Birth position, accoucheur, and perineal outcomes: informing women about choices for vaginal birth

Prevalence and associated factors of maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North-West Ethiopia, 2022

BACKGROUND

Maternal injury with any form of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery is very common which ranges globally from 16.2 to 90.4%. The frequency of Obstetric anal sphincter Injuries and the incidence of cervical laceration increases rapidly. However, in Ethiopia, there is limited evidence on the prevalence of maternal birth trauma and its determinant factors after vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the magnitude and associated factors of Maternal Birth Trauma after vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Gondar, North-West Ethiopia, 2022.

METHODS

An Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted among mothers with singleton vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from 9th May to 9th August 2022 among 424 study participants. Pre-tested semi-structured questioner was utilized. Epi-Data version 4.6 was used for data entry and exported to SPSS version 25 for data management and analysis. To identify the determinant factors, binary logistic regression model was fitted and variables with p-value < 0.2 were considered for the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, Variables with P-value < 0.05 were considered to have statistical significant association with the outcome variable. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% CI was reported to declare the statistical significance and strength of association between Maternal Birth Trauma and independent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 424 mothers who delivered vaginally were included. The mean age of participants was 26.83 years (± 5.220 years). The proportion of birth trauma among mothers after vaginal delivery was47.4% (95%CI: 43.1, 51.7). Of different forms of perineal trauma, First degree tear in 42.8%, OASIs in 1.5% and Cervical laceration in 2.5% study participants. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis being primiparous (AOR = 3.00; 95%CI: 1.68, 5.38), Gestational age ≥ 39 weeks at delivery (AOR = 2.96; 95%CI: 1.57, 5.57), heavier birth weight (AOR = 12.3; 95%CI: 7.21, 40.1), bigger head circumference (AOR = 5.45; 95%CI: 2.62, 11.31), operative vaginal delivery (AOR = 6.59; 95%CI: 1.44, 30.03) and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head support (AOR = 6.30; 95%CI: 2.21, 17.94) were significantly associated with the presence of maternal birth trauma.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery was relatively high in this study. Prim parity, gestational age beyond 39 weeks at delivery, heavier birth weight, bigger head circumference, operative vaginal delivery and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head supported were factors affecting perineal outcome. The Ministry of Health of Ethiopia should provide regular interventional training as to reduce maternal birth trauma.

Effects of flexible sacrum position at birth on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the differences in both maternal and neonatal outcomes between flexible and non-flexible sacrum positions at birth.

METHODS

A descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study was carried out on a sample of low-risk pregnant women. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions and multivariate linear regressions were conducted to estimate the association between our discrete or continuous variables of interest. Maternal outcomes were perineal tear, maternal blood loss, second stage length; neonatal outcomes were Apgar scores and neonatal asphyxia. Results were adjusted for maternal age, neonatal birth weight, and epidural analgesia.

RESULTS

We considered for final analysis 2198 women. In primiparous women, women giving birth in the all-fours position were significantly more likely to have an intact perineum (P = 0.011) and a shorter length of the second stage of labor (P = 0.022). Maternal age (P = 0.005) and neonatal weight (P = 0.013) significantly increased perineal tearing; maternal age (P = 0.004) and neonatal birth weight (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher amount of blood loss. Maternal age (P = 0.002) and neonatal weight (P < 0.001) significantly increased the length of the second stage of labor. For multiparous women, the side-lying position was significantly correlated with an intact perineum (P = 0.031); maternal age and intact perineum were statistically inversely associated. Epidural analgesia significantly increased the length of the second stage of labor in both nulliparous (P < 0.001) and pluriparous women (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Women with a low-risk labor should be free to choose their birth position as flexible sacrum positions are shown to increase maternal well-being and do not affect neonatal health.

Alternative Birthing Positions Compared to the Conventional Position in the Second Stage of Labor: A Review

The position in which the woman delivers has a lot of impact on the ease of delivery. Women's satisfaction with their birthing experience and the care they receive is significantly impacted by the fact that giving birth is frequently a challenging experience. Birthing positions refer to various postures which can be assumed at the time of delivery by a pregnant woman. Currently, the majority of women give birth either while lying flat on their backs or in a semi-sitting position. Upright positions, which include standing, sitting, or squatting along with side-lying and hands-and-knees, are less common birth positions. Doctors, nurses, and midwives are among the most important healthcare professionals, having a significant influence in deciding which position the woman will give birth in and on the physiological and psychological effects of the experience of a woman in labor. There isn't much research to back up the best position for mothers during the second stage of labor. This review article aims to review and compare the advantages and risks of common birthing positions and know about the knowledge of alternative birthing positions among pregnant women.

Effect of Flexible Sacrum Position on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Public Health Facilities, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Restricting women giving birth in health care facilities from choosing the most comfortable position during labor and birth is a global problem. This study was aimed to examine the effect of flexible sacrum birth positions on maternal and neonatal outcomes in public health facilities in Ethiopia's Amhara Region. A non-equivalent control group post-test-only design was employed at public health facilities from August to November 2019. A total of 1048 participants were enrolled and assigned to intervention or control groups based on their choice of birth position. Participants who preferred the flexible sacrum birth position received the intervention, while participants who preferred the supine birth position were placed in the control group. Data were collected using observational follow-up from admission to immediate postpartum period. Log binomial logistic regression considering as treated analysis was used. Of the total participants, 970 women gave birth vaginally, of whom 378 were from the intervention group, and 592 were from the control group. The intervention decreased the chance of perineal tear and poor Apgar score by 43 and 39%, respectively. The flexible sacrum position reduced the duration of the second stage of labor by a mean difference of 26 min. Maternal and newborn outcomes were better in the flexible sacrum position.

[Normal childbirth: physiologic labor support and medical procedures. Guidelines of the French National Authority for Health (HAS) with the collaboration of the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the French College of Midwives (CNSF) - Maternal postures during the second stage of labour, delivery techniques and perineal protection]

OBJECTIVE

To assess maternal postures during the second stage of labour on course of labour, mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity. To describe the different techniques of spontaneous vaginal delivery and their influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. To describe the different perineal protection techniques.

METHOD

Systematic review of the literature through consultation of Medline, Cochrane databases and international recommendations.

