Maximal suppression of renin-angiotensin system in nonproliferative glomerulonephritis

Discontinuation of the renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improves erythropoiesis in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blockade by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) has been related to anemia in various situations. We aimed to investigate whether discontinuation of RAS inhibitors improves erythropoiesis in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDSs). Seventy-four patients with LR-MDS were divided into three groups matched for gender and age. Group A consisted of 20 hypertensive patients who discontinued RAS inhibitors and received alternative medications. Group B consisted of 26 patients who continued to receive ACEi/ARB and Group C included 28 patients (50% hypertensive) never exposed to ACEi/ARB. Half of the patients in each group were under treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). Data were collected at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Group A showed a significant increase in hemoglobin from 10.4 ± 1g/dL at baseline to 12.6 ± 1.2 g/dL after 12 months (p = 0.035) and in hematocrit (31.4 ± 3% versus 37.9 ± 4%, p = 0.002). Incident anemia decreased from 100% at baseline to 60% at 12 months (p = 0.043) despite a concomitant dose reduction in rHuEPO by 18% (p = 0.035). No changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit were observed in both Group B and Group C. In the subset of patients not treated with rHuEPO, improvement of erythropoiesis was found only in Group A, as measured by changes in hemoglobin (11.5 ± 1 g/dL versus 12.4 ± 1.3 g/dL, p = 0.041) and hematocrit (34.5 ± 3% versus 37.1 ± 4%, p = 0.038) after 12 months. In contrast, Group B and Group C decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit after 12 months (p < 0.05). In conclusion, discontinuation of ACEi/ARB in LR-MDS patients is followed by a significant recovery of erythropoiesis after 12 months.

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system in the cardiorenal syndrome with anaemia: a double-edged sword

: The term 'cardiorenal syndrome' (CRS) was introduced to describe problems related to the simultaneous existence of heart and renal insufficiency. The prevalence of anaemia in CRS is high and increases the risk of hospitalizations and death. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition is the cornerstone therapy in cardiovascular and renal medicine. As angiotensin II regulates both glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and erythropoiesis, RAS inhibition can further deteriorate renal function and lower hematocrit or cause anaemia in patients with heart failure. The aim of this review is to explore the relationship among CRS, anemia and administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and summarize the evidence suggesting that RAS inhibition may be considered an iatrogenic cause of deterioration of CRS with anemia. It should be emphasized however, that RAS inhibition reduces mortality in both groups with and without worsening of renal function, and therefore, no patient with CRS should be denied an ACEi or ARB trial without careful evaluation.

Erythropoiesis and Blood Pressure Are Regulated via AT1 Receptor by Distinctive Pathways

The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) plays a central role in blood pressure regulation. Although clinical and experimental studies have suggested that inhibition of RAS is associated with progression of anemia, little evidence is available to support this claim. Here we report that knockout mice that lack angiotensin II, including angiotensinogen and renin knockout mice, exhibit anemia. The anemia of angiotensinogen knockout mice was rescued by angiotensin II infusion, and rescue was completely blocked by simultaneous administration of AT1 receptor blocker. To genetically determine the responsible receptor subtype, we examined AT1a, AT1b, and AT2 knockout mice, but did not observe anemia in any of them. To investigate whether pharmacological AT1 receptor inhibition recapitulates the anemic phenotype, we administered AT1 receptor antagonist in hypotensive AT1a receptor knockout mice to inhibit the remaining AT1b receptor. In these animals, hematocrit levels barely decreased, but blood pressure further decreased to the level observed in angiotensinogen knockout mice. We then generated AT1a and AT1b double-knockout mice to completely ablate the AT1 receptors; the mice finally exhibited the anemic phenotype. These results provide clear evidence that although erythropoiesis and blood pressure are negatively controlled through the AT1 receptor inhibition in vivo, the pathways involved are complex and distinct, because erythropoiesis is more resistant to AT1 receptor inhibition than blood pressure control.

Resistance of dialyzed patients to erythropoietin

Resistance to recombinant human erythropoietin is a common condition in dialyzed patients with chronic kidney disease and is associated with more hospitalizations, increased mortality and frequent blood transfusions. The main cause of hyporesponsiveness to recombinant human erythropoietin in these patients is iron deficiency. However, a high proportion of patients does not respond to treatment, even to the use of intravenous iron, which indicates the presence of other important causes of resistance. In addition to the iron deficiency, the most common causes of resistance include inflammation, infection, malnutrition, inadequate dialysis, and hyperparathyroidism, although other factors may be associated. In the presence of adequate iron stores, other causes should be investigated and treated appropriately.

