Weekly and monthly regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the management of advanced ovarian cancer. A preliminary report on side effects

Phase Ib with expansion study of olaparib plus weekly (Metronomic) carboplatin and paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Our goals were to: establish the maximum-tolerated dose of olaparib tablets combined with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with relapsed high-grade serous ovarian cancer; evaluate dose-limiting toxicities; and evaluate efficacy at the maximum tolerated dose.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, investigator-initiated trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01650376), patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer who failed primary platinum and taxane therapy received oral olaparib tablets twice daily days 1-3 each week combined with fixed-dose metronomic carboplatin AUC2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks. A 3 × 3 design was used to determine the olaparib maximum tolerated dose. Combination therapy continued until disease progression, but patients with partial or complete response were transitioned to olaparib maintenance therapy. All patients were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose of olaparib tablets was 150 mg twice daily with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel. 54 women were enrolled, 14 in phase Ib and 40 in the expansion phase. The median number of prior therapeutic regimens was 3. Response included 13 complete remission (24%) and 16 partial remission (30%) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for an overall response rate of 54% (95% CI 40% to 67%). Of 47 patients who underwent BRCA testing, 23 were BRCA mutation (BRCAm) and 24 B RCA wild type (BRCAwt). Progression-free survival for BRCAm was 12.1 months versus 4.8 for BRCAwt (p=0.0001). Median overall survival for BRCAm was 24.1 months versus 10.4 months for BRCAwt (p=0.02). 42 patients (78%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicities with combination therapy; the most common were hematologic. There were no treatment related deaths. Among 14 patients who received maintenance therapy, 7 experienced grade 1-2 non-hematologic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Olaparib 150 mg tablet twice daily can be safely administered in combination with metronomic carboplatin and paclitaxel in pre-treated relapsed ovarian cancer with 24% complete remission. BRCAm patients had statistically significant longer progression-free survival and overall survival than BRCAwt.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01650376.

Efficacy of weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced ovarian cancer patients with poor performance status

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to reveal the efficacy of weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced ovarian cancer patients with poor performance status (PS).

METHODS

FIGO stage III/IV ovarian cancer or fallopian tube cancer patients who underwent interval debulking surgery (IDS) followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on NAC: weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin (W-TC) and 3 weeks of paclitaxel and carboplatin (TW-TC). Toxicity, efficacy of NAC, surgery outcome, and prognosis were assessed by comparing the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty patients treated with W-TC and 18 patients treated with TW-TC were analyzed. All of the W-TC patients were poor PS (PS ≥ 2), and all of the TW-TC patients were good PS (PS ≤ 1). The overall clinical response rates were 70% in W-TC and 83.4% in TW-TC. In the W-TC group, Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia and greater than grade 2 neuropathy were significantly reduced compared to TW-TC patients. A frequency of treatment delay greater than 7 and 14 days, G-CSF support, blood transfusion, and dose reduction or regimen change were also significantly reduced in the W-TC group. The rate of IDS, optimal debulking surgery, complications during operation, and blood transfusion were similar between the W-TC and TW-TC groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival were also similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that NAC with W-TC for poor PS patients with non-treated ovarian cancer reduced the toxicity of chemotherapy and had the same efficacy as TW-TC.

Influence of c-Src on hypoxic resistance to paclitaxel in human ovarian cancer cells and reversal of FV-429

SRC family kinase was documented to have vital roles in adjusting cancer cell malignant behaviors. To date, the role of c-Src, a member of SRC family kinase, in resistance to paclitaxel in human ovarian cancer cells under hypoxia has not been investigated. In the present study, we discovered that hypoxic environment suppressed paclitaxel-induced G2/M phase arrest and blockade of c-Src improved ovarian cancer cells’ sensitivity to paclitaxel. FV-429, a derivative of natural flavonoid wogonin, could suppress gene expression and activation of c-Src, followed by deteriorated Stat3 nuclear translocation and its binding to HIF-1α, resulting in paclitaxel resistance reversal through G2/M arrest potentiation. Our study demonstrated that c-Src contributed to hypoxic microenvironment-rendered paclitaxel resistance in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells by G2/M phase arrest deterioration, and through c-Src suppression, FV-429 was capable of reversing the resistance by blocking c-Src/Stat3/HIF-1α pathway.

Phase II trial of bevacizumab with dose-dense paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the tolerability and efficacy of bevacizumab with carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel as first-line adjuvant therapy for advanced stage ovarian cancer.

