Effectiveness of omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (OAC) therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in a Japanese population

Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy is controversial, with recommendations ranging from 7 to 14 days. Several systematic reviews have attempted to address this issue but have given conflicting results and limited their analysis to proton pump inhibitor (PPI), two antibiotics (PPI triple) therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the optimal duration of multiple H. pylori eradication regimens.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the relative effectiveness of different durations (7, 10 or 14 days) of a variety of regimens for eradicating H. pylori. The primary outcome was H. pylori persistence. The secondary outcome was adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched up to December 2011 to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also searched the proceedings of six conferences from 1995 to 2011, dissertations and theses, and grey literature. There were no language restrictions applied to any search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only parallel group RCTs assessing the efficacy of one to two weeks duration of first line H. pylori eradication regimens in adults were eligible. Within each regimen, the same combinations of drugs at the same dose were compared over different durations. Studies with at least two arms comparing 7, 10, or 14 days were eligible. Enrolled participants needed to be diagnosed with at least one positive test for H. pylori on the basis of a rapid urease test (RUT), histology, culture, urea breath test (UBT), or a stool antigen test (HpSA) before treatment. Eligible trials needed to confirm eradication of H. pylori as their primary outcome at least 28 days after completion of eradication treatment. Trials using only serology or a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine H. pylori infection or eradication were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study eligibility and data extraction were performed by two independent review authors. Data analyses were performed within each type of intervention, for both primary and secondary outcomes. The relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT)/number needed to harm (NNTH) according to duration of therapy were calculated using the outcomes of H. pylori persistence and adverse events. A random-effects model was used. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were planned a priori.

MAIN RESULTS

In total, 75 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight types of regimens were reported with at least two comparative eligible durations. They included: PPI + two antibiotics triple therapy (n = 59), PPI bismuth-based quadruple therapy (n = 6), PPI + three antibiotics quadruple therapy (n = 1), PPI dual therapy (n = 2), histamine H2-receptor antagonist (H₂RA) bismuth quadruple therapy (n = 3), H₂RA bismuth-based triple therapy (n = 2), H₂RA + two antibiotics triple therapy (n = 3), and bismuth + two antibiotics triple therapy (n = 2). Some studies provided data for more than one regimen or more than two durations.For the PPI triple therapy, 59 studies with five regimens were reported: PPI + clarithromycin + amoxicillin (PCA); PPI + clarithromycin + a nitroimidazole (PCN); PPI + amoxicillin + nitroimidazole (PAN); PPI + amoxicillin + a quinolone (PAQ); and PPI + amoxicillin + a nitrofuran (PANi). Regardless of type and dose of antibiotics, increased duration of PPI triple therapy from 7 to 14 days significantly increased the H. pylori eradication rate (45 studies, 72.9% versus 81.9%), the RR for H. pylori persistence was 0.66 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.74), NNT was 11 (95% CI 9 to 14). Significant effects were seen in the subgroup of PCA (34 studies, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.75; NNT 12, 95% CI 9 to 16); PAN (10 studies, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.86; NNT = 11, 95% CI 8 to 25); and in PAQ (2 studies, RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.83; NNT 3, 95% CI 2 to 10); but not in PCN triple therapy (4 studies, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.07). Significantly increased eradication rates were also seen for PPI triple therapy with 10 versus 7 days (24 studies, 79.9% versus 75.7%; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89; NNT 21, 95% CI 15 to 38) and 14 versus 10 days (12 studies, 84.4% versus 78.5%; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.90; NNT 17, 95% CI 11 to 46); especially in the subgroup of PAC for 10 versus 7 days (17 studies, RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.91) and for 14 versus 10 days (10 studies, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91). A trend towards increased H. pylori eradication rates was seen with increased duration of PCN for 10 versus 7 days, and of PAN for 10 versus 7 days and 14 versus 10 days, though this was not statistical significant. The proportion of patients with adverse events, defined by authors, was marginally significantly increased only between 7 days and 14 days (15.5% versus 19.4%; RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.37; NNTH 31, 95% CI 18 to 104) but not for other duration comparisons. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events was not significantly different between treatment durations.Only limited data were reported for different durations of regimens other than PPI triple therapy. No significant difference of the eradication rate was seen for all regimens according to different durations except for H₂RA bismuth quadruple therapy, where a significantly higher eradication rate was seen for 14 days versus 7 days, however only one study reported outcome data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the duration of PPI-based triple therapy increases H. pylori eradication rates. For PCA, prolonging treatment duration from 7 to 10 or from 10 to 14 days is associated with a significantly higher eradication rate. The optimal duration of therapy for PCA and PAN is at least 14 days. More data are needed to confirm if there is any benefit of increasing the duration of therapy for PCN therapy. Information is limited for regimens other than PPI triple therapy; more studies are needed to draw meaningful conclusions for optimal duration of other H. pylori eradication regimens.

Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2009 revised edition

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, the profile of Helicobacter pylori infection has changed in Japan. In particular, the relationship between H. pylori and gastric cancer has been demonstrated more clearly. Accordingly, the committee of the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research has revised the guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four meetings of guidelines preparation committee were held from July 2007 to December 2008. In the new guidelines, recommendations for treatment have been classified into five grades according to the Minds Recommendation Grades, while the level of evidence has been classified into six grades. The Japanese national health insurance system was not taken into consideration when preparing these guidelines.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy achieved a Grade A recommendation, being useful for the treatment of gastric or duodenal ulcer, for the treatment and prevention of H. pylori-associated diseases such as gastric cancer, and for inhibiting the spread of H. pylori infection. Levels of evidence were determined for each disease associated with H. pylori infection. For the diagnosis of H. pylori infection, measurement of H. pylori antigen in the feces was added to the tests not requiring biopsy. One week of proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy (including amoxicillin and metronidazole) was recommended as second-line therapy after failure of first-line eradication therapy.

CONCLUSION

The revised Japanese guidelines for H. pylori are based on scientific evidence and avoid the administrative restraints that applied to earlier versions.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are a causative agent of digestive disease. Although a proton pump inhibitor combined with amoxicillin-clarithromycin is the accepted drug treatment for H. pylori eradication in Japan, there is no consensus treatment for hemodialysis patients.

STUDY

Seventy-seven hemodialysis patients underwent upper digestive tract endoscopy. Biopsy specimens were taken, and histological findings, culture, and rapid urease tests were performed to confirm the presence of H. pylori. H. pylori-positive patients were then administered at random either a seven-day lansoprazole (60 mg a day)-amoxicillin (750 mg a day)-clarithromycin (400 mg a day) (LAC) regimen or a seven-day lansoprazole (60 mg a day)-clarithromycin (400 mg a day) (LC) regimen. The success of H. pylori eradication was determined from histological findings, culture, and rapid urease tests.

RESULTS

In 13 of 77 patients (13.6%), ulcers and/or ulcer scars were seen by endoscopy. Thirty-one patients (40.3%) were positive for H. pylori, and 20 patients among them were randomized to one of two regimens: one is seven-day LAC regimen (eleven patients) and the other is seven-day LC regimen (nine patients). Eradication was successful in nine of the eleven patients (72.7%) receiving the LAC regimen, but in only three of the nine patients (33.3%) who underwent the LC regimen. No serious adverse effects were observed with either regimen, and 95% of the patients reported complete compliance.

CONCLUSION

A seven-day low dose LAC regimen is safe and effective and recommended for treatment of H. pylori infection in hemodialysis patients.

Omeprazole-based triple therapy with low-versus high-dose of clarithromycin plus amoxicillin for H pylori eradication in Iranian population

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of H pylori eradication in an omeprazole-based triple therapy with high- and low-dose of clarithromycin and amoxicillin.