RESULTS

There is no particular posture that has demonstrated its superiority (Level of Evidence (LE) 2). In case of no contraindication and permanent maternal and fetal monitoring, it is recommended to encourage women to adopt the postures they consider most comfortable during the second stage of labour (Consensus agreement). There is insufficient evidence in the literature to recommend a technique for fetal head and shoulders delivery. There is not enough data in the literature to recommend the use of Ritgen maneuver (grade B), perineal massage (gradeC) or hot compresses (Consensus agreement). The abdominal expression must be abandoned (grade B).

CONCLUSION

The second stage of labour is a crucial time in labour that can lead to significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. It is necessary to take the greatest possible care in the supervision and management of women, especially for the perineal protection. The influence of non-medicinal techniques on the course of the second stage of labour should be studied.

Is Vaginal Birth without an Episiotomy a Rarity in the 21st Century? Cross-Sectional Studies in Southern Poland

Purpose: The objective of this study was to analyze the birth methods (vaginal, with medical intervention, or by Cesarean Section, CS) predominant in the Malopolska province, to describe the risk factors for non-physiologically normal births, and to characterize the demographics of women who give birth and selected parameters of maternity care. Methods: The retrospective analysis was conducted on data collected in 2013⁻2014 in the framework of the current activity of the Polish National Health Fund and encompassed 68,894 childbirths from 29 hospitals in 21 towns in the south of Poland. Results: In the study period, 38,366 (56.5%) of the births in Malopolska were vaginal, and only 22,839 (22.9%) of births were considered 'normal', without an episiotomy. The remaining were births by CS (29,551; 43.5%). Factors increasing the chances of having a normal childbirth in comparison with birth by CS were as follows: days free from work, living in a village, woman's age > 35 years, and the hospital's referral level (primary or secondary). Women aged 18⁻34 years and those living in a village/town were more frequently admitted directly into the birth room without a stay in the maternity units. There was a high level of medicalization of births in Malopolska: natural labour and childbirth were rare. It seems that efforts to increase natural birth rates should be directed toward both reducing the CS rate as well as increasing vaginal birth without an episiotomy.

[Which interventions during labour to decrease the risk of perineal tears? CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to evaluate whether interventions performed during labour could influence the risk of perineal tears.

METHODS

A separate keyword search for each medical intervention during labor was performed by selecting only studies evaluating perineal consequences, particularly the risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (LOSA). Interventions during pregnancy and during fetal expulsion have been specifically addressed in other chapters of the recommendations.

RESULTS

Maternal mobilisation and postures during the first stage of labour have not been shown to reduce the risk of OASIS (LE3). No particular posture has demonstrated its superiority over any other during the second stage of labour for preventing obstetric perineal lesions including OASIS and postnatal incontinence (urinary or faecal) (LE2). There is no reason to recommend one maternal posture rather than another during the first and the second stages of labour for the purpose of reducing the risk of OASIS (Grade C). Women should be allowed to choose the position most comfortable for them during the first and second stages of labour (Professional consensus). Posterior cephalic positions present the greatest risks of perineal injury (LE2). Manual rotation of cephalic posterior positions to the anterior during the second stage of labour may make it possible to reduce the risk of operative vaginal delivery, although no reduction in the risk of perineal injuries or OASIS has been clearly demonstrated (LE3). For fetuses in posterior cephalic positions, no data justifies a preference for manual rotation at full dilation to diminish the risk of perineal injury (Professional consensus). Urinary catheterisation is recommended for women with epidural analgesia during labour when spontaneous micturition is not possible (Professional consensus). Although current data does not justify a preference for continuous or intermittent urinary catheterisation (LE2), intermittent catheterisation nonetheless appears preferable in this situation (Professional consensus). During the second stage phase, delayed pushing does not modify the risk of OASIS (LE1). It does, however, increase the chances of spontaneous delivery (LE1). It is thus recommended that, when maternal and fetal status allow it, the start of pushing should be delayed (Grade A). There is no evidence to support preferring one pushing technique rather than another to diminish the risk of OASIS (grade B). Performing an operative vaginal delivery for the sole purpose of reducing the duration of the second stage of labour may increase the risk of OASIS (LE3). Perineal massage or the application of warm compresses during the second stage of labour appear to reduce the risk of OASIS (LE2). However, we have not made a determination about their use in clinical practice.

Perineal outcome following educational intervention: a retrospective audit of primiparous women

The management of vaginal delivery appears to offer an opportunity to reduce the morbidity of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) which is very common in the postpartum period. Research by the authors suggests that an episiotomy is protective against PFD, in particular urinary incontinence. The aim of this subsequent audit was to see if educational intervention can alter the common medical practice of episiotomy and in turn reduce postpartum PFD. Nine hundred and fifty four primiparous women with a non-instrumental vaginal delivery were included, of which 30% had an intact perineum, 51% a spontaneous tear and 19% an episiotomy. The intervention was a teaching session by the Head of Urogynaecology encompassing the anatomy, the impact of a vaginal delivery on PFD, in addition to local and international research. Whilst no significant difference was noted overall in the episiotomy rates as a result of the educational intervention (p = .17), significant differences were noted with the different accoucheur types. Where the accoucheur was an obstetrician or obstetrics registrar, the episiotomy rates increased from 56% to 70% (p < .01); where the midwife was the accoucheur the episiotomy rate changed minimally (11-18%, respectively; p = .27). This demonstrates that feedback about the provider's own practice patterns can change the behaviour to conform with the agreed upon standards. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is the most common complication of childbirth, affecting approximately 85% of Australian women following a vaginal delivery. A link has been made between the perineal outcome and PFD, which has a significant impact on the quality of life. Previous research suggests that the management of a vaginal delivery offers an opportunity to reduce its morbidity, with an episiotomy being protective. However, there is a wide variation in the use of episiotomy which ranges from 9% to 100%. What the results of this study add? The literature suggests that the strongest factor associated with the episiotomy rates arises from differences in the attitude and training. Consequently, this study explored whether an educational intervention can change the common medical practice of episiotomy and in turn reduce postpartum PFD. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? No significant difference was noted overall in the episiotomy rates as a result of the educational intervention, however, the response to the educational intervention was varied among the different types of accoucheurs with the obstetricians, obstetric registrars and student midwives significantly increasing their rate of episiotomy, whilst the midwives demonstrated no significant change. This suggests that there are contributing factors which may include past education and experience; this is an area for further research.