METHODS

After IRB approval, this single-institution, phase II study enrolled patients with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer after primary cytoreductive surgery to treatment with carboplatin (AUC 5), weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15mg/kg) every 3weeks for at least 6cycles. The primary endpoint was tolerability of at least 4cycles of therapy, with a target treatment success rate of >60%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. Plasma biomarkers were analyzed by the multiplex ELISA assays.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled with 30 evaluable patients receiving at least one cycle of combination treatment. Twenty-three patients (77%) were able to complete at least 4cycles of therapy per protocol, and the posterior probability that the treatment success rate is >60% is 0.77. Twenty-one patients (70%) were able to complete ≥6cycles of therapy. Median PFS was 22.4months for patients with optimal (R0) compared to 16.9months for optimal≤1cm (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.58-4.98, p=0.33), and 16.9months for suboptimal>1cm (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.05-13.34, p=0.04) disease. Increases in mean Flt-3L was significantly higher in responders versus non-responders (83.4 vs. 28pg/mL, p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant bevacizumab with dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with acceptable toxicity and a high likelihood of completing 4cycles of therapy. Dynamic changes in Flt-3L may represent a predictive marker to treatment response.

Comparison of cantharidin toxicity in breast cancer cells to two common chemotherapeutics

As part of a larger study synthesizing a more directed form of chemotherapy, we have begun to assess the efficacy of different potential toxins that could be delivered locally rather than systemically. In doing so, we hope to reduce the systemic side effects commonly observed, while maintaining a high level of toxicity and eliminating the need for metabolic alterations. In a search for this more efficient method for killing cancerous cells, we have begun studying cantharidin, a toxin used in traditional Chinese medicine, as a potential chemotherapeutic. Using an MTT cell viability assay, the toxicity of cantharidin was compared to both cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel in three different breast cancer cell lines: MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and SK-BR-3. Increasing the concentration of chemotherapy drugs did decrease cell viability in all cell lines when cantharidin and cyclophosphamide were applied; however differences for paclitaxel were cell-specific. Additionally, cantharidin exhibited the highest decrease in cell viability regardless of cell type, indicating it may be a much more potent and less specific chemotherapeutic. These results will help us move forward in developing a potentially more potent treatment for breast cancer that might eliminate the need for subtype-specific treatments.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, carboplatin, and biweekly bevacizumab therapy in women with clinical stage II or III HER2-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that adding bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with nab-P and carboplatin would increase the rates of pCR in BC patients and that early changes in tumor vascularity imaged by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) would predict pCR.

METHODS

Thirty-three women with clinical stage II or III HER2-negative BC received nab-P 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve = 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 administered every 28 days.

RESULTS

Six patients (18%) achieved pCR, all pCRs occurred in triple-negative BC (TNBC) (pCR = 50% for TNBC). At the end of cycle 2, the changes in relative angiogenic volume were significantly different between responders and nonresponders (P = .001). The major toxicity of this NCT was myelosuppression.

CONCLUSION

NCT with weekly nab-P, carboplatin, and biweekly bevacizumab resulted in a pCR rate that was neither superior to the historical data with anthracycline- or taxane-containing NCT nor to carboplatin and taxane combinations in patients with HER2-negative BC. In patients with TNBC, the observed pCR rate was 50%. The early changes in the relative angiogenic volume imaged by DCE-MRI could predict pCR.

Thinking twice before abandoning first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: report of two cases and literature review. Passing from tri-weekly to weekly regimens

We present two cases of advanced ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with standard tri-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. Therapy was converted to weekly regimens because of disease progression, resulting in disease response. Weekly regimens could overcome drug resistance and this strategy should be attempted before abandoning first-line chemotherapy in favor of palliation.

Rationally designed treatment for solid tumors with MAPK pathway activation: a phase I study of paclitaxel and bortezomib using an adaptive dose-finding approach

In the preclinical setting, phosphorylation and subsequent proteosomal degradation of the proapoptotic protein BIM confers resistance to paclitaxel in solid tumors with RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway activation. Concurrent administration of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enables paclitaxel-induced BIM accumulation, restoring cancer cell apoptosis in vitro and producing tumor regression in mice in vivo. A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel and bortezomib combinatorial treatment. Sixteen patients with refractory solid tumors commonly exhibiting mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation were treated weekly with paclitaxel and bortezomib. Starting doses were 40 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel and 0.7 mg/m(2) for bortezomib. A modified continual reassessment method adapted for 2-drug escalation was used for MTD determination with 3-patient cohorts treated at each dose level. MTD was reached at 60 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and 1.0 mg/m(2) bortezomib, the recommended phase II dose. Therapy was overall well tolerated. Most frequently observed toxicities included anemia (in 43.75% of patients, one grade 3 event), fatigue (in 43.75% of patients, one grade 3 event beyond cycle 1), and neuropathy (in 31.25% of patients, one grade 3 event after cycle 1). Of 15 evaluable patients, one non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patient with paclitaxel exposure at the adjuvant setting had a partial response and five patients had stable disease (SD); median disease stabilization was 143.5 days; three NSCLC patients had SD lasting 165 days or longer. Thus, rationally designed weekly treatment with paclitaxel and bortezomib in solid tumors with MAPK pathway activation, including previously taxane-treated malignancies, is a tolerable regimen with preliminary signals of antitumor activity worthy of further investigation.

