Conservative versus immunosuppressive treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Ten tips on immunosuppression in primary membranous nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) management poses challenges, particularly in selecting appropriate immunosuppressive treatments (IST) and monitoring disease progression and complications. This article highlights 10 key tips for the management of primary MN based on current evidence and clinical experience. First, we advise against prescribing IST to patients without nephrotic syndrome (NS), emphasizing the need for close monitoring of disease progression. Second, we recommend initiating IST in patients with persistent NS or declining kidney function. Third, we suggest prescribing rituximab (RTX) or RTX combined with calcineurin inhibitors in medium-risk patients. Fourth, we propose cyclophosphamide-based immunosuppression for high-risk patients. Fifth, we discourage the use of glucocorticoid monotherapy or mycophenolate mofetil as initial treatments. Sixth, we underscore the importance of preventing infectious complications in patients receiving IST. Seventh, we emphasize the need for personalized monitoring of IST by closely measuring kidney function, proteinuria, serum albumin and anti-M-type phospholipase A2 receptor levels. Eighth, we recommend a stepwise approach in the treatment of resistant disease. Ninth, we advise adjusting treatment for relapses based on individual risk profiles. Finally, we caution about the potential recurrence of MN after kidney transplantation and suggest appropriate monitoring and treatment strategies for post-transplantation MN. These tips provide comprehensive guidance for clinicians managing MN, aiming to optimize patient outcomes and minimize complications.

PLA2R Antibody Does Not Outperform Conventional Clinical Markers in Predicting Outcomes in Membranous Nephropathy

Introduction

The prognostic value of PLA2R antibody (Ab) test in clinical practice remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate its ability in predicting hard outcomes in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) after adjustments to conventional markers of disease activity.

Methods

A total of 222 patients diagnosed with PMN from January 2003 to July 2019 having had a serum PLA2R Ab test, were included from 3 centers in the north of England. Baseline conventional markers, PLA2R-Ab-status (positive vs. negative), Ab-titer (high vs. low), and time of testing (pre-PLA2R era vs. PLA2R era) were evaluated for association with outcomes. Primary outcome was time to progression (composite of doubling of creatinine, stage 5 chronic kidney disease, or death). Secondary outcomes were time to partial remission (PR) and time to immunosuppression. Cox proportional hazard testing was used.

Results

During a median follow-up of 5.26 years, progression was seen in 65 (29.3%) and PR in 179 of 222 patients (80.6%). There was a clear association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (standardized hazard ratio [HRZ] = 0.767, P < 0.05) and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (uPCR) (HRZ = 1.44, P < 0.005) with time to progression among all patients, and eGFR (HRZ = 0.606, P < 0.005) in Ab-positive patients. Baseline Ab-positivity was not associated with time to progression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.93, P = 0.71) or time to PR (aHR = 0.84, P = 0.13). Similarly, baseline high Ab-titer was not associated with time to progression (aHR = 1.07, P = 0.77) or time to PR (aHR = 0.794, P = 0.08).

Conclusion

Once adjusted to conventional markers of disease activity, baseline PLA2R Ab-positivity or Ab-titer do not predict disease progression or time to PR. Further studies are needed to harness the utility of PLA2R Ab test in prognostication in PMN.

Revisiting immunological and clinical aspects of membranous nephropathy

Idiopathic or primary membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults and the elderly. It is characterized by a thickening of the wall of the glomerular capillaries due to the presence of immune complex deposits. 85% of membranous nephropathy cases are classified as primary or idiopathic (IMN). The rest are of secondary origin (SMN), caused by autoimmune conditions or malignant tumors as lung cancer, colon and melanomas. It is an organ-specific autoimmune disease in which the complement system plays an important role with the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC; C5b-9), which produces an alteration of the podocyte structure. The antigen responsible for 70-80% of IMN is a podocyte protein called M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). More recently, another podocyte antigen has been identified, the "Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A" (THSD7A), which is responsible for 10% of the cases of negative IMN for anti- PLA2R.

Effectiveness and safety of cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend classical combined therapy of steroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), while it is associated with severe adverse effects.

AIMS

We conducted an observational and retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of steroids plus tacrolimus (TAC) versus steroids plus CYC for IMN.

METHODS

A total of 203 kidney-biopsy-proven IMN patients was enrolled in this study. One group (n = 142) received steroid combined with intravenous CYC (750 mg/m² body surface) and the other group (n = 61) received steroid combined with oral TAC (target blood concentration of 4-8 ng/mL). The primary outcomes were achievement of remission. The secondary end-points included incidence of adverse events, relapse rates, 24 h urinary protein (UP), serum albumin, serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

RESULTS

Over the 18-month observation period, the study suggested that the remission rates at the first 3 months were significantly higher in TAC group than in CYC group (72.1% vs 54.9%, P < 0.05). Although the cumulative incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events was not different significantly between the two groups, the incidence after first 3 months was lower in TAC group. Levels of 24-h UP and serum albumin improved in the TAC group more than in the CYC group (P < 0.05) over the observed period.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of its short-term effectiveness and long-term safety profile, steroid plus TAC might be a better option for IMN.

Effectiveness and safety of cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Background: Guidelines recommend combined therapy of glucocorticoid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), while it is associated with severe adverse effects. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of glucocorticoid plus tacrolimus (TAC) for IMN.

