The concept of the epilepsy syndrome: how useful is it in clinical practice?

An epilepsy syndrome is a disorder characterized by a cluster of symptoms and signs customarily occurring in combination. A syndromic approach to the epilepsies would be of practical value for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic purposes. However, despite considerable efforts by leaders in the field of epileptology and the improved knowledge of the clinical, genetic, imaging, and biologic aspects of epilepsy, there are no measurable objective criteria for recognizing seizure types and epilepsy syndromes as separate diagnostic entities with well-defined prognostic and therapeutic aspects. The lack of pragmatic, evidence-based instruments to devise a syndromic classification useful for clinical practice can be explained by the evolving concept of epilepsy syndrome, its dynamic characteristics, the poor prognostic predictivity, and the extremely complex genetic and pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the epileptic phenomena. In addition, the results of the published reports on epilepsy syndromes are mostly biased by flaws in the study population, design, and statistical analysis. The Classification Core Group of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), which is working on a new classification of the epilepsies, stated that the process of syndrome identification requires that an evidence-based approach be applied to the published literature and future studies.

Pediatric seizure and epilepsy classification: why is it important or is it important?

The classification of seizures and epilepsy is a divisive (no pun intended) topic. Debate ranges from how to classify seizures and epilepsy to whether a classification is needed at all. The classification of seizures and epilepsy in the pediatric population, specifically in the neonatal age group, differs from similar classifications in the adult population. To date, the most workable classification documents are the 1981 Classification of Seizures and the 1989 Classification of the Epilepsies from the International League Against Epilepsy. Subsequently, alternative classifications and schemes have been proposed but not universally accepted. Some pediatric-specific classifications, again with particular emphasis on classifying seizures and epilepsy in the neonatal population, have also been proposed. This review examines these classifications and attempts to analyze their pediatric-specific components in terms of applicability to the pediatric population and for their utility for pediatric physician-scientists and health care providers.

Report of the ILAE classification core group

A Core Group of the Task Force on Classification and Terminology has evaluated the lists of epileptic seizure types and epilepsy syndromes approved by the General Assembly in Buenos Aires in 2001, and considered possible alternative systems of classification. No new classification has as yet been proposed. Because the 1981 classification of epileptic seizure types, and the 1989 classification of epilepsy syndromes and epilepsies are generally accepted and workable, they will not be discarded unless, and until, clearly better classifications have been devised, although periodic modifications to the current classifications may be suggested. At this time, however, the Core Group has focused on establishing scientifically rigorous criteria for identification of specific epileptic seizure types and specific epilepsy syndromes as unique diagnostic entities, and is considering an evidence-based approach. The short-term goal is to present a list of seizure types and syndromes to the ILAE Executive Committee for approval as testable working hypotheses, subject to verification, falsification, and revision. This report represents completion of this work. If sufficient evidence subsequently becomes available to disprove any hypothesis, the seizure type or syndrome will be reevaluated and revised or discarded, with Executive Committee approval. The recognition of specific seizure types and syndromes, as well as any change in classification of seizure types and syndromes, therefore, will continue to be an ongoing dynamic process. A major purpose of this approach is to identify research necessary to clarify remaining issues of uncertainty, and to pave the way for new classifications.

A population-based survey of childhood epilepsy in Okayama Prefecture, Japan: reclassification by a newly proposed diagnostic scheme of epilepsies in 2001

The purpose of this study is to clarify the usefulness and problems of the newly proposed classification of epilepsies (International League Against Epilepsy: ILAE, 2001) in the epidemiological studies of epilepsy. We previously conducted an epidemiological study in Okayama Prefecture, Japan, in 1999, using the ILAE 1989 classification. Among 250,997 children under 13 years of age, 2220 epileptic patients were ascertained. In this study, we reclassified them according to the ILAE 2001 classification, focusing on axes 2 (seizure types) and 3 (syndromes). We were able to classify 1803 (95.0%) seizure types out of 1899 with detailed clinical information. In focal seizures, the most common were secondarily generalized seizures (88.6%), which generally do not represent a unique anatomic substrate. In generalized seizures, topic-clonic seizures (40.7%) and spasms (21.0%) were the most common. We identified only 269 (12.1%) patients with specific epilepsy syndromes out of the 2220. We classified 1761 patients without specific syndromic diagnoses only by axis 2, but the new concept of epileptic seizure types, representing a unique pathophysiologic mechanism and anatomic substrate, was not very meaningful in most cases, even in those with focal seizures.