Primary chemotherapy patterns for ovarian cancer treatment in Japan

AIMS

Evidence-based clinical practices can improve patient outcomes, especially in the area of chemotherapy. In Japan, it is not known how well physicians adhere to evidence-based chemotherapy guidelines. This study aimed to assess physician compliance with national guidelines for ovarian cancer primary chemotherapy in Japan.

METHODS

Using an administrative database, we analyzed 209 cases of surgical laparotomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy as the primary intervention for adnexal cancer. Cases were identified across seven teaching hospitals between 2003 and 2006.

RESULTS

Of the 136 patients receiving inpatient chemotherapy, 101 cases (74%) were treated with platinum-taxane therapy. In five hospitals, platinum-taxane therapy was used in more than 75% of patients, compared to 56% and 32% in the other two hospitals, respectively. The proportion of patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin concomitant therapy (TC therapy) was 67%, although significant variation was noted between hospitals (range 32% to 94%, P < 0.001). Of the 91 patients receiving TC therapy, 59 (65%) were given full-dose monthly regimens, while 32 cases (35%) were treated with divided doses weekly. Weekly TC therapy was more frequently provided in hospitals with a low volume of patients receiving TC therapy. Patients under the age of 65 receiving inpatient chemotherapy were more likely to receive full-dose regimens than patients 65 or older (68% vs 43%, P = 0.005). Publication of national treatment guidelines did not appear to substantially impact chemotherapy practice patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to standardized chemotherapy was comparable to rates in European countries, although rates among hospitals differed significantly. Elderly patients were more likely to receive divided-dose regimens.

Weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical and endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity profile of weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

Patients had measurable disease defined by clinical examination or radiographic studies. Each cycle of treatment consisted of carboplatin at an AUC of 2 and paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with advanced or recurrent cervical and endometrial cancers were included in this study. The overall response rate (ORR) was 39% (2 CR, 9 PR). Among the 15 cervical cancers the ORR was 20%, while the 13 endometrial cancers had a 62% ORR. Median time to progression and overall survival was 3.4 and 7.6 months for those with cervical cancer and 5.5 and 15.4 months for those with endometrial cancer. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was uncommon (7% grade 3 anemia, 21% grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 7% grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia).

CONCLUSION

A regimen of weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin has an acceptable toxicity profile that is easily managed by dose adjustment and the use of erythropoietic therapy. This regimen appears to have activity in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer which warrants further evaluation.

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4–6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50–80 mg/m2 cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m2 for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.

Historical control study of paclitaxel–carboplatin (TJ) versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy (CAP) for epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

As the first-line chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer, the paclitaxel-carboplatin (TJ) regimen has replaced the cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin or carboplatin (CAP) regimen in our institutes since 1998. Both regimens were retrospectively compared for effectiveness and safety to verify the adequacy of the TJ regimen.

METHODS

Women with epithelial ovarian cancer at FIGO stage Ic-IV were enrolled into the study and were assigned to either the CAP group (57 cases, from 1991 until 1998) or the TJ group (49 cases, from 1998 until 2002). The response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared in both groups. Adverse effects were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The TJ group received an average of 6.3 courses of paclitaxel at 170.6 mg/m2 and carboplatin with an AUC of 4.3, while the CAP group received 5.8 courses of cisplatin at 61.4 mg/m2. The response rates were 82.8% in the TJ group and 70.6% in the CAP group at stage III-IV. The median OS was 43.9 months in the TJ group and 44.3 months in the CAP group. There was no statistically significant difference in effectiveness between the two groups. Peripheral neuropathy, myalgia/arthralgia, and allergic reactions were found significantly more often in the TJ group, but every adverse effect occurring in the TJ group was clinically controllable. In contrast, renal dysfunction occurred more frequently in the CAP group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the TJ regimen is as effective as the CAP regimen in its antitumor effect for epithelial ovarian cancer, and has controllable adverse effects.

