1
|
Schreiner L, Jordan M, Sieghartsleitner S, Kapeller C, Pretl H, Kamada K, Asman P, Ince NF, Miller KJ, Guger C. Mapping of the central sulcus using non-invasive ultra-high-density brain recordings. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6527. [PMID: 38499709 PMCID: PMC10948849 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57167-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain mapping is vital in understanding the brain's functional organization. Electroencephalography (EEG) is one of the most widely used brain mapping approaches, primarily because it is non-invasive, inexpensive, straightforward, and effective. Increasing the electrode density in EEG systems provides more neural information and can thereby enable more detailed and nuanced mapping procedures. Here, we show that the central sulcus can be clearly delineated using a novel ultra-high-density EEG system (uHD EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). This uHD EEG records from 256 channels with an inter-electrode distance of 8.6 mm and an electrode diameter of 5.9 mm. Reconstructed head models were generated from T1-weighted MRI scans, and electrode positions were co-registered to these models to create topographical plots of brain activity. EEG data were first analyzed with peak detection methods and then classified using unsupervised spectral clustering. Our topography plots of the spatial distribution from the SSEPs clearly delineate a division between channels above the somatosensory and motor cortex, thereby localizing the central sulcus. Individual EEG channels could be correctly classified as anterior or posterior to the central sulcus with 95.2% accuracy, which is comparable to accuracies from invasive intracranial recordings. Our findings demonstrate that uHD EEG can resolve the electrophysiological signatures of functional representation in the brain at a level previously only seen from surgically implanted electrodes. This novel approach could benefit numerous applications, including research, neurosurgical mapping, clinical monitoring, detection of conscious function, brain-computer interfacing (BCI), rehabilitation, and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonhard Schreiner
- g.Tec Medical Engineering GmbH, Schiedlberg, Austria.
- Institute for Integrated Circuits, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
| | | | - Sebastian Sieghartsleitner
- g.Tec Medical Engineering GmbH, Schiedlberg, Austria
- Institute of Computational Perception, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Harald Pretl
- Institute for Integrated Circuits, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Priscella Asman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nuri F Ince
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kai J Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ngan Kee N, Foster E, Marquina C, Tan A, Pang SST, O'Brien TJ, Kwan P, Jackson GD, Chen Z, Ademi Z. Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Surgical and Neurostimulation Treatments for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Adults. Neurology 2023; 100:e1866-e1877. [PMID: 36927880 PMCID: PMC10159768 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Surgical and neurostimulator treatments are effective for reducing seizure burden in selected individuals living with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We aimed to determine the presence and key model determinants for cost-effectiveness of these interventions, compared with medical management alone, to assist with decisions about resource allocation. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on June 1, 2022, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis database. Included studies were economic evaluations in adult DRE cohorts, comparing surgical and neurostimulator treatments (vagus nerve stimulation [VNS], responsive neurostimulation [RNS], and deep brain stimulation [DBS]) vs medical management alone and reporting cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility, or cost-effectiveness. Exclusion criteria were studies with pediatric cohorts and those published in a language other than English. Three independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed data against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist, and a fourth reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. RESULTS Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Seven studies evaluated epilepsy surgery, and 3 evaluated neurostimulation treatments. All relevant studies established that epilepsy surgery is a cost-effective intervention compared with medical management alone, for quality-adjusted life-years and seizure freedom at 2 and 5 years. All relevant studies found neurostimulator treatments to be potentially cost-effective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with lower ICER indicating greater cost-effectiveness, was reported for 9 studies and varied between GBP £3,013 and US $61,333. Cost adaptation revealed ICERs from US $170 to US $121,726. Key model determinants included, but were not limited to, improved surgical outcomes and quality of life, reduced surgical and presurgical evaluation costs, higher rates of surgical eligibility after referral and evaluation, epilepsy subtype, less expensive neurostimulator devices with improved longevity, and cost analysis strategy used in the analysis. DISCUSSION There is consistent evidence that epilepsy surgery is a cost-effective treatment of eligible candidates with DRE. Limited evidence suggests that VNS, RNS, and DBS may be cost-effective therapies for DRE, although more health economic evaluations alongside prospective clinical trials are needed to validate these findings. STUDY REGISTRATION INFORMATION PROSPERO CRD42021278436.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Ngan Kee
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Emma Foster
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Clara Marquina
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Andy Tan
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Samantha S T Pang
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Patrick Kwan
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Graeme D Jackson
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Zhibin Chen
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia.
