Low density lipoprotein apheresis in treatment of hyperlipidemia: experience with four different technologies

Lipoprotein-apheresis in familial hypercholesterolemia: Long-term patient compliance in a French cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a complex therapeutic option and poor compliance can adversely affect treatment outcome. The aim of this study was to describe long-term compliance to treatment in patients undergoing regular LA therapy and to investigate factors related to low compliance.

METHODS

We analysed 11,391 prescribed procedures of LA performed between 1990 and 2007 in 51 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Regular LA treatment was initiated in patients presenting with either homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 21), or severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 30) with elevated LDL-cholesterol levels and who did not respond adequately to diet and drug therapy; the majority of these patients (n = 30) had cardiovascular disease at initiation of therapy.

RESULTS

The overall observed compliance rate based on the number of achieved/programmed procedures was 87.5%. Neither cardiovascular history nor subtypes of hypercholesterolemia was associated with compliance. In addition, there was no impact of patient demography on compliance. Treatment frequency alone significantly impacted non-compliance (i.e. patient with weekly procedures were less compliant). Interestingly, a non-significant decrease in compliance was observed among patients aged <20 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the complexity of the LA procedure and its impact on the organisation of patients' daily lives, overall compliance was very high. The choice of an appropriate and adequate frequency of treatment significantly impacted patient compliance.

Whole Blood Selective LDL-Apheresis: A Comparison of Two Different Adsorbers

The effects of LDL-apheresis with whole blood adsorption were compared in five patients with severe familial and ARH hypercholesterolemia, using two different sorbents, polyacrylic acid with the DALI system and dextran sulfate with the DX21 system. The patients were treated bimonthly with both systems at random. For each patient, the same number of procedures with both systems was considered, ranging from 2 to 11 for each technique. During a period of observation of 26 months, a total of 80 LDL-apheresis, 40 with the DALI system and 40 with the DX21, with equivalent volumes of treated whole blood was evaluated (mean blood volume treated: 8151 mL). Total and LDL cholesterol were effectively lowered with both techniques. The mean percentage reduction of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol respectively was 54.1±7.7% and 62.3±9% with the DALI system, 52.7±7.8% and 59.2±9.5 with the DX21: t-test for paired data showed p: 0.01 for LDL-cholesterol. The reduced removal of LDL-C with dextran sulfate, either within the same patient or all the patients taken together was of a very limited amount compared to polyacrylic acid. The superiority of one over the other sorbent cannot be affirmed: further studies on a higher number of procedures and patients, together with an evaluation of biocompatibility effects, compared to polyacrylic acid may clarify and make evident a significant difference in efficacy between the two systems.

Pilot study of extracorporeal removal of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 in preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies to stabilize the clinical manifestations and prolong pregnancy in preeclampsia do not exist. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), an alternatively spliced variant of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, induces a preeclampsia-like phenotype in experimental models and circulates at elevated levels in human preeclampsia. Removing sFlt-1 may benefit women with very preterm (<32 weeks) preeclampsia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We first show that negatively charged dextran sulfate cellulose columns adsorb sFlt-1 in vitro. In 5 women with very preterm preeclampsia and elevated circulating sFlt-1 levels, we next demonstrate that a single dextran sulfate cellulose apheresis treatment reduces circulating sFlt-1 levels in a dose-dependent fashion. Finally, we performed multiple apheresis treatments in 3 additional women with very preterm (gestational age at admission 28, 30, and 27+4 weeks) preeclampsia and elevated circulating sFlt-1 levels. Dextran sulfate apheresis lowered circulating sFlt-1, reduced proteinuria, and stabilized blood pressure without apparent adverse events to mother and fetus. Pregnancy lasted for 15 and 19 days in women treated twice and 23 days in a woman treated 4 times. In each, there was evidence of fetal growth.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study supports the hypothesis that extracorporeal apheresis can lower circulating sFlt-1 in very preterm preeclampsia. Further studies are warranted to determine whether this intervention safely and effectively prolongs pregnancy and improves maternal and fetal outcomes in this setting.

