Residency application statements can predict postresidency training

Timing of Infectious Disease Clinical Rotation Is Associated With Infectious Disease Fellowship Application

Background

With declining interest in infectious disease (ID) noted among internal medicine (IM) residents, national attention has been directed at methods to recruit more prospective ID applicants. The factors driving the recent decline in ID fellowship applications have thus far only been evaluated in survey studies. Since 2008 at our institution, all IM interns were required to complete a 4-week inpatient ID rotation. We evaluated this rotation to determine if any experiential factors could be linked to future ID interest.

Methods

Categorical IM interns rotating on the mandatory ID rotation at our institution between July 1, 2008, and June 30, 2015, were included. Interns were grouped by eventual application to ID fellowship (IDA) and nonapplication (non-IDA). Consult numbers and types and characteristics of team members during the rotation were compared.

Results

Between July 2008 and June 2015, 143 IM interns met inclusion criteria. Ten (7%) were IDA. There was no difference in number of consults seen, intern, team member, faculty, or fellow characteristics among groups. However, 90% of IDA compared with 46% of non-IDA rotated during the first 6 months of internship (P = .01).

Conclusions

During a 7-year period, those interns randomly assigned to rotate on ID in the first 6 months of their intern year were more likely to become future ID applicants. This supports prior self-reported survey data that early exposure to the field may impact future career choice and suggests that incorporating ID early into the intern experience may increase recruitment.

Palliative medicine fellowship: a study of resident choices

CONTEXT

There are no data on the motives or characteristics of physicians choosing fellowship training in Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM).

OBJECTIVES

To understand more about the residents who choose HPM and what leads them to this decision.

METHODS

An electronic survey of HPM fellows initiating training in July 2009.

RESULTS

Seventy-six physicians began the study, with 62 responders (82%) completing all questions. Fifty-five percent were aged 30-40 years, and 61% were female. Sixty-eight percent were non-Hispanic Caucasian, 24% were Asian, and none were African American. Fifty-five percent were trained in internal medicine. Most (86%) asserted that the care of a dying, critically ill, or symptomatic person impacted their decision to enter the field of HPM. Sixty-three percent did not feel prepared to manage dying patients, and 41% felt personal regret about the care they delivered. The major reasons for choosing the specialty were a desire to contribute to relief of suffering (79%), enhance end-of-life care (73%), and improve communication (78%). Ninety-five percent received negative comments about their career choice. Fifty-nine percent had no exposure to hospice or palliative medicine in medical school, whereas 61% had an exposure available during residency. Forty-seven percent decided to enter a fellowship in the third year of residency, and 33% applied after practicing in their primary specialty for a median of 10 years. Accreditation, strength of education, and a hospital palliative medicine service were required by the majority for selection of a fellowship program.

CONCLUSION

Negative experiences with end-of-life care in residency, particularly in the intensive care unit, continue to be a factor in selection of HPM as a specialty. Many residents make their decision to enter the field and apply during Postgraduate Year 3. Most received negative comments about the choice. Fellows require a broad range of experience when selecting a fellowship program.