Enhanced angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 attenuates angiotensin II-induced collagen production via AT1 receptor-phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt pathway

Recent reports support a protective role for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) against glomerular diseases, especially by decreasing of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. However, the mechanism regulating this effect appears to be complex and poorly understood. Our aim was to investigate whether or not ACE2 ameliorates the profibrotic effects of Ang II-mediated, Akt-dependent pathways in the mouse mesangial cell line, MES-13.Gene transfer of ACE2 suppressed Ang II-activated Akt-phosphorylation, accompanied by a decreased level of collagen type I in cells. In addition, Ang II-induced collagen type I synthesis in MES-13s by activating the Ang II/AT-1R-PI3K pathway. This transactivation was dependent on cAMP/Epac but not on PKA. TGF-βRI played a pivotal role in this signaling pathway inducing collagen deposition effects which could be reversed by ACE2 gene transfer in MES-13 cells. The results revealed that gene transfer of ACE2 regulated Ang II-mediated AT1R-TGFβRI-PI3K-Akt signaling and involved the synthesis of collagen. The beneficial effect of ACE2 overexpression appeared to result mainly from blocking phosphorylation of Akt in mesangial cells, suggesting that the ACE2 gene might be a novel therapeutic target for glomerular diseases.

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of erythropoiesis

The renin-angiotensin system is the major regulator of blood pressure by virtue of controlling vascular resistance and plasma volume. Much less recognition exists for the role of the renin-angiotensin system in regulating erythropoiesis, a biological function critical for oxygen delivery to tissues. In this review, we present evidence that angiotensin II (Ang II) is a physiologically important regulator of erythropoiesis with 2 key actions. First, Ang II is a growth factor of erythroid progenitors and, in cooperation with erythropoietin, increases red blood cell mass. Second, Ang II acts as an erythropoietin secretagogue to maintain increased erythropoietin levels despite increments in hematocrit. Among a multitude of physiologic and pathophysiologic implications, these lines of evidence provide an explanation for the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and Ang II type 1 receptor blockers to decrease hematocrit or cause anemia in various clinical conditions.

Low-dose dual blockade of the renin–angiotensin system improves tubular status in non-diabetic proteinuric patients

OBJECTIVE

Treatment with agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system is commonly regarded as a gold standard renoprotective strategy in patients with chronic kidney diseases. For maximum antiproteinuric effect, the dose titration of these agents is recommended. This therapeutic strategy is not used for proteinuric patients who are not able to receive high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In patients with primary glomerulonephritis (n=24), a randomized, triple-treatment, triple-period, cross-over study was performed to compare the effects of combined therapy with benazepril 5 mg and losartan 25 mg and monotherapy with either agent alone at a two-fold higher dose on the extent of tubular injury as assessed by alpha1-microglobulin (alpha1-m) excretion and the plasma level of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1).

RESULTS

Combination therapy significantly reduced alpha1-m excretion compared to either agent used alone: 178.29+/-27.36 to 99.63+/-13.03 mg/g creatinine for losartan + benazepril vs 178.29+/-27.36 to 161.59+/-23.22 mg/g creatinine for benazepril alone (p<0.05; ANOVA) and 178.29+/-27.36 to 99.63+/-13.03 mg/g creatinine for losartan + benazepril vs 178.29+/-27.36 to 173.45+/-27.69 mg/g creatinine for losartan alone (p<0.05; ANOVA). There was a significant correlation between change in alpha1-m excretion and reduction in proteinuria (r=0.704; p=0.023). There were no differences in TGF-beta1 level between the studied treatments. Systemic blood pressure reduction did not differ among the therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonists at very small doses may be superior to monotherapy with these agents at higher doses as far as tubular injury is concerned. We speculate that such a therapeutic strategy may be a useful approach for patients who are known not to be capable of receiving optimal renoprotective doses of these regimens.

