The effect on vision of associated treatments in patients taking vigabatrin: carbamazepine versus valproate

Evaluation of optical coherence tomography findings in adolescents with genetic generalized epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, central macular thickness (CMT), and subfoveal choroid thickness (CT) by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in adolescents with newly diagnosed epilepsy and patients who had been using Na valproate (VPA) for at least 1 year.

METHODS

We examined 60 patients with genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) aged 8-17 years. Thirty patients with newly diagnosed GGE who were evaluated before the beginning of the therapy and another 30 patients who were chosen from among adolescents with epilepsy using VPA for at least 1 year were included in the study.

RESULTS

Nasal quadrant RNFL thickness and CMT measurements were significantly lower in the monotherapy group compared with the newly diagnosed group (p = 0.044 and p = 0.032, respectively). CT measurements were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.413). There was a negative correlation in regression analysis between the duration of drug use and RNFL thickness in all quadrants.

CONCLUSION

According to our study, we observed thinning of the nasal RNFL and macular thickness in adolescents with epilepsy who were using Na valproate for at least 1 year and that as the duration of use increased, the thinning occurred in all RNFL quadrants. Further studies with larger series are needed to better understand the effects of both epilepsy and VPA on the eye.

Vigabatrin-related adverse events for the treatment of epileptic spasms: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Although vigabatrin (VGB) is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of epileptic spasms, there are safety concerns. The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to assess adverse events of VGB for the treatment of epileptic spasms. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. The population was infants treated with VGB for epileptic spasms. The outcomes were VGB-related adverse events. Meta-analyses of VGB-related MRI abnormalities, retinal toxicity as measured by electroretinogram (ERG), visual field defect as measured by perimetry, and other adverse events were conducted. Results: Fifty-seven articles were included in the systematic review. The rate of VGB-related MRI abnormalities was 21% (95% CI: 15-29%). Risk factors for MRI abnormalities were age younger than 12 months and higher VGB dose. VGB-related retinal toxicity and visual field defect occurred in 29% (95% CI: 7-69%) and 28% (95% CI: 4-78%) respectively. Other adverse events occurred in 23% (95% CI: 16-34%), consisting predominantly of central nervous system symptoms, and the majority of these did not require therapeutic modification. Conclusion: This study will inform physicians and families on the risk profile of VGB for the treatment of epileptic spasms and will help decisions on treatment options.

Detecting Retinal Vigabatrin Toxicity in Patients with Partial Symptomatic or Cryptogenic Epilepsy

Purpose.

Detecting retinal vigabatrin toxicity in patients with partial symptomatic or cryptogenic epilepsy can be challenging because of preexisting visual field defects secondary to a structural abnormality in the brain or lack of collaboration. The aim of this study was to measure the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) with optic coherence tomography (OCT), as well as contrast sensitivity, color vision, and perimetry, in patients with partial symptomatic or cryptogenic epilepsy on vigabatrin, and to determine the efficacy of these tests as markers of vigabatrin-related retinal damage in these subgroups of epileptic patients.

Methods.

The study involved 38 patients with either partial symptomatic or cryptogenic epilepsy and 16 healthy individuals comprising the control group. At the time of the study, 14 of the patients were using vigabatrin, 10 were receiving sodium valproate monotherapy, and 14 were on carbamazepine monotherapy. All the participants underwent RNFLT imaging with OCT, contrast sensitivity, color discrimination assessment, and perimetry.

Results.

The average 360° RNFLT of the vigabatrin group was significantly lower when compared to the other groups. The average RNFLT of all quadrants except the temporal one in the vigabatrin group was also significantly reduced. There was no difference in the mean deviation, contrast sensitivity, and color discrimination between the study groups, but they were all significantly lower than the control group.

Conclusions.

RNFLT measurement with OCT can efficiently identify vigabatrin toxicity in patients with partial symptomatic and cryptogenic epilepsy. Perimetry, contrast sensitivity, and color discrimination assessment might be inconclusive in these particular subgroups of epileptic patients.

