Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen (DECAV) for uterine sarcomas

Phase II Study Evaluating PegLiposomal Doxorubicin and Carboplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Gynecologic Sarcomas and Mixed Epithelial-Mesenchymal Tumors A Phase II Protocol of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Study Group (AGO-GYN 7)

Background

Gynecologic sarcomas are rare diseases with still undefined optimal treatment. Platinum and anthracyclines were reported as active agents in gynecologic sarcoma and carcinosarcoma. So far, data regarding the combination of carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for this patient population are missing.

Methods

This prospective single-arm multicenter phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of carboplatin AUC 6 in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 q28 in 40 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent gynecologic sarcoma or carcinosarcoma.

Results

Twenty patients with carcinosarcoma and 20 patients with leiomyosarcoma or endometrial stromal sarcoma were included. The percentage of patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia was 50%, but we did not observe any febrile neutropenia. The rates of grade 1 and 2 palmo-plantar erythema were moderate with 25% and 10%, respectively. Response rate was 33.3%. The 12-month progression-free and overall survival times were 32.5% and 77.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

The combination of carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is feasible and has activity within the investigated study cohort.

Letrozole as second-line hormonal treatment for recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A case report and review of the literature

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is a rare malignancy. The tumor is reportedly responsive to hormonal therapy, most commonly with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), but the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors for recurrent LGESS remains unclear. The present study reports a case of stage IC LGESS presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding, and also provides a review of the literature. Following a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, MPA therapy was initiated; treatment was successful, but discontinued 19 months later due to disruptive side effects. A further 2 months later, the patient presented with recurrent disease and received chemotherapy. MPA treatment was restarted with a partial response. A second recurrence, 4 years later, presented with lung and para-aortic lymph node metastases. The patient responded to treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole. The patient has since exhibited stable disease and remained free of symptoms for 7 years. This case suggests that aromatase-inhibitor treatment may be effective for recurrent LGESS as a second-line treatment.

Multimodal treatment with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide for the treatment of advanced or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a unicentric experience

OBJECTIVE

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is a rare gynecologic malignancy characterized by a poor prognosis due to a high rate of local and metastatic recurrences. Chemotherapy with doxorubicin or ifosfamide or both is associated with a 10% to 30% objective response rate. We report a monocentric experience with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide (API) combination in the setting of multimodal treatment of advanced or metastatic ULMS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This monocentric retrospective study included patients with metastatic or locally advanced ULMS with a physiological age younger than 65 years treated in first line with a multimodal aggressive approach with API chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 d1, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 per day d1d2 plus mesna, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d3, plus G-CSF; every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles. Surgery, radiation therapy, or radiofrequency ablation therapy of metastatic sites was associated whenever possible.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients received API for metastatic or locally advanced ULMS. Median age was 51 years (40-64 years); 4 (11%) patients were treated for a locally advanced disease and 34 (89%) for metastatic disease. Sixteen patients responded (4 complete responses+12 partial responses) among 33 evaluable patients (objective response rate, 48%); 8 and 9 patients had, respectively, stable and progressive disease. Twelve patients had surgeries with 9 surgical complete responses and 3 surgical partial responses. Median progression-free and overall survival in the whole population were 9.8 and 27 months, respectively. Main grade 3-4 toxicities in 38 patients were neutropenia (74%), thrombocytopenia (60%), anemia (55%), fatigue (18%), and vomiting (13%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 37% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the toxicity observed, API is an effective treatment which compares favorably with other first-line therapies for patients with metastatic or advanced ULMS.

Current and future options in the management and treatment of uterine sarcoma

Uterine sarcomas are rare aggressive mesenchymal tumours with limited prognosis. They encompass various histological subtypes such leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated sarcomas with different surgical and medical strategies. Current evidence of surgery, adjuvant and palliative therapy is reported.

