Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome

Evaluation of Lymphocyte Transformation Test Results in Patients with Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions following the Use of Anticonvulsant Drugs

BACKGROUND/AIM

Administration of the anticonvulsant drugs phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and lamotrigine can be associated with severe hypersensitivity reactions. The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is a method to determine which drug has caused the hypersensitivity reaction. This study was done to evaluate the results of LTT in patients with delayed hypersensitivity reactions following the administration of anticonvulsants.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with hypersensitivity reactions, e.g. drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash and eosinophilia with systemic symptoms (DIHS/DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN), following the administration of anticonvulsant drugs, and 24 patients who had used anticonvulsant drugs but did not have hypersensitivity reactions (the control group) were included in this study. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated. The cells were stimulated with the drugs, phytohemagglutinin as a mitogen and Candida as an antigen (positive controls). Lymphocyte proliferation was measured using the BrdU proliferation assay kit (Roche, Germany). The stimulation index was calculated as the mean ratio of the OD of stimulated cells divided by the OD of unstimulated cells. The results in the case and control groups were compared.

RESULTS

Of 24 patients in the test group, 14 (58.3%) had positive LTT results and 10 (41.7%) had negative results. Among patients in the control group, 1 (4.2%) had a positive LTT result and 23 (95.8%) had negative results. Among the patients who had received carbamazepine and phenytoin, there was a significant difference between the results of LTT in the case and control groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.028, respectively). Although patients receiving lamotrigine and phenobarbital had more positive LTT results in the case group than in the control group, these differences were not statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of LTT were 58.4, 95.8, 93.3 and 69.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the significant difference in LTT results between the case and control groups in patients receiving carbamazepine and phenytoin, and not observing such a difference in patients receiving phenobarbital and lamotrigine, LTT results are more valuable for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions following the administration of carbamazepine and phenytoin. The LTT has good specificity but low sensitivity for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome associated myocarditis: a survival experience after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Myocarditis that develops because of the drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a life-threatening disease. We report a case of DRESS-associated myocarditis with cardiac failure that required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for cardiovascular support.

CASE SUMMARY

A 14-year-old boy experienced DRESS-associated myocarditis after anticonvulsive therapy with carbamazepine, clonazepam and phenytoin. The clinical signs included hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia and poor left ventricular (LV) performance. Laboratory investigations showed elevated levels of cardiac enzymes. Systemic corticosteroid pulse therapy for 3 days was administered for treating the DRESS syndrome. The patient required inotropic drugs including dopamine, dobutamine and milrinone because of refractory hypotension and poor LV function. He was placed on ECMO support, and intra-aortic balloon pumping was initiated because of poor response to inotropic drugs and stasis of blood flow in the ventricle on hospital day 17. Plasma exchanges for four separate times over 8 days were also performed during ECMO support on day 22. His condition stabilized 13 days after ECMO support was initiated. The patient was discharged on hospital day 50, and the seizure was controlled by the oral form clonazepam, phenobarbital, topiramate and levetiracetam. Three months later, an echocardiogram showed mild dilated cardiomyopathy.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms-associated fulminant myocarditis is a life-threatening disease. Traditionally, systemic corticosteroid administration, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin infusion and ventricular assist device implantation have been used for the treatment of this disease. To our knowledge, this is the first case of DRESS-associated fulminant myocarditis treated successfully with ECMO support. However, echocardiogram should be followed regularly because dilated cardiomyopathy may be the late sequela.

The DRESS syndrome: a literature review

The Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptom (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug-induced reaction. Diagnosing DRESS is challenging due to the diversity of cutaneous eruption and organs involved. We used the RegiSCAR scoring system that grades DRESS cases as "no," "possible," "probable," or "definite" to classify cases reported in the literature. We also analyzed the clinical course and treatments of the cases. A total of 44 drugs were associated with the 172 cases reported between January 1997 and May 2009 in PubMed and MEDLINE. The most frequently reported drug was carbamazepine, and the vast majority of cases were classified as "probable/definite" DRESS cases. Hypereosinophilia, liver involvement, fever, and lymphadenopathy were significantly associated with "probable/definite" DRESS cases, whereas skin rash was described in almost all of the cases, including "possible cases." Culprit drug withdrawal and corticosteroids constituted the mainstay of DRESS treatment. The outcome was death in 9 cases. However, no predictive factors for serious cases were found. This better knowledge of DRESS may contribute to improve the diagnosis and management of this syndrome in clinical practice.