Comprehensive review of visual defects reported with topiramate

Objective

The objective of this study was to analyze clinical patterns of visual field defects (VFDs) reported with topiramate treatment and assess possible mechanism of action (MOA) for antiepileptic drug (AED) associated VFDs.

Methods

A comprehensive topiramate database review included preclinical data, sponsor’s clinical trials database, postmarketing spontaneous reports, and medical literature. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) suggestive of retinal dysfunction/damage were summarized. Relative risk (RR) was computed from topiramate double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (DBPCTs) data.

Results

Preclinical studies and medical literature review suggested that despite sharing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic MOA with other AEDs, topiramate treatment was not associated with VFDs. TEAEs suggestive of retinal dysfunction/damage were observed in 0.3%–0.7% of adults and pediatric patients with topiramate (N=4,679) versus ≤0.1% with placebo (N=1,834) in DBPCTs for approved indications (epilepsy and migraine prophylaxis); open-label trials (OLTs) and DBPCTs for investigational indications had similar incidence. Overall, 88% TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Serious TEAEs were very rare (DBPCTs: 0%; OLTs: ≤0.1%), and most were not treatment limiting, and resolved. The most common visual TEAEs (approved indications) were VFD, scotoma, and optic atrophy. The incidence of TEAEs in DBPCTs (approved and investigational indications) was higher in topiramate-treated (N=9,169) versus placebo-treated patients (N=5,023; 0.36% vs 0.24%), but the RR versus placebo-treated patients was not significant (RR: 1.51 [95% confidence interval: 0.78, 2.91]).

Conclusion

VFDs do not appear to be a class effect for AEDs with GABA-ergic MOA. The RR for VFDs is not significantly different between topiramate and placebo treatment.

Vitamin U, a novel free radical scavenger, prevents lens injury in rats administered with valproic acid

Valproic acid (2-propyl-pentanoic acid, VPA) is the most widely prescribed antiepileptic drug due to its ability to treat a broad spectrum of seizure types. VPA exhibits various side effects such as organ toxicity, teratogenicity, and visual disturbances. S-Methylmethioninesulfonium is a derivative of the amino acid methionine and it is widely referred to as vitamin U (Vit U). This study was aimed to investigate the effects of Vit U on lens damage parameters of rats exposed to VPA. Female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into four groups. Group I comprised control animals. Group II included control rats supplemented with Vit U (50 mg/kg/day) for 15 days. Group III was given only VPA (500 mg/kg/day) for 15 days. Group IV was given VPA + Vit U (in same dose and time). Vit U was given to rats by gavage and VPA was given intraperitoneally. On the 16th day of experiment, all the animals which were fasted overnight were killed. Lens was taken from animals, homogenized in 0.9% saline to make up to 10% (w/v) homogenate. The homogenates were used for protein, glutathione, lipid peroxidation levels, and antioxidant enzymes activities. Lens lipid peroxidation levels and aldose reductase and sorbitol dehydrogenase activities were increased in VPA group. On the other hand, glutathione levels, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, glutathione- S-transferase, and paraoxonase activities were decreased in VPA groups. Treatment with Vit U reversed these effects. This study showed that Vit U exerted antioxidant properties and may prevent lens damage caused by VPA.

Modelling the risk of visual field loss arising from long-term exposure to the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin: a cross-sectional approach

BACKGROUND

The antiepileptic drug vigabatrin has been used widely since 1989, but has only been approved for use in the US since 2009. The risk:benefit of vigabatrin is generally predicated upon an assumed frequency of associated visual field loss (VAVFL) of approximately 31 %. This estimate is based upon relatively short-term usage (up to 4-5 years) and it is essential to determine whether the frequency of VAVFL increases with longer-term usage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to model, from cross-sectional evidence, over greater ranges of treatment duration and cumulative dose than previously evaluated, the risk (frequency) of VAVFL with increasing exposure to vigabatrin.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a retrospective cohort study undertaken in a regional hospital epilepsy clinic.