Polyacrylate adsorbents for the selective adsorption of cholesterol-rich lipoproteins from plasma or blood

Polyacrylate (PAA) adsorbents selectively bind low density lipoproteins (LDL) from human plasma and blood, whereas very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) are only minimally adsorbed. The adsorption of cholesterol-rich lipoproteins to PAA adsorbents is related to the molecular weight (mw) of the polyanion ligand. Ca(++) and Mg(++) inhibit the binding of LDL to PAA adsorbents. The chemical composition of the organic hardgels of the adsorbents does not have an influence on adsorption. The selective adsorption of LDL to PAA adsorbents can be explained to result from their low negative surface charge density and the specific colloid-chemical properties of the surface-bound PAA, which do not prevent LDL from binding to charge-like domains of the ligand. By contrast, VLDL and high density lipoproteins (HDL) are repelled from the adsorbents due to their higher negative surface charge density.

LDL-apheresis: indications and clinical experience in a tertiary cardiac centre

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of liposorber D low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis system in high-risk cardiac patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 466 treatments undertaken in eight patients with coronary heart disease. Five patients had severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), one had severe hypertriglyceridaemia and two were cardiac transplant recipients with FH intolerant to statins. Acute reductions during single sessions and preprocedural long-term changes in lipoprotein subfractions, laboratory safety parameters, adverse events and clinical outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

In 352 treatments performed in seven patients, acute reductions averaged 52.8% (standard deviation: 8.61%) for total cholesterol (TC), 61.8% (10.13%) for LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), 21.1% (9.66%) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), 71.1% (median) for lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and 44.5% (14.42%) for triglycerides (p < 0.05). Long-term reductions of TC, LDL-C, Lp(a) and triglycerides by 18.1%, 21.7%, 9.4% (median) and 19.8%, respectively, were achieved. HDL-C was increased by 7.5%. Results from the patient with severe hypertriglyceridaemia were analysed separately because of markedly elevated TC and triglycerides. Technical and clinical complications were mild and showed an incidence of 16.65% and 12.45% respectively. The most common clinical event was transient hypotension (5.8%), whereas vascular access difficulties (11.3%) represented a common technical problem. All patients demonstrated clinical improvement. However, two patients treated via a central line developed septicaemia, resulting in endocarditis in one of them.

CONCLUSION

Liposorber D is a simple, safe and effective modality in reducing atherogenic lipoproteins in dyslipidaemic high-risk cardiac patients. The treatment via an arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access in this type of patient.

Treatment of Hyperlipidemia With a Modified Low Density Lipoprotein Apheresis System With Dextran Sulfate

Many low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis systems have been applied to patients with hyperlipidemia, but these systems usually work on the basis of complicated equipment and the cost of treatment is expensive. In order to achieve effective treatment of hyperlipidemia at a lower cost, we developed a new LDL apheresis system with dextran sulfate (LAS-DS). In this study, 50 patients with hyperlipidemia were treated 120 times with the new LAS-DS. In each treatment, 600 +/- 100 mL of plasma (equal to approximately 25% of the total plasma of patients) was collected by apheresis, and DS solution and calcium chloride solution were added into the collected plasma as LDL absorber and catalyzer, respectively. DS selectively binds LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) under the catalysis of calcium ion and the LDL-C-DS complex is removed by centrifugation. The treated plasma was transfused back into the patients and the excessive calcium in the plasma was removed by the cation exchange column integrated in the transfusion set. After treatment with our new system, the acute mean LDL-C reduction was 97% in the apheresis plasma of hyperlipidemia patients. The corresponding reduction was 55.2% and 69.4% for total cholesterol and total triglyceride. There were insignificant reductions of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and albumin. The new LDL apheresis system with DS that we developed is very simple to operate without relying on complicated equipment, and it can achieve significant clinical results at a much lower cost compared with existing systems. Based on this study we think the new system can provide a safe, effective and much cheaper means for the treatment of hyperlipidemia patients.

Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Therapy With a Direct Hemoperfusion Column: A Japanese Multicenter Clinical Trial

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has been applied to patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with coronary artery disease (CAD). To examine the efficacy and safety of a new type of LDL adsorption column (KLD01, Kaneka, Osaka, Japan), which deals with whole blood without separating plasma, the new system was evaluated in a multicenter trial. The present study included 33 FH patients with CAD (24 males, 9 females, 57 +/- 13 years) who were treated five times with a mean interval of 2.12 +/- 0.60 weeks between treatments. We studied the removal efficacies for serum LDL cholesterol, Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and triglyceride, the times for the preparation of the system and for treatment, symptoms, and the biochemical data. The scheduled treatments were completed by 31 patients. Serum levels of LDL cholesterol, Lp(a) and triglycerides were all significantly reduced with KLD01; 61.5 +/- 6.2%, 72.4 +/- 5.9% and 69.5 +/- 9.7%, respectively. The times for both setting up the column system (26 +/- 7 min) and treatment (138 +/- 20 min) were shorter with KLD01 than conventional methods. Adverse reactions occurred in eight cases (17 episodes), but the patients fully recovered immediately after each apheresis therapy session. We conclude that the new type of LDL adsorption column, one that deals with whole blood, is a promising apheresis therapy for FH patients in view of its efficacy, reduced time for treatment, and safety.

A systematic review of LDL apheresis in the treatment of cardiovascular disease

LDL apheresis is an effective method of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentration in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) who are either refractory to treatment or intolerant of medical therapy. We searched the medical literature through July 2004 using PubMed and Medline and the search terms "LDL apheresis", "cardiovascular", and "disease" to identify apheresis techniques and to evaluate their effects on cardiovascular pathophysiology and clinical outcomes. We conclude that LDL apheresis reduces cardiovascular events in hypercholesterolemic patients and may be an effective treatment for other vascular diseases including cholesterol embolic disease, focal segmental glomerular sclerosis, sudden hearing loss, and age-related macular degeneration.

Is Lipoprotein (a)-Apheresis Useful?

Numerous epidemiological investigations have shown the importance of cholesterol, and in particular low density lipoprotein (LDL), and of the lipoproteins in the development of coronary sclerosis. A continuing relationship between cholesterol levels and coronary morbidity has been established. The LDL concentration in the blood is, in particular, to be made responsible for the development of arteriosclerosis and especially of coronary heart disease (CHD). Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], as a risk factor for premature cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, can be lowered by LDL-apheresis. Especially in isolated high levels of Lp(a) with CHD or polygenic hypercholesterolemia with elevated Lp(a) levels, LDL-apheresis can be indicated and can be useful to improve endothelium regulation and induce changes in coronary tone by an increase in endothelial derived relaxing factor. Lipoprotein (a) can be dramatically lowered by LDL-apheresis, but clinical improvement especially by low LDL is not still not clarified. Studies with weekly apheresis with statins versus drug therapy alone are necessary. To clarify the controversial discussions of whether lowering Lp(a) may be unnecessary or necessary to arrest progression of CHD, more clinical and randomized studies are needed. Lipoprotein (a) can be also lowered by current LDL-apheresis methods.

A survey of blood purification techniques

Apheresis may be performed with many different techniques. The basis for different therapeutic approaches lies in the pathophysiological processes present in the diseases that have to be treated. Over the years more sophisticated devices have been developed. The most frequent treatment is plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) using centrifugation or single filtration techniques. In addition cascade filtration and subsequent adsorption from plasma is done. Thereby removal is done by adsorption of molecules such as bilirubin, immunoglobulins (immunoadsorption), circulating immune complexes, various antibodies including those against blood types. Such adsorption technologies have also been developed to allow adsorption directly from a column perfused by whole blood (hemoperfusion). By combining various techniques, systems are available that allow bridging of patients with hepatic failure to transplantation (MARS, Prometheus). By adding e.g., hepatic cells to such systems, besides dialysis and adsorption, cells will help to degrade toxic molecules. Such bioreactors are in clinical use. Apheresis includes also the removal or retrieval of cells from blood for e.g., stemcell transplantation, polycythaemia or hemochromatosis. Removal of leukocytes from blood using leukocyte filters is indicated in inflammatory bowel diseases. By specifically irradiating lymphocytes and monocytes with UV light using the technique of extra corporeal photochemotherapy (ECTP) various immunological diseases are treated. On the other hand, various alternative techniques may be used for the same disorder. Thus for patients with high plasma LDL-cholesterol not responding to other lipid lowering strategic treatment, alternative therapy may be done either by cascade filtration, adsorption technology from plasma, heparin precipitation (HELP-system) or hemoperfusion. This article describes various techniques in clinical use.