Retrospective analysis of 32 pediatric patients with anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (ACHSS)

OBJECTIVE

To review 32 pediatric patients with anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome.

DESIGN

Retrospectively, data and photographs were collected on 32 patients who had been diagnosed with anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome.

SETTING

The sections of dermatology at Children's Memorial Hospital in Chicago, Illinois, and Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics in Kansas City, Missouri.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presentation, implicated medications, laboratory evaluations, complications, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

The mean age of all patients with anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (ACHSS) was 8.9 years. The mean duration of anticonvulsant therapy before onset of symptoms was 3 weeks. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital were the most commonly implicated medications. Lamotrigine, oxcarbamazepine, and primidone were implicated in some of our patients. Fever and rash were seen in all patients, while lymphadenopathy was found in 84.4% of patients. Hematologic abnormalities were seen in 93.8% and hepatic involvement was seen in 90.4% of cases, representing the two most commonly involved systems. Atypical lymphocytosis and eosinophilia was seen in 72% and 56% of patients, respectively. Renal and pulmonary involvement were each seen in 15.6% of cases. Systemic steroids were used in 59.4% of ACHSS patients; 16% of patients received intravenous immunoglobulin. No deaths were reported in our group of pediatric patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACHSS is a distinct clinical entity which may occur in pediatric patients treated with anticonvulsants, and may have potentially life-threatening consequences. Involvement of multiple organ systems, including the hematologic, hepatic, renal, and pulmonary systems was common. Treatment varied widely, but ranged from supportive care to systemic corticosteroids.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: report of 12 cases and literature review

BACKGROUND

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis is an acute pustular eruption occurring after infection and/or drug ingestion, with spontaneous cure after a single eruption.

AIM

To communicate a series of cases of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on cases of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, observed between 1993 and 2006 at the Dermatology Department, Hospital General de Occidente, Jalisco, Mexico.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included, with a predominance of male patients and a mean age of 28 years. The most common cause was drugs, detected in 83% of cases, and most of these were a result of anticonvulsants and antimicobials. The most frequent symptoms were itching, present in all cases, and fever, present in 92% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis is considered to be a distinct clinical and histopathologic entity. Because of its self-resolving character, early recognition can help to avoid unnecessary diagnostic studies and treatments.

Lamotrigine-associated rash: to rechallenge or not to rechallenge?

The major burden of illness in bipolar disorder (BD) is in the depressive pole. Lamotrigine has been shown to be useful in the long-term prophylaxis of depressive episodes in BD. Current guidelines recommend discontinuing lamotrigine in patients who develop rash. Our objective in this paper is to review literature to identify possible predictors of serious vs. benign rash that might help guide clinical decision-making and recommend titration strategy for re-introduction of lamotrigine, if indicated. We performed a search of the literature between 1966 and July 2008 to investigate the phenomenon of lamotrigine-induced rash and rechallenge procedures. The search identified six reports, and we were able to identify another case series from reviewing the bibliography of all of the above papers. We reviewed all the papers of lamotrigine rash rechallenge that resulted from the literature search. These papers describe 44 cases of lamotrigine rechallenge. Currently, there are 39 reported cases in the literature of successful lamotrigine rechallenge after a rash and five cases with rash recurrence. There are some characteristics of the rash that can help identify serious cases from benign ones. In addition, very slow titration of lamotrigine is crucial to the reduction of rash recurrence rate. Several cases that develop benign rash on lamotrigine can be rechallenged without adverse consequences. We believe that lamotrigine rechallenge in bipolar depression is an under-utilized option in our clinical armamentarium, and further studies are needed to guide us in this area.

