Importance of Blood Pressure and Volume Control in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Objectives

To review the factors that impact control of blood pressure and euvolemia in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Design

Review of the most recent publications on this subject; inclusion of some personal data on the relation between plasma volume and evolution of blood pressure in short-term and long-term peritoneal dialysis patients.

Setting

Peritoneal dialysis program in a university hospital.

Results

The literature on circadian blood pressure and the role of the decreased compliance of the great vessels in uremia is reviewed. Analysis of the long-term evolution of plasma volume in peritoneal dialysis patients in correlation with the evolution of blood pressure indicates a positive correlation in 36 of 46 simultaneous determinations. The treatment of volume overload and hypertension in peritoneal dialysis includes the prescription of loop diuretics, preservation of residual renal function, reduction of dietary salt intake, and prevention and treatment of peritoneal ultrafiltration failure.

Conclusions

A reduction in the great cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients as nowadays observed can only be expected when more attention is paid to better control of hypervolemia and hypertension in these patients.

Sodium Removal in Patients Undergoing CAPD and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

Objectives

To compare sodium removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients, and to identify the main factors that modify Na removal in clinical practice in these patients.

Design

Study in three steps. Cross-sectional observational (Study A), and longitudinal interventional (Studies B and C).

Patients and Methods

First (Study A) we carried out a cross-sectional survey of Na removal in 63 patients on CAPD and 78 patients on APD. Second (Study B), we studied Na removal in 32 patients before and after changing from CAPD to APD therapy. Finally (Study C), we analyzed the impact on Na removal of introducing icodextrin for the long dwell in 16 patients undergoing CAPD or APD.

Results

In Study A, total Na removal averaged 210 mmol/day for CAPD patients and 91 mmol/day for APD patients ( p < 0.001); Na removal was < 100 mmol/day in 7.1% of CAPD patients and 56.4% of APD patients. Multivariate analysis identified ultrafiltration [B = 125 mmol/day, 95% confidence interval (CI) 110, 140], CAPD therapy (B = 60 mmol/day, 95%CI 37, 83), and residual diuresis (B = 51 mmol/L, 95%CI 34, 69) as independent predictors of Na removal (adjusted r2 = 0.76). For APD patients, longer nocturnal dwell times and performing a supplementary diurnal exchange were also independently associated with higher Na removal rates. In Study B, Na removal decreased from 192 to 92 mmol/day (median) after the change to APD ( p = 0.02). In Study C, peritoneal Na removal increased from 98 to 148 mmol/day (median) ( p = 0.04) after introducing icodextrin.

Conclusions

Standard APD schedules are frequently associated with poor Na removal rates. For any degree of ultrafiltration, Na removal is better in CAPD than in APD. Icodextrin, supplementary diurnal exchanges, and longer nocturnal dwell times improve Na removal in APD. Sodium removal can be estimated from ultrafiltration in patients on CAPD, but must be specifically monitored in patients on APD.

Serum BNP Concentration and Left Ventricular Mass in CAPD and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Objective

To compare ultrafiltration under continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated PD (APD), disclosing potential effects on serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and echocardiographic findings.

Patients and Methods

This cross-sectional clinical study included 32 patients on CAPD and 30 patients on APD without clinical evidence of heart failure or hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease. Peritoneal equilibration tests, BNP levels, and echocardiographic measurements were performed in each subject. BNP measurements were also performed in 24 healthy control subjects.

Results

Patients on APD had lower ultrafiltration and higher values of BNP and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) compared with patients on CAPD (respectively: 775 ± 160 vs 850 ± 265 mL, p = 0.01; 253.23 ± 81.64 vs 109.42 ± 25.63 pg/mL, p = 0.001; 185.12 ± 63.50 vs 129.30 ± 40.95 g/m2, p = 0.001). This occurred despite higher mean dialysate glucose concentrations and far more extensive use of icodextrin in the APD group.

Conclusion

Treatment with APD is associated with higher plasma BNP levels and LVMI compared to CAPD. This may be the result of chronic fluid retention caused by lower ultra-filtration in APD patients.

Sodium removal and peritoneal dialysis modalities: no differences with optimal prescription of icodextrin

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) has been considered as a more efficient modality for sodium removal than automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), due to the longer dwell times and the sodium sieving phenomenon. However, because studies regarding sodium removal in peritoneal dialysis (PD) report rather controversial results and carry various methodological flaws, it remains uncertain whether they offer enough significant information regarding PD prescription and therapy. The aim of the present observational cross-sectional study was to evaluate the impact of the optimal prescription of CAPD and APD, regarding solute clearances and daily ultrafiltrate, on daily sodium removal. Forty-six (46) patients aged 52.3 ± 14 years were studied. Twenty-six (26) patients were subjected to CAPD, and 20 patients were subjected to APD. Ten (10) patients per group were prescribed icodextrin for the long dwell to achieve optimal adequacy and ultrafiltration (UF) targets. CAPD patients removed a higher, albeit not statistically significant, daily amount of sodium (131.7 ± 98.2 mmol) compared with APD patients (79.4 ± 129.2 mmol). Their Kt/V urea was lower (1.48 ± 0.3 vs. 2.17 ± 0.33, P < 0.05), and there were no differences on daily UF (1119 ± 533 vs. 1005 ± 517 mL). In both groups, icodextrin use for the long dwell resulted in equal sodium removal with that of patients not prescribed icodextrin. Our results, derived from an unselected PD population, indicate that although classic CAPD may be more efficient for sodium removal than APD, the use of icodextrin as an adjuvant for higher daily UF not only increases solute clearance but also removes more sodium for both modalities. In addition, calculations of sodium removal in PD do not seem to benefit the everyday clinical practice, provided that PD patients can achieve the adequacy targets and present optimal daily UF without signs of volume overload.

Compared time profiles of ultrafiltration, sodium removal, and renal function in incident CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Fluid and sodium removal rates may not be equivalent in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). This may influence compared cardiovascular outcomes in both groups.

METHODS

The authors compared prospectively the time courses of ultrafiltration, sodium removal, and residual renal function (RRF) in a group of incident patients treated with CAPD (n = 53) or APD (n = 51) for at least 1 year (mean follow-up, 28.9 months; range, 13 to 62). The authors analyzed potential effects of these factors on blood pressure (BP) control and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Ultrafiltration and sodium removal rates were consistently lower in APD patients (mean differences, 236 mL/d; P = 0.012, and 36 mmol/d; P = 0.018, respectively, end of first year). Moreover, univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that APD therapy results in a moderate, but significantly faster decline of RRF than CAPD therapy. Analysis of clinical outcomes showed that CAPD (versus APD) therapy or higher ultrafiltration or sodium removal rates were associated with a better time course of systolic, but not diastolic, BP. We were unable to identify PD modality, ultrafiltration, or sodium removal rates as independent predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Ultrafiltration and sodium removal rates are consistently lower in incident APD patients than in their counterparts undergoing CAPD. Moreover, RRF declines faster during APD than during CAPD therapy, although this difference may be partially counteracted by a detrimental effect of ultrafiltration on RRF. Aside from a better control of systolic BP in CAPD patients, these differences do not portend significant cardiovascular consequences during the first years of PD therapy.