The kidney and hypertension: causes and treatment

Chronic kidney disease is both a cause and a consequence of hypertension. Extracellular volume expansion is an important, if not the most important, contributing factor to hypertension seen in chronic kidney disease. Beyond volume expansion, chronic kidney disease-related hypertension is without truly defining characteristics. Consequently, the sequencing of antihypertensive medications for the patient with chronic kidney disease and hypertension becomes arbitrary. Prescription practice in such patients should be mindful of the need for multiple drug classes with at least one of them being a diuretic. Blood pressure goals in the patient with chronic kidney disease and hypertension are set at lower levels than those for patients with essential hypertension alone. It remains to be determined to what level blood pressure should be lowered in the patient with chronic kidney disease, however.

Hypertension, Renal Disease, and Drug Considerations

The incidence of chronic kidney disease is steadily increasing in the United States. The magnitude of this problem is such that virtually all health care providers are being called upon to manage these patients. The interplay between chronic kidney disease and drug therapy is complex in that the kidney is both a target for drug effect as well as a moderator of drug elimination. Renal drug elimination occurs by filtration, secretion, and/or metabolism. For renally-cleared compounds, drug clearance typically falls in tandem with the loss of renal function. This process is noteworthy for drug accumulation when the glomerular filtration rate approaches the 30-cc/min range. The kidney is a target for drug effect in relationship to blood pressure and protein excretion. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker therapy (usually given along with a diuretic) are the drug classes that have been shown to be effective for reduction in both blood pressure and protein excretion in the chronic kidney disease patient. A number of questions still remain unanswered in the pharmacotherapy of chronic kidney disease, including the optimal dose for these drugs as well as what represents the most favorable achieved blood pressure.

A novel phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent pathway for angiotensin II/AT-1 receptor-mediated induction of collagen synthesis in MES-13 mesangial cells

Chronic activation of the angiotensin II (ANG II) type 1 receptor (AT-1R) is critical in the development of chronic kidney disease. ANG II activates mesangial cells (MCs) and stimulates the synthesis of extracellular matrix components. To determine the molecular mechanisms underlying the induction of MC collagen, a mouse mesangial cell line MES-13 was employed. ANG II treatment induced an increase in collagen synthesis, which was abrogated by co-treatment with losartan (an AT-1R antagonist), wortmannin (a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor), an Akt inhibitor, and stable transfection of dominant negative-Akt1. ANG II induced a significant increase in PI3K activity, which was abolished by co-treatment with losartan or 2',5'-dideoxyadenosine (2',5'-DOA, an adenylyl cyclase inhibitor) but not by PD123319 (an AT-2R antagonist) or H89 (a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor). The Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP)-specific cAMP analog, 8-pHPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP, significantly increased PI3K activity, whereas a PKA-specific analog, 6-benzoyladenosine-cAMP, showed no effect. The ANG II-induced increase in PI3K activity was also blocked by co-treatment with PP2, an Src inhibitor, or AG1478, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonist. ANG II induced phosphorylation of Akt and p70S6K and EGFR, which was abrogated by knockdown of c-Src by small interference RNA. Knockdown of Src also effectively abolished ANG II-induced collagen synthesis. Conversely, stable transfection of a constitutively active Src mutant enhanced basal PI3K activity and collagen production, which was abrogated by AG1478 but not by 2',5'-DOA. Moreover, acute treatment with ANG II significantly increased Src activity, which was abrogated with co-treatment of 2',5'-DOA. Taken together, these results suggest that ANG II induces collagen synthesis in MCs by activating the ANG II/AT-1R-EGFR-PI3K pathway. This transactivation is dependent on cAMP/Epac but not on PKA. Src kinase plays a pivotal role in this signaling pathway between cAMP and EGFR. This is the first demonstration that an AT1R-PI3K/Akt crosstalk, along with transactivation of EGFR, mediates ANG II-induced collagen synthesis in MCs.

Mesangial hypercellularity predicts antiproteinuric response to dual blockade of RAS in primary glomerulonephritis

