Panel 1: methodological issues in pharmacoeconomic evaluations--clinical studies

Patient Characteristics, Safety, and Tolerability with Telaprevir Treatment for HCV in the Clinic: a Retrospective, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is a paucity of information regarding similarities and differences between patients from the phase 3 studies of telaprevir and those receiving telaprevir in clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review evaluated baseline characteristics and follow-up safety and tolerability data for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection treated with telaprevir and peginterferon alfa and ribavirin (PR) in clinical practice.

RESULTS

In total, 338 charts from patients at four academic and three community US treatment centers who received telaprevir and PR and had at least 12 weeks of follow-up data were included; 62% were from academic centers and 38% were from community centers. Of the 338 patients, 269 completed 12 weeks of telaprevir and PR; 32 discontinued due to adverse events. Mean age was 55 years; patients were predominantly white (79.3%) males (58.9%) with genotype 1a HCV infection (61.8%); 35.5% were reported to have cirrhosis at baseline; and 55.3% previously received PR. Hypertension and depression were the most common comorbidities. Patient characteristics outside the per-protocol minimum criteria used in the phase 3 studies of telaprevir were, e.g., hemoglobin, 9.2%; albumin, 5.3%; platelets, 11.5%; and neutrophil count, 5.6%. Adverse events occurred in 329/338 (97.3%) patients, with anemia, fatigue, nausea, and rash being the most common. Of 38 hospitalizations, 26 were deemed related to telaprevir and PR. Three patients died due to pneumonia, septic shock, and hepatorenal syndrome (n=1 each).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings complement those reported from rigorous, randomized controlled studies with telaprevir-based treatment and provide a general assessment of similarities and/or differences between patients from the phase 3 studies of telaprevir and those treated with telaprevir in clinical practice.

Assessing the quality of pharmacological treatments from administrative databases: the case of low-molecular-weight heparin after major orthopaedic surgery

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

'Real world data' are needed to assess the quality of pharmacological treatments in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether administrative databases can be used to assess the quality of prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin after major orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

The study was performed in a Belgian university hospital. Patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR), total knee replacement (TKR) or hip fracture surgery (HFS) were selected retrospectively from the hospital's 2002 and 2003 administrative databases. Readmissions during the same year as the procedure were also analysed. Three quality indicators were assessed: incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding and death; adherence to guidelines; and the costs of care.

RESULTS

Although 70% of data were collected from administrative databases, patients' records also had to be examined. During the period studied, VTE and major bleeding events were rare. Patients undergoing HFS were at greater risk of having a pulmonary embolism [Exact odds ratio (OR)=3.78; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.13-16.22; P=0.03] or of death from any cause (Exact OR=2.15; 95% CI=1.52-infinity; P<0.01) than patients undergoing THR or TKR. The hospital's prophylaxis protocol was not always followed. Half the patients received higher prophylaxis doses than recommended and 11% received lower doses but no impact on adverse events was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Results show that administrative databases contain enough information to measure the frequency of adverse events but complementary data on patient weight and on non-reimbursed drugs must be extracted from the patients' records to evaluate adherence to guidelines. Our findings stress the need for better integration of information systems.

Health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials: A review of study protocols at the Swedish Medical Products Agency

Objectives: Conducting economic evaluation in the context of clinical studies is common but has been the subject of extensive discussion due to its limitations. Various standard approaches and guidelines how such studies should be conducted have been proposed, but there is very limited information available about how common these studies are, what type of data that is collected, and how the quality of the protocols compares to the suggested standards. This study examines the prevalence and study design of health economic evaluations conducted alongside clinical trials in Sweden between 1995 and 2005.

Methods: A systematic assessment of clinical trial protocols that had arrived as applications to the Medical Products Agency between 1995 and 2005 was performed. Only protocols arriving during the first half of odd years within the time period were included.

Results: A total number of 680 protocols from 1995 to 2005 were examined, and among them, 14.4 percent included a health economic part. With the exception of year 2001, a trend toward an increased prevalence of economic evaluations next to clinical trials can be seen.

Conclusions: This study shows that economic evaluations alongside clinical trials are becoming more common, although most trials still lack a health economic part of the protocol. The information about the economic evaluation provided in the protocols is in many cases scarce, possibly due to the fact that there currently are no generally accepted and applied guidelines for economic evaluations in clinical trial protocols. Introducing requirements for detailed study plans also for the economic evaluation should improve the quality of economic evaluations alongside clinical trials.

Comparing cost-effectiveness analyses of anti-hypertensive drug therapy for decision making: mission impossible?

The purpose of this literature review was to compare the methodology used in the most recently published cost-effectiveness studies of antihypertensive treatments, and to identify methodological strengths and weaknesses that indicate the study's potential as a useful, decision-making tool. Based on the results of a search of several databases, spanning the years 1995 to 2000, 10 cost-effectiveness studies were identified. Although the majority of the studies reported their cost-effectiveness ratio in "costs per year of life gained," the studies also considered a varying range of components including additional end points. The methodology used to measure effectiveness, the cost variables included, and the characteristics of the patient population varied significantly across studies. Due to this lack of conformity, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to compare the results and draw conclusions about the relative cost-effectiveness of different types of antihypertensive drug therapies. This lack of uniform comparison across studies is likely to draw criticism from both the clinical and health-care decision-making communities. Future studies within this field should be thorough and useful for decision making. It is suggested that short-term outcomes should include systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements and long-term outcomes should include end points such as myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure and renal events. Other positive outcomes such as a more favorable side-effect profile, should be used to enhance the primary outcomes. Additionally, when subpopulations are considered in submodels, studies should address the issue of generalizability. Cost calculations should be transparent and related to the perspective of the study. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of a drug may be an acceptable method provided that data sources and assumptions are valid and transparent.

Efficacy and cost analysis of ibutilide

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of ibutilide in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFl) in a clinical setting and to compare the cost of first-line ibutilide with that of projected first-line electrical cardioversion (EC) from a hospital and third-party payer perspective.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients (n = 60) who received ibutilide from August 1996 to March 1998 were reviewed. Efficacy was defined as successful conversion to sinus rhythm within 60 minutes of the end of the infusion, and the maintenance of sinus rhythm until hospital discharge. Safety was evaluated by determining the incidence of torsade de pointes. Charges for EC and drug administration were obtained from the hospital database and converted to costs using cost/charge ratios. Hospital costs included drug, drug administration, cardiac intensive care laboratory fee, and the cost of managing torsade de pointes. The third-party payer calculation included all of the above plus the cardiologist and anesthesiologist fees.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of patients with AF or AFl were successfully converted with ibutilide; 67% of these remained in sinus rhythm at hospital discharge. Three patients experienced nonsustained torsade de pointes; all resolved with pharmacologic management. From a hospital perspective, the cost of first-line ibutilide was greater than the cost of first-line EC ($280 vs. $138 per patient). However, from a third-party payer perspective, the use of ibutilide saved approximately $324 per patient ($718 vs. $1042).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of ibutilide in the clinical setting are consistent with data reported in clinical trials. In contrast to a previous decision analysis, ibutilide was not associated with cost savings from a hospital perspective, but was from a payer perspective.