PATIENTS

The cohort comprised 147 consecutive patients treated with vigabatrin for refractory complex partial (focal) seizures, who had all undergone ophthalmological examination and who had undertaken perimetry, reliably, according to a standard and robust protocol. The visual field plots were evaluated masked to treatment duration and dose.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The risk (frequency) of VAVFL with increasing exposure to vigabatrin was modelled, from the cross-sectional evidence, by standard and plateau logistic regression.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 80 females and 67 males (mean age 40.3 years, standard deviation 13.7). The median duration of vigabatrin exposure was 7.9 years (interquartile range 3.6-11.0, range 0.2-16.1 years); 46 patients (31 %) had received vigabatrin for over 10 years. Eighty-seven patients (59 %) exhibited VAVFL; the proportion with VAVFL was higher in males (66 %) than females (54 %). The plateau model for duration and for cumulative dose exhibited a better fit than the standard model (both p < 0.001). The modelled frequency of VAVFL increased with increasing exposure up to approximately 6 years duration and 5 kg cumulative dose, and plateaued at approximately 76 % (95 % CI 67-85) and 79 % (95 % CI 70-87), respectively. Severity of VAVFL, classified in terms of the visual field index Mean Deviation, was not significantly associated with either duration or cumulative dose of therapy.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians and patients, in enabling informed choice, should be alert to the possible substantial increased risk:benefit for VAVFL with increasing long-term exposure to vigabatrin and the ensuing increased cost:benefit resulting from the necessary additional visual assessments.

The long-term safety of antiepileptic drugs

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used by millions of people worldwide for the treatment of epilepsy, as well as in many other neurological and psychiatric conditions. They are frequently associated with adverse effects (AEs), which have an impact on the tolerability and success of treatment. Half the people who develop intolerable AEs discontinue treatment early on after initiation, while the majority of people will continue to be exposed to their effects for long periods of time. The long-term safety of AEDs reflects their potential for chronic, cumulative dose effects; rare, but potentially serious late idiosyncratic effects; late, dose-related effects; and delayed, teratogenic or neurodevelopmental effects. These AEs can affect every body system and are usually insidious. With the exception of delayed effects, most other late or chronic AEs are reversible. To date, there is no clear evidence of a carcinogenic effect of AEDs in humans. While physicians are aware of the long-term AEs of old AEDs (the traditional liver enzyme-inducing AEDs and valproate), information about AEs of new AEDs (such as lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate or zonisamide), particularly of their teratogenic effects, has emerged over the years. Sporadic publications have raised issues about AEs of the newer AEDs eslicarbazepine, retigabine, rufinamide, lacosamide and perampanel but their long-term safety profiles may take years to be fully appreciated. Physicians should not only be aware of the late and chronic AEs of AEDs but should systematically enquire and screen for these according to the individual AED AE profile. Care should be taken for individuals with comorbid conditions that may render them more susceptible to specific AEs. Prevention and appropriate management of long-term AED AEs is expected to improve adherence to treatment, quality of life and control of epilepsy.

Patterns of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in vigabatrin-exposed individuals

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (ppRNFL) thinning in individuals exposed to the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin with respect to 2 separate variables: cumulative vigabatrin exposure and severity of vigabatrin-associated visual field loss (VAVFL).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects were older than 18 years, 129 with vigabatrin-treated epilepsy (vigabatrin-exposed group) and 87 individuals with epilepsy never treated with vigabatrin (nonexposed group).

METHODS

All subjects underwent ppRNFL imaging using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Eighty-four vigabatrin-exposed individuals underwent Goldmann kinetic perimetry. The visual field examined from the right eye was categorized as normal (n = 47), mildly abnormal (n = 18), or moderately to severely abnormal (n = 19). In 91 vigabatrin-exposed individuals, the cumulative vigabatrin exposure could be ascertained: 41 subjects received 1000 g or less, 23 subjects received more than 1000 g but equal to or less than 2500 g, 16 subjects received more than 2500 g but equal to or less than 5000 g or less, and 11 subjects received more than 5000 g.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in ppRNFL thickness across the twelve 30° sectors: (1) among all nonexposed individuals and all vigabatrin-exposed individuals, (2) between each vigabatrin-exposed group, according to cumulative vigabatrin exposure, and the nonexposed group, (3) among different vigabatrin-exposed subjects grouped according to cumulative vigabatrin exposure, and (4) among vigabatrin-exposed subjects grouped according to severity of VAVFL.

