Apheresis in cryoglobulinemia complicating hepatitis C and in other renal diseases

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange as Management of Complicated Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Other Autoimmune Diseases

Introduction

Autoimmune diseases include a diverse and complex group of pathologies with a broad clinical spectrum due to the production of autoantibodies, which generates multisystemic compromise. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a good additive treatment for immunosuppression due to its action over the autoantibodies.

Objectives

To describe the main clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and other systemic autoimmune diseases managed with TPE.

Methodology

This descriptive retrospective study enrolled patients with systemic autoimmune diseases who received TPE.

Results

In total, 66 patients with a median age of 33.5 years (24-53 years) were included; the majority were females [n=51 (77.27%)]. Forty (60.61%) patients were diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus. In these cases, the main indication for TPE was diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH; n=20, 30.3%) and neurolupus (n=9, 13.6%). No TPE-related deaths occurred, and the main complication was hemorrhage, without significant differences among the four types of TPE solutions used. The overall outcome was improvement in 41 (62.12%) patients.

Conclusion

TPE is safe and effective in patients with severe manifestations of autoimmune diseases.

Hyperviscosity Syndrome in Hematological Diseases and Therapeutic Apheresis

The hyperviscosity syndrome classified into pleiocytosic, sclerotic and sieric syndromes according to the blood components involved are characterized by a different degree of clinical signs and symptoms related to rheological modification of blood. Therapeutic management of these syndromes is complex and the choice of apheresis treatment is generally restricted to emergency episodes in order to overcome the acute phase and to reverse the symptoms until definitive therapy is effective.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Use of Cellular and Plasma Apheresis in the Critically Ill Patient: Part II: Clinical Indications and Applications

Apheresis is the process of separating the blood and removing or manipulating a cellular or plasma component for therapeutic benefit. Such procedures may be indicated in the critical care setting as primary or adjunctive therapy for certain hematologic, neurologic, renal, and autoimmune/rheumatologic disorders. In part I of this series, the technical aspects of apheresis were described and the physiologic rationale and clinical considerations were discussed. This review highlights the pathophysiologic basis, specific clinical indications, and treatment parameters for disorders that more commonly require management in the intensive care unit. The choice of plasma or cellular apheresis in these cases is guided by wellaccepted, evidence-based clinical treatment guidelines. For some disorders, such as liver failure, severe sepsis, and multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome, apheresis treatment approaches remain experimental. Ongoing studies are investigating the potential utility of conventional plasma exchange, ex vivo plasma manipulation, and newer technologies for these and other disorders in severely ill patients.

Plasma exchange for kidney disease: what is the best evidence?

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been used as adjunctive therapy for various kidney diseases dating back to the 1970s. In many cases, support for TPE was on mechanistic grounds given the potential to remove unwanted large molecular-weight substances such as autoantibodies, immune complexes, myeloma light chains, and cryoglobulins. More recently, growing evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and prospective studies has provided insights into more rational use of this therapy. This report describes the role of TPE for the 6 most common kidney indications in the 2013 Canadian Apheresis Group (CAG) registry and the evidence that underpins current recommendations and practice. These kidney indications include thrombotic microangiopathy, antiglomerular basement membrane disease, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, cryoglobulinemia, recurrence of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in the kidney allograft, and kidney transplantation.

Therapeutic apheresis for renal disorders

This review summarizes the clinical evidence and practical details for the use of plasmapheresis and other apheresis modalities for each indication in nephrology. Updated information on the molecular biology and immunology of each renal disease is discussed in relation to the rationale for apheresis therapy and its place amid other available treatments. Autoantibody-mediated diseases, such as anti-GBM (anti-glomerular basement membrane) glomerulonephritis (GN), ANCA (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody)-related GN and the antibody-mediated type of TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), and alloantibody-mediated diseases such as kidney transplant sensitization and humoral rejection, can be treated by various plasmapheresis methods. These include standard plasmapheresis with a replacement volume, or plasmapheresis with online plasma purification using adsorption columns or secondary filtration. However, it should be noted that the pathogenic molecules implicated in FSGS (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), myeloma cast nephropathy, and perhaps other diseases are too small to be removed by most online purification methods. A great majority of controlled trials and series on which evidence-based treatment recommendations are made were performed using centrifugal plasmapheresis; it is presumed that membrane-separation plasmapheresis is equally efficacious. For some rarer diseases, such as MPGN (membranoproliferative GN) type 2 with factor H abnormalities or C3Nef (C3 nephritic factor) autoantibodies, there are only a few case reports, but enough scientific understanding to warrant a trial of plasmapheresis in severe cases. Photopheresis, which is effective for cell-mediated rejection in heart and lung transplantation, has not yet found a place in the routine treatment of kidney transplant rejection.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence-based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed.

