Lupus vasculopathy: Diagnostic, pathogenetic and therapeutic considerations

A rare form of vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lupus vasculopathy is characterized by necrosis and accumulation of immunoglobulins (IGs) and complements in the wall of arterioles and small arteries resulting in luminal narrowing. Lupus vasculopathy often accompanies lupus nephritis and portends a poor prognosis. Although there is general agreement on the treatment of lupus nephritis, effective treatment strategies for lupus vasculopathy remain to be defined. We report a 20-year-old woman with SLE who presented with generalized tonic-clonic seizure. Her immunosuppressive regimen consisted of mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone and hydroxychloroquine. On physical examination, she was Cushingoid in appearance and hypertensive. Laboratory tests indicated renal disease. Coagulation studies disclosed de novo lupus anticoagulant. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated acute focal cerebral hemorrhage. Echocardiography revealed reduced ejection fraction and severe mitral regurgitation. Despite high-dose glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil, renal function remained poor. Kidney biopsy demonstrated lupus vasculopathy and glomerulonephritis. Plasma exchange therapy and intravenous cyclophosphamide were administered. Over the ensuing four weeks, renal function improved, complement levels increased, autoantibody titers decreased and lupus anticoagulant disappeared. In conclusion, lupus vasculopathy can occur in SLE despite a heavy immunosuppressive regimen. Antiphospholipid antibodies might be involved in the pathogenesis of lupus vasculopathy. Plasma exchange therapy in conjunction with intravenous cyclophosphamide may represent an effective treatment strategy for lupus vasculopathy.

Changes in the urinary excretion of beta2-microglobulin (beta 2MG) and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) during treatment for lupus nephritis

Tubulointerstitial involvement in the kidneys is frequently found but it is a less emphasized feature of lupus nephritis (LN). Recent studies have shown increases in the urinary excretion of beta2-microglobulin (beta 2MG) and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), which are considered to indicate the presence of tubulointerstitial damage, particularly in cases of LN. However, the changes in these urinary parameters during the clinical course of LN have not yet been fully clarified. In this report, we describe the changes in the urinary excretion of beta 2MG and NAG during immunosuppressive treatment combined with double filtration plasmapheresis in a case of LN.

Advances in apheresis therapy for glomerular diseases

This article is an overview of the immunomodulatory effects of apheresis in renal diseases, especially primary and secondary glomerulonephritis, and the clinical evidence for the efficacy of apheresis therapy. Permeability factor(s) derived from circulating T cells are speculated to have a crucial role in the proteinuria of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Plasma exchange (PE); immunoadsorption plasmapheresis (IAPP), using protein A sepharose cartridges; low-density lipoprotein apheresis; and lymphocytapheresis (LCAP) have been used to remove such factors or pathogenic T cells. Other glomerular diseases induced by specific antibodies such as anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, and immune-complexes have also been treated with PE, double-filtration plasmapheresis, IAPP, and LCAP. Recommendations, based on the evidence from recent randomized controlled studies, have been established in apheresis therapy for various glomerular diseases.

Indications for plasma exchange in systemic lupus erythematosus in 2005

Plasma exchange can remove putative pathogenic autoantibodies and circulating immune complexes from the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, their efficacy has only been supported by noncontrolled and/or retrospective studies. Nonetheless, PE may still be of relevance in some selected SLE patients and as adjunctive therapy, in combination with corticosteroids (CS) and other immunosuppressant(s). We review herein the principal historical steps of the use of plasma exchange to treat SLE, based upon the main trials and case reports that have highlighted its most pertinent indications. Acute life-threatening manifestations and severe therapy-resistant manifestations, like refractory SLE renal disease, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, neuropsychiatric SLE, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, hyperviscosity syndrome and cryoglobulinemia, are the indications for which plasma exchange might have a beneficial therapeutic role. Although few SLE patients undergo plasma exchange each year nowadays (10-20 per year in France), adverse events are very rare and recent advances in plasma exchange technologies, like immunoadsorption, might, in the future, counterbalance their cost and broaden their place in the therapeutic armamentarium for SLE.

Immunomodulation Effects and Clinical Evidence of Apheresis in Renal Diseases

This article overviews the immunomodulation effects and clinical evidence of apheresis in renal diseases, in particular primary and secondary glomerulonephritis. A considerable permeability factor(s) derived from circulating T cells is speculated to have a crucial role in the proteinuria of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Plasma exchange (PE), immunoadsorption using Protein A sepharose cartridges, low-density lipoprotein apheresis and lymphocyte apheresis (LCAP) were tried to remove such factors or pathogenic T cells. Other glomerular diseases induced by specific antibodies such as antiglomerular basement membrane antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and immune-complexes such as lupus nephritis were also treated with PE, double filtration plasma apheresis. IAPP and LCAP. Many reports suggested that apheresis might have beneficial immunomodulation effects for the treatment of glomerular diseases: however, the recommendations based on evidence from small cohorts remain at low-level in most.

Plasmapheresis for rheumatic diseases in the twenty-first century: take it or leave it?

As is often the case, one cannot give a simple answer to the question: plasmapheresis-take it or leave it? A thorough review of the current data on the possible mechanisms of action, the efficacy, and the safety of plasmapheresis in rheumatic diseases demonstrates that the answer depends on the disease and the patients involved.