The greater antiproteinuric efficacy of converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker combination (CEI+ARB), versus monotherapy with either drug, is not a consistent finding. We evaluated the clinicopathologic predictors of response to CEI+ARB in 43 patients with primary glomerulonephritis (GN), never treated with immunosuppressive drugs, and with persistent proteinuria after CEI alone. Main histological lesions were analyzed by obtaining on 557 glomeruli and 165 arteries formal score of mesangial cellularity, glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial damage, mononuclear cell infiltration, arteriosclerosis, and arteriolar hyalinosis. Duration of CEI and CEI+ARB therapy was similar (4.7+/-2.4 and 5.0+/-1.5 months). Proteinuria (g/day) decreased from 3.5+/-2.9 to 2.4+/-2.3 after CEI, and to 1.5+/-1.3 after CEI+ARB (P<0.0001). Reduction of proteinuria after CEI+ARB was greater in proliferative versus non-proliferative GN (-63.3+/-23.4 versus 42.4+/-23.7%, respectively; P=0.006). When patients were categorized in responders and non-responders to CEI+ARB, no difference between the two groups was detected in any demographic or clinical variable, whereas histology showed in responders a greater prevalence of proliferative GN (71.4 versus 31.8%, P=0.009) and higher score of mesangial cellularity (1.76+/-0.53 versus 1.20+/-0.22, P<0.0001). At multiple regression analysis (r(2)=0.476, P=0.001), response to CEI+ARB resulted independently related only to mesangial cellularity (P<0.0001). In conclusion, the best independent predictor of antiproteinuric efficacy of CEI+ARB in patients with primary GN is the degree of mesangial cellularity. This finding supports the experimental evidence that high angiotensin II contributes to proliferation of mesangial cells.

Combination Therapy With an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker and an ACE Inhibitor in Proteinuric Renal Disease: A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety Data

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) was shown to decrease urinary protein excretion and slow the progression of both diabetic and nondiabetic proteinuric renal disease. The safety and efficacy of combined ACE-inhibitor and ARB therapy is not well established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an ARB in patients with chronic proteinuric renal disease. Twenty-one randomized controlled studies (n = 654 patients) were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases. Five trials had a parallel-group design and 16 trials used a crossover design. Combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and an ARB resulted in a small, but significant, increase in serum potassium levels (weighted mean difference, 0.11 mEq/L [0.11 mmol/L]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 0.17) and a nonsignificant decrease in glomerular filtration rate (weighted mean difference, 1.4 mL/min [0.02 mL/s]; 95% CI, -2.6 to 0.2). Addition of an ARB resulted in a further decrease in proteinuria (weighted mean difference, 440 mg/d; 95% CI, 289 to 591) compared with an ACE inhibitor alone. This effect was observed in patients with diabetic (210 mg/d; 95% CI, 84 to 336) and nondiabetic (582 mg/d; 95% CI, 371 to 793) renal disease. In conclusion, the combination of ACE-inhibitor and ARB therapy in patients with chronic proteinuric renal disease is safe, without clinically meaningful changes in serum potassium levels or glomerular filtration rates. Combination therapy also was associated with a significant decrease in proteinuria, at least in the short term. Additional trials with longer follow-up are needed to determine whether the decrease in proteinuria will result in significant preservation of renal function.

Combined therapy of cilazapril and losartan has no additive effects in ameliorating adriamycin-induced glomerulopathy

AIMS

Effects of the blockade of renin-angiotensin system (RAS), by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), type 1 angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or a combination of both, were evaluated in Adriamycin (ADR)-induced glomerulopathy.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (180-250 g) were induced of glomerulopathy by treatment with ADR (2 mg/kg, i.v.). Six weeks later, they were treated with cilazapril (1 mg/kg/day) and/or losartan (10 mg/kg/day) for an additional 6 weeks.

RESULTS

The urinary excretion of protein progressively increased following the treatment with ADR, which was prevented by ACEi, ARB, and a combination of both. Similarly, the glomerulopathy assessed by glomerulosclerosis index was also ameliorated by ACEi or ARB. However, combined therapy of both ACEi and ARB was without an additional effect (Control 1.4 +/- 0.4%, ADR 10.7 +/- 2.7%**, ACEi 0.8 +/- 0.4%, ARB 2.6 +/- 1.0%, ACEi+ARB 1.7 +/- 1.5%, ** p < 0.01 vs. Control). The expression of transforming growth factor-beta(1) was increased following the treatment with ADR (1.4 +/- 0.07-fold, p < 0.05 vs. Control), however, the degree of which was similarly blunted by either ACEi, ARB, or the combination of both. The expression of type 1 angiotensin II receptor mRNA increased following the treatment with ADR, the degree of which was further upregulated by ACEi and decreased by ARB to the control level (ADR 1.3 +/- 0.06-fold*, ACEi 1.8 +/- 0.05-fold***, ARB 1.0 +/- 0.04-fold, * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 vs. Control). The combined therapy of ACEi and ARB still showed an upregulation of type 1 angiotensin II receptor mRNA, however, of which degree was mitigated compared with that induced by ACEi alone (ACEi+ARB 1.5 +/- 0.04-fold, ** p < 0.01 vs. Control). On the contrary, the expression of type 2 angiotensin II receptor mRNA was downregulated following the treatment with ADR, which was similarly restored to the control level by ACEi, ARB, and a combination of both (ADR 0.5 +/- 0.08-fold**, ACEi 1.0 +/- 0.06-fold, ARB 1.0 +/- 0.05-fold, ACEi+ARB 1.0 +/- 0.05-fold, ** p < 0.01 vs. Control).