METHODS: One hundred and sixty H pylori positive patients were randomly assigned to two groups based on the following 2 wk investigation; (1) group A or low-dose regimen received omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d, clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d and amoxicillin 500 mg b.i.d; and (2) group B or high-dose regimen received omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d, clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d and amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d. During the study H pylori status was assessed by histology and rapid urease test prior and by ¹³C-urea breath test 6 wk after the therapy. Standard questionnaires were administered to determine the compliance to treatment and possible adverse events of therapy. Data were subject to χ² to compare the eradication rates in the two groups. The significant level of 95% (P≤ 0.05) was considered statistically different.

RESULTS: We found that the per-protocol eradication rate was 88% (68/77) in group A, and 89% (67/75) in group B. The intension-to-treat eradication rate was 85% (68/80) in group A and 83.75% (67/80) in group B. Overall adverse events were 26% in group A and 31% in group B. The adverse events were generally mild in nature and tolerated well in both groups with a compliance of 98% in group A vs 96% in group B.

CONCLUSION: The omeprazole-based low dose regimen of clarithromycin and amoxicillin for two weeks in H pylori eradication is as effective as high dose regimen in Iranian population.

One-year follow-up study of Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with 13C-urea breath test after 3-d and 7-d rabeprazole-based triple therapy

AIM: To investigate the long-term role of a 3-d rabeprazole-based triple therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori(H pylori)-infected active peptic ulcers.

METHODS: We prospectively studied 115 consecutive patients with H pylori-infected active peptic ulcers. H pylori infection was confirmed if any two of H pylori DNA, histology, and rapid urease test were positive. Patients were assigned to either an open-labeled 3-d course of oral amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or 7-d course of oral amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. Subsequently, all patients received oral rabeprazole 20 mg once daily until the 8^th wk. Three months after therapy, all patients were followed-up endoscopically for the peptic ulcer, H pylori DNA, histology, and rapid urease test. One year after therapy, H pylori infection was tested using the ¹³C-urea breath test.

RESULTS: The ulcer healing rates 3 mo after therapy were 81.0% vs 75.4% for the 3-d and 7-d groups [intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, P = 0.47] respectively, and 90.4% vs 89.6% for the 3-d and 7-d groups [per-protocol (PP) analysis, P = 0.89] respectively. The eradication rates 3 mo after therapy were 75.9% vs 73.7% for the 3-d and 7-d groups (ITT, P = 0.79) respectively, and 84.6% vs 87.5% for the 3-d and 7-d groups (PP, P = 0.68) respectively. One year after therapy, seventy-five patients returned to receive the ¹³C-urea breath test, and the eradication rates were 78.4% vs 81.6% in 3-d and 7-d groups (PP, P = 0.73) respectively.

CONCLUSION: Our study showed the eradication rates against H pylori infection 3 and 12 mo after triple therapy were not different between the 3-d and 7-d rabeprazole-based groups. Therefore, the 3-d rabeprazole-based triple therapy may be an alternative treatment for peptic ulcers with H pylori infection.

Appropriate cut-off value of 13C-urea breath test after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A cut-off value of 2.5 per thousand for the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) is recommended in Japanese persons, based on the result of a multicenter trial in patients prior to treatment for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The cut-off value of 2.5 per thousand has also been used in the assessment of eradication after treatment. The 6-8-week evaluation after treatment is recommended in the guidelines of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. The present study aimed to prospectively re-assess the cut-off value of the 13C-UBT at 6 weeks after treatment by using the results obtained at 6 months as an indication of true positive or true negative H. pylori infection status.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety patients who were positive for H. pylori underwent eradication treatment, and 177 patients of these patients who were assessed as having true positive or true negative H. pylori status at 6 months after treatment were evaluated in this study. Eradication was assessed by 13C-UBT, culture, and histology at 6 weeks and at 6 months after treatment, and the cut-off value of 13C-UBT at 6 weeks was re-assessed.

RESULTS

A cut-off value of 3.5 per thousand. at 6 weeks after treatment showed 97.2% diagnostic accuracy, while a cut-off value of 2.5 per thousand at 6 weeks showed 96.0% diagnostic accuracy. For a 3.5 per thousand cut-off value, only five patients were positive by 13C-UBT and were negative by culture and histology at 6 weeks, and three patients were true positive and two were false positive by the 13C-UBT at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

A cut-off value of 3.5 per thousand for the 13C-UBT is recommended at 6 weeks after eradication treatment in Japanese persons.