Methods: Two hundred and three kidney-biopsy-proven IMN patients were enrolled in this study. One group (n = 142) received glucocorticoid combined with intravenous CYC (750 mg/m² body surface) and the other group (n = 61) received glucocorticoid combined with oral TAC (target blood concentration of 4–8 ng/mL). The primary outcomes were achievement of remission and incidence of adverse events. The secondary end points included relapse rates, 24 h urinary protein (UP), serum albumin, serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Results: Over the 18-month observation period, the study suggested that the remission rates at the first 3 months were significantly higher in TAC group than in CYC group (72.1% versus 54.9%, p < .05). Although the cumulative incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events was not different significantly between the two groups, the incidence after first 3 months was lower in TAC group. 24hUP and serum albumin improved in TAC group more than the CYC group (p < .05) over the observed period.

Conclusion: Because of its short-term effectiveness and long-term safety profile, glucocorticoid plus TAC might be a better option for IMN.

Treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: where are we now?

In the last 10 years, basic science and clinical research have made important contributions to the understanding and management of primary membranous nephropathy (MN). The identification of antibodies directed against the M-type phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A protein have added a new perspective on diagnosis, monitoring the immunological activity, predicting prognosis and guiding therapy in patients with primary MN. Mounting evidence suggests that quantification and follow-up of antiPLA2R Abs levels can help in assessing prognosis and evaluate the response to treatment. The kidney disease improving global outcomes guidelines published in 2012 have not been updated. New data on the use of rituximab suggest it should be considered as a potential initial therapy in the treatment of patients with primary MN.

Rituximab for immunologic renal disease: What the nephrologist needs to know

Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric, monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, is increasingly used in immune-mediated renal diseases. While licensed in the induction treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis, it represents one of the most commonly prescribed off-label drugs. Much of the information regarding its safety has been drawn from experience in hematology and rheumatology. Ample evidence illustrates the safety of RTX, however, rare but serious adverse events have emerged that include progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and hepatitis B reactivation. Moderate to severe hypogammaglobulinemia and late-onset neutropenia following RTX therapy confer an increased infectious risk and factors predicting these side effects (i.e. a genetic basis) need to be identified. Nephrologists initiating RTX need to bear in mind that long-term risks and optimal dosing for many renal indications remain unclear. Special considerations must be given when RTX is used in women of childbearing age. We summarize practical aspects concerning the use of RTX. This review will provide nephrologists with information to guide their use of RTX alerting them to safety risks and the need for patient counselling.

Prevalence of serum anti M-type phospholipase A2 receptor antibody in primary membranous nephropathy: A single center experience

We conducted a prospective study to assess utility of detection of antibodies to phospholipase A₂receptor (PLA₂R) in the serum of patients with membranous nephropathy. Seventy five patients with biopsy proven membranous nephropathy admitted between January 2011 and September 2014 were studied. Serum anti- PLA₂R was tested by indirect immunofluorescence. The test was positive in 45 out of 60 patients with primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) and in none of the 15 patients with secondary membranous nephropathy, with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 100% for PMN. Anti PLA₂R positivity also showed a significant correlation with quantum of proteinuria and negative correlation with serum albumin. This study has validated detection of serum anti PLA₂R in PMN as a non invasive diagnostic tool in Indian patients.

Kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as prognostic markers in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Background

Urinary excretion of alpha-1-microglobulin and beta-2-microglobulin reflects tubular damage and predicts outcome in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy with reasonable accuracy. Urinary kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin are novel biomarkers of tubular damage. We investigated if these markers could improve prediction of outcome in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Methods

We measured kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in urine samples from patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, who had nephrotic proteinuria and normal renal function. Excretion of alpha-1-microglobulin and beta-2-microglobulin had been measured previously. Progression was defined as a serum creatinine rise >30%, a rise in serum creatinine to an absolute value of ≥135  µmol/L, or a clinical decision to start immunosuppressive therapy. Remission was defined as proteinuria <3.5 g/day and >50% reduction from baseline.

Results

Sixty-nine patients were included. Median follow-up was 35 months (interquartile range 18–63 months). Progression occurred in 30 patients (44%), and spontaneous remission in 36 (52%). Kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin excretion rates were significantly correlated with each other, and with alpha-1-microglobulin and beta-2-microglobulin. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for progression were 0.75 (0.62–0.87) for kidney injury molecule-1 and 0.74 (0.62–0.87) for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin. In multivariate analysis with either alpha-1-microglobulin and beta-2-microglobulin, kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin did not independently predict outcome.

Conclusion

Kidney injury molecule-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin excretion rates correlated with excretion rates of other tubular damage markers and predicted outcome in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. They did not add prognostic value compared to measurement of either alpha-1-microglobulin or beta-2-microglobulin.

