A clinical role for peripheral blood lymphocyte infusions and perspectives on collection

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.

Use of natural killer cells in hematopoetic stem cell transplantation

Adoptive immunotherapy using natural killer (NK) cells may prove useful, especially in situations where infusion of T cells is impractical such as in recipients of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from haploidentical donors. NK cells may induce potent antileukemic and possibly antirejection activity and may even mitigate graft versus host disease (GvHD). Whether such effects are clinically important and whether they are mediated mainly or exclusively by KIR-HLA class I interactions remains to be determined. Recent advances in graft engineering provide for methods to isolate large numbers of purified NK cells. Several groups have shown that clinical grade NK cells up to a dose of 10(7)/kg may be collected and purified for the purpose of infusion to patients. Early results, in a limited number of patients, show that these cell doses may be administered without adverse events and without inducing GvHD. Whether such infusions will be useful in preventing graft rejection, or exerting graft versus leukemia effects and hastening immune recovery requires further study.

Purified donor NK-lymphocyte infusion to consolidate engraftment after haploidentical stem cell transplantation

This pilot study tested feasibility of natural killer cell purification and infusion (NK-DLI) in patients after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim was to obtain >or=1.0 x 10(7)/kg CD56+/CD3- NK cells and <1.0 x 10(5)/kg CD3+ T cells. Mononuclear cells were collected by 10 l leukapheresis. A two-step ex vivo procedure was used to purify NK cells, using an immunomagnetic T-cell depletion, followed by NK-cell enrichment. Five patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies were included, presenting 3-12 months after a haploidentical HSCT with mixed chimerism (3), impending graft failure (1) or early relapse (1). The purified product contained a median of 1.61 x 10(7)/kg (range 0.21-2.2) NK cells and 0.29 x 10(5)/kg (0.11-1.1) T cells. A purity of NK cells of 97% (78-99), a recovery of 35.5% (13-75), and a T-cell depletion of 3.55 log (2.9-4.5) was achieved. Infusions were well tolerated and none of the patients developed graft-versus-host disease. We observed an increase in donor chimerism in 2/5, stable mixed chimerism, decreasing chimerism and relapse of AML in one patient each. Selection of NK-DLI is technically feasible. NK cells are well tolerated when used as adoptive immunotherapy in recipients of haploidentical HSCT.