Tendon sheath abscess and severe carbamazepine hypersensitivity

We report a 10-year-old girl with enthesitis and Staphylococcus aureus tendon sheath abscess as complications of severe carbamazepine hypersensitivity. Our patient had an adverse reaction to intravenous immunoglobulin and this, as well as the use of corticosteroids, may have contributed to her condition.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a component of the anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome: description of two cases

Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome is a rare syndrome caused by a specific, severe unusual reaction to antiepileptic agents; anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome develops 1 week to 3 months after the introduction of the drug and most frequently consists of a multisystemic and multiorgan involvement. Drug withdrawal usually leads to rapid improvement of symptoms. Up to now no oesophageal damage has been described. We present two cases of carbamazepine hypersensitivity syndrome with concomitant development of eosinophilic oesophagitis that resolved after drug withdrawal.

Cutaneous reactions to drugs in children

Cutaneous eruptions are a commonly reported adverse drug reaction. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions in the pediatric population have a significant impact on patients' current and future care options. A patient's recollection of having a "rash" when they took a medication as a child is a frequent reason for not prescribing a particular treatment. The quick detection and treatment of cutaneous adverse drug reactions, plus identification of the causative agent, are essential for preventing the progression of the reaction, preventing additional exposures, and ensuring the appropriate use of medications for both the current condition and others as the patient ages. The purpose of this review is to discuss a reasonable approach to recognition and initial management of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in children.

Probable Anticonvulsant Hypersensitivity Syndrome Due to Fosphenytoin in a Pediatric Patient with Streptococcus pneumoniae Meningitis

An 8-year-old previously healthy girl with Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis developed probable anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) within 5 days of starting fosphenytoin. She experienced fever, rash, periorbital edema, profound hepatotoxicity and coagulopathy. Her sudden and dramatic rise in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) to greater than 80 times the upper limit of normal in combination with an elevated INR were very concerning. Mortality from AHS has been correlated with the degree of hepatic involvement. Fosphenytoin was immediately discontinued and, within 48 hours, AST, ALT and INR began to decrease and were within normal limits by hospital day 23. Prompt recognition of probable AHS and immediate discontinuation of fosphenytoin resulted in an abrupt reversal of clinical signs and laboratory values associated with potential hepatic failure in a pediatric patient.

Increased adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials and anticonvulsants in patients with HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, signs, symptoms, and mechanisms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial medications among people with HIV.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE/PubMed (1980-November 2005) and National Library of Medicine Meeting Abstracts (1989-November 2005), as well as hand searches of journals and abstracts, were conducted to identify primary literature. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant reports.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles and abstracts, particularly of in vitro experiments and clinical studies, were compiled and reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ADRs, especially in HIV-infected patients, are a cause for concern. Sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial drugs are commonly used to prevent and treat complications of HIV, including seizures and opportunistic infections. Patients with HIV have a much greater rate of ADRs to these drug classes, including severe and life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. Several mechanisms of these ADRs have been postulated. Sulfamethoxazole and anticonvulsant hypersensitivity may involve the increased formation and decreased detoxification of reactive metabolites. The mechanisms for the marked increase in hypersensitivity ADRs to antimycobacterial drugs may be related to an altered immune profile in patients infected with both tuberculosis and HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs to antimicrobial and anticonvulsant therapy cause markedly increased morbidity and mortality in HIV-positive patients. Further research involving the interaction between HIV and the increased ADRs to these drugs is required.