Immunoadsorption apheresis and immunosuppressive drug therapy in the treatment of complicated HCV-related cryoglobulinemia

The immunosuppressive drug therapy (IDT) is not always effective to avoid the development of complications in hepatitis C virus-related cryoglobulinemia (HCV-Cr). Removal of cryoglobulins by therapeutic plasmapheresis is currently accepted. In this randomized, parallel group study, 17 male and female patients aged 43-79 years, with complicated HCV-Cr, were submitted for 12 weeks (initial immunosuppressive therapy) to IDT (alpha-interferon, pegylated-interferon alpha-2a, cyclophosphamide, methylprednisolone, prednisone, cyclosporine, ribavirin, and melphalan). Then, they were randomly assigned to two parallel groups: A # 9 patients treated by immunoadsorption apheresis (Selesorb((R))) (IA) plus IDT, and B # 8 patients submitted to IDT only, for further 12 weeks. # 187 IA aphereses were performed. No adverse reactions or complications were observed. A Clinical Score (CS) was adapted from a pre-existing scoring model to evaluate signs and symptoms inherent to the underlying immunologic disorder. The CS was calculated at baseline (CS0), after the initial immunosuppressive therapy (CS1 = 12 weeks) when patients were treated only with IDT, and at the end of the study (24 weeks) in the group A (CSA; IA plus IDT) and B (CSB; IDT only). The score did not change significantly from CS0 to CS1. However, statistically significant differences were observed between CS1 and CSA (P < 0.001), and CSA versus CSB (P = 0.03), respectively. The changes observed were favorable to the patients assigned to the IA plus IDT group (A): in most case relief of symptoms and complications have been obtained.

Distinguishing diabetic nephropathy from other causes of glomerulosclerosis: an update

Diabetic nephropathy is a common cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. It is characterised by diffuse or nodular glomerulosclerosis, afferent and efferent hyaline arteriolosclerosis, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis and atrophy. Diffuse and nodular diabetic glomerulosclerosis share similar histological features with other clinical conditions. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy studies, and clinicopathological correlation are essential to differentiate diabetic nephropathy from other conditions that result in diffuse and nodular glomerulosclerosis.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—Evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American society for apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. This elaborate process had been undertaken every 7 years resulting in three prior publications in 1986, 1993, and 2000 of "The ASFA Special Issues." This article is the integral part of the Fourth ASFA Special Issue. The Fourth ASFA Special Issue is significantly modified in comparison to the previous editions. A new concept of a fact sheet has been introduced. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. A detailed description of the fact sheet is provided. The article consists of 53 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA. Categories I, II, and III are defined as previously in the Third Special Issue. However, a few new therapeutic apheresis modalities, not yet approved in the United States or are currently in clinical trials, have been assigned category P (pending) by the ASFA Clinical Categories Subcommittee. The diseases assigned to category IV are discussed in a separate article in this issue.

Immunoadsorption apheresis (Selesorb) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus-related type 2 mixed cryoglobulinemia

In this short-term open label clinical pilot study, conducted at one center, the immune complex dextran sulphate adsorber (Selesorb) was used to treat four female patients aged 59-69 with HCV-related cryoglobulinaemia, vasculitis and/or neuropathy. The primary trial objective was to assess the clinical efficacy of the immunoadsorber. The secondary objective of the trial was to determine the safety of the adsorber and to investigate the adsorption capacity, measured as the adsorption of cryoglobulin-related immune complexes and the resulting influence on plasma components of the immune system. The patients have been submitted to treatment with the immunoadsorber, at approximately 1-3 days intervals, completing six sessions. The follow-up was one month. In the patients treated with Selesorb, we observed a statistically significant decrease in plasma of all classes of immunoglobulins (IgA: 5-28%; IgG: 14-44%; IgM: 8-38%). In two patients with peripheral neuropathy secondary to cryoglobulinemia, the symptomatology was improved. In a third patient the neurological involvement was substantially unchanged, and the same unsuccessful outcome was observed for Sjögren syndrome is concerned. Nevertheless, the two patients with lower extremity vasculitis showed an appreciable improvement. We failed to observe significant side effects directly related to the use of this immunoadsorbent.