A rare case report of low-grade endometrial sarcoma: A surgical tale from Himalayas

INTRODUCTION

In the context of female genital tract malignancy, uterine sarcoma is considered the rarest form of the disease. Despite the inert nature of low-grade endometrial sarcoma, they must be meticulously diagnosed on time, with an exact grading of the severity and staging of the disease, which further guides the treatment modality and prognosis.

CASE SUMMARY

A married Asian female without any significant past medical and surgical history complained of abdominal distension and discomfort, which was progressive in nature, for which a radiological assessment was made that showed features suggestive of endometrial sarcoma. Total abdominal hysterectomy with sapingoopherectomy was done without any perioperative complications. Histology further confirmed the diagnosis. Post-operatively, the patient had an unremarkable hospital stay and was discharged home.

DISCUSSION

Endometrial stromal sarcoma is one of the rare malignant entities presenting usually in late adult females, but sometimes it can present at an earlier age as well. Abdominal masses in females, although usually overlooked as benign, can sometimes be associated with a malignant picture. Low-grade endometrial sarcomas have been seen to masquerade other minor benign cases, such as leiomyoma. Despite the rarity of such malignant conditions, diagnosis and management are rather straightforward, and post-operative patient prognosis has been found to be rewarding.

CONCLUSION

Among the uterine sarcoma cases, endometrial sarcoma comes under the malignant disease of the least occurrence. Compared to other malignant conditions, these patients present with minor symptoms like discomfort, which may go unchecked. The major factor that should be noted is the on-time diagnosis and appropriate choice of treatment modality. Overall, despite a minute prevalence and difficult diagnosis, the prognosis of the patient is rather good.

Reproductive and oncologic outcomes in young women with uterine sarcoma undergoing fertility-sparing treatment: a systematic review

Background

Uterine sarcomas (US) are rare cancer of possible occurrence even in women of childbearing age. To date, total hysterectomy is the standard treatment in the early stages. The possibilities of carrying out fertility-sparing treatments (FST) to save the fertility of women with unfulfilled reproductive desires are described in the literature, but to date, they can only be considered experimental.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of women with different histological types of US undergoing FST.

Design

Systematic review.

Data sources and methods

Electronic databases were searched for English-language studies describing FST for US until January 31, 2024.

Results

Forty-five papers which met the abovementioned inclusion criteria, were included in the qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis was not possible because of the heterogeneity of the data. A descriptive summary of the results according to the histotype of US was provided. Six hundred forty-one patients of childbearing age with US and undergoing FST. After treatment with FST, 89 (13.9%) disease recurrences and 107 (16.7%) pregnancies were recorded.

Conclusion

In selected cases of early-stage US, FST may be proposed. However, the patient must be informed of the real possibility of recurrence and potentially difficult achievement of pregnancy. Additional well-designed prospective studies and clinical trials are needed to address the knowledge gaps and enhance clinical decision-making in this population.

Trial registration

PROSPERO ID: CRD42024509356.

Fertility-Sparing Management May Be Considered in Young Women with Uterine Sarcoma

Uterine sarcomas occur very rarely in young women. Hysterectomy, which is a standard treatment, may not be acceptable for those patients, especially nulliparous women. Fertility-sparing management may be an alternative. The aim of the study was to assess fertility-sparing management in patients with uterine sarcoma. Eleven patients were eligible for the study. Histopathologic types of the tumor included: adenosarcoma (n = 3), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (n = 3), low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma (n = 1), leiomyosarcoma (n = 1), leiomyosarcoma myxoides (n = 1), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1), high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (n = 1). The mean age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 27.4 years (range: 17–35) and the average follow-up 61 months (range: 12–158). Six patients received adjuvant treatment: megestrol (n = 5) and chemotherapy (n = 1). Recurrence was diagnosed in five cases. Median time to recurrence was 35 months (range: 8–90). Three patients conceived spontaneously following treatment and gave at least one live birth. In total, five full-term pregnancies were recorded and five healthy children were born. Fertility-sparing management may be considered in some patients with uterine sarcoma; however, it may not be appropriate in high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Patients with adenosarcoma may have a low chance of childbearing.

Fertility-sparing management combined with photodynamic therapy for endometrial stromal sarcoma: a case report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Low-grade endometrial sarcoma (LGESS) has a favorable prognosis after standard surgical treatment. The conservative fertility-sparing treatments in young patients with LGESS have been reported; however, the role of conservative therapy is not well defined.

STUDY DESIGN/PATIENT AND METHODS

A 31-year-old nulliparous woman was diagnosed with LGESS after resection of a cervical polyp with resection margin positive for malignancy. She underwent fertility-sparing surgery including laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy, endocervical curettage, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) on the endometrium and uterine cervix. And she had received adjuvant therapy with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor.

RESULTS

She conceived by in vitro fertilization and delivered twins at 32+2 weeks gestation by Cesarean section 32 months after conservative treatment. She has no evidence of recurrence after 99 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Conservative management of LGESS may be attempted in selected patients who want to preserve fertility. Conservative surgery combined with PDT has shown effective results in long-term follow-up.

Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective study of 153 cases

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS).

METHODS

Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P<0.0001, =0.0041, and =0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P<0.0001, =0.0020, and =0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P=0.0137 and =0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P=0.1187 and =0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P=0.0810 and =0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR.

CONCLUSION

Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.

Fertility preservation in gynecologic cancer

SUBJECT

Management of patients with gynecologic cancer can now often be tailored to the extent of the disease and preservation of child-bearing ability and/or sexual function may be possible for certain women with early invasive disease.

METHOD

A better understanding of the tumor-biology, and the consideration of different clinicopathologic factors, that bear prognostic significance in therapeutic modalities, will allow more and more individualization of treatment.

DISCUSSION

Management of young women with early gynecologic cancer should therefore be individualized with the risk of conservative therapy balanced against the dangers and advantages of more radical therapy. Experts in gynecologic oncology and infertility together with an informed patient and her family should make treatment decisions.

OUTCOME

This article will review the conservative surgical management of early invasive cancers of the ovary, cervix and endometrium, in order to help preserve child-bearing capacity. In addition, management of gynecologic cancers diagnosed during pregnancy will also be discussed.