Drug hypersensitivity to previously tolerated phenytoin by carbamazepine-induced DRESS syndrome

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome associated with anticonvulsant drugs is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease that occurs in response to arene oxide producing anticonvulsant such as phenytoin and carbamazepine. There have been many reports of cross reactivity among the anticonvulsants upon first exposure to the offending drugs. However, there has been few data describing the development of DRESS syndrome after switching medication from previously well-tolerated phenytoin to carbamazepine, and the induction of hypersensitivity to phenytoin by DRESS to carbamazepine. We experienced a case of a 40-yr-old man who had uncontrolled seizure that led to the change of medication from the long-term used phenytoin to carbamazepine. He developed DRESS syndrome after changing the drugs. We stopped carbamazepine and restored phenytoin for seizure control, but his clinical manifestations progressively worsened and he recovered only when both drugs were discontinued. Patch tests with several anticonvulsants showed positive reactions to both carbamazepine and phenytoin. Our case suggests that hypersensitivity to a previously tolerated anticonvulsant can be induced by DRESS to another anticonvulsant, and that the patch test may be a useful method for detecting cross-reactive drugs in anticonvulsant-associated DRESS syndrome.

Treatment of anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome with intravenous immunoglobulins and corticosteroids

Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome is a specific severe idiosyncratic reaction to the aromatic antiepileptic drugs. The most frequent presenting symptoms are fever and rash, lymphadenopathy owing to lymphoid hyperplasia, hepatitis, and interstitial nephritis. Severe skin reactions (Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis) have also been reported. Early detection is crucial owing to the high mortality rate. Although withdrawal of the offending drug is critical, the optimal treatment approach remains controversial. Previous studies report a severe course and prolonged hospital stay for cutaneous drug-related reactions, including referral to a burn center, skin débridement, and allograft skin coverage. The aim of the present report is to describe four adolescents with antiepileptic drug hypersensitivity syndrome who were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and systemic corticosteroids. All recovered completely following an uncomplicated and relatively short course and hospitalization. Findings indicate that this regimen might be a promising treatment option in this patient population. Larger, controlled trials are needed to reach a definitive conclusion.

Une nouvelle cause de cholangite intra et extra-hépatique : le syndrome d’hypersensibilité médicamenteuse ou DRESS

The DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) corresponds to a drug reaction generally including cutaneous eruption, fever, hematologic abnormalities such as eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis and one or more specific visceral lesions specially in the liver. We report a case of drug hypersensitivity syndrome or DRESS associated with intra and extra-hepatic biliary lesions. This syndrome was associated with sulfasalazine and naproxene therapy. A reactivation of HHV6 was documented in the continuations of the DRESS and could play a role in the symptomms.

Rash, fever, and neck pain in the office: is this a neurologic emergency?

Anticonvulsants, neuroleptics, and antispasticity agents are used with increasing frequency in the pediatric population. Each of the drugs discussed in this article has serious but potentially reversible adverse effects. Pediatric primary care providers must be aware of the potential emergencies associated with the use of these neurologic medications to provide prompt and effective treatment.

Cross Hypersensitivity Syndrome between Phenytoin and Carbamazepine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of cross anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) between phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ) in hospitalized patients.

METHOD

Retrospective chart review about the cross AHS was retrieved from pharmacy adverse drug reaction program from 1998 to 2002 in a 450-bed teaching hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

AHS was defined as the appearance of at least two symptoms with the first anticonvulsant drug (ACD). Cross AHS was considered if after withdrawal of a first ACD because of hypersensitivity symptoms, a new episode with similar or new symptoms appeared after exposure to a second ACD. The following symptoms were considered- rash, fever, hepatotoxicity, lymphadenopathies or hematological disturbances.

RESULTS

Cross AHS between PHT and CBZ was observed in nine cases (45). After the cross-reaction event, four of them were treated with valproic acid, two with vigabatrin, two with phenobarbital and one with no treatment without developing further AHS.

CONCLUSIONS

AHS is a severe complication of aromatic ACD that can compromise the future choice of therapy. Because of the high incidence of clinical cross-reaction between these two drugs, non-aromatic ACD alternatives, must be considered.