Randomized multicenter and stratified phase II study of gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic or relapsed leiomyosarcomas: a Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) French Sarcoma Group Study (TAXOGEM study)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with uterine and nonuterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had metastatic or unresectable LMS and had received one prior anthracycline-based regimen. A total of 90 patients received either single-agent gemcitabine (arm A; gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. for 100 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (arm B; gemcitabine, 900 mg/m(2) i.v. for 90 minutes on days 1 and 8, plus docetaxel, 100 mg/m(2) i.v. for 1 hour on day 8 of a 21-day cycle with lenograstim). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

RESULTS

The objective response rates were 19% and 24% in arm A (gemcitabine) and arm B (gemcitabine plus docetaxel), respectively, for patients with uterine LMS. For patients with nonuterine LMS, the objective response rates were 14% and 5% for arms A and B, respectively. The median progression-free survival times for arms A and B were 5.5 months and 4.7 months, respectively, for patients with uterine LMS. For patients with nonuterine LMS, the median progression-free survival times were 6.3 months and 3.8 months for arms A and B, respectively. One toxic death occurred in arm B.

CONCLUSIONS

Both single-agent gemcitabine and gemcitabine plus docetaxel were found to be effective second-line therapies for leiomyosarcomas, with a 3-month progression-free survival rate of 40% for LMS with both uterine and nonuterine sites of origin. Single-agent gemcitabine yielded results similar to those of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in this trial, but patients using single-agent gemcitabine experienced less toxicity.

Expression and amplification of HER-2/neu oncogene in uterine carcinosarcomas: a marker for potential molecularly targeted treatment?

Surgery is the treatment of choice for uterine carcinosarcomas; nevertheless, the poor effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy represents an insidious problem for patients with metastatic or unresectable disease, and indeed, new therapeutic approaches are clearly required to improve survival of uterine carcinosarcoma patients. The HER-2 oncogene, located on chromosome 17, encodes for a tyrosine kinase growth factor receptor. We analyzed HER-2/neu overexpression by immunohistochemistry in 28 uterine carcinosarcomas. HER-2/neu amplification with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was tested in positive cases. The expression of HER-2/neu was correlated with disease-free interval and survival (Kaplan-Meier estimates). We observed HER-2/neu overexpression in nine cases (32.1%) and HER-2/neu amplification in all the four HER-2/neu 3+ score positive cases tested by FISH. HER-2/neu expression was not correlated with clinical outcome. Patients with disease limited to the uterus (stages I-II) displayed a significantly better disease-free survival (P= 0.004) and actuarial survival (P= 0.01). Demonstration of HER-2/neu overexpression and amplification in uterine carcinosarcoma may represent the first rationale step for further investigations. Hence, the results of this analysis may support the challenge of a new therapeutic approach, which could test the role of anti-HER-2 (trastuzumab) in patients with advanced or metastatic uterine carcinosarcoma.

Harm or benefit of hormonal treatment in metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: single center experience with 10 cases and review of the literature

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare disease with probably less than 700 new cases in the US or EU per year. ESS usually expresses steroidal receptors and is regarded to be hormone-sensitive. A higher risk in women receiving estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) or tamoxifen has been suspected, and remissions following treatment with progestins have been reported in case studies. Aromatase inhibitors represent an interesting new treatment option. Due to the rarity of the tumor, only few case series and no prospective studies are published. We therefore conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the influence of hormonal treatment to ESS.

METHODS

Our institutional sarcoma data bank was screened for cases of ESS since 1999. All corresponding files and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Ten patients with low-grade ESS were identified. Diagnosis was established before or by hysterectomy in 6 patients, by local recurrence after previous hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease in 3 patients or by pulmonary metastases with no primary tumor found so far in 1 patient. 5/10 patients were on ERT and 3/10 on tamoxifen at the time of diagnosis of metastatic disease. Treatment strategies consisted of stopping ERT and tamoxifen, respectively, or initiation of the progestin MPA or letrozole. Three patients achieved stable disease after stopping ERT. 2/3 patients responded to MPA as first-line treatment (1 CR; 50+ months, 1 PR; 9 months). 4/5 patients responded to letrozole as first-line therapy (3 PR;3+, 9+ and 10+ months) or second-line treatment after MPA (1 PR; 37+ months). 9/10 patients are alive 33 to 255 months after hysterectomy. Survival since diagnosis of metastatic disease is 4 to 164 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a previous history of low-grade ESS should not be treated with estrogens or tamoxifen. If nevertheless present, withdrawal of ERT or tamoxifen is strongly advised, resulting in disease stabilization in some cases. MPA and letrozole, in particular, are highly effective and lead to sustained disease control in most cases.

Metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the sigmoid colon three years after hysterectomy

A 49-year-old woman, who had undergone hysterectomy for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) 3 years ago, presented with a 2-wk history of lower abdominal pain. Barium enema and sigmoidoscopy disclosed a polypoid submucosal tumor. Histopathologic features of biopsy specimens from the lesion were similar to those of the resected uterine ESS. Under the diagnosis of metastatic ESS of the sigmoid colon, sigmoidectomy was performed. Microscopic examination demonstrated dense proliferation of spindle cells with little nuclear atypia, which were sometimes arranged in whorled pattern around abundant arterioles. Mitotic count is below 1 in 10 high-power fields. Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells were strongly positive for vimentin, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor but negative for α-smooth muscle actin, S-100 protein and CD34. Thus, a final diagnosis of low-grade ESS metastasis to the sigmoid colon was made. Her postoperative course was uneventful and hormonal therapy with progestational agents is entertained.

Emerging treatments for soft tissue sarcoma of adults

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues. Patients can present with a localised tumour (primary or local recurrence) at different sites (e.g., extremity, abdomen) or metastatic disease, which may require different treatment strategies. Is the surgical resection of a localised sarcoma enough or is it better to give an additional treatment like adjuvant and/or preoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy? Which chemotherapy should be selected in the first or second line situation? Do new treatment options exist, such as targeted therapies? This review provides answers to some of these questions. To decide on consecutive treatment steps, it is important to know as many relevant factors as possible at first presentation. Therefore, the first part of this review discusses the specific characteristics and prognostic factors of importance for treatment planning. A short summary of current therapy strategies and existing standards is then given. The main body of the review summarises information on new and emerging clinical compounds for patients with soft tissue sarcoma of adults, including recent developments of targeted therapy.

COX-2, c-KIT and HER-2/neu expression in uterine carcinosarcomas: prognostic factors or potential markers for targeted therapies?

OBJECTIVES

Uterine carcinosarcomas are uncommon, highly aggressive neoplasms that frequently recur after surgical treatment and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Patients with recurrent disease respond poorly to salvage chemotherapy and irradiation. New therapeutic options are required for patients with metastatic disease. Clinical evidences showing the effect of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, STI571, in c-KIT-positive gastrointestinal tumors, the role of COX-inhibitors chemotherapy-associated in colorectal cancer patients and the successful therapeutic possibility of anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic breast carcinoma, have encouraged us to study the expression of c-KIT, COX-2 and HER-2/neu in uterine carcinosarcomas.

METHODS

We analyzed the expression of COX-2, c-KIT and HER-2/neu in 24 uterine carcinosarcomas and their correlation with clinical outcome. Disease-free interval and actuarial survival rates were the end points of the study.

RESULTS

High staining intensity for COX-2 was observed in 8 cases (33.3%). C-KIT was expressed in 4 cases (16.7%) and HER-2/neu in 7 cases (29.2%). Patients with COX-2-positive tumors had a significantly poorer disease-free interval and survival (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively). All patients with c-KIT-positive tumors had early stage disease. In spite of this, their survival was not significantly better than that of c-KIT-negative cases. HER-2/neu expression did not show any correlation with clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

c-KIT, COX-2, and HER-2/neu were expressed in different proportions of uterine carcinosarcomas. COX-2 expression was a strong indicator of unfavorable prognosis. These results warrant further study to evaluate the possible role of a new molecularly targeted cancer therapy with COX-2 inhibitors in patients with uterine carcinosarcomas. The role of c-KIT expression and consequently the hypothetical use of STI571 should be tested in a larger series.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin followed by radiotherapy in localized uterine sarcomas: results of a case-control study with radiotherapy alone

Uterine sarcoma is a poor prognosis disease, with a high risk of metastatic relapse. We conducted a study of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin followed by radiotherapy (n=18). The results were then compared in a matched case-controlled study to radiotherapy alone (n=16) or no therapy at all (n=2). Chemotherapy consisted in three cycles of adriamyein-platinum-ifosfamide (API) (doxorubicin 60 mg /m2 on day 1; cisplatin 100 mg /m2 on day 2; ifosfamide 5 g /m2 on day 1+mesna 5 g /m2 on day 1+granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; q 3 weeks). Drug doses were reduced (20% for ifosfamide and cisplatin) four times (four patients) due to hematologic toxicity. Compared to a case-control study of adjuvant radiotherapy alone, results were not decreased by the addition of a toxic chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant API chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy is a feasible protocol; a multicenter phase III study comparing radiotherapy alone versus API chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy just began in France.