Supplemental perioperative oxygen and fluids to improve surgical wound outcomes: Translating evidence into practice

Role of oxygen in wound healing: a review of evidence

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence regarding the influence of oxygen as an intrinsic factor on cutaneous wound healing.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using Ovid and the Cochrane Database with the search terms: 'Wound healing', 'Oxygen', 'Collagen', 'Angiogenesis', 'Inflammation' and 'Surgical Site Infection'. Human and animal studies were included if relevant and examined for methodological quality.

RESULTS

There are no meta-analyses of the use of oxygen in wound healing and only two randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Studies vary in methodological quality. The majority of the data comes from animal models. In total 1568 studies on wound healing and oxygen were found.

CONCLUSION

Oxygen is vital throughout wound healing, especially in the inflammatory and proliferative phases. Research suggests that patient supplementation with oxygen could enhance bacterial killing and angiogenesis, reduce surgical site infection rates and increase wound tensile strength, facilitating improved healing.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Randomized clinical trial of the influence of local water-filtered infrared A irradiation on wound healing after abdominal surgery

Background

Postoperative local water-filtered infrared A (wIRA) irradiation improves tissue oxygen partial pressure, tissue perfusion and tissue temperature, which are important in wound healing.

Methods

The effect of wIRA irradiation on abdominal wound healing following elective gastrointestinal surgery was evaluated. Some 111 patients undergoing moderate to major abdominal surgery were randomized into one of two groups: wIRA and visible light irradiation (wIRA group) or visible light irradiation alone (control group). Uncovered wounds were irradiated twice a day for 20 min from days 2–10 after operation.

Results

Irradiation with wIRA improved postoperative wound healing in comparison to visible light irradiation alone. Main variables of interest were: wound healing assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) by the surgeon (median 88·6 versus 78·5 respectively; P < 0·001) or patient (median 85·8 versus 81·0; P = 0·040), postoperative pain (median decrease in VAS score during irradiation 13·4 versus 0; P < 0·001), subcutaneous oxygen tension after irradiation (median 41·6 versus 30·2 mmHg; P < 0·001) and subcutaneous temperature after irradiation (median 38·9 versus 36·4 °C; P < 0·001). The overall result, in terms of wound healing, pain and cosmesis, measured on a VAS by the surgeon (median 79·0 versus 46·8; P < 0·001) or patient (79·0 versus 50·2; P < 0·001) was better after wIRA irradiation.

Conclusion

Postoperative irradiation with wIRA can improve normal postoperative wound healing and may reduce costs in gastrointestinal surgery.