Is antimicrobial susceptibility testing necessary before second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection?

BACKGROUND

An antimicrobial susceptibility test for Helicobacter pylori before second-line treatment is often performed, although whether the test is truly necessary remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-two patients with H. pylori infection for whom first-line treatment with a 1-week proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin-clarithromycin (AC) regimen had failed were randomly assigned to two groups: those having or not having the susceptibility test before re-treatment. The cure rates for these two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Five of the 82 patients were excluded from the analysis. For 38 patients in the susceptibility-test group, we used what we considered the best regimen based on susceptibility testing: 10 patients [no resistance to clarithromycin (CAM)] received the lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen, 22 patients [19 CAM resistant, metronidazole (MNZ) susceptible; three failure of culture] were given the lansoprazole-amoxicillin-metronidazole (LAM) regimen, and six patients (both MNZ and CAM resistant) received dual therapy with omeprazole (OPZ) and amoxicillin (AMOX) in which the OPZ dose was determined by the CYP2C19 gene polymorphism. For 39 patients in the group with no susceptibility testing, LAM regimens were prescribed. The intention-to-treat (ITT)-based cure rates in the groups with and without susceptibility testing were 81.6% (95% confidence interval; 66-92%) and 92.4% (79-98%), respectively, and there was no significant difference between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

Susceptibility testing is not necessarily required before second-line therapy if the first-line treatment has been performed using proton pump inhibitor/AC regimens.

Indications for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and first-line therapy regimen in Japan: recommendation by the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research

In November 2000, eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection was approved under the present Japanese system of health insurance. Before the approval, the Japanese guideline of "Diagnosis and Treatment of H. pylori infection" was made by the guideline committee of the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research. Indications for H. pylori eradication therapy were classified into three groups: (A) recommended: gastric and duodenal ulcers; (B) recommended and managed at a specialized institution: low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; (C) current studies of the significance of the therapy: following endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer and gastric surgery for gastric cancers, hyperplastic gastric polyp, atrophic gastritis, and nonulcer dyspepsia. The first-line therapy regimen recommended is 1 week of triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor standard dose twice a day, amoxicillin 750 mg bid, and clarithromycin 200 or 400 mg bid. The reasons for preferring this regimen are to avoid extensive use of metronidazole, which is allowed for treatment of Trichomonas infection in Japan, and the low rate of emergence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori with amoxicillin co-therapy. For second-line therapy patients should be referred to specialists, who can examine the susceptibility of H. pylori isolates against antibiotics and have much experience with this therapy.

Single vs. double dose of a proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Triple therapies combining a double dose of proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics are the standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Some reports suggest that the use of half the dose of proton pump inhibitor is equally effective.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of a single vs. double dose of proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE search. The search strategy included the words (pylori) AND (triple, PPI, proton pump, omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, amoxycillin or metronidazole). Abstracts of the articles obtained and papers presented at the European Helicobacter pylori Study Group and American Gastroenterological Association congresses from 1996 to 2001 were examined. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized studies with at least two branches of triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor and two standard antibiotics; (ii) branches could differ only in terms of proton pump inhibitor dosage. A meta-analysis was conducted using conventional shareware (Review Manager 4.1).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2391 patients. Cure rates with double doses of proton pump inhibitor were higher in both the intention-to-treat analysis (83.9% vs. 77.7%; Peto odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.85; P < 0.01) and per protocol analysis (89% vs. 81%; Peto odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.47; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapies containing a single dose of proton pump inhibitor are less effective than those containing a standard double dose of proton pump inhibitor.

