Prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: p53 expression correlates with higher incidence of mortality

We investigated the significance of prognostic markers-estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, MIB-1 and bcl-2 - in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. In 101 patients with primary cervical adenocarcinoma, treated from 1989 to 2000, we evaluated clinical parameters in relation to these prognostic markers. Mean age of patients was 45 years. Seventy eight percent of the patients were in FIGO stage I, 16% stage II, 7% stage III and IV. estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53 and bcl-2 immunoreactivity was scored as 0 (up to 5% positive cells), 1+ (5-25% of cells positive), 2+ (26-50% of cells positive), 3+ (51-75% of cells positive) or 4+ (>76% of cells positive). MIB-1 was scored in 10 categories: 0-10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, 81-90, 91-100. The overall survival rate was 67%. Survival was not influenced by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, MIB-1, or bcl-2 strongly positive staining. Only p53 showed significant influence on survival, even when adjusted for stage or tumor grade. In conclusion, it does not seems useful to determine estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, MIB-1 or bcl-2 in cervical adenocarcinomas as an indication of prognosis: survival is not influenced by presence or absence. However, if p53 staining is strongly positive survival is significantly worse than in tumors scored as negative or weak positive.

Tumor markers and molecular biological markers in gynecologic malignancies

Gynecologic oncology is a rapidly growing field due to constant advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular biology. This review serves as an overview of new studies promoting the use of tumor markers and molecular biological prognostic factors in malignancies affecting women. The majority of studies focus on either endometrial or ovarian carcinoma. Other gynecologic malignancies (cervical, vulvar, and vaginal carcinoma) have a much smaller representation in the world literature. Multiple new markers were examined over the last year. We conclude that although some markers show promise as potential new consensus prognostic indicators, more work is needed to confirm results and clarify any existing discrepancies.

MIB-1 in endometrial carcinoma: prognostic significance with 5-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

MIB-1, a monoclonal antibody to the Ki-67 antigen, has presumptively been shown to be predictive of recurrent disease in patients with endometrial cancer. In order to more conclusively establish whether MIB-1 staining can be used as a prognostic indicator of recurrent disease or survival, a larger group of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years was analyzed.

METHODS

The tumors from 147 consecutive patients receiving primary surgical therapy for endometrial carcinoma were evaluated with the MIB-1 monoclonal antibody. Proliferation index was quantified by image analysis. Patients were followed for a minimum of 60 months. In addition to MIB-1 staining, histologic type, stage, grade, depth of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and peritoneal cytology were evaluated as prognostic indicators.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 147 patients died during the study period. MIB-1 staining was not significantly elevated in advanced (stage II, III, and IV) as opposed to early (stage I) carcinomas (P = 0.38). In patients whose tumor MIB-1 staining was less than 33.0%, no deaths occurred. By multivariate analysis, only MIB-1 staining (P < 0.001), FIGO stage (P = 0.005), and LVI (P = 0.005) were shown to be independent prognostic indicators predictive of survival.

CONCLUSION

In this series of 147 consecutive patients with endometrial carcinoma, the monoclonal antibody MIB-1 was shown to be an independent prognostic indicator of 5-year survival. This follow-up further validates the previous work regarding the significance and potential usefulness of MIB-1 as a prognostic indicator.