Evaluation of weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Although paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy (TC) is an established effective standard regimen for patients with ovarian cancer, both treatment delay for hematologic toxicity and discontinuation of treatment due to neurotoxicity have occasionally been reported. To achieve therapeutic density, we evaluated the usefulness of weekly low-dose TC therapy (WTC) in patients with platinum-sensitive (median PFI was 11.4 +/- 2.7 months) recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients were treated with paclitaxel at 60 mg/m(2) and carboplatin at AUC = 2 using 3 weekly courses with a 1-week break schedule. Eighteen patients had assessable tumors for response, and the other seven patients were evaluated by CA-125-based response. All of the patients were assessable for toxicity.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (OR) based on WHO criteria was 84.2% (95% CI; 0.65-0.98), including nine complete responses (CR); OR based on CA-125 was 85.7% (95% CI; 0.42-0.99), including 3 CR. The total response rate was 88.0% (95% C.I.; 0.68-0.97). The median progression-free survival of the patients was 13.5 months during the mean follow-up period of 21.9 +/- 9.2 months. No patients had grade 1 or higher thrombocytopenia, and although 44% of the patients developed neurotoxicity, all cases remained grade 1. Treatment delay of over 7 days due to toxicity was observed in only two patients (16.0%) and in six cycles (1.3%) in a total of 451 cycles.

CONCLUSION

WTC combination, as used in this study, produced a high response rate with acceptable toxicity, and the optimal combination in a weekly regimen remains to be determined.

Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel is safe, active, and well tolerated in recurrent ovarian cancer cases of Japanese women previously treated with cisplatin-containing multidrug chemotherapy

The safety and efficacy of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel administration in recurrent ovarian cancers after platinum-containing multidrug chemotherapy were tested. Japanese patients who achieved complete response with surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and who had a recurrence after at least 6 months were included in the case - control study. Twenty-seven cases received the weekly TJ (WTJ) regime (cohort 1: T = 80 mg/m(2), J = AUC 2, median course = 13, range = 3-26) and 41 received other regimens [cohort 2: CAP = 37, monthly TJ (MTJ) = 4]. Toxicity profile, response rate, therapeutic index (TI), and survival were analyzed. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy (grades 3 and 4) in cohorts 1 and 2 were 1.7% and 90%, 5.1% and 14.3%, and 0% and 4.8%, respectively. Response rates were 77.8% and . Thus, TI of the two cohorts was 3.9 and 1.9, respectively. The median survival of cohort 1 was 48.3 months (95% CI 11.5-85.0) whereas that of cohort 2 was 17.8 months (95% CI 5.3-30.3, P < 0.005). WTJ has better toxicity profile and TI than monthly platinum-based multidrug regimens for recurrent ovarian cancers in Japanese women. As second-line treatment of ovarian cancer should primarily provide high TI, WTJ regimen appears a better candidate, but its long-term survival benefit should be tested against MTJ.

Expanded Experience With an Intradermal Skin Test to Predict for the Presence or Absence of Carboplatin Hypersensitivity

Purpose: Carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity is increasingly recognized as a potentially serious toxicity when this agent is administered for more than six total cycles.

Patients and Methods: Our group has used a predictive skin test in women with gynecologic cancers who have previously received more than six cumulative cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Thirty minutes before all subsequent carboplatin courses, a 0.02-mL aliquot from the solution prepared for treatment is injected intradermally. A positive test is considered to be a ≥ 5-mm wheal, with a surrounding flare.

Results: From October 1998 through March 2003, 126 patients received a total of 717 carboplatin skin tests (median per patient, four tests; range, one to 54 tests). Of the 668 negative tests (93% of the total performed), 10 were associated with evidence of carboplatin hypersensitivity (1.5% false-negative rate; 95% CI, 0.6% to 2.4%), none of which were severe (eg, dyspnea, hypotension, cardiac/respiratory compromise). Of the 41 positive tests, the decision was made to not deliver the drug to 32 patients, although seven women ultimately underwent a future attempt at re-treatment with a platinum agent using a desensitization program. In seven episodes where patients received the carboplatin despite the finding of a positive test, six were associated with the development of symptoms of anaphylaxis (none severe).

Conclusion: A negative carboplatin skin test seems to predict with reasonable reliability for the absence of a severe hypersensitivity reaction with the subsequent drug infusion. The implications of a positive test remain less certain, but limited experience with continued treatment suggests this approach must be undertaken with considerable caution.