Helicobacter pylori therapy: first-line options and rescue regimen

In the present paper, several points regarding Helicobacter pylori treatment are reviewed, with the following conclusions: (1) all different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are equivalent when prescribed with antibiotics; (2) ranitidine bismuth citrate is equal to or, in some cases with antibiotic resistance, more effective than PPI; (3) previous treatment with PPI does not seem to affect the rate of eradication obtained with PPI plus two antibiotics; (4) just 1 week of PPI is enough to obtain duodenal ulcer healing, provided that H. pylori eradication is achieved; (5) the eradication rates seem to be higher in peptic ulcer than in nonulcer dyspepsia; (6) in areas where the prevalence of metronidazole resistance is high, triple therapy including a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is the best option, and (7) quadruple therapy (PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole) is the recommended second-line therapy after PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, although replacing the PPI and the bismuth compound by ranitidine bismuth citrate achieves also good results.

Guidelines in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan

BACKGROUND

In preparation of the approval of Helicobacter pylori therapy by the Japanese national health system, the board of directors of the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research decided to prepare guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection for physicians in routine medical practice.

METHODS

A guidelines preparation committee was formed and six meetings were held. Then, in December 1999, a consensus meeting was held in Kobe to obtain the opinions of general practitioners as well as experts from Europe, North America, and Asia.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is recommended in gastric or duodenal ulcer patients. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is recommended or gastric mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma but it should be done at specialist institutions. The significance of H. pylori eradication therapy is still under evaluation in patients with hyperplastic polyps, chronic atrophic gastritis, non-ulcer dyspepsia and in patients after endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric cancer and after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. When diagnosing H. pylori infection, at least one of the tests requiring endoscopic biopsy (e.g. rapid urease test, histology, or culture) and tests not requiring biopsy (e.g. measurement of H. pylori antibody or urea breath test) should be used. Multiple tests are recommended to increase the accuracy. The drugs of first choice currently covered by the national health insurance system in Japan are: lansoprazole (30 mg) 1 capsule twice daily, amoxicillin (250 mg) 3 capsules twice daily, and clarithromycin (200 mg) 1-2 tablets twice daily. These three drugs should be administered after breakfast and dinner for 1 week.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are intended for utilization in routine medical practice after the Japanese national health system begins to cover the management of H. pylori infection.

Strategy for retreatment of therapeutic failure of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin (A) and clarithromycin (C) or metronidazole (M) provides an eradication rate ranging from 80 to 90%. However, there have been few controlled studies with regard to the most effective regimen to re-treat patients after failure of the first-line therapy. Accordingly, we retrospectively reviewed our experiences and compared regimens with different combinations of antimicrobials to determine the optimal retreatment regimen.

METHODS

Out of 133 patients who had received second-line therapy after failure of first-line PPI/AC therapy, we selected, for review, patients who took the prescribed drugs for first-line therapy equal to, or more than 80%. As a result, data on 114 patients (83 males and 31 females; mean age 49.1 +/- 13.0 years; peptic ulcer n = 89; non-ulcer dyspepsia, n = 25) were eligible for evaluation. They had either repeated the PPI/AC regimen (n = 34; 5-14 days), or had been administered the PPI/AM regimen (n = 80; 10 days). The cure rates of the two regimens were compared.

RESULTS

The eradication rates for second-line therapy with the PPI/AC regimen versus the PPI/AM regimen were 52.9% (95% CI, 35-70) versus 81.3% (95% CI, 71-89) by intention-to-treat analysis (P < 0.01), and 62.1% (95% CI, 42-79) versus 91.4% (95% CI, 81-97) by per-protocol analysis (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The eradication rate for the PPI/AM retreatment regimen was significantly higher than for the repeated PPI/AC regimen, suggesting that a 10-day PPI/AM regimen can be recommended as a retreatment regimen for patients who had first-line eradication therapy by PPI/AC regimens.

