor for graft failure. Immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, cyclosporine and tacrolimus may be important contributing factors to post-transplant hypertension. Recent data from multicenter trials and from conversion studies (cyclosporine to tacrolimus) suggest that renal transplant patients under tacrolimus-based therapy showed less arterial hypertension compared with cyclosporine treated patients. New immunosuppressive drugs, including mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin, are not nephrotoxic and they do not have any hypertensive effect. New immunosuppressive combinations including mycophenolate mofetil in a triple therapy regimen (associated with corticosteroids and cyclosporine) can reduce blood pressure so that corticosteroids can be stopped or cyclosporine reduced or even eliminated. Non-nephrotoxic regimens using rapamycin (sirolimus) as basic immunosuppression, associated with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, could reduce the incidence of post-transplant arterial hypertension. Also, in renal transplant patients initially immunosuppressed with rapamycin, cyclosporine and corticosteroids, after the elimination of CSA, a lower blood pressure is achieved. In summary, new protocols with mycophenolate mofetil and/or rapamycin may permit several combinations that offer important alternatives to classical immunosuppressive regimens to reduce the incidence and clinical impact of arterial hypertension after renal transplantation.

[Present and future of kidney transplantation]

Renal transplant is the treatment of choice for the patient with end stage renal disease. Spain is the country with the highest donation rate (33 ppm). However, at present this figure is stabilized. The development of non-beating heart programmes, living-donor nephrectomy (specially laparoscopic nephrectomy) programmes, and may be xenotransplantation in a non-immediate future could increase the transplantation activity. The knowledge of preservation mechanisms, specially with the use of perfusion machines allows to rescue for transplantation kidneys with a long warm-ischemia time. Furthermore, these machines are useful for analyzing viability markers. The new immunosuppressive drugs: Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate-Mophetil, Rapamycin and monoclonal antibodies against alpha chain of the interleukine-2 receptor (Basoliximab and Dazcizumab) have reduced the incidence of acute rejection in the immediate renal transplant period. However, its effect in the long-term follow-up period is still a matter of controversy. The incidence of tumour in the renal transplant recipient is increased, specially those of lymphoma, skin cancer and Kaposi sarcoma. Periodical exams for detecting the development of tumours are mandatory in this population. Finally, xenotransplantation is an attractive alternative, although immunological, infective and ethical barriers should previously be resolved.

New developments in immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation

The introduction of new immunosuppressive agents and protocols has improved outcomes for renal transplant recipients by decreasing the risk of rejection and by increasing the function and lifespan of the allograft. This article reviews the major changes in the combinations of therapies used: calcineurin inhibitors, target of rapamycin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, non-depleting monoclonal versus depleting monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies for induction and increasing emphasis on protocols for reduction or avoidance of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. The new agents with novel immunological targets such as anti-CD40 ligand, LEA29Y, FTY720, anti-CD20 (rituximab, Rituxan, Mabthera) and anti-CH52 (alemtuzumab, Campath), which are under development but have yet to survive the rigors of clinical trials are also discussed. In the presence of low early rejection rates, immunosuppressive therapy is setting new goals such as better graft function (glomerular filtration rates), reduction in adverse effects such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and drug toxicity and, above all, the prevention of late graft deterioration.

T-cell activation through the antigen receptor. Part 2: role of signaling cascades in T-cell differentiation, anergy, immune senescence, and development of immunotherapy

Part 2 of this review on cellular activation by the T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) will highlight how TCR signaling pathways are adapted to achieve specific biologic outcomes, including different states of T-cell differentiation and the induction of T-cell tolerance. We will also explore how treatment with altered peptide ligands affects TCR signaling to change T-cell differentiation or to induce an anergy state. These changes are accomplished through alteration of protein tyrosine kinase activity, the stoichiometry of phosphorylation of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs, intracellular free ionized calcium flux, mitogen-activated protein kinase activity, and transcriptional activation of key cytokine promoters. The CTLA-4 plays an important role in the induction and maintenance of anergy. The second theme will highlight how altered TCR signal transduction, including changes in the compartmentalization of signaling components at the TCR synapse, contributes to decreased T-cell activation during immune senescence. Finally, we will illustrate how the molecular details of TCR activation can be used to modify the function of the immune system. This includes a description of the mechanism of action of altered peptide ligands, CTLA-4Ig, and pharmacologic inhibitors of mitogen-activated protein kinases, nuclear factor kappaB, and protein kinase C cascades.

Progress in the clinical application of immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplantation

Although only very few new immunosuppressive drugs have been approved over the past two decades, the introduction of each new drug has progressively reduced the incidence of acute rejection and raised hopes that there would be an increase in long-term allograft survival. It is now consistently possible to achieve acute rejection rates of between 10 and 20%, and in many studies the rate has fallen below 10%. This is important, as acute rejection is one of the most important factors reducing the long-term survival of the allograft as a consequence of the development of chronic allograft nephropathy. The availability of these new agents has allowed experimentation with diverse protocols that explore the possibility of reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids. These include both 'avoidance' and 'withdrawal' protocols. The target of rapamycin inhibitors, sirolimus and everolimus, have extended this paradigm. It is possible, but not yet proved, that their antiproliferative effect on smooth muscle will retard the vascular remodelling characteristic of chronic allograft nephropathy, atherosclerosis and hypertension. This review concentrates on the current progress being made in clinical immunosuppression, and includes data presented at the Transplant 2001 meeting of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, held in May 2001.