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common form of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The disease shows a benign or indolent course in the majority of patients, with a rate of spontaneous complete or partial remission of nephrotic syndrome as high as 30% or more. Despite this, 30% to 40% of patients progress toward end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within five to 15 years. The efficacy and safety of immunosuppression for IMN with nephrotic syndrome are still controversial. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive treatments for adult patients with IMN and nephrotic syndrome. Moreover it was attempted to identify the best therapeutic regimen, when to start immunosuppression and whether the above therapies should be given to all adult patients at high risk of progression to ESKD or only restricted to those with impaired kidney function.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Renal Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chinese databases, reference lists of articles, and clinical trial registries to June 2014. We also contacted principal investigators of some of the studies for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of immunosuppression in adults with IMN and nephrotic syndrome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data synthesis were performed using the Cochrane-recommended methods. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty nine studies with 1825 patients were included, 36 of these could be included in our meta-analyses. The data from two studies could not be extracted and one study was terminated due to poor accrual. Immunosuppression significantly reduced all-cause mortality or risk of ESKD ((15 studies, 791 patients): RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.95, P = 0.03) and risk of ESKD ((15 studies, 791 patients): RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95, P = 0.03), increased complete or partial remission ((16 studies, 864 patients): RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.70, P = 0.04), and decreased proteinuria ((9 studies,(393 patients): MD -0.95 g/24 h, 95% CI -1.81 to -0.09, P = 0.03) at the end of follow-up (range 6 to 120 months). However this regimen was associated with more discontinuations or hospitalisations ((16 studies, 880 studies): RR 5.35, 95% CI 2.19 to 13.02), P = 0.0002). Combined corticosteroids and alkylating agents significantly reduced death or risk of ESKD ((8 studies, 448 patients): RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.75, P = 0.002) and ESKD ((8 studies, 448 patients): RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.81, P = 0.008), increased complete or partial remission ((7 studies, 422 patients): RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.89, P = 0.004) and complete remission ((7 studies, 422 patients): RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.32, P < 0.00001), and decreased proteinuria ((6 studies, 279 patients): MD -1.25 g/24 h, 95% CI -1.93 to -0.57, P = 0.0003) at the end of follow-up (range 9 to 120 months). In a population with an assumed risk of death or ESKD of 181/1000 patients, this regimen would be expected to reduce the number of patients experiencing death or ESKD to 80/1000 patients (range 47 to 136). In a population with an assumed complete or partial remission of 408/1000 patients, this regimen would be expected to increase the number of patients experiencing complete or partial remission to 596/1000 patients (range 462 to 772). However this combined regimen was associated with a significantly higher risk of discontinuation or hospitalisation due to adverse effects ((4 studies, 303 patients): RR 4.20, 95% CI 1.15 to 15.32, P = 0.03). Whether this combined therapy should be indicated in all adult patients at high risk of progression to ESKD or only restricted to those with deteriorating kidney function still remained unclear. Cyclophosphamide was safer than chlorambucil ((3 studies, 147 patients): RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.90, P = 0.02). There was no clear evidence to support the use of either corticosteroid or alkylating agent monotherapy. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil failed to show superiority over alkylating agents. Tacrolimus and adrenocorticotropic hormone significantly reduced proteinuria. The numbers of corresponding studies related to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, adrenocorticotropic hormone, azathioprine, mizoribine, and Tripterygium wilfordii are still too sparse to draw final conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update, a combined alkylating agent and corticosteroid regimen had short- and long-term benefits on adult IMN with nephrotic syndrome. Among alkylating agents, cyclophosphamide was safer than chlorambucil. This regimen was significantly associated with more withdrawals or hospitalisations. It should be emphasised that the number of included studies with high-quality design was relatively small and most of included studies did not have adequate follow-up and enough power to assess the prespecified definite endpoints. Although a six-month course of alternating monthly cycles of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide was recommended by the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline 2012 as the initial therapy for adult IMN with nephrotic syndrome, clinicians should inform their patients of the lack of high-quality evidence for these benefits as well as the well-recognised adverse effects of this therapy. Cyclosporine or tacrolimus was recommended by the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline 2012 as the alternative regimen for adult IMN with nephrotic syndrome; however, there was no evidence that calcineurin inhibitors could alter the combined outcome of death or ESKD.

Predictors of response and relapse in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy treated with tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Although tacrolimus is recommended by KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN), little is known about factors that influence response and relapse of the disease after tacrolimus therapy.

METHODS

Multicentre study that collected 122 MN patients with nephrotic syndrome and stable renal function treated with tacrolimus. Duration of treatment was 17.6 ± 7.2 months, including a full-dose and a tapering period.

RESULTS

The percentage of remission was 60, 78 and 84% after 6, 12 and 18 months of treatment, respectively. The amount of proteinuria at baseline significantly predicted remission, the lower the baseline proteinuria the higher the probability of remission. Only 10 patients (8%) received concomitantly corticosteroids, and their rate of remission was similar (80% at 18 months). Among responders, 42% achieved complete remission (CR) and 58% partial remission (PR). Almost half (44%) of the responder patients relapsed. The amount of proteinuria at the onset of tacrolimus tapering was significantly higher in relapsing patients. By multivariable analysis, the presence of a PR versus CR at the onset of tacrolimus tapering and a shorter duration of the tapering period significantly predicted relapses. Tolerance was good and the number of adverse events low.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus monotherapy is an effective and safe option for the treatment of MN with stable renal function. Relapses are frequent in patients with PR and can be partially prevented by a longer tapering period.

Chlorambucil-induced cytomegalovirus infection: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Chlorambucil is an alkylating agent used in combination with prednisolone for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Although chlorambucil is generally well-tolerated, it is a myelosuppresive drug that can cause several infections.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of an 81-year-old Caucasian male presenting with idiopathic membranous nephropathy who developed fever, cough, dyspnea, pulmonary infiltrates, and abdominal pain shortly after the initiation of treatment with chlorambucil and corticosteroids for nephropathy. Virology tests for infectious diseases revealed a recent cytomegalovirus infection. Antiviral treatment (ganciclovir) resulted in full remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytomegalovirus infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates in patients treated with chlorambucil for nephrotic syndrome.