Perineal injuries and birth positions among 2992 women with a low risk pregnancy who opted for a homebirth

BACKGROUND

Whether certain birth positions are associated with perineal injuries and severe perineal trauma (SPT) is still unclear. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of perineal injuries of different severity in a low-risk population of women who planned to give birth at home and to compare the prevalence of perineal injuries, SPT and episiotomy in different birth positions in four Nordic countries.

METHODS

A population-based prospective cohort study of planned home births in four Nordic countries. To assess medical outcomes a questionnaire completed after birth by the attending midwife was used. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis and logistic regression were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred ninety-two women with planned home births, who birthed spontaneously at home or after transfer to hospital, between 2008 and 2013 were included. The prevalence of SPT was 0.7 % and the prevalence of episiotomy was 1.0 %. There were differences between the countries regarding all maternal characteristics. No association between flexible sacrum positions and sutured perineal injuries was found (OR 1.02; 95 % CI 0.86-1.21) or SPT (OR 0.68; CI 95 % 0.26-1.79). Flexible sacrum positions were associated with fewer episiotomies (OR 0.20; CI 95 % 0.10-0.54).

CONCLUSION

A low prevalence of SPT and episiotomy was found among women opting for a home birth in four Nordic countries. Women used a variety of birth positions and a majority gave birth in flexible sacrum positions. No associations were found between flexible sacrum positions and SPT. Flexible sacrum positions were associated with fewer episiotomies.

Birthing postures and birth canal lacerations

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the differences in the birth canal lacerations following the lateral and fours posture deliveries compared with those following the supine posture deliveries.

METHODS

We examined the birth canal lacerations of our "low risk" pregnant women under the midwife-led delivery care at Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital between April 2006 and March 2015.

RESULTS

There were 3826, 1754 and 719 women who delivered with supine, lateral and fours postures. The rate of no laceration in the women who delivered with lateral posture was significant lower than that in the women who delivered with supine posture (OR 0.630, 95% CI 0.56-0.71, p < 0.01); however, the incidence of perineal laceration in the women who delivered with lateral posture was significant lower than that in the women who delivered with supine posture (OR 0.856, 95% CI 0.76-0.90, p < 0.01). The incidence of perineal laceration of third- or fourth-degree in the women who delivered with fours posture was significant higher than that in the women who delivered with supine posture (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.2-4.2, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The current results may be to help for self-determination of birthing postures in prenatal women.

Comparative study on the influence of three delivery positions on pain intensity during the second stage of labor

BACKGROUND

Labor is a physiologic process, and consideration of labor pain and relieving that is among the major components of maternal care. Application of some labor position can lay the fetus better in pelvic canal direction. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of laying the mother in three labor positions on the pain severity in the second, third, and fourth stages of labor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a clinical trial conducted on 96 primiparous pregnant women randomly selected through convenient sampling from those who were hospitalized in the hospitals of Isfahan and Jahrom. Women with a gestational age of 37-42 weeks, singleton pregnancy, who had passed the first labor stage through physiologic process, and with cephalic presentation were selected. The subjects were randomly allocated to be in the groups of lithotomy, sitting, and squatting positions. Pain severity in the second, third, and fourth labor stages was measured with visual analog scale (VAS) as well as McGill present pain intensity (PPI). The data were collected through interviews and observations with the help of VAS. The data were analyzed by Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests.

RESULTS

In the latent phase of the second labor stage, mean pain severity in lithotomy (2.27) and squatting positions (2.48) was significantly less than the mean pain severity in sitting (5.33) position (P = 0.001). Pain severity in the active phase of the second and third labor stages was significantly less in squatting position (6.14) group compared to the other two groups (7.59 and 7.41 in sitting and lithotomy positions, respectively) (P = 0.024). Pain severity in the fourth labor stage showed no significant difference in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of various labor positions as one of the non-medicational methods to reduce pain in the second and third stages of labor leads to labor pain reduction.

Malawi women's knowledge and use of labour and birthing positions: A cross-sectional descriptive survey

PROBLEM

Despite research evidence supporting use of upright birthing positions, most women give birth in supine position. Little is known about women's knowledge and use of labour and birthing positions. Specifically, there is a lack of evidence on Malawi women's knowledge and use of birthing positions, and this limits the possibility of improvement in childbirth practices.

AIM

To assess women's knowledge and use of different positions during labour and birthing.

METHODS

The study used a cross-sectional descriptive survey in a Malawi maternity unit where 373 low-risk postnatal women participated in face-to-face exit interviews, using a structured questionnaire. A descriptive analysis of the categorical variables was conducted to examine frequencies and percentages.

FINDINGS

The majority of women knew about walking (66.4%) and lateral (60.6%) as labour positions, whereas 99.2% knew about the supine as a birthing position. Half of the women (50%) walked during labour and the majority (91.4%) gave birth whilst in supine position. Midwives were the main source of information on positions used during childbirth.

DISCUSSION

Education about different birthing positions is needed for women who deliver at the maternity unit so that they can make informed decisions on their own options for childbirth. However, midwives must have the competence to encourage and assist women give birth in different positions, so professional development of midwives in childbirth positions is a priority.

CONCLUSION

Childbirth education should include information on the various labour and birthing positions. Midwives should be equipped with appropriate skills to help women use different positions during childbirth.

Better perineal outcomes in sitting birthing position cannot be explained by changing from upright to supine position for performing an episiotomy

BACKGROUND

women who give birth in supine position are more likely to have an episiotomy than women who give birth in sitting position. A confounding effect may be that women in upright positions in second stage of labour are asked to lie down if a professional needs to perform an episiotomy. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine whether this factor can explain the lower rate of episiotomy in sitting compared to supine position.

METHODS

data from 1196 women who had a spontaneous, vaginal birth were analysed. Positions during second stage and at birth were carefully recorded. Three groups of birthing positions were compared in multivariable analyses: 1) horizontal during second stage and supine at birth (horizontal/supine), 2) horizontal and upright during second stage and supine at birth (various/supine), 3) sitting at birth regardless of the position in second stage. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for known risk factors for perineal damage.