Five-day proton pump inhibitor-based quadruple therapy regimen is more effective than 7-day triple therapy regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

There have been no reports that describe whether 5-day quadruple therapy (rabeprazole + amoxicillin + clarithromycin + metronidazole; RACM) could substitute for standard 7-day triple therapy as a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was designed as a randomized prospective single centre study. A total of 160 H. pylori-positive patients who had not received therapy were given either a 5-day RACM regimen (n=80, rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.d., clarithromycin 200 mg b.d. and metronidazole 250 mg b.d.) or a 7-day RAC regimen (n=80, rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 200 mg b.d.). Cure of the infection was assessed by a (13)C urea breath test 1 month after the completion of therapy.

RESULTS

The eradication rates of the 5-day RACM regimen and the 7-day RAC regimen were 93% (95% CI: 84--97%) and 81% (95% CI: 71--89%) by intention-to-treat analysis, 94% (95% CI: 86--98%) and 83% (95% CI: 73--91%) by all-patients-treated analysis analysis and 95% (95% CI: 87--98%; P < 0.05) and 82% (95% CI: 72--90%) by per protocol analysis, respectively. No serious adverse effect was observed, and 99% of the patients reported complete compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The cure rate of the 5-day RACM regimen was more effective than the 7-day RAC regimen, suggesting that this regimen could be preferable as a first-line therapy for H. pylori infection.

Addition of metronidazole to rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection provides an excellent cure rate with five-day therapy

BACKGROUND

New triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori based on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) provides a cure rate of approximately 90% with few adverse effects. Recently, a PPI-based quadruple therapy, which consists of a PPI plus bismuth-based triple therapy for 7 days, has been studied, and a sufficient eradication rate has been achieved. However, a shorter duration results in improved compliance. In this study, newly developed short-term, simple twice-daily quadruple therapy consisting of rabeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (RACM) was compared with a PPI-based triple-therapy regimen for eradication of H. pylori.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was designed as a randomized open, prospective single-center study. Of a total of 105 H. pylori-positive patients, 55 received the RACM regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; clarithromycin, 200 mg bid; and metronidazole, 250 mg bid), and 50 received the RAC regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; and clarithromycin, 200 mg bid). Cure of the infection was assessed by HpSA (H. pylori stool antigen immunoassay) 1 month after completion of therapy.

RESULTS

The rates of eradication of H. pylori by RACM versus RAC were 94.5% (95% CI, 85-99) versus 80.0% (95% CI, 66-90) by intention-to-treat analysis; 98.1% (95% CI, 90-100) versus 87.0% (95% CI, 74-95) by all-patients-treated analysis; and 98.1% (95% CI, 90-100) versus 86.7% (95% CI, 73-95) by per-protocol analysis. No major adverse effects were reported, and 98.0% of patients reported complete compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The simple twice-daily and short-term quadruple regimen for only 5 days provided an excellent eradication rate. Compliance with the regimen was high, and serious adverse effects were few. Therefore, the RACM regimen can be considered as safe and effective.

Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection does not improve symptoms in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients-a double-blind placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether the cure of H. pylori infection improves NUD symptoms.

AIM

To conduct a double-blind placebo-controlled single centre study with concealed allocation to investigate this question.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety NUD patients with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to either the treatment group (50 patients) or placebo group (40 patients). The treatment group received omeprazole, amoxycillin, clarithromycin and the placebo group received omeprazole and placebos for 7 days. Symptoms were assessed every week for up to 12 weeks after completion of medication by a symptom questionnaire. Alteration of histological parameters for gastritis was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The infection was cured in 41 out of 48 patients in the treatment group and none in the placebo group. There was no significant difference in the mean symptom scores at any assessment point up to 12 weeks between the treatment and placebo groups. Regarding histological parameters, activity and inflammation, not atrophy or intestinal metaplasia, were significantly improved in the treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Although histological parameters were significantly improved in the treatment group, there was no significant improvement in symptoms of NUD in the treatment group compared to placebo.