Mitomycin C, carboplatin and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil in advanced oesophago-gastric and pancreatic cancer: results of two phase II studies

Cisplatin is an active palliative chemotherapy agent in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer, but it is associated with significant non-haematological toxicity. Substitution of cisplatin by carboplatin in combination chemotherapy regimens may reduce these adverse effects. These two phase II studies evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of mitomycin C (MMC) 7 mg/m2 q 6 weekly, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 5 mg/ml/min q 3 weekly and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU) 300 mg/m2/day (McarboF) in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer. Between October 1998 and June 2000, 31 patients were enrolled in the studies, 23 patients in the oesophago-gastric study and eight patients in the pancreatic study. Although non-haematological toxicity was modest, both protocols were closed prematurely because of excessive haematological toxicity and frequent treatment delays. The overall incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 39 and 52%, respectively. The McarboF combination showed significant activity with an overall response rate of 52% in advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Palliative benefit was also evident with improvement in symptoms of pain and weight loss in over 79 and 50% of patients in the oesophago-gastric study and pancreatic study, respectively. Median overall survival times were 10.6 and 6.6 months for patients with oesophago-gastric and pancreatic cancer, respectively. The McarboF regimen showed promising activity in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer, with modest non-haematological side-effects. This combination merits further evaluation with modification of the dose and schedule of carboplatin and MMC in order to reduce the severity of haematological toxicity.

Hemorrhagic Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Treated with a Weekly Schedule of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel. A Case Report

Ovarian carcinomas are chemosensitive tumors. Chemotherapy plays a pivotal role also in advanced disease, and the response to chemotherapy appears to be predictive of prolonged survival. Only performance status seems to limit therapy administration and affect patient survival.

Here we report on a 66-year-old patient with a clinical status heavily compromised by peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with bloody effusion, which required increasingly frequent paracentesis and transfusions. The clinical conditions worsened under carboplatin monochemotherapy. A further attempt with carboplatin and paclitaxel in a weekly schedule resulted in a clinical response in terms of reduced need for paracentesis and blood support and improved performance status. This case confirms that treatment is the only chance to improve clinical status even in patients with very advanced ovarian cancer and an extensive tumor load. In our opinion, the modified schedule adopted in the case presented here may be worthwhile for future phase II studies in a selected patient population.

Weekly low-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Weekly paclitaxel alone has moderate activity in the salvage treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer and is associated with a favorable toxicity profile. Combination paclitaxel and carboplatin is a well-established first-line regimen for ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin in recurrent ovarian or peritoneal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent ovarian or peritoneal cancer previously treated with between one and four chemotherapeutic regimens were eligible. Patients had measurable or assessable disease defined by clinical exam, radiographic studies, or serum CA-125 greater than 75 U/ml. One cycle of treatment consisted of carboplatin at an area under the curve of 2 and paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle. Clinical responses were defined by established criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included in this intent-to-treat study. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2 (range 1 to 4). The overall response rate was 82.8% (16 complete clinical responses, 8 partial responses). Among 8 platinum-refractory patients, the response rate was 37.5%, while 21 platinum-sensitive patients had a 100% response rate. Median time to progression was 13.7 months among platinum-sensitive patients and 3.2 months among platinum-refractory patients. Overall median time to progression was 11.5 months and median-duration of response was 9.9 months. Hematologic toxicity was common (32% grade 3 neutropenia, no grade 4 neutropenia, 14.2% grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia) and managed by treatment delay, dose reduction of paclitaxel, or discontinuation of carboplatin.

CONCLUSION

Weekly low-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel has significant activity in both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity that is easily managed by dose adjustment.

Role of weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

Dose-dense weekly administration of paclitaxel has the potential advantage of allowing a larger percentage of cancer cells to enter the vulnerable phase of their cell cycle when cytotoxic paclitaxel concentrations are present. The lower doses and shorter infusion times used with weekly dosing should also minimize bone marrow suppression and other toxicities associated with standard paclitaxel 3-weekly administration. Clinical studies have confirmed that paclitaxel can be safely delivered on a weekly schedule as a 1-h infusion to patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Weekly administration of paclitaxel also appears to be better tolerated than 3-weekly administration. Single-agent weekly paclitaxel is associated with response rates of 20-65%. Combination therapy with weekly paclitaxel has mainly involved carboplatin and response rates with such regimens range from 60-88%. Triple-drug combination therapy has produced response rates of 42-67.5%. Such therapy has included weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin/cisplatin plus topotecan, and carboplatin plus doxorubicin. In an attempt to avoid problems with high corticosteroid doses, dexamethasone doses of 10 and 8 mg have been used successfully in premedication regimens for weekly paclitaxel in ovarian cancer.