FINDINGS

women in sitting position at birth compared to those in the horizontal/supine group had a lower episiotomy rate (adjusted OR 0.28;95%-CI 0.14-0.56) and a non-significant higher intact perineum rate (adjusted OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.96-2.04). Women in the various/supine group compared to the horizontal/supine group had a similar episiotomy rate (adjusted OR 1.12;95%-CI 0.69-1.83).

CONCLUSIONS

we did not confirm our hypothesis that more women in supine compared to sitting position have an episiotomy because women in upright position are asked to lie down if an episiotomy is necessary.

Healthy Birth Practice #5: Avoid Giving Birth on Your Back and Follow Your Body's Urge to Push

Women in the United States are still giving birth in the supine position and are restricted in how long they can push and encouraged to push forcefully by their caregivers. Research does not support these activities. There is discussion about current research and suggestions on how to improve the quality of the birth experience. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the "Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #5: Spontaneous Pushing in Upright or Gravity-Neutral Positions," published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma

BACKGROUND

Perineal trauma following vaginal birth can be associated with significant short-term and long-term morbidity. Antenatal perineal massage has been proposed as one method of decreasing the incidence of perineal trauma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of antenatal digital perineal massage on the incidence of perineal trauma at birth and subsequent morbidity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (22 October 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 10), PubMed (1966 to October 2012), EMBASE (1980 to October 2012) and reference lists of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating any described method of antenatal digital perineal massage undertaken for at least the last four weeks of pregnancy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both review authors independently applied the selection criteria, extracted data from the included studies and assessed study quality. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials (2497 women) comparing digital perineal massage with control. All were of good quality. Antenatal digital perineal massage was associated with an overall reduction in the incidence of trauma requiring suturing (four trials, 2480 women, risk ratio (RR) 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 0.96), number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 15 (10 to 36)) and women practicing perineal massage were less likely to have an episiotomy (four trials, 2480 women, RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.95), NNTB 21 (12 to 75)). These findings were significant for women without previous vaginal birth only. No differences were seen in the incidence of first- or second-degree perineal tears or third-/fourth-degree perineal trauma. Only women who have previously birthed vaginally reported a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of pain at three months postpartum (one trial, 376 women, RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.87) NNTB 13 (7 to 60)). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of instrumental deliveries, sexual satisfaction, or incontinence of urine, faeces or flatus for any women who practised perineal massage compared with those who did not massage.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antenatal digital perineal massage reduces the likelihood of perineal trauma (mainly episiotomies) and the reporting of ongoing perineal pain, and is generally well accepted by women. As such, women should be made aware of the likely benefit of perineal massage and provided with information on how to massage.

Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to describe the range of perineal trauma in women with a singleton vaginal birth and estimate the effect of maternal and obstetric characteristics on the incidence of perineal tears.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study on all women with a planned singleton vaginal delivery between May and September 2006 in one obstetric unit, three freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings in South East England. Data on maternal and obstetric characteristics were collected prospectively and analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The outcome measures were incidence of perineal trauma, type of perineal trauma and whether it was sutured or not.

RESULTS

The proportion of women with an intact perineum at delivery was 9.6% (125/1,302) in nulliparae, and 31.2% (453/1,452) in multiparae, with a higher incidence in the community (freestanding midwifery-led units and home settings). Multivariable analysis showed multiparity (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.90) was associated with reduced odds of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), whilst forceps (OR 4.43; 95% CI: 2.02-9.71), longer duration of second stage of labour (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.13-1.98), and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.001-1.001), were associated with increased odds. Adjusted ORs for spontaneous perineal truama were: multiparity (OR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.32-0.56); hospital delivery (OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01-2.17); forceps delivery (OR 2.61; 95% CI: 1.22-5.56); longer duration of second stage labour (OR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.28-1.63); and heavier birthweight (OR 1.001; 95% CI: 1.000-1.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This large prospective study found no evidence for an association between many factors related to midwifery practice such as use of a birthing pool, digital perineal stretching in the second stage, hands off delivery technique, or maternal birth position with incidence of OASIS or spontaneous perineal trauma. We also found a low overall incidence of OASIS, and fewer second degree tears were sutured in the community than in the hospital settings. This study confirms previous findings of overall high incidence of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery, and a strong association between forceps delivery and perineal trauma.

Maternal position and other variables: effects on perineal outcomes in 557 births

BACKGROUND

Damage to the perineum is common after vaginal delivery, and it can be caused by laceration, episiotomy, or both. This study investigated the effects of maternal position (lateral vs lithotomy) and other variables on the occurrence of perineal damage.

METHODS

A retrospective study included the examination of hospital records from 557 women. The effects of demographic characteristics, gravidity, parity, duration of pregnancy, reason for admission, and mode of labor on perineal outcomes were investigated through univariate (independent sample t test, chi-square test) and multivariate analysis (logistic regression analysis).

RESULTS

Considering episiotomy as perineal damage, univariate analysis showed a protective effect of the lateral position (45.9% vs 27.9%, p > 0.001), and fewer episiotomies were performed (6.7% vs 38.2%) with this position. This protective effect for perineal damage disappeared on excluding women undergoing episiotomy from analysis. Multivariate analysis including all participants showed an increase of 47 percent in the likelihood of an intact perineum for the lateral position when compared with the lithotomy position (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.36-0.78). Parity was associated with a reduction of 44 percent in perineal damage (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78, p < 0.001). Moreover, the lithotomy position was associated with significantly more episiotomies than the lateral position (7% vs 38%, p < 0.001). The odds of perineal damage increased in deliveries performed by physicians (OR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.79-4.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Childbirth in the lateral position resulted in less perineal trauma when compared with childbirth in the lithotomy position, even after correcting for parity and birth attendant. The probability of an intact perineum increased in deliveries performed by midwives. (BIRTH 39:2 June 2012).

Fear causes tears - perineal injuries in home birth settings. A Swedish interview study

Background

Perineal injury is a serious complication of vaginal delivery that has a severe impact on the quality of life of healthy women. The prevalence of perineal injuries among women who give birth in hospital has increased over the last decade, while it is lower among women who give birth at home. The aim of this study was to describe the practice of midwives in home birth settings with the focus on the occurrence of perineal injuries.