Functional dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infection: a recent consensus up to 1999

With accumulated evidence for a close relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and many gastric disorders, the idea that this infection may invoke dyspeptic symptoms appears realistic. If curative therapy for H. pylori can bring about relief of symptoms in these patients, we would possess a new therapeutic tool for functional dyspepsia. Although there have been many clinical trials on this issue, the benefits of H. pylori treatment have been controversial. However, several large-scale clinical studies have been very recently published, and suggest a specific direction on this clinical question. From these results, the current consensus is that H. pylori infection does not directly affect symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia. However, most clinical trials have been performed on Western populations, and there are few reports from Asian countries. Our recent study on the Japanese population also supported the consensus, that is, a negative relationship between H. pylori infection and symptoms in functional dyspepsia patients.

Impact of rabeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection-comparison with omeprazole and lansoprazole

BACKGROUND

A recent trend in curative therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is the so-called triple therapy, which consists of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two different antimicrobials. Various regimens employing this triple therapy have been reported. However, little is known about the effectiveness of rabeprazole, a recently developed proton pump inhibitor, when used in the triple therapy.

AIM

To validate its usefulness by comparing rabeprazole with omeprazole and lansoprazole, in combination with amoxycillin and clarithromycin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

221 H. pylori-positive patients with peptic ulcer disease were randomized to receive one of three different proton pump inhibitor/amoxycillin-clarithromycin (PPI/AC) regimens for 7 days. (i) OAC regimen (n = 75): omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin (AMOX) 500 mg t.d.s. and clarithromycin (CAM) 200 mg b.d.; (ii) LAC regimen (n = 74): lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. , AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d.; and (iii) RAC regimen (n = 72): rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d. Cure of the infection was determined by the 13C urea breath test 1 month after completion of the treatment.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat based cure rates for OAC, LAC and RAC regimens were 85% (95% CI, 75-92), 84% (95%, CI 73-91) and 88% (95% CI, 78-94), respectively, and per protocol based cure rates of these regimens were 88% (95% CI, 78-94), 91% (95%, CI 82-99) and 93% (95% CI, 84-98), respectively. Adverse effects in the entire study population, which included diarrhoea, glossitis or skin rash, were reported by 15% of the patients, and complete compliance was achieved in 95% of these patients.

CONCLUSION

1-week proton pump inhibitor/AC regimens for H. pylori infection were effective in the Japanese population. Rabeprazole can be considered as equivalent to omeprazole and lansoprazole in the PPI/AC triple therapy.

Efficacy of 1 week omeprazole or lansoprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in the Japanese population

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of curative therapy for Helicobacter pylori may vary according to the geographic region and patient population, thus the efficacy of each treatment regimen should be determined according to the specific patient population. However, there is no literature available concerning the efficacy of 1 week omeprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin (OAC) regimens for the cure of H. pylori infection in Japan.

METHODS

Helicobacter pylori-positive patients (224) with peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomized to receive one of three different omeprazole or lansoprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin (PPI/AC) regimens for 7 days: (1) OAC 20 regimen (n = 76), omeprazole (OPZ) 20 mg daily, amoxycillin (AMOX) 500 mg t.d.s. and clarithromycin (CAM) 200 mg b.d.; (2) LAC 30 regimen (n = 73), Lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg daily, AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d.; and (3) OPZ 40 regimen (n = 75), OPZ 20 b.d., AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d. Cure of the infection was determined by the [13C]-urea breath test, 1 month after completion of the treatment.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat based cure rates for OAC 20, LAC 30 and OAC 40 regimens were 75.0% (95% CI, 64-84%), 82.2% (95%, CI 72-90), and 80.0% (95% CI, 69-88), respectively and per-protocol based cure rates of these regimens were 79.2% (95% CI, 68-88%), 83.3% (95%, CI 73-91), and 83.1% (95% CI, 72-91%), respectively. Adverse effects, which included diarrhoea, glossitis or skin rash, were reported by 26.1% of the patients. However, these were mild and did not affect compliance.

CONCLUSION

One week PPI/AC regimens for H. pylori infection with smaller proton pump inhibitors and antimicrobial dosages compared to regimens used in Western countries were revealed to provide sufficient cure rate (more than 80% by ITT analysis) with mild adverse effects in the Japanese population.