RESULTS

The ppRNFL was significantly thinner in vigabatrin-exposed compared with nonexposed individuals in most 30° sectors (P<0.004). The temporal, temporal superior, and temporal inferior 30° sectors, as well as the nasal 30° sector, were not affected. There was a trend for increasing ppRNFL thinning with increasing cumulative vigabatrin exposure. The nasal-superior 30° sector was significantly thinner in group 1 (≤1000 g) compared with nonexposed individuals (P<0.05) and in vigabatrin-exposed individuals with normal visual fields compared with nonexposed individuals (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

After vigabatrin exposure in individuals receiving cumulative doses of 1000 g or less or in the presence of normal visual fields, ppRNFL thinning in the nasal superior 30° sector may occur. With higher cumulative doses of vigabatrin exposure, additional ppRNFL thinning was observed. The temporal aspects of the ppRNFL are spared, even in individuals with large cumulative vigabatrin exposures and moderate or severe VAVFL.

Balancing clinical benefits of vigabatrin with its associated risk of vision loss

Vigabatrin is an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) for the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) and infantile spasms (IS), but its benefits must be evaluated in conjunction with its risk of retinopathy with the development of peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs). Vigabatrin should be considered for rCPS if a patient has failed appropriate trials of other AEDs or is not a suitable candidate for other AEDs, is not an optimal surgical candidate, and continues to experience debilitating effects from seizures. Vigabatrin is indicated as monotherapy for pediatric patients with IS. Its efficacy in achieving improved seizure control should be apparent within 12 weeks in patients with rCPS and within 2-4 weeks after attaining appropriate dosage for patients with IS. Because 12 weeks is well less than the known time of onset of visual defects, the risk of developing pVFDs may be minimized by discontinuing vigabatrin early during the course of therapy for patients with inadequate response. Appropriate vision screening is recommended at baseline, every 3 months during continued vigabatrin treatment, and at 3-6 months after discontinuation (if therapy has spanned more than a few months). If a pVFD is detected at any point and the decision is made to discontinue therapy, the pVFD is not likely to progress after discontinuation of vigabatrin. Although some patients will be at risk of retinopathy, vigabatrin is an appropriate treatment option for patients who achieve substantial clinical benefit, especially given the severe consequences of rCPS and uncontrolled IS. While retinopathy with the development of pVFDs is a serious adverse event, it is not life-threatening and its risk can be effectively managed.

Understanding and interpreting vision safety issues with vigabatrin therapy

Vigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase. It is effective as adjunctive therapy for adult patients with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) who have inadequately responded to several alternative treatments and as monotherapy for children aged 1 month to 2 years with infantile spasms. The well-documented safety profile of vigabatrin includes risk of retinopathy characterized by irreversible, bilateral, concentric peripheral visual field constriction. Thus, monitoring of visual function to understand the occurrence and manage the potential consequences of peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs) is now required for all patients who receive vigabatrin. However, screening for pVFDs for patients with epilepsy was conducted only after the association between vigabatrin and pVFDs was established. We examined the potential association between pVFDs and epilepsy in vigabatrin-naïve patients and attempted to identify confounding factors (e.g., concomitant medications, method of vision assessment) to more accurately delineate the prevalence of pVFDs directly associated with vigabatrin. Results of a prospective cohort study as well as several case series and case reports suggest that bilateral visual field constriction is not restricted to patients exposed to vigabatrin but has also been detected, although much less frequently, in vigabatrin-naïve patients with epilepsy, including those who received treatment with other GABAergic antiepileptic therapy. We also reviewed published data suggesting an association between vigabatrin-associated retinal toxicity and taurine deficiency, as well as the potential role of taurine in the prevention of this retinopathy.

Visual field loss in patients with refractory partial epilepsy treated with vigabatrin: final results from an open-label, observational, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Use of the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin is associated with an elevated risk of visual field loss.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of, and risk factors for, vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss (VAVFL) in the setting of a large-scale, multinational, prospective, observational study.