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- From the The Royal Melbourne Hospital (N.N.K., T.J.O.B., P.K.), Parkville; Department of Neuroscience (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Neurology (E.F., T.J.O.B., P.K., Z.C.), Alfred Health, Melbourne; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (C.M., P.K., Z.C., Z.A.), Monash University, Melbourne; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (C.M., Z.A.), Monash University, Parkville; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences (A.T., S.S.T.P.), Monash University, Clayton; Department of Medicine (T.J.O.B., P.K., G.D.J., Z.C.), The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering (P.K.), Monash University, Clayton; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (G.D.J.), Melbourne; and Department of Neurology (G.D.J.), Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kitschen A, Aleknonytė-Resch M, Sakalytė G, Diederich F. Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment compared to medical treatment in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy: A systematic review. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:749-761. [PMID: 36371643 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Approximately 30% of epilepsy patients develop a drug-refractory epilepsy, that is, seizures cannot be controlled with antiepileptic drugs. Surgery has been evaluated as an effective but costly form of treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment compared to medical treatment for these patients. METHOD A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database until September 2022. Title, abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two researchers. Original studies published in English or German analyzing the cost-effectiveness of surgical compared to medical treatment were included. Study characteristics, effectiveness measures, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were extracted. The quality of studies was assessed using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included. Most studies evaluated surgery as cost-effective. The ICER per patient seizure free ranged from dominant to purchasing power parity US dollars (PPP-USD) 479,275. The ICER per 1% seizure reduction ranged from PPP-USD 227 to PPP-USD 342. The ICER per year without seizures was PPP-USD 4202 and the ICER per quality-adjusted life-year ranged from dominant to PPP-USD 90,874. The studies varied greatly in their methodology and time horizon. CONCLUSION Surgical treatment is cost-effective compared to medical treatment, especially when a lifetime horizon is adopted. It is concluded that all disease-specific costs should be considered over a long period when assessing the cost-effectiveness of epilepsy treatment. From an economic perspective, efforts should be made to improve access to surgical treatment for patients with drug-refractory epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kitschen
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Department of Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Milda Aleknonytė-Resch
- Department of Neurology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
- Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Freya Diederich
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raspin C, Faught E, Armand J, Barion F, Pollit V, Murphy J, Danielson V. An economic evaluation of vagus nerve stimulation as an adjunctive treatment to anti-seizure medications for the treatment of drug resistant epilepsy in the United States. J Med Econ 2023; 26:189-199. [PMID: 36691763 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2171230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with recurrent epileptic seizures are typically treated with anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Around a third of epilepsy patients fail to achieve an adequate response to ASMs and may be eligible to receive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy for their drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) if they are unsuited to surgery. VNS received approval from the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration agency. However, there has to date been no comprehensive cost effectiveness evaluation of VNS within the US setting. This study was designed, using a US Medicare perspective, to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with VNS as an adjunct to ongoing ASM therapy, compared to ASMs alone. METHODS We developed a cohort state transition model in Microsoft Excel, with four health states defined by different percentage reductions in seizure frequency, with a 3-month cycle and transition probabilities derived from published clinical trials and registry data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to understand the impact of parameter uncertainty. Costs included the VNS device, placement, programming, battery changes, and removal; ASM therapy; adverse events associated with VNS (dyspnea, hoarseness, and cough); and costs associated with seizure burden (i.e. hospitalizations, emergency department visits, neurologist visits). RESULTS Under base case assumptions, treatment with VNS was associated with a 0.385 QALY gain and a $109,678 saving per patient, when compared with ASM therapy alone. The incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) was $128,903 at a threshold of $50,000 per QALY, with the positive iNMB indicating that VNS is a highly cost effective treatment. This result is explained by the modeled reduction in relative seizure frequency and associated reduction in healthcare resource use that the VNS group experienced. Sensitivity analyses supported this conclusion. CONCLUSIONS VNS was evaluated as a cost effective addition to the current standard of care in the treatment of DRE in the US Medicare context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward Faught