[Membranous nephropathy]

Membranous nephropathy is characterized by immune complex deposits on the outer side of the glomerular basement membrane. Activation of complement and of oxidation lead to basement membrane lesions. The most frequent form is idiopathic. At 5 and 10 years, renal survival is around 90 and 65% respectively. A prognostic model based on proteinuria, level and duration, progression of renal failure in a few months can refine prognosis. The urinary excretion of C5b-9, β2 and α1 microglobuline and IgG are strong predictors of outcome. Symptomatic treatment is based on anticoagulation in case of nephrotic syndrome, angiotensin conversion enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers and statins. Immunosuppressive therapy should be discussed for patients having a high risk of progression. Corticoids alone has no indication. Treatment should include a simultaneous association or more often alternating corticoids and alkylant agent for a minimum of 6 months. Adrenocorticoid stimulating hormone and steroids plus mycophenolate mofetil may be equally effective. Steroids plus alkylant decrease the risk of end stage renal failure. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus decrease proteinuria but are associated with a high risk of recurrence at time of withdrawal and are nephrotoxic. Rituximab evaluated on open studies needs further evaluations to define its use.

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Immunosuppressive treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is heavily debated. The controversy is mainly related to the toxicity of the therapy and the variable natural course of the disease-spontaneous remission occurs in 40-50% of patients. The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis provides guidance for the treatment of iMN. The guideline suggests that immunosuppressive therapy should be restricted to patients with nephrotic syndrome and persistent proteinuria, deteriorating renal function or severe symptoms. Alkylating agents are the preferred therapy because of their proven efficacy in preventing end-stage renal disease. Calcineurin inhibitors can be used as an alternative although efficacy data on hard renal end points are limited. In this Review, we summarize the KDIGO guideline and address remaining areas of uncertainty. Better risk prediction is needed to identify patients who will benefit from immunosuppressive therapy, and the optimal timing and duration of this therapy is unknown because most of the randomized controlled trials were performed in low-risk or medium-risk patients. Alternative therapies, directed at B cells, are under study. The discovery of anti-M type phospholipase A2 receptor-antibodies is a major breakthrough and we envisage that in the near future, antibody-driven therapy will enable more individualized treatment of patients with iMN.

Outcomes of tacrolimus therapy in adults with refractory membranous nephrotic syndrome: a prospective, multicenter clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of adult refractory idiopathic membranous nephropathy with steroid and other immunosuppressant-resistant nephrotic syndrome can be a significant challenge. The authors investigated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) as a promising regimen.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter trial was conducted in 9 nephrology centers from 2006 to 2008. Fourteen patients were enrolled. In conjunction with prednisone, TAC was started at 0.05 mg/kg/d, titrated to achieve a trough blood level of 5 to 10 ng/mL for the first 6 months, then reduced to 4 to 6 ng/mL for the subsequent 6 months. The primary endpoints included complete or partial remission. Secondary endpoints included relapse, change of clinical parameters and adverse events.

RESULTS

After 12 months, complete remission was achieved in 35.7% of patients and partial remission in 42.9%, yielding a response rate of 78.6%. Proteinuria, serum albumin, cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein were improved significantly (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.01, P = 0.004, respectively). Proteinuria and serum albumin were significantly improved (42.0% ± 13.2%, P = 0.02; 15.2% ± 4.5%, P = 0.01, respectively) even after the first month of treatment. One patient relapsed during the subsequent 6 months of follow-up. Adverse events included 2 cases of infection and 1 case each of hyperglycemia, hand tremor, sudden death (nondrug related) and diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

TAC plus prednisone may be an alternative therapeutic option for steroid and general immunosuppressant-resistant membranous nephrotic syndrome patients, with a favorable safety profile. However, given the limitation of a small number of patients in this trial, further study with a larger number and longer follow-up is needed.

Recurrent glomerulonephritis under rapid discontinuation of steroids

BACKGROUND

Recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN) remains an important cause of kidney allograft loss and whether rapid discontinuation of steroids (RDS) is associated with a higher risk of recurrence is not known.

METHODS

We studied recurrence rate, and graft and patient survival in four groups of recipients: 216 recipients with GN transplanted under RDS (group 1), 978 concurrent non-GN recipients transplanted under RDS (group 2), 260 historic comparator group transplanted for GN between 1994 and 1999 with steroid maintenance (group 3), and 950 recipients who were also transplanted between 1994 and 1999 for non-GN and also maintained on steroids (group 4). Regression analysis adjusting for donor and recipient factors, steroid and sirolimus use, and also GN type was used to address factors associated with recurrent disease.

RESULTS

The 1-, 5-, and 7-year recurrence rate in the GN group under RDS was 6.7%, 13.7%, and 19.2% and in historic GN recipients maintained on steroids it was 2.4%, 3.8%, and 5.3%, respectively (P<0.0001). RDS was associated with a higher adjusted risk of recurrent disease for all GN types (hazard ratio 4.86; 95% confidence interval 2.34-10.07; P<0.0001). Graft and patient survival were similar in the two GN groups and both were highest among all groups. Notably, death-censored graft survival was not different among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Steroid avoidance may be associated with a higher rate of recurrent GN but no apparent increase in risk of graft loss. This group of recipients needs to be studied more carefully, in larger numbers, and for a longer time period.