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that combined therapy of ACEi and ARB with relatively high or maximal doses of each drug has no additive or synergistic benefits on the progression of ADR-induced glomerulopathy. Effects of RAS blockade may in part be related to differential regulation of type 1 and type 2 angiotensin II receptors.

Combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers to halt progression of chronic renal disease: Pathophysiology and indications

It is no a secret that we are confronted by an alarmingly increasing number of patients with progressive renal disease. There is ample evidence for the notion that angiotensin II (Ang II) is a major culprit in progression. The vasopeptide Ang II turned out to have also multiple nonhemodynamic pathophysiologic actions on the kidney, including proinflammatory and profibrogenic effects. Diverse complex Ang II generating systems have been identified, including specifically local tissue-specific renin-angiotensin systems (RAS). For example, proximal tubular cells have all components required for a functional RAS capable of synthesizing Ang II. On the other hand, Ang II is not the only effector of the RAS and other peptides generated by the RAS influence renal function and structure as well. Moreover, the discoveries that Ang II can be generated by enzymes other than angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and that Ang II and other RAS derived peptides bind to various receptors with different functional consequences have further added to the complexity of this system. Several major clinical trials have clearly shown that ACE inhibitor treatment slows the progression of renal diseases, including in diabetic nephropathy. Well-controlled studies demonstrated that this effect is in part independent of blood pressure control. More recently, with Ang II type 1 receptor (AT(1)) receptor antagonists a similarly protective effect on renal function was seen in patients with type 2 diabetes. Neither ACE inhibitor treatment nor AT(1) receptor blockade completely abrogate progression of renal disease. A recently introduced novel therapeutic approach is combination treatment comprising both ACE inhibitor and AT(1) receptor antagonists. The rationale for this approach is based on several considerations. Small-scale clinical studies, mainly of crossover design, documented that combination therapy is more potent in reducing proteinuria in patients with different chronic renal diseases. Blood pressure as an important confounder was, however, significantly lower in the majority of this studies in the combination treatment arms compared to the respective monotherapies. In a recent prospective study Japanese authors avoided this confounder and demonstrated that combination therapy reduced hard end-points (end stage renal failure or doubling of serum creatinine concentration) by 50% compared to the respective monotherapies. This effect could not be explained by a more pronounced reduction of blood pressure in the combination therapy group. Although these results are encouraging, administration of combination therapy should be reserved currently to special high risk groups. Further studies are necessary to confirm these promising results. It is possible that combination therapy may increase the risk of hyperkalemia, particularly when with coadministered with medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or spironolactone. In our opinion patients with proteinuria >1 g/day despite optimal blood pressure control under RAS-blocking monotherapy are a high-risk group which will presumably benefit from combination therapy.

Diuretic and Enhanced Sodium Restriction Results in Improved Antiproteinuric Response to RAS Blocking Agents

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and diuretics may exert synergistic antiproteinuric effects. Eighteen patients with a proteinuria >1 g/24 h after 6 mo of treatment with ramipril at 5 mg/d were assigned to receive in random order ramipril at 10 mg/d, valsartan at 160 mg/d, or combined ramipril at 5 mg/d and valsartan at 80 mg/d in addition to their antihypertensive treatment. The treatment periods lasted 4 wk and were separated by a 4-wk washout with ramipril at 5 mg/d. At the end of this crossover sequence, patients received combined ramipril at 5 mg/d, valsartan at 80 mg/d, and an increased furosemide dosage for an additional 4-wk period. The primary end point was the urinary protein/creatinine ratio for two 24-h urine collections at the end of each treatment period. No significant differences were noted between the study end points of the ramipril 10, valsartan 160, and combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80 treatment groups. However, the urinary protein/creatinine ratio was lower with combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80-increased furosemide dosage than with valsartan 160 and combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80, with a similar tendency compared with ramipril 10. Combined ramipril 5 and valsartan 80-increased furosemide dosage decreased systolic home BP and increased serum creatinine but did not significantly increase the number of symptomatic hypotension cases compared with the other three treatments. Thus, in patients with severe proteinuria and hypertension, a cautious increase in diuretic dosage in addition to combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers decreases proteinuria and BP but may expose the patient to prerenal failure.