STUDY DESIGN

A comparative, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study.

SETTING

Hospital outpatient clinics at 46 centres in five countries.

PATIENTS

734 patients with refractory partial epilepsy, divided into three groups and stratified by age (8-12 years; >12 years) and exposure to vigabatrin. Group I comprised patients treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months. Group II comprised patients previously treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months who had withdrawn from the drug for > or =6 months. Group III comprised patients never treated with vigabatrin. Patients underwent perimetry at either 4- or 6-month intervals, for up to 36 months. Visual field outcome was evaluated masked to drug exposure.

INTERVENTION

Perimetry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The visual field outcome at each of four analysis points: (i) at enrolment (i.e. baseline, all patients); (ii) for patients exhibiting a conclusive outcome at the initial visual field examination; (iii) for patients exhibiting at least one conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations; and (iv) at the last conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations.

RESULTS

Of the 734 patients, 524 yielded one or more conclusive visual field examinations. For Group I, the frequency of VAVFL at the last conclusive examination was 10/38 (26.3%) for those aged 8-12 years and 65/150 (43.3%) for those aged >12 years. For Group II, the respective frequencies were 7/47 (14.9%) and 37/151 (24.5%). One case resembling VAVFL was present amongst the 186 patients in Group III at the last conclusive examination. The frequency of VAVFL in Groups I and II combined was 20.0% for those aged 8-12 years and 33.9% for those aged >12 years. VAVFL was associated with duration of vigabatrin therapy (odds ratio [OR] up to 15.2; 95% CI 4.4, 51.7), mean daily dose of vigabatrin (OR up to 26.4; 95% CI 2.4, 291.7) and male gender (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.5, 4.1). VAVFL was more frequently detected with static than with kinetic perimetry (OR up to 0.43; 95% CI 0.24, 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Since the probability of VAVFL is positively associated with treatment duration, careful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of continuing treatment with vigabatrin is recommended in patients currently receiving this drug. All patients continuing to receive vigabatrin should undergo visual field examination at least every 6 months for the duration of treatment. We recommend two-level (three-zone), gradient-adapted, suprathreshold static perimetry of the peripheral field together with threshold perimetry of the central field out to 30 degrees from fixation. The frequency of ophthalmological and perimetric examinations should be increased in the presence of VAVFL.

Vigabatrin and Epilepsy: Lessons Learned

PURPOSE

The risk factors for visual field loss attributable to vigabatrin (VAVFL) are equivocal. This multinational, prospective, observational study aimed to clarify the principal/major factors for VAVFL.

METHODS

Interim analysis of three groups with refractory partial epilepsy, stratified by age (8-12 years; >12 years) and exposure to vigabatrin (VGB). Group I comprised participants treated with VGB for >or=6 months, Group II participants previously treated with VGB for >or=6 months who had discontinued the drug for >or=6 months and Group III those never treated with VGB. Perimetry was undertaken at least every six months, for up to 36 months; results were evaluated masked to drug exposure.

RESULTS

Based upon 563 participants in the locked data set, 432 yielded one or more Conclusive visual field examinations. For Group I, the frequency of VAVFL at the last Conclusive examination was 10/32 (31.2%) for those aged 8-12 years and 52/125 (41.6%) for those aged >12 years. For Group II, the proportions were 4/39 (10.3%) and 31/129 (24.0%). No cases resembling VAVFL manifested in Group III. VAVFL was associated with duration of VGB therapy (Odds ratio [OR] 14.2; 95% CI 5.0 to 40.5); mean dose of VGB (OR 8.5; 95% CI 2.2 to 33.2); and male gender (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.7). VAVFL was more common with static than kinetic perimetry (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic benefit of VGB is counteracted by the progressive accrual of the risk of VAVFL with continued exposure and with increase in mean dose.