Impact of phenytoin therapy on the skin and skin disease

Phenytoin (diphenylhydantoin; Dilantin), ALZA Corp.) is a highly effective and widely prescribed anticonvulsant agent used in the treatment of focal and tonic clonic generalised seizures. The side effects of phenytoin can occassionally engender significant morbidity. Phenytoin can induce generalised eruptions that include: a maculopapular exanthem, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, generalised exfoliative dermatitis, toxic epidermal necrolysis, vasculitis and fixed drug eruptions. Phenytoin is linked to a hypersensitivity syndrome that manifests with fever, rash and lymphadenopathy. Patients receiving phenytoin may develop pseudolymphoma or, rarely, malignant lymphoma and mycosis fungoides-like lesions. Rarer cutaneous side effects include drug-induced lupus, purple hand syndrome, pigmentary alterations and IgA bullous dermatosis. Phenytoin can effect clotting function and alter vitamin and mineral levels. Prenatal exposure to phenytoin may result in a spectrum of structural, developmental and behavioural changes, known as the fetal hydantoin syndrome. Patients who use phenytoin in the long-term commonly manifest with gingival hyperplasia, coarsening of the facies, and hirsutism.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in a premature infant

Fever, skin reactions, and limb edema because of drug-induced hypersensitivity have been reported in children because of various drugs, mainly aromatic antiepileptic drugs such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepin, and primidone. The skin reactions differ in severity and range from mild maculopapular erythema to exfoliative dermatitis. They have been described in older children but have not been reported in newborn infants. We report a premature newborn infant who developed fever, skin reactions, and edema because of phenytoin while receiving anticonvulsant therapy.

Medical treatment of epilepsy

The licensing of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has led to a marked increase in the pharmaceutical armamentarium available for the treatment of epilepsy since 1990. The new drugs have now secured their place in the pharmacotherapy of epilepsy. The main reason for their success is their good general tolerability (especially with regard to cognitive function), the low rate of drug-drug interaction and the high anticonvulsant potency of some of the compounds. It is fortunate that many of the new AEDs have also proven effective in the treatment of generalised seizures, although they were originally developed for the treatment of focal seizures. However, the wide treatment choice has not solved the problems associated with the medical treatment of epilepsy. In monotherapy, none of the new AEDs have been shown to be superior in their potency to control seizures to older AEDs in comparative studies. Nonetheless, the greater choice of drugs allows treatment to be better tailored to the requirements of individual patients. Now there is a need to study patients whose seizures were not controlled by initial or alternative monotherapy to create an evidence-base for truly rational combination therapy in the future. Additional improvements in the medical treatment of epilepsy may come from AEDs currently in development, many of which use novel or unknown modes of action. So far, however, there is no evidence that any of these compounds will have radically different effects from the drugs currently available, or that they will have antiepileptic rather than purely anticonvulsant potential.

Dermatologic drug reactions

Cutaneous drug reactions have a variety of clinical presentations. This review focuses on the most common or severe cutaneous reaction patterns. Knowledge of the clinical morphology and the most commonly associated medication aids in rapid diagnosis and institution of the appropriate therapy.

Enterocolitis: an adverse event in refractory epilepsy patients treated with levetiracetam?

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a recently marketed novel anti-epileptic drug with a promising efficacy and safety profile. In this report we describe two patients who presented with enterocolitis and discuss the possible relationship with concurrent LEV intake.

PATIENTS

In two patients. LEV was initiated to control refractory complex partial seizures (CPS). The first patient was treated with 1500 mg/day and complained of abdominal pain and weight loss 6 months later. Internal examination and colonoscopy revealed a punctate colitis. The second patient presented with bloody stool 1 month after LEV initiation. Colonoscopy showed punctate colitis. In both patients gastrointestinal symptoms disappeared following tapering of LEV.

DISCUSSION

There are no reports in the literature describing colitis related to LEV intake. Three possible mechanisms of action are discussed. Colitis may be part of a hypersensitivity syndrome caused by LEV. Pharmacodynamic interactions with other anti-epileptic drugs, for example, carbamazepine may play a role. A haematological adverse event is another possibility since piracetam, a related molecule, has a known impact on erythrocytes and platelets.

CONCLUSION

The close temporal relationship between initiation of LEV intake, symptomatic colitis and clinical improvement following LEV tapering, suggests that colitis may be a possible and previously undescribed adverse effect of LEV.