Methods

Twenty midwives who had assisted home births for between one and 29 years were interviewed using an interview guide. The midwives also had experience of working in a hospital delivery ward. All the interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was used.

Results

The overall theme was "No rushing and tearing about", describing the midwives' focus on the natural process taking its time. The subcategories 1) preparing for the birth; 2) going along with the physiological process; 3) creating a sense of security; 4) the critical moment and 5) midwifery skills illuminate the management of labor as experienced by the midwives when assisting births at home.

Conclusions

Midwives who assist women who give birth at home take many things into account in order to minimize the risk of complications during birth. Protection of the woman's perineum is an act of awareness that is not limited to the actual moment of the pushing phase but starts earlier, along with the communication between the midwife and the woman.

Juggling Instinct and Fear: An Ethnographic Study of Facilitators and Inhibitors of Physiological Birth Positioning in Two Different Birth Settings

BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence to support the benefits for women of using a variety of birth positions, particularly upright birth positions, there is limited research into practices that facilitate or inhibit physiological birth positioning.

AIM: To explore how physiological birth positioning is facilitated by midwives and experienced by women in two main settings in New South Wales (NSW), Australia (birth center and delivery ward).

METHOD: An ethnographic approach guided data collection and analysis in this study. Data was collected using observation of women in the second stage of labor, focus groups with midwives, and interviews with women.

RESULTS: Women were more likely to assume upright birth positions in the birth center setting (81.84%) than in the delivery ward setting (24.47%). They also instinctively wanted to lean forward during labor and birth. Midwives and women constantly “juggle instinct and fear” as they work to adapt to the birth environment, and this impacts physiological birth positioning.

CONCLUSION: Women are more likely to adopt physiological birth positions during the first and second stage of labor in a birth center setting compared to a delivery ward setting. The birth center setting acts as a facilitator for physiological birth positions by providing a buffer from medicalized care.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: An in-depth exploration into facilitators and inhibitors of physiological birth positioning in two different birth settings provided new insights. Findings from this study have the potential to inform clinical practice through the design of birth environments and models of care that are available to women.

Perineal outcomes on the left lateral versus vertical semi-sitting birth positions: a randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perineal outcomes in unconventional birth positions. METHOD: A randomized clinical study. Conducted in a birth centre in the city of Itapecerica da Serra, Brazil. A sample of 158 nulliparas, divided randomly into the left lateral position (81 experimental) and upright half-sitting (77 - control). RESULTS: Experimental group showed less vulvar edema, 13.6% vs. 29.9%, OR 2.71 (95% IC 1.22 -6.02), episiotomy, 16.0% vs. 35.1 OR 2,46 (95% IC 1, 27 - 4.74), and more labial lacerations 37,0% vs. 19,5% OR 2,43 (95% IC 1,18 5,51). The women who adopted the upright half-sitting position had a lower risk of first-degree laceration (37,7% versus 56,8%). However, they had a higher risk of second-degree laceration and frequency of episiotomy OR 2,11 (95% IC 1,02 4,35). The presence of vulvar edema increased the risk of spontaneous trauma and episiotomy OR 3,99 (95% IC 1,80 8,85). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirmed the hypothesis that the left lateral position offers less risk of serious perineal traumas.

A Comparison of “Hands Off” Versus “Hands On” Techniques for Decreasing Perineal Lacerations During Birth

Our goal was to determine the frequency, degree, and location of perineal lacerations and the neonatal outcomes associated with the use of two techniques of perineal protection--expectant ("hands off") and interventionist ("hands on")--during childbirth. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for perineum protection during spontaneous delivery. Study participants included 70 nulliparous expectant mothers, who were divided equally between the "hands off" and "hands on" groups (n = 35 per group). Perineal laceration occurred in 81.4% of the women. Among these, first-degree lacerations were predominant (82.5%). Lacerations in the anterior and posterior regions of the perineum occurred with similar frequencies. Laceration rates did not differ between the "hands off" and "hands on" groups (P > .05). Neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups. The use of "hands off" technique of perineal protection does not alter the frequency or degree of perineal lacerations in childbirth, relative to a "hands on" technique.

Obstetric outcomes of low-risk labors at 'Japanese tatami' mat delivery room: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

We examined the obstetric outcomes of low-risk labors at the 'Japanese tatami' mat compared with Western-style delivery room.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 201 deliveries at the 'Japanese tatami' delivery room and 360 deliveries at the standard Western-style delivery room.

RESULTS

There were no measurable differences in the duration of labor, the incidence of perineal laceration, total maternal blood loss and the incidence of low Apgar score and umbilical artery pH between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that the Japanese room is unsafe for low-risk infants and mothers in comparison with the standard Western-style delivery room.

Influência da posição de parto vaginal nas variáveis obstétricas e neonatais de mulheres primíparas

OBJETIVOS: determinar a prevalência de fatores obstétricos associados à posição de parto vaginal (PPV) - vertical ou horizontal; investigar correlações entre PPV e fatores obstétricos, bem como sua influência sobre as características neonatais. MÉTODOS: foi realizado um estudo de corte transversal. A amostra foi composta por 176 mulheres primíparas que realizaram parto vaginal, entre julho/2006 e fevereiro/2007. Foi investigada a correlação entre PPV e as seguintes variáveis obstétricas: ocorrência e grau de laceração perineal espontânea, episiotomia, sutura perineal, uso de ocitocina e instrumentação cirúrgica. Os neonatos foram classificados quanto à idade gestacional, peso, estatura, perímetro cefálico e Apgar 1º e 5º minutos. Teste qui quadrado foi aplicado para investigar correlação entre PPV e variáveis obstétricas e o teste t-student para investigar a influência da PPV nas características neonatais. RESULTADOS: não foi observada correlação entre PPV e sutura perineal, laceração perineal, uso de ocitocina, episiotomia e utilização de instrumentação cirúrgica (uso de fórceps ou vácuo-extrator). Houve correlação entre PPV e episiotomia e maior prevalência de episiotomia na posição horizontal. Não houve influência da PPV nas características neonatais. CONCLUSÕES: houve maior ocorrência de episiotomia na posição de parto horizontal, embora ambas as posições de parto tenham sido satisfatórias para os neonatos.