ILAE classification of epilepsy syndromes

The efforts of the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE) to devise classifications of the epilepsies has greatly improved communication among epileptologists and influenced both basic and clinical research. Several classifications have been proposed since 1970; the most recent classification of epilepsy syndromes and epilepsies was published in 1989. Since 1997, the ILAE Task Force on Classification and Terminology has been evaluating this classification and some modifications have been recommended. Although the 1989 classification can be criticized and needs to be updated, it has been widely accepted and is universally employed. Consequently, the Task Force has agreed not to propose a replacement until a clearly better classification can be created.

Comparison of classifications of seizures: a preliminary study with 28 participants and 48 seizures

PURPOSE

Our aim was to compare three available seizure classifications (SCs), namely, the international classification of epileptic seizures published in 1981 (ICES; Epilepsia 1981;22:489-50); the semiological seizure classification (SSC) by H. Luders, J. Acharya, C. Baumgartner, et al. (Epilepsia 1998;39:1006-13; Acta Neurol Scand 1999;99:137-41); and the proposal of a new diagnostic scheme for seizures (PDSS) by J. Engel, Jr. (Epilepsia 2001;42:796-803) published in 2001. The three SCs were compared with respect to diagnostic success rates, usefulness, and consistency by a large group of neurologists in this preliminary study.

METHODS

After a training period, 28 blindfed participants with different levels of experience with epilepsy classified videos or written descriptions of 48 randomly selected seizures according to the three SCs. Definite diagnoses of the seizures were established based on all clinical, ictal/interictal EEG, and MRI data. All the participants answered a questionnaire concerning their preferences for SCs after the study.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic success rates were 81.4% for ICES, 80.5% for PDSS, and 87.5%, for SSC. Various parameters concerning experience with epilepsy affected success rates positively, without reaching statistical significance, whereas experience with epilepsy surgery appeared to be a parameter significantly affecting the success rate in all SCs. In reliability analysis, Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 for ICES, 0.88 for PDSS, and 0.70 for SSC, all showing good agreement in the group. Nineteen reviewers chose SSC, eight chose ICES, and one chose PDSS as their preference in the questionnaire, completed after the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

The results of this preliminary study demonstrate that with proper training, physicians treating epilepsy patients can handle new SCs, and emphasize the need for revision of the current classification.

Specific Epileptic Syndromes Are Rare Even in Tertiary Epilepsy Centers: A Patient‐oriented Approach to Epilepsy Classification

PURPOSE

To assess the practicability and reliability of a five-dimensional patient-oriented epilepsy classification and to compare it with the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of epilepsy and epileptic syndromes. The dimensions consist of the epileptogenic zone, semiologic seizure type(s), etiology, related medical conditions, and seizure frequency.

METHODS

The 185 epilepsy patients (94 adults, 91 children, aged 18 years or younger) were randomly selected from the database of a tertiary epilepsy center and the general neurological department of a metropolitan hospital (28 adults). The charts were reviewed independently by two investigators and classified according to both the ILAE and the patient-oriented classification. Interrater reliability was assessed, and a final consensus among all investigators was established.

RESULTS

Only four (4%) adults and 19 (21%) children were diagnosed with a specific epilepsy syndrome of the ILAE classification. All other patients were in unspecific categories. The patient-oriented classification revealed that 64 adults and 56 children had focal epilepsy. In an additional 34 adults and 45 children, the epileptogenic zone could be localized to a certain brain region, and in 14 adults and five children, the epileptogenic zone could be lateralized. Fourteen adults and 21 children had generalized epilepsy. In 16 adults and 14 children, it remained unclear whether the epilepsy was focal or generalized. Generalized simple motor seizures were found in 66 adults and 52 children, representing the most frequent seizure type. Etiology could be determined in 40 adults and 45 children. Hippocampal sclerosis was the most frequent etiology in adults (10%), and cortical dysplasia (9%), in children. Seven adults and 31 children had at least daily seizures. Seventeen adults and 26 children had rare or no seizures at their last documented contact. The most frequent related medical conditions were psychiatric disorders and mental retardation. Interrater agreement was high (kappa values of 0.8 to 0.9) for both the patient-oriented and the ILAE classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific epilepsy syndromes included in the current ILAE classification are rare even in a tertiary epilepsy center. Most patients are included in unspecific categories that provide only incomplete information. In contrast, all of the patients could be classified by the five-dimensional patient-oriented classification, providing all essential information for the management of the patients with a high degree of interrater reliability.