Spontaneous remission of nephrotic syndrome in membranous nephropathy with chronic renal impairment

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous remission (SR) of nephrotic syndrome, in the absence of immunosuppressive treatment, is relatively common among patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and normal renal function. However, it has not been reported in patients with chronic renal impairment.

METHODS

All patients with IMN who had developed SR in the presence of chronic renal insufficiency were identified among the nephrology departments that belong to the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN). Their characteristics and outcome after SR were studied.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were identified. All of them showed renal insufficiency and nephrotic syndrome at the time of renal biopsy. Serum creatinine (Scr) continued to increase in the following months, reaching a peak value of 2.6 ± 1.5 mg/dL (range 1.7-6.5). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or spironolactone were prescribed in 10/11 patients at renal biopsy or shortly after it. Nephrotic proteinuria persisted during the first months of follow-up, but it started to spontaneously decrease 12 ± 7 months (2-30 months) after renal biopsy. Finally, complete (nine patients) or partial (two patients) remission of nephrotic syndrome was observed. Coinciding with proteinuria remission, renal function tended to improve. Nephrotic syndrome relapsed in two patients, accompanied by a rapid deterioration of renal function. In the remaining nine patients, remission persisted throughout a follow-up of 146 ± 64 months. Mean Scr at the last visit was 1.9 ± 0.9 mg/dL and proteinuria 0.2 g/24 h.

CONCLUSION

SR of nephrotic syndrome can also be observed in membranous nephropathy patients exhibiting chronic renal impairment.

Management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) can have a variable natural course. Treatments able to induce remission can improve the long-term prognosis. However, the optimal therapy for IMN remains controversial.

AREA COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We reviewed the historical and current literature from 1979 to 2010 regarding the natural course of IMN and the possible treatments giving special emphasis to randomized controlled trials and to more recent approaches.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain a comprehensive review of the available treatments of IMN. A personal therapeutic algorithm for nephrotic patients with IMN is also provided.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

At least five different treatments showed efficacy in many (but not all) patients with IMN.

Spontaneous remission of nephrotic syndrome in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Spontaneous remission is a well known characteristic of idiopathic membranous nephropathy, but contemporary studies describing predictors of remission and long-term outcomes are lacking. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 328 patients with nephrotic syndrome resulting from idiopathic membranous nephropathy that initially received conservative therapy. Spontaneous remission occurred in 104 (32%) patients: proteinuria progressively declined after diagnosis until remission of disease at 14.7 +/- 11.4 months. Although spontaneous remission was more frequent with lower levels of baseline proteinuria, it also frequently occurred in patients with massive proteinuria: 26% among those with baseline proteinuria 8 to 12 g/24 h and 22% among those with proteinuria >12 g/24 h. Baseline serum creatinine and proteinuria, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists, and a >50% decline of proteinuria from baseline during the first year of follow-up were significant independent predictors for spontaneous remission. Only six patients (5.7%) experienced a relapse of nephrotic syndrome. The incidence of death and ESRD were significantly lower among patients with spontaneous remission. In conclusion, spontaneous remission is common among patients with nephrotic syndrome resulting from membranous nephropathy and carries a favorable long-term outcome with a low incidence of relapse. A decrease in proteinuria >50% from baseline during the first year predicts spontaneous remission.

The natural history of the non-nephrotic membranous nephropathy patient

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although early studies suggest that patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MGN) and subnephrotic range proteinuria overall do well, these studies were small and follow-up was short or difficult to discern.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Three hundred ninety-five cases of idiopathic MGN with at least 12 mo of follow-up from the Toronto Glomerulonephritis Registry were reviewed to determine the outcome of the subgroup of patients that presented with subnephrotic range proteinuria. Onset and follow-up data included mean arterial pressure (MAP) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) as determined by the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Outcome variables included the rate of progression (slope of CrCl), 50% reduction in initial CrCl, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

RESULTS

One hundred eight (27% of the total) patients presented with subnephrotic proteinuria and almost 40% (42 of 108) of this subgroup remained subnephrotic. Their long-term slope was -0.93 ml/min/yr. In contrast, those who subsequently developed nephrotic range proteinuria had a progression rate almost four times faster (-3.52 ml/min/yr). The majority who developed nephrotic syndrome did so within the first year of follow-up. The only distinguishing baseline feature between the two groups was a higher level of urine protein in the group that subsequently developed nephrotic syndrome (1.98 [0.3 to 3.4] versus 2.43 [0.5 to 3.4] g/d).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MGN and sustained subnephrotic range proteinuria have an excellent prognosis. Conservative management with close monitoring is recommended given the difficulty predicting which patients will develop nephrotic range proteinuria and then progress more rapidly.

Introduction of a cyclophosphamide-based treatment strategy and the risk of ESRD in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in preventing ESRD in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is debated. From 1991 onwards, we have advocated a restrictive treatment strategy in our university hospital and regional referring hospitals. We advised the use of immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of a combination of steroids and oral cyclophosphamide for 12 months, in patients with iMN at high risk for ESRD.

METHODS

Primary renal diagnosis of all patients who start renal replacement therapy in the Netherlands is registered in the RENINE database. We studied the incidence of ESRD due to iMN in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2005. We mailed a questionnaire to all nephrology centres that entered a patient with ESRD and iMN in the RENINE database after 2000.