A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of immersion bath on labour pain

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the effect of an immersion bath on pain magnitude during the first stage of labour.

DESIGN

a randomised controlled trial comparing the pain scores of bathing and non-bathing nulliparous women during birth was employed.

SETTING

the study was conducted at the Normal Birth Center of Amparo Maternal, São Paulo, Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

108 birthing women, with 54 women randomly assigned to each group.

INTERVENTIONS

when the birthing women presented at 6-7 cm of cervical dilation, they were placed in an immersion bath for 60 mins.

OUTCOME MEASURES

pain scores, using a behavioural pain scale and a numeric scale, were recorded at two evaluation time points: at 6-7 cm of cervical dilation and 1h after the first pain score evaluation.

FINDINGS

at the first evaluation, on the behavioural scale, the means were 2.1 for both groups (p=0.914; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.9-2.3 for the control group and 2.0-2.2 for the experimental group). On the numeric scale, the means were 8.7 and 8.5 for the control and experimental groups, respectively (p=0.235; 95% CI 8.2-9.2 for the control group and 8.1-8.9 for the experimental group). At the second evaluation, the pain score means for both scales were statistically higher in the control group than in the experimental group. On the behavioural scale, the scores were 2.4 vs. 1.9, respectively, for the control and experimental groups (p<0.001; 95% CI 2.2-2.6 for the control group and 1.7-2.1 for the experimental group). On the numeric scale, the scores were 9.3 vs. 8.5, respectively, for the control and experimental groups (p<0.05; 95% CI 8.9-9.7 for the control group and 8.1-8.9 for the experimental group).

CONCLUSIONS

mean labour pain scores in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group. The present findings suggest that use of an immersion bath is a suitable alternative form of pain relief for women during labour.

The use of liquid petroleum jelly in the prevention of perineal lacerations during birth

Most of vaginal births are accompanied by lacerations in the genital tract. This was a randomized study carried out in a Birth Center located in São Paulo city to evaluate the efficacy of liquid petroleum jelly in reducing perineal laceration. The sample was composed of 38 nulliparous women per group (experimental and control). In the experimental group was used 30 ml of the petroleum jelly in the perineal region during the expulsive period. The parturient were allowed to push spontaneously during the delivery and remained in the left side position. The frequency of perineal laceration was similar in both groups (experimental 63.2% versus control 60.5%). The posterior perineum region presented the highest frequency of trauma (53.2%). Of the total cases of perineal trauma, 72.3% were first-degree lacerations. The use of liquid petroleum jelly of perineal protection does not reduce the frequency neither the degree of lacerations in childbirth.

Risk factors for anal sphincter tears: the importance of maternal position at birth

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of birth position in the occurrence of anal sphincter tears (AST).

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

South Hospital in Stockholm, a teaching hospital with around 5700 births per year.

POPULATION

Among all 19,151 women who gave birth at the South Hospital during the study period 2002-05, 12,782 women met the inclusion criteria of noninstrumental, vaginal deliveries.

METHODS

Data on birth position and other obstetric factors were analysed in relation to occurrence of AST.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Third- and fourth-degree AST.

RESULTS

AST occurred in 449 women (3.5%). The trauma was more frequent in primiparous (5.8%) than in multiparous women (1.7%). The highest proportion of AST was found among women who gave birth in lithotomy position (6.9%), followed by squatting position (6.4%). Logistic regression analyses showed that lithotomy (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.58-2.59) and squatting positions (adjusted OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.09-3.82) were associated with a significantly increased risk for AST. Other major risk factors for anal sphincter trauma were primiparity (adjusted OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.55-4.25), prolonged second stage of labour >1 hour (adjusted OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11-2.10), infant birthweight more than 4 kg (adjusted OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.64-2.72) and large infant head circumference (adjusted OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.23-1.99).

CONCLUSION

Lithotomy and squatting position at birth were associated with an increased risk for AST also after control for other risk factors.

Accouchement en décubitus latéral. Essai clinique randomisé comparant les positions maternelles en décubitus latéral et en décubitus dorsal lors de la deuxième phase du travail

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of a maternal position for childbearing, that of lateral decubitus compared with the dorsal decubitus in second phase of parturition, by studying various parameters such as: rate of intact perineum, electronic foetal heart rate monitoring during expulsion, mode of delivery, quantity of maternal blood losses, and neonatal status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The type of study was as follows: prospective, comparative and randomized according to Zelen's design, monocentric, in pragmatic mode and intention to treat. After a review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of the activity of a service (Romans-sur-Isère/France), an assumption of improvement of 15% of the rates of intact perineum in lateral position is put forth. An amount of 562 patients was included and randomized in 2 groups in which the childbirth was carried out in dorsal or lateral decubitus. The data were analysed by software SPSS version 13, by using the tests t of Student, Chi(2) of Pearson or the exact test of Fisher. The analysis relates to 487 patients after exclusion of the distortions to the protocol.

RESULTS

We observed a significant increase in the rate of intact perineum, as well as a significant increase in the maternal blood loss, without exceeding the physiological limits, during expulsion in lateral position. The rate of directed delivery was less but more frequent were the haemorrhages in decubitus side. The rate of artificial delivery and/or uterine revision doubled without however reaching the threshold of significativity. Finally, the other parameters did not differ between the two groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The test makes it possible to show the improvement of the perineal status during dorsal childbirth in decubitus side compared with the position in decubitus. The data collected prove to be in conformity with those of the literature, which is not very prolix on the subject! The secondary criteria are not improved, and professionals must carry out a reflexion concerning delivery, to adapt the recommendations for the introduction of such practice into a service, must carry out a reflexion. This study provides the scientific basis (NP1), which makes it possible to justify the diffusion of this position of expulsion if one is keen on the improvement of the perineal status.