Visual function in epilepsy patients treated with initial valproate monotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate whether initial valproate (VPA) monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy causes visual field defects and visual dysfunction.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, visual fields were examined with the kinetic Goldmann and automated Humphrey perimeters, contrast sensitivity function with the Pelli-Robson letter chart and colour vision with the Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates Part 2 (SPP 2) and Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test (FM 100) in eighteen epilepsy patients (aged 18--50 years, 30.2.+/-10 years, mean+/-S.D.) treated with initial valproate monotherapy for 2--20 years (8.4+/-5.1 years).

RESULTS

None had vigabatrin-type, concentric visual field defect with the kinetic Goldmann or automated Humphrey perimetries. In the Humphrey perimetry, the mean deviation for the group was within normal limits varying from -2.53 to 0.59 dB (-0.74+/-0.80 dB) in the right eye and from -2.66 to 0.67 dB (-0.78+/-0.82 dB) in the left eye. In the FM 100 test, acquired colour vision deficiency was found in two out of 18 patients (11%, 95% CI: 0--25%). However, the mean total error score was lower in the patient group than in the control group. All patients had normal contrast sensitivity function.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of VPA in the treatment of epilepsy is not associated with visual field defects similar to vigabatrin, but may induce abnormalities in colour vision.

Epilepsy and Medication Effects on the Pattern Visual Evoked Potential*

Visual disruption in patients diagnosed with epilepsy may be attributable to either the disease itself or to the anti-epileptic drugs prescribed to control the seizures. Effects on visual function may be due to perturbations of the GABAergic neurotransmitter system, since deficits in GABAergic cortical interneurons have been hypothesized to underlie some forms of epilepsy, some anti-epileptic medications increase cortical GABA levels, and GABAergic neural circuitry plays an important role in mediating the responses of cells in the visual cortex and retina. This paper characterizes the effects of epilepsy and epilepsy medications on the visual evoked response to patterned stimuli. Steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEP) evoked by onset-offset modulation of high-contrast sine-wave stimuli were measured in 24 control and 54 epileptic patients. Comparisons of VEP spectral amplitude as a function of spatial frequency were made between controls, complex partial, and generalized epilepsy groups. The effects of the GABA-active medication valproate were compared to those of carbamezepine. The amplitude of the fundamental (F1) component of the VEP was found to be sensitive to epilepsy type. Test subjects with generalized epilepsy had F1 spatial frequency-amplitude functions with peaks shifted to lower spatial frequencies relative to controls and test subjects with complex partial epilepsy. This shift may be due to reduced intracortical inhibition in the subjects with generalized epilepsy. The second harmonic component (F2) response was sensitive to medication effects. Complex partial epilepsy patients on VPA therapies showed reduced F2 response amplitude across spatial frequencies, consistent with previous findings that showed the F2 response is sensitive to GABA-ergic effects on transient components of the VEP.

The effect of antiepileptic drugs on visual performance

Visual disturbances are a common side-effect of many antiepileptic drugs. Non-specific retino- and neurotoxic visual abnormalities, that are often reported with over-dosage and prolonged AED use, include diplopia, blurred vision and nystagmus. Some anticonvulsants are associated with specific visual problems that may be related to the mechanistic properties of the drug, and occur even when the drugs are administered within the recommended daily dose. Vigabatrin, a GABA-transaminase inhibitor, has been associated with bilateral concentric visual field loss, electrophysiological changes, central visual function deficits including reduced contrast sensitivity and abnormal colour perception, and morphological alterations of the fundus and retina. Topiramate, a drug that enhances GABAergic transmission, has been associated with cases of acute closed angle glaucoma, while tiagabine, a GABA uptake inhibitor, has been investigated for a potential GABAergic effect on the visual field. Only mild neurotoxic effects have been identified for patients treated with gabapentin, a drug designed as a cyclic analogue of GABA but exhibiting an unknown mechanism while carbamazepine, an inhibitor of voltage-dependent sodium channels, has been linked with abnormal colour perception and reduced contrast sensitivity. The following review outlines the visual disturbances associated with some of the most commonly prescribed anticonvulsants. For each drug, the ocular site of potential damage and the likely mechanism responsible for the adverse visual effects is described.