RESULTS

The introduction of the cyclophosphamide-based treatment strategy in the Nijmegen region resulted in a significant 70% reduction in the incidence of ESRD in patients with iMN as compared to an unchanged incidence in other parts of the Netherlands. The response rate to the questionnaire was 65%. There were 45 patients (34 M, 11 F) with a mean age of 49 +/- 17 years at diagnosis and a median serum creatinine of 138 micromol/l (range 60-1798). Overall, only 22 patients (49%) had been treated with immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of prednisone monotherapy in 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the introduction of a cyclophosphamide-based restrictive treatment policy has reduced the risk of ESRD in iMN. The questionnaires reflect the differences in opinion on the optimal treatment of high-risk patients with iMN.

Mycophenolate mofetil in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a clinical trial with comparison to a historic control group treated with cyclophosphamide

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide can decrease proteinuria and improve renal function in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, but has a high risk of side effects. We studied whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could be a reasonable alternative with fewer side effects.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical trial with historic controls.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS

32 cases and 32 controls with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and renal insufficiency at multiple centers. For comparison, we selected matched historic controls treated with cyclophosphamide.

INTERVENTION

MMF, 1 g twice daily, for 12 months versus cyclophosphamide, 1.5 mg/kg/d, for 12 months. Both groups also received intermittent methylprednisolone and alternate-day prednisone.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

Serum creatinine, proteinuria, and side effects during and after treatment.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 23 months (range, 11 to 46 months). Median serum creatinine levels were 1.8 mg/dL (159 micromol/L) in both groups at baseline and 1.4 mg/dL (124 micromol/L) in the MMF group versus 1.3 mg/dL (115 micromol/L) in the cyclophosphamide group at 12 months (P = 0.4). Proteinuria values at baseline and 12 months were protein of 8.40 and 1.41 g/d in the MMF group versus 9.19 and 1.13 g/d in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.5 at 12 months), respectively. Cumulative incidences of remission of proteinuria at 12 months were 66% in the MMF group versus 72% in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.3). Five patients (16%) in the MMF group versus none in the cyclophosphamide group had disease that did not respond to therapy (P = 0.05). Twelve patients (38%) experienced a relapse and 9 patients (31%) were re-treated in the MMF group compared with 4 (13%) and 2 patients (6%) in the cyclophosphamide group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.024, respectively). Side effects occurred in 24 patients (75%) in the MMF group and 22 patients (69%) in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.6).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized control group, short duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A 12-month course of MMF decreased proteinuria and improved renal function in the majority of patients, but did not appear as effective or better tolerated than cyclophosphamide. Long-term data and randomized controlled trials are needed to ascertain the efficacy of MMF in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

A randomized, controlled trial of steroids and cyclophosphamide in adults with nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Universal consensus regarding the need for and the modality of therapy has not been formed because of a lack of controlled trials of sufficient size, quality, and duration. This study compared the effect of a 6-mo course of alternating prednisolone and cyclophosphamide with supportive treatment in adults with nephrotic syndrome caused by IMN on doubling of serum creatinine, development of ESRD, and quality of life in a randomized, controlled trial. Patients were followed up for 10 yr. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. A total of 93 patients completed the study. Of the 47 patients who received the experimental protocol, 34 achieved remission (15 complete and 19 partial), compared with 16 (five complete, 11 partial) of 46 in the control group (P < 0.0001). The 10-yr dialysis-free survival was 89 and 65% (P = 0.016), and the likelihood of survival without death, dialysis, and doubling of serum creatinine were 79 and 44% (P = 0.0006) in the two groups. Treated patients exhibited significantly lower prevalence of edema, hypertension, hypoalbuminemia, hyperlipidemia that required therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker use, and better quality of life on follow-up. The incidence of infections was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, untreated IMN with nephrotic syndrome is associated with a high risk for deterioration of renal function. A 6-mo regimen of cyclophosphamide and steroids induces remissions in a high proportion, arrests progression of renal insufficiency, and improves quality of life.

Tacrolimus monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: A randomized controlled trial

Membranous nephropathy is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Although some patients with membranous nephropathy achieve a spontaneous remission, renal function continues to deteriorate in others. We conducted a prospective randomized trial evaluating monotherapy with tacrolimus to achieve complete or partial remission in patients with biopsy-proven membranous nephropathy. Twenty-five patients received tacrolimus (0.05 mg/kg/day) over 12 months with a 6-month taper, whereas 23 patients were in the control group. The probability of remission in the treatment group was 58, 82, and 94% after 6, 12, and 18 months but only 10, 24, and 35%, respectively in the control group. The decrease in proteinuria was significantly greater in the treatment group. Notably, six patients in the control group and only one in the treatment group reached the secondary end point of a 50% increase in their serum creatinine. No patient in the tacrolimus group showed a relapse during the taper period. Nephrotic syndrome reappeared in almost half of the patients who were in remission by the 18th month after tacrolimus withdrawal. We conclude that tacrolimus is a very useful therapeutic option for patients with membranous nephropathy and preserved renal function. The majority of patients experienced remission with a significant reduction in the risk for deteriorating renal function.