Clinical applications of long-term LDL-apheresis on and beyond refractory hypercholesterolemia

Premature coronary heart disease (CHD) can result from high LDL cholesterol levels even in the absence of any other risk factors. A striking example is found in children who have the homozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with extremely high levels of LDL-cholesterol, and severe atherosclerosis and CHD often develop during the first decades of life. LDL-apheresis was developed for the treatment of severe type of FH patients who are resistant to lipid-lowering drug therapy. Clinical efficacy and safety of the therapeutic tool which directly removes LDL from circulation have already been established in the treatment for refractory hypercholesterolemia in FH patients. The most recently developed method enables lipoproteins to be adsorbed directly from whole blood, using polyacrylate column. In addition to benefits derived from the stabilization or regression of arterial lesions, we highlight other possible clinical applications of LDL-apheresis. However, most of these clinical benefits came from case reports or retrospective studies. Mechanisms related these clinical improvement remain unclear, and prospective randomized controlled trials should be performed for the new clinical indications of LDL-apheresis.

LDL apheresis

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis provides a safe and effective means of treating patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). It also has a role in preventing the progression of coronary artery disease in heterozygotes and others with severe dyslipidaemia who are refractory to or intolerant of high doses of lipid-lowering drugs. Established methods involve either adsorption of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins by affinity columns containing anti-apolipoprotein B antibodies or dextran sulphate, or their precipitation at low pH by heparin, in each instance after first separating plasma from blood cells with a cell separator. The most recently developed method enables lipoproteins to be adsorbed directly from whole blood, using polyacrylate columns. All 4 methods have proved to be similarly efficient when used weekly or biweekly to lower LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) without unduly reducing HDL cholesterol. Economic constraints restrict the use of LDL apheresis to the treatment of potentially fatal disorders such as FH, where there is clear evidence of benefit compared with conventional therapy. Widening the indications to include the treatment of other dyslipidaemic disorders such as steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, post-transplant donor vessel disease, stroke and prevention of re-stenosis after coronary angioplasty requires evidence from controlled trials that is currently lacking.

Lipoprotein(a): an emerging cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) is a cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein, consisting of a covalent linkage joining the unique and highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) to apolipoprotein B100, the main protein moiety of low-density lipoproteins. Although the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in humans is mostly genetically determined, acquired disorders might influence synthesis and catabolism of the particle. Raised concentration of lipoprotein(a) has been acknowledged as a leading inherited risk factor for both premature and advanced atherosclerosis at different vascular sites. The strong structural homologies with plasminogen and low-density lipoproteins suggest that lipoprotein(a) might represent the ideal bridge between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusive disorders. Unfortunately, the exact mechanisms by which lipoprotein(a) promotes, accelerates, and complicates atherosclerosis are only partially understood. In some clinical settings, such as in patients at exceptionally low risk for cardiovascular disease, the potential regenerative and antineoplastic properties of lipoprotein(a) might paradoxically counterbalance its athero-thrombogenicity, as attested by the compatibility between raised plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and longevity.

Comparison of different treatment regimens in a case of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

The laboratory results of five periods of different treatment regimens were compared in a 19-year-old girl with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH): weekly low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis sessions with dextran sulfate columns (LA 15, Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) without statin administration; weekly LDL apheresis with polyacrylate columns (DALI, Fresenius Adsorber Technology, Bad Homburg, Germany) without statin; LDL apheresis as in Period 2 with 40 mg atorvastatin daily; LDL apheresis as in Period 2 with 80 mg atorvastatin daily; and fortnightly LDL apheresis sessions with polyacrilate and administration of 80 mg atorvastatin daily. The five treatments were given in the above order, and each lasted at least 2 months. To compare the effectiveness of the different methods, the blood levels of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were measured before each session, and the percentage decreases in the blood levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were recorded during sessions in Periods 1 and 2. In Periods 1 and 2, the biological effectiveness of LDL apheresis was comparable. Atorvastatin (40 mg daily) improved the blood levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, but lowered HDL-cholesterol values. Increasing the daily dose of atorvastatin from 40 mg to 80 mg did not significantly improve LDL-cholesterol levels. When the time between two sessions was longer (Period 5), the total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol values worsened and were comparable to those of Period 2 during which there was no atorvastatin treatment. In this case of homozygous FH, weekly sessions of LDL apheresis in association with atorvastatin at dose of 40 mg per day gave the best results.