Minimizing genital tract trauma and related pain following spontaneous vaginal birth

Genital tract trauma is common following vaginal childbirth, and perineal pain is a frequent symptom reported by new mothers. The following techniques and care measures are associated with lower rates of obstetric lacerations and related pain following spontaneous vaginal birth: antenatal perineal massage for nulliparous women, upright or lateral positions for birth, avoidance of Valsalva pushing, delayed pushing with epidural analgesia, avoidance of episiotomy, controlled delivery of the baby's head, use of Dexon (U.S. Surgical; Norwalk, CT) or Vicryl (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ) suture material, the "Fleming method" for suturing lacerations, and oral or rectal ibuprofen for perineal pain relief after delivery. Further research is warranted to determine the role of prenatal pelvic floor (Kegel) exercises, general exercise, and body mass index in reducing obstetric trauma, and also the role of pelvic floor and general exercise in pelvic floor recovery after childbirth.

Getting Through Birth in One Piece

PURPOSE

To identify factors related to perineal trauma in childbirth, replicating the work of .

STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD

A retrospective descriptive analysis of pregnancy and birth data recorded into the Nurse Midwifery Clinical Data Set for women (N = 510) with a singleton pregnancy and largely uncomplicated prenatal course. Prenatal care occurred at four prenatal clinics with births at a tertiary care facility during 1996-1997, with care provided by nurse midwifery faculty. Multivariate statistics detailed clinical characteristics associated with perineal trauma.

RESULTS

Episiotomy was related to parity, marital status, infant weight, fetal bradycardia, prolonged second stage labor, and lack of perineal care measures. Factors related to laceration were age, insurance status, and marital status. For all women, laceration was more likely when in lithotomy position for birth (p = .002) or when prolonged second stage labor occurred (p = .001). Factors that were protective against perineal trauma included massage, warm compress use, manual support, and birthing in the lateral position. found that ethnicity and education were related to episiotomy and that warm compresses were protective. In this study, use of oils/lubricants increased lacerations, as did lithotomy positioning. Laceration rates were similar in both studies. Episiotomy use was lower in this study.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Side-lying position for birth and perineal support and compress use are important interventions for decreasing perineal trauma. Strategies to promote perineal integrity need to be implemented by nurses who provide prenatal education and care for the laboring woman.

Increased blood loss in upright birthing positions originates from perineal damage

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the risk of severe blood loss is increased in semi-sitting and sitting position, and if so, to which extent blood loss from perineal damage is responsible for this finding.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from a large trial.

SETTING

Primary care midwifery practices in the Netherlands.

POPULATION

About 1646 low-risk women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery.

METHODS

Blood loss was measured using a weighing scale and measuring jug. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the net effects of birthing position and perineal damage on blood loss greater than 500 ml.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean total blood loss and incidence of blood loss greater than 500 ml and 1000 ml.

RESULTS

Mean total blood loss and the incidence of blood loss greater than 500 ml and 1000 ml were increased in semi-sitting and sitting position. In logistic regression analysis, the interaction between birthing position and perineal damage was almost significantly associated with an increased risk of blood loss greater than 500 ml. Semi-sitting and sitting position were only significant risk factors among women with perineal damage (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00-1.69 and OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.37-3.71, respectively). Among women with intact perineum, no association was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Semi-sitting and sitting birthing positions only lead to increased blood loss among women with perineal damage.

Care practice #5: spontaneous pushing in upright or gravity-neutral positions

This updated edition of Care Practice Paper #5 presents the evidence for the benefits of spontaneous pushing in upright or gravity-neutral positions during labor. Various pushing positions and techniques are described, and the advantages and disadvantages are reviewed. Women are encouraged to push when and how their bodies tell them to and to choose the positions for birth that are the most comfortable.

Anal sphincter lacerations and upright delivery postures—a risk analysis from a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate obstetric sphincter lacerations after a kneeling or sitting position at second stage of labor in a multivariate risk analysis model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-one primiparous women with normal pregnancies and spontaneous labor were randomized, 138 to a kneeling position and 133 to a sitting position. Medical data were retrieved from delivery charts and partograms. Risk factors were tested in a multivariate logistic regression model in a stepwise manner.

RESULTS

The trial was completed by 106 subjects in the kneeling group and 112 subjects in the sitting group. There were no significant differences with regard to duration of second stage of labor or pre-trial maternal characteristics between the two groups. Obstetrical sphincter tears did not differ significantly between the two groups but an intact perineum was more common in the kneeling group (p<0.03) and episiotomy (mediolateral) was more common in the sitting group (p<0.05). Three grade IV sphincter lacerations occurred in the sitting group compared to none in the kneeling group (NS). Multivariate risk analysis indicated that prolonged duration of second stage of labor and episiotomy were associated with an increased risk of third- or fourth-degree sphincter tears (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). Delivery posture, maternal age, fetal weight, use of oxytocin, and use of epidural analgesia did not increase the risk of obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations in the two upright postures.

CONCLUSION

Obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations did not differ significantly between a kneeling or sitting upright delivery posture. Episiotomy was more common after a sitting delivery posture, which may be associated with an increased risk of anal sphincter lacerations. Upright delivery postures may be encouraged in healthy women with normal, full-term pregnancy.

Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma

BACKGROUND

Perineal trauma following vaginal birth can be associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity. Antenatal perineal massage has been proposed as one method of decreasing the incidence of perineal trauma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of antenatal perineal massage on the incidence of perineal trauma at birth and subsequent morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (30 January 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005), PubMed (1966 to January 2005), EMBASE (1980 to January 2005) and reference lists of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating any described method of antenatal perineal massage undertaken for at least the last four weeks of pregnancy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both review authors independently applied the selection criteria, extracted data from the included studies and assessed study quality. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials (2434 women) comparing digital perineal massage with control were included. All were of good quality. Antenatal perineal massage was associated with an overall reduction in the incidence of trauma requiring suturing (three trials, 2417 women, relative risk (RR) 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 0.96), number needed to treat (NNT) 16 (10 to 39)). This reduction was statistically significant for women without previous vaginal birth only (three trials, 1925 women, RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.96), NNT 14 (9 to 35)). Women who practised perineal massage were less likely to have an episiotomy (three trials, 2417 women, RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.97), NNT 23 (13 to 111)). Again this reduction was statistically significant for women without previous vaginal birth only (three trials, 1925 women, RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.97), NNT 20 (11 to 110)). No differences were seen in the incidence of 1st or 2nd degree perineal tears or 3rd/4th degree perineal trauma. Only women who have previously birthed vaginally reported a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of pain at three months postpartum (one trial, 376 women, RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.91) NNT 13 (7 to 60)). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of instrumental deliveries, sexual satisfaction, or incontinence of urine, faeces or flatus for any women who practised perineal massage compared with those who did not massage.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antenatal perineal massage reduces the likelihood of perineal trauma (mainly episiotomies) and the reporting of ongoing perineal pain and is generally well accepted by women. As such, women should be made aware of the likely benefit of perineal massage and provided with information on how to massage.