Renal pathology in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A new perspective

Histology findings in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MGN) have been associated with the risk of renal failure, but whether they are independent of the clinical variables at the time of biopsy, predict rate of progression, or should guide therapy is uncertain. Renal biopsies of 389 adult MGN patients were evaluated semiquantitatively for interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, vascular sclerosis, focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions (FSGS), complement deposition, and stage and synchrony of deposits by electron microscopy (EM). Associations were tested between these findings and the rate of renal function decline (slope), renal survival, remission in proteinuria, and response to immunosuppression. Patients with a greater degree of tubulo-interstitial disease, vascular sclerosis, and secondary FSGS were older, had a higher mean arterial pressure, and a lower creatinine clearance at presentation. Although these histologic features were associated with a reduced renal survival, they did not predict this outcome independently of the baseline clinical variables nor did they correlate with the rate of decline in function or with baseline proteinuria. Furthermore, the severity of tubulo-interstitial and vascular lesions did not preclude a remission in proteinuria in those who received immunosuppressive therapy. Neither stage nor synchronicity of EM deposits nor the amount of complement deposition predicted renal survival but the latter did correlate with progression rate. In MGN, certain histologic changes are associated with renal survival outcome. However, the indicators of chronic injury are associated with age, blood pressure, and creatinine clearance at presentation and not with rate of disease progression or initial proteinuria.

Graft Loss from Recurrent Glomerulonephritis Is Not Increased with a Rapid Steroid Discontinuation Protocol

BACKGROUND

The risk of recurrence of glomerulonephritis in kidney transplant recipients on a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression protocol is unknown.

METHODS

We studied the 4-year graft and patient survival in 105 adult kidney transplant recipients who received their transplant for glomerulonephritis (GN) and were treated with a protocol incorporating rapid discontinuation of prednisone for 5 days (group 1). We compared these outcomes to two control groups; 439 concurrent recipients who received a transplant for causes other than GN (group 2) and to 260 kidney transplant recipients who received an allograft for GN between 1994 and 1999 and were maintained on a steroid-based immunosuppressive protocol (group 3).

RESULTS

The 4-year graft and patient survival were similar in the three groups. Acute rejection-free survival was also similar. Serial annual serum creatinine and estimated GFR were also comparable amongst the three groups. Two grafts were lost in group 1 from biopsy-proven recurrent GN and eight other subjects had evidence of histological recurrence at 11.2+/-11.9 months. Seven grafts were lost for recurrent disease in group 3 and 15 others had evidence of histological recurrence at 29.1+/-32.6 months. The mean time to graft loss from recurrence was 52+/-22 months.

CONCLUSION

A regimen that utilizes rapid discontinuation of steroids conveys no added risk of graft loss from recurrent GN in the short term but longer follow-up is needed. A consideration should be made to discontinue corticosteroids in the potential recipients who are on them at the time of transplantation.

Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: Outline and Rationale of a Treatment Strategy

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome. The treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy is heavily debated. Based on literature data and our own experience, we propose a rational treatment strategy. Patients with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL [> 135 micromol/L]) are at greatest risk for the development of end-stage renal disease and should receive immunosuppressive therapy. In patients with normal renal function (serum creatinine level < 1.5 mg/dL [< 135 micromol/L]), risk for developing end-stage renal disease can be estimated by measuring urinary excretion of beta2-microglobulin or alpha1-microglobulin and immunoglobulin G. For low-risk patients, a wait-and-see policy is advised. High-risk patients likely benefit from immunosuppressive therapy. Currently, combinations of steroids with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide are the best studied. We prefer cyclophosphamide in view of its fewer side effects. Cyclosporine may be an alternative option in patients with well-preserved renal function, although long-term data are lacking. Other immunosuppressive agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, currently are under study; however, data are insufficient to support their routine use.

Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Autoimmune and Renal Diseases

Progress in understanding the pathogenesis and treatment of rheumatologic and glomerular diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus and particularly lupus nephritis has been closely linked with the development of newer immunosuppressive agents. With improved patient survival following the institution of cyclophosphamide and corticosteroid therapy, longer-term management issues came to the forefront, especially how to decrease adverse effects of the immunosuppressive regimen. Many of the immunosuppressive regimens used in lupus patients were first established as efficacious and safe through their use in solid organ transplantation. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is now widely used in the field of transplantation. Following anecdotal reports describing benefits of MMF in lupus and lupus nephritis patients, small studies and finally large randomized, controlled trials have established the use of MMF in these patients, particularly those with lupus nephritis. MMF use in other rheumatologic and renal diseases has been evaluated in only smaller studies and very few randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, many studies currently are ongoing with this immunosuppressive agent. This article will review the published data and the experience of two major New York medical centers with the use of MMF in autoimmune and renal diseases.

Efficacy of a second course of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with membranous nephropathy and persistent or relapsing disease activity

BACKGROUND

A single course of immunosuppressive treatment improves renal survival in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) and renal insufficiency. However, not all patients respond and relapses occur within 5 years in 30% of patients. It is unknown if a second course of immunosuppressive therapy is effective in such patients.

METHODS

We have prospectively studied and evaluated the clinical course in 15 patients (14 male, one female; age: 52+/-12 years) with iMN who have received a repeated course of immunosuppressive therapy because of deteriorating renal function associated with relapsing or persistent nephrotic syndrome.