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khoo A, Martin L, Tisi JD, O’Keeffe AG, Sander JW, Duncan JS. Cost of pre-surgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery: A single-center experience. Epilepsy Res 2022; 182:106910. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
6
|
Cao M, Galvis D, Vogrin SJ, Woods WP, Vogrin S, Wang F, Woldman W, Terry JR, Peterson A, Plummer C, Cook MJ. Virtual intracranial EEG signals reconstructed from MEG with potential for epilepsy surgery. Nat Commun 2022; 13:994. [PMID: 35194035 PMCID: PMC8863890 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28640-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Modelling the interactions that arise from neural dynamics in seizure genesis is challenging but important in the effort to improve the success of epilepsy surgery. Dynamical network models developed from physiological evidence offer insights into rapidly evolving brain networks in the epileptic seizure. A limitation of previous studies in this field is the dependence on invasive cortical recordings with constrained spatial sampling of brain regions that might be involved in seizure dynamics. Here, we propose virtual intracranial electroencephalography (ViEEG), which combines non-invasive ictal magnetoencephalographic imaging (MEG), dynamical network models and a virtual resection technique. In this proof-of-concept study, we show that ViEEG signals reconstructed from MEG alone preserve critical temporospatial characteristics for dynamical approaches to identify brain areas involved in seizure generation. We show the non-invasive ViEEG approach may have some advantage over intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG). Future work may be designed to test the potential of the virtual iEEG approach for use in surgical management of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Cao
- Department of Medicine St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel Galvis
- Translational Research Exchange at Exeter, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Centre for Systems Modelling and Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon J Vogrin
- Department of Medicine St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Art and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - William P Woods
- Faculty of Health, Art and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sara Vogrin
- Department of Medicine St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,CAS Centre for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Beijing, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wessel Woldman
- Translational Research Exchange at Exeter, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Centre for Systems Modelling and Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John R Terry
- Translational Research Exchange at Exeter, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Centre for Systems Modelling and Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andre Peterson
- Department of Medicine St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chris Plummer
- Department of Medicine St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Faculty of Health, Art and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Mark J Cook
- Department of Medicine St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Egiz A, Nautiyal H, Fazail AH, Asl SF. Letter to the Editor Regarding "Neurological Functional Surgery in Mexico: From Pre-Columbian Cranial Surgery to Functional Neurosurgery in the 21st Century". World Neurosurg 2021; 157:246-247. [PMID: 34929772 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Egiz
- School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Hritik Nautiyal
- School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sokolov E, Sisterson ND, Hussein H, Plummer C, Corson D, Antony AR, Mettenburg JM, Ghearing GR, Pan JW, Urban A, Bagić A, Richardson RM, Kokkinos V. Intracranial monitoring contributes to seizure freedom for temporal lobectomy patients with nonconcordant preoperative data. Epilepsia Open 2021; 7:36-45. [PMID: 34786887 PMCID: PMC8886064 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The question of whether a patient with presumed temporal lobe seizures should proceed directly to temporal lobectomy surgery versus undergo intracranial monitoring arises commonly. We evaluate the effect of intracranial monitoring on seizure outcome in a retrospective cohort of consecutive subjects who specifically underwent an anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 85 patients with focal refractory TLE who underwent ATL following: (a) intracranial monitoring via craniotomy and subdural/depth electrodes (SDE/DE), (b) intracranial monitoring via stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG), or (c) no intracranial monitoring (direct ATL—dATL). For each subject, the presurgical primary hypothesis for epileptogenic zone localization was characterized as unilateral TLE, unilateral TLE plus (TLE+), or TLE with bilateral/poor lateralization. Results At one‐year and most recent follow‐up, Engel Class I and combined I/II outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Outcomes were better in the dATL group compared to the intracranial monitoring groups for lesional cases but were similar in nonlesional cases. Those requiring intracranial monitoring for a hypothesis of TLE+had similar outcomes with either intracranial monitoring approach. sEEG was the only approach used in patients with bilateral or poorly lateralized TLE, resulting in 77.8% of patients seizure‐free at last follow‐up. Importantly, for 85% of patients undergoing SEEG, recommendation for ATL resulted from modifying the primary hypothesis based on iEEG data. Significance Our study highlights the value of intracranial monitoring in equalizing seizure outcomes in difficult‐to‐treat TLE patients undergoing ATL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisaveta Sokolov