Maternal position at midwife-attended birth and perineal trauma: is there an association?

BACKGROUND

Most women will sustain some degree of trauma to the genital tract after vaginal birth. This study aimed to examine the association between maternal position at birth and perineal outcome in women who had a midwife-attended, spontaneous vaginal birth and an uncomplicated pregnancy at term.

METHODS

Data from 3,756 births in a major public tertiary teaching hospital were eligible for analysis. The need for sutures in perineal trauma was evaluated and compared for each major factor studied (maternal age, first vaginal delivery, induction of labor, not occipitoanterior, use of regional anesthesia, deflexed head and newborn birthweight >3,500 g). Birth positions were compared against each other. Subgroup analysis determined whether birth positions mattered more or less in each of the major factors studied. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables.

RESULTS

Most women (65.9%) gave birth in the semi-recumbent position. Of the 1,679 women (44.5%) who required perineal suturing, semi-recumbent position was associated with the need for perineal sutures, whereas all-fours was associated with reduced need for sutures; these associations were more marked in first vaginal births and newborn birth weight over 3,500 g. When regional anesthesia was used, semi-recumbent position was associated with a need for suturing, and lateral position associated with a reduced need for suturing. The four major factors significantly related to perineal trauma included first vaginal birth, use of regional anesthesia, deflexed head, and newborn weight more than 3,500 g.

CONCLUSIONS

Women should be given the choice to give birth in whatever position they find comfortable. Maternity practitioners have a responsibility to inform women of the likelihood of perineal trauma in the preferred birth position. Ongoing audit of all clinicians attending births is encouraged to further determine effects of maternal birth position and perineal trauma, to investigate women's perception of comfortable positioning at birth, and to measure changes to midwifery practice resulting from this study.

Is it possible to predict or prevent third degree tears?

OBJECTIVES

This paper reviews the causes anal sphincter injury during vaginal delivery. It emphasises that they are not usually the result of poor obstetric care. The role of the colorectal surgeon in their management is discussed.

METHODS

Medline was searched using the key words third degree tears, pregnancy, risk factors, prevention and recurrence risk. A hand search of journals and located articles was made. Two hundred and twenty three papers were identified, 84 are referenced.

RESULTS

The reported incidence of anal sphincter tears is usually between 0.5% and 2.5% of vaginal deliveries. Maternal factors such as parity and age and obstetric factors such as mode of presentation, the use of forceps and the size of the baby all influence the incidence of sphincter tears. Predicting tears in individual women is inaccurate and midwifery practices can do little to prevent them. Reducing pelvic floor morbidity by increasing the caesarean section rate would require that a large number of caesarean sections be done to prevent a small number of tears. The recognition of perineal trauma is improved by training. Accurate apposition of the sphincters with antibiotic cover and post-operative laxatives are the important technical aspects of the repair. Colorectal follow up helps to identify those women with symptoms and allows advice about the advisability of subsequent vaginal deliveries. A previous third degree tears increases the risk of a subsequent one, although the overall risk remains low. A second vaginal delivery after a third degree tear that has resulted in a functional deficit predisposes to worsening function. When there is no residual anatomical defect and no functional loss, there is no evidence of increased risk of incontinence following another vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal delivery will continue to be the main method of delivery and will continue to generate a low incidence of pelvic floor morbidity. The management of injury to the anal sphincter is facilitated by close co-operation between obstetricians and colorectal surgeons.

Hip-flexed postures do not affect local anaesthetic spread following induction of epidural analgesia for labour

Hip-flexed postures enlarging the pelvic diameter are used to improve the obstetric course of labour. Although most investigations show that lateral and sitting positions do not affect the spread of epidural analgesia, the effect of recently introduced hip-flexed postures has yet to be confirmed. This prospective randomised study included 93 parturients. Ropivacaine 0.1% 12 mL plus sufentanil 0.5 micrograms/mL was administered epidurally over a period of 6 min in one of four postures: sitting, right hip-flexed left lateral position, left hip-flexed right lateral position and supine 30 degrees lateral tilt as a control group. Left and right cephalad and sacral epidural spread were measured every 2 min over a period of 30 min. Pain relief, motor blockade and maternal and fetal side effects were noted. The total epidural spread was 15+/-0.3 dermatomes and the upper level of thermo-algesic blockade T7-T8 (range T3 to T10) in all groups. There were no differences between groups in left or right total spread or upper level of epidural blockade, time to maximal block or pain relief. There was no motor block nor any maternal or fetal side effects. The power of the study (1 - beta) was 93%. We conclude that, for the three hip-flexed postures tested, position does not influence local anaesthetic spread or symmetry of thermo-algesic blockade after induction of obstetric epidural analgesia.

Supine position compared to other positions during the second stage of labor: a meta-analytic review

The routine use of the supine position during the second stage of labor can be considered to be an intervention in the natural course of labor. This study aimed to establish whether the continuation of this intervention is justified. Nine randomized controlled trials and one cohort study were included. A meta-analysis indicated a higher rate of instrumental deliveries and episiotomies in the supine position. A lower estimated blood loss and lower rate of postpartum hemorrhage were found in the supine position, however it is not clear whether this is a real or only an observed difference. Heterogenous, non-pooled data showed that women experienced more severe pain in the supine position and had a preference for other birthing positions. Many methodological problems were identified in the studies and the appropriateness of a randomized controlled trial to study this subject is called into question. A cohort study is recommended as a more appropriate methodology, supplemented by a qualitative method to study women's experiences. Objective laboratory measurements are advised to examine the difference in blood loss. In conclusion, the results do not justify the continuation of the routine use of the supine position during the second stage of labor.