RESULTS

The first course of immunosuppression was started 8 months (range: 0-143 months) after renal biopsy and consisted of chlorambucil (n = 8) or cyclophosphamide (n = 7); the second course consisted of cyclophosphamide in all patients. The interval between the first and second course was 40 months (range: 7-112 months). Total follow-up was 110 months (range: 46-289 months). Renal function and proteinuria improved at least temporarily in all patients after the second course. During follow-up, an additional course of therapy was given in four patients. Status at the end of follow-up was complete remission (n = 2), partial remission (n = 8), persistent proteinuria (n = 3), end-stage renal disease (n = 1) and death (n = 1, due to cardiovascular disease while nephrotic). Renal survival was 86% at 5 and 10 years of follow-up. The repeated courses of immunosuppression have resulted in a gain of dialysis-free survival time of > or =93 months (range: 43-192 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that patients with iMN who do not respond well or relapse after a first course of immunosuppressive therapy and have renal insufficiency should be offered a second course of immunosuppression. Such a strategy maintains renal function in the majority of patients.

Restrictive use of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: high renal survival in a large patient cohort

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive treatment initiated at an early stage in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) improves renal survival. Treatment should ideally be restricted to high-risk patients.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of a restrictive immunosuppressive treatment strategy for patients with iMN.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study evaluating a predefined treatment protocol.

METHODS

From 1988, we adopted a restrictive treatment strategy: immunosuppressive treatment, mainly consisting of cyclophosphamide and steroids, was advised only in patients with renal insufficiency or severe intolerable nephrotic syndrome. We evaluated this strategy in a large patient cohort. To exclude any bias, we included all adult patients with iMN biopsied in the study period with a serum creatinine (Scr) < 135 micromol/l, a proteinuria > or = 3.0 g/day and/or a serum albumin (Salb) < or = 30 g/l at the time of biopsy. Analysis was according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

We studied 69 patients. At the time of biopsy, mean age was 51 years, Scr 90 micromol/l, Salb 23 g/l and proteinuria 6.7 g/day. Average follow-up was 5.5 years. Thus far 33 (48%) patients have received immunosuppressive therapy, mainly because of renal insufficiency (n = 24). Status at the end of follow-up was: complete remission n = 22 (32%), partial remission n = 24 (35%), nephrotic syndrome n = 15 (22%), persistent proteinuria n = 1 (1.4%), ESRD n = 6 (8.7%), death n = 1 (1.4%; due to bladder carcinoma after cyclophosphamide therapy). Patient survival was 100% at 5 and 7 years. Renal survival was 94% at 5 years and 88% at 7 years.

DISCUSSION

In patients with iMN, a restrictive treatment policy assures a favourable prognosis, while preventing exposure to immunosuppressive therapy in >50% of the patients.

Cytotoxic therapy for membranous nephropathy and renal insufficiency: improved renal survival but high relapse rate

BACKGROUND

Patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) and renal insufficiency have a high risk for progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In the short term, treatment with oral cyclophosphamide and steroids attenuates the deterioration of renal function in these patients; however, the long-term efficacy is unknown.

METHODS

We have studied prospectively 65 patients with iMN and renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >135 micromol/l) who were treated with oral cyclophosphamide (1.5-2.0 mg/kg/day for 12 months) and steroids (methylprednisolone pulses 3 x 1 g, i.v. at months 1, 3 and 5, and oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/48 h for 6 months).

RESULTS

Follow-up was 51 (5-132) months. Renal function temporarily improved or stabilized in all patients. A partial remission (PR) occurred in 56 patients followed by a complete remission (CR) in 17. During follow-up, 11 patients had relapsed (28% relapse rate after 5 years), of whom nine were re-treated because of renal function deterioration. At the end of follow-up, 16 patients were in CR, 31 in PR, eight had a persistent nephrotic syndrome, one had mild proteinuria, four had progressed to ESRD and five had died. Overall renal survival was 86% after 5 years and 74% after 7 years, compared with 32% after 5 and 7 years in a historical control group. Treatment-related complications occurred in two-thirds of patients, mainly consisting of bone marrow depression and infections. One patient has developed bladder cancer, another patient prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal survival is good if patients with iMN and renal insufficiency are treated with oral cyclophosphamide. However, side effects occur frequently and relapse rate is high during longer follow-up.

Nephrotic syndrome caused by membranous nephropathy: response to a short course of cyclophosphamide alternating with prednisolone

OBJECTIVE

The optimal duration of immunosuppressive therapy and the timing of treatment for treating membranous nephropathy (MN) have yet to be established. We examined outcomes of a short course of cyclophosphamide alternating with prednisolone for MN patients with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks) combined with prednisolone (1 mg/kg every 48 hours for 8 weeks, then tapering off for 1 year) was prescribed for 28 MN patients (12 men and 16 women; mean age 52.4+/-2.25 years SEM). We first evaluated the response rates to this combined therapy, then compared the clinical characteristics of those who achieved remission (group A) with those who did not (group B) within 6 months of the start of treatment.

RESULTS

The incidences of complete and partial remission increased with the follow-up period; 32 and 21% by 6 months, 54 and 29% by 12 months, and 79 and 11% by 24 months, respectively. Serum IgG (906+/-100.8 versus 562+/-66.1 mg/day; p<0.01) was significantly higher in group A, and the selectivity index (C(IgG)/C(albumin) 0.16+/-0.015 versus 0.30+/-0.040; p<0.01), significantly lower. Nephrotic syndrome persisted in 3 group B patients (23%), who finally had impaired renal function.

CONCLUSION

MN patients with nephrotic syndrome responded favorably to a short course of cyclophosphamide combined with prednisolone. The serum IgG level and selectivity index may serve as markers of early response to this treatment.