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Helweh Hussein
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Cheryl Plummer
- University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Corson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Arun R Antony
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Gena R Ghearing
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jullie W Pan
- University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alexandra Urban
- University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anto Bagić
- University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vasileios Kokkinos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Raspin C, Shankar R, Barion F, Pollit V, Murphy J, Sawyer L, Danielson V. An economic evaluation of vagus nerve stimulation as an adjunctive treatment to anti-seizure medications for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in England. J Med Econ 2021; 24:1037-1051. [PMID: 34348576 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1964306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are commonly used to prevent recurring epileptic seizures, but around a third of people with epilepsy fail to achieve an adequate response. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is clinically recommended for people with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not suitable for surgery, but the cost-effectiveness of the intervention has not recently been evaluated. The study objective is to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with using VNS as an adjunct to ongoing ASM therapy, compared to the strategy of using only ASMs in the treatment of people with DRE, from an English National Health Service perspective. METHODS A cohort state transition model was developed in Microsoft Excel to simulate costs and QALYs of the VNS + ASM and ASM only strategies. Patients could transition between five health states, using a 3-month cycle length. Health states were defined by an expected percentage reduction in seizure frequency, derived from randomized control trial data. Costs included the VNS device as well as its installation, setup, and removal; ASM therapy; adverse events associated with VNS (dyspnea, hoarseness, and cough); and health-state costs associated with epilepsy including hospitalizations, emergency department visits, neurologist visits, and primary care visits. A range of sensitivity analyses, including probabilistic sensitivity analysis, were run to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty. RESULTS In the base case, VNS + ASM had an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £17,771 per QALY gained compared to ASMs alone. The cost-effective ICER was driven by relative reductions in expected seizure frequency and the differences in health care resource use associated therewith. Sensitivity analyses found that the amount of resource use per epilepsy-related health state was a key driver of the cost component. CONCLUSIONS VNS is expected to be a cost-effective intervention in the treatment of DRE in the English National Health Service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rohit Shankar
- Faculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Juvale IIA, Che Has AT. Possible interplay between the theories of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Eur J Neurosci 2020; 53:1998-2026. [PMID: 33306252 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the oldest known neurological disorders and is characterized by recurrent seizure activity. It has a high incidence rate, affecting a broad demographic in both developed and developing countries. Comorbid conditions are frequent in patients with epilepsy and have detrimental effects on their quality of life. Current management options for epilepsy include the use of anti-epileptic drugs, surgery, or a ketogenic diet. However, more than 30% of patients diagnosed with epilepsy exhibit drug resistance to anti-epileptic drugs. Further, surgery and ketogenic diets do little to alleviate the symptoms of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand the underlying mechanisms of pharmacoresistant epilepsy to design newer and more effective anti-epileptic drugs. Several theories of pharmacoresistant epilepsy have been suggested over the years, the most common being the gene variant hypothesis, network hypothesis, multidrug transporter hypothesis, and target hypothesis. In our review, we discuss the main theories of pharmacoresistant epilepsy and highlight a possible interconnection between their mechanisms that could lead to the development of novel therapies for pharmacoresistant epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Imtiyaz Ahmed Juvale
- Department of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - Ahmad Tarmizi Che Has
- Department of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Initiating a new national epilepsy surgery program: Experiences gathered in Georgia. Epilepsy Behav 2020; 111:107259. [PMID: 32622155 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Surgery is the most effective therapeutic approach for medically refractory epilepsies and a safe and cost-efficient treatment in terms of long-term expenses of direct, indirect, and intangible costs. Georgia is a Caucasian low- to middle-income country with a remarkable effort to deal with epileptic diseases, but without an appropriate epilepsy surgery program. To address the needs for such a service in this country, two joint German-Georgian projects were initiated in 2017 and 2019. In the framework of these projects, a productive exchange program involving German and Georgian experts was undertaken in the past two years. This program included training and mentoring for Georgian clinical colleagues, as well as joint case conferences and workshops with the aim of optimizing presurgical diagnostics and preparing for an epilepsy surgery program in Georgia. Finally, a postsurgical medium- and long-term follow-up scheme was organized as the third component of this comprehensive approach. As a result of our efforts, the first patients underwent anterior temporal lobectomy and all of them remain seizure-free up to the present day. Hence, epilepsy surgery is not only feasible, but also already available in Georgia. In this report, we aim to share our experiences in the initiation and implementation of surgical epilepsy intervention in Georgia and illustrate our recent endeavor and achievements.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis of epilepsy surgery in children and adolescents with drug resistant focal epilepsy at three years in a tertiary care epilepsy center in Thailand. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 79:163-168. [PMID: 33070889 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy surgery is proven as a cost-effective treatment in developed countries, especially in adults with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study is aimed to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of epilepsy surgery in children and adolescents with DRE at three years compared with those who were eligible for surgery but received medical treatment. This study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2018. Clinical data were obtained from a retrospective chart review. Direct medical costs, including epilepsy surgery, inpatient and outpatient treatment were retrieved from the finance department. Direct non-medical costs were collected from the family interview. The effectiveness was determined by percent seizure reduction and quality of life assessed by EQ-5D scores. Decision tree analysis using TreeAge Pro® 2018 was deployed to determine the cost-effectiveness. Seventeen patients had epilepsy surgery and 19 were in the medical group. Seizure freedom was noted in 52% and 16% in the surgical and medical groups, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 743,040 THB (22,793 USD) per 1 QALY and 3302 THB (101 USD) per 1% seizure reduction. The study did not demonstrate cost-effectiveness of epilepsy surgery in the short term compared with Thailand's threshold (160,000 THB (4908 USD) per 1 QALY). Epilepsy surgery may be cost-effective if evaluated beyond three years.
Collapse
|
13
|
Noninvasive electromagnetic source imaging of spatiotemporally distributed epileptogenic brain sources. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1946. [PMID: 32327635 PMCID: PMC7181775 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15781-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain networks are spatiotemporal phenomena that dynamically vary over time. Functional imaging approaches strive to noninvasively estimate these underlying processes. Here, we propose a novel source imaging approach that uses high-density EEG recordings to map brain networks. This approach objectively addresses the long-standing limitations of conventional source imaging techniques, namely, difficulty in objectively estimating the spatial extent, as well as the temporal evolution of underlying brain sources. We validate our approach by directly comparing source imaging results with the intracranial EEG (iEEG) findings and surgical resection outcomes in a cohort of 36 patients with focal epilepsy. To this end, we analyzed a total of 1,027 spikes and 86 seizures. We demonstrate the capability of our approach in imaging both the location and spatial extent of brain networks from noninvasive electrophysiological measurements, specifically for ictal and interictal brain networks. Our approach is a powerful tool for noninvasively investigating large-scale dynamic brain networks. Noninvasive electromagnetic measurements are utilized effectively to estimate large scale dynamic brain networks. Sohrabpour et al. propose a novel electrophysiological source imaging approach to estimate the location and size of epileptogenic tissues in patients with epilepsy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cramer JA, Yan T, Tieu R, Knoth RL, Fincher C, Malhotra M, Choi J. Risk of hospitalization among patients with epilepsy using long versus short half-life adjunctive antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsy Behav 2020; 102:106634. [PMID: 31783318 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) remain the primary treatment for epilepsy, many patients continue to have seizures. Uncontrolled seizures may be related to AED half-life, since short half-life (SHL) AEDs require more frequent dosing compared with the simplified regimens of long half-life (LHL) AEDs. Long half-life AEDs may also improve seizure control by extending missed dose forgiveness periods. The value of LHL AEDs may be assessed as reduced healthcare utilization. The study's objective was to examine the impact of adding an LHL versus SHL adjunctive AED on the risk of hospitalizations in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. METHODS This was a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study using the Symphony Health Solution Patient Integrated Dataverse. Patients ≥12 years old with uncontrolled epilepsy (≥2 medical claims ≥30 days apart) were identified during a study period (8/1/2012-7/31/2017). Patients were selected if they were subsequently initiated an adjunctive AED (excluding modified release formulations), and the prescription date served as the index. Patients were stratified into two mutually exclusive cohorts based on the index AED half-life (≤20 versus >20 h). Poisson regressions with robust error variances were performed for the relative risks (RRs) of all-cause, epilepsy-related, and injury-related hospitalizations. RESULTS A total of 4984 patients were identified (2705 in the LHL and 2279 in the SHL cohort). Compared with those in the SHL cohort, patients in the LHL cohort were significantly younger [mean (SD, years): 43.9 (18.5) versus 49.2 (17.2), p < 0.001] and were less comorbid [mean (SD) of Charlson comorbidity index: 1.2 (1.8) versus 1.8 (2.2), p < 0.001]. In the one-year postindex date, adjusting for group differences, the risks of both all-cause and epilepsy-related hospitalizations were significantly lower in the LHL cohort than in the SHL cohort [all-cause: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76-0.93), p = 0.0006; epilepsy-related: 0.83 (0.73-0.94), p = 0.0046].Injury-related hospitalizations did not differ between LHL and SHL cohorts. CONCLUSION In patients with uncontrolled epilepsy who were initiated on an adjunctive AED, the choice of an LHL versus SHL was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause and epilepsy-related hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tingjian Yan
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, 280 S. Beverly Dr., Ste. 404, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, USA
| | - Ryan Tieu
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, 280 S. Beverly Dr., Ste. 404, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, USA
| | | | | | - Manoj Malhotra
- Eisai Inc., 100 Tice Blvd., Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677, USA
| | - Jiyoon Choi
- Eisai Inc., 100 Tice Blvd., Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sacino M, Huang SS, Alexander H, Fayed I, Keating RF, Oluigbo CO. An Initial Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 2020; 55:141-148. [PMID: 32829333 DOI: 10.1159/000509329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a new technology that provides a clinically efficacious and minimally invasive alternative to conventional microsurgical resection. However, little data exist on how costs compare to traditional open surgery. The goal of this paper is to investigate the cost-effectiveness of MRgLITT in the treatment of pediatric epilepsy. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of pediatric patients who underwent MRgLITT via the Visualase® thermal therapy system (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) between December 2013 and September 2017. Direct costs associated with preoperative, operative, and follow-up care were extracted. Benefit was calculated in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the cost-effectiveness was derived from the discounted total direct costs over QALY. Sensitivity analysis on 4 variables was utilized to assess the validity of our results. RESULTS Twelve consecutive pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy underwent MRgLITT procedures. At the last postoperative follow-up, 8 patients were seizure free (Engel I, 66.7%), 2 demonstrated significant improvement (Engel II, 16.7%), and 2 patients showed worthwhile improvement (Engel III, 16.7%). The average cumulative discounted QALY was 2.11 over the lifetime of a patient. Adjusting for inflation, MRgLITT procedures had a cost-effectiveness of USD 22,211 per QALY. Our sensitivity analysis of cost variables is robust and supports the procedure to be cost--effective. CONCLUSION Our data suggests that MRgLITT may be a cost-effective alternative to traditional surgical resection in pediatric epilepsy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Sacino
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sean S Huang
- Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Hepzibha Alexander
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Islam Fayed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Robert F Keating
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Chima O Oluigbo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA, .,Department of Neurosurgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jukkarwala A, Baheti NN, Dhakoji A, Salgotra B, Menon G, Gupta A, Prakash S, Rathore C. Establishment of low cost epilepsy surgery centers in resource poor setting. Seizure 2019; 69:245-250. [PMID: 31121549 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To prospectively assess the feasibility of establishing low cost epilepsy surgery programs in resource poor settings. METHOD We started epilepsy surgery centers in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities in India in private hospitals. This model is based on the identifying and operating ideal epilepsy surgery candidates on the basis of clinical history, interictal and ictal video-EEG data, and 1.5 T MRI without other investigations and without regular involvement of other specialists. Trained epileptologists formed the fulcrum of this program who identified ideal candidates, offered them counseling, and read video-EEG and MRI. We also spread epilepsy awareness among locals and physicians and established focused epilepsy clinics. The expenses were subsidized for deserving patients and policies were devised to keep video-EEG duration and staff requirement to minimum. Difficult epilepsy surgery cases were referred to established centers. Initial surgeries were performed by invited epilepsy surgeons and subsequently by local neurosurgeons. RESULTS A total of 125 