Dual blockade of the renin angiotensin system in diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease

Dual blockade of the renin angiotensin system is based on a principle of obtaining the broadest and most efficient blockade of the effects of angiotensin II, by using the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB). By combining two, different pharmacologic principles and inhibiting both the ACE and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, it seems possible to block both the production and the action of angiotensin II, which would serve as efficient antihypertensive therapy. Exploring the beneficial effects of dual-blockade therapy is a work in rapid progress, in both diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy. But evidence is also emerging in cardiovascular medicine, an overview of which is provided in this article.

Low-dose dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in patients with primary glomerulonephritis

BACKGROUND

Treatment with agents interfering with the renin-angiotensin system retards the progressive course of proteinuric chronic renal disease. However, because of unwanted effects associated with such therapy, some patients cannot be treated with these drugs at all or may be administered only very small doses. To find an optimal nephroprotective strategy for these patients, we compared antiproteinuric effects of combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist in very small doses with treatment with either agent alone at greater, but not maximal, doses. We compared the concomitant use of benazepril, 5 mg, and losartan, 25 mg, and monotherapy with these agents in doses 2-fold greater.

METHODS

This is a randomized, open, crossover study of 3 treatments in 3 periods of 4 months each. Twenty-four patients with primary glomerulonephritis and nonnephrotic proteinuria, recognized previously as not able to be administered high doses of drugs from these classes, completed the protocol.

RESULTS

Combined therapy decreased 24-hour proteinuria (-45.54% versus baseline) more effectively than either losartan (-28.17%; analysis of variance, P < 0.01) or benazepril (-20.19%; analysis of variance, P < 0.001) alone. Subgroup analysis showed that antiproteinuric effects of combination therapy, as well as losartan or benazepril alone, were significantly greater in patients with basal proteinuria greater than 2 g/24 h than in those with proteinuria less than this value (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.05, respectively). All therapies significantly decreased blood pressure (BP) compared with baseline, but there were no differences between treatments in BP changes.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that combination therapy with very small doses of losartan and benazepril was more effective in reducing proteinuria than greater doses of either agent in monotherapy, and this greater antiproteinuric efficacy was independent of changes in BP.

Management of Glomerular Proteinuria: A Commentary

ABSTRACT. It is widely accepted that proteinuria reduction is an appropriate therapeutic goal in chronic proteinuric kidney disease. Based on large randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT), ACE inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy have emerged as the most important antiproteinuric and renal protective interventions. However, there are numerous other interventions that have been shown to be antiproteinuric and, therefore, likely to be renoprotective. Unfortunately testing each of these antiproteinuric therapies in RCT is not feasible. The nephrologist has two choices: restrict antiproteinuric therapies to those shown to be effective in RCT or expand the use of antiproteinuric therapies to include those that, although unproven, are plausibly effective and prudent to use. The goal of this work is to provide the documentation needed for the nephrologist to choose between these strategies. This work describes 25 separate interventions that are either antiproteinuric or may block injurious mechanisms of proteinuria. Each intervention is assigned a level of recommendation (Level 1 is the highest; Level 3 is the lowest) according to the strength of the evidence supporting its antiproteinuric and renoprotective efficacy. Pathophysiologic mechanisms possibly involved are also discussed. The number of interventions at each level of recommendation are: Level 1, n = 7; Level 2, n = 9; Level 3, n = 9. Our experience indicates that we can achieve in most patients the majority of Level 1 and many of the Level 2 and 3 recommendations. We suggest that, until better information becomes available, a broad-based, multiple-risk factor intervention to reduce proteinuria can be justified in those with progressive nephropathies. This work is intended primarily for clinical nephrologists; therefore, each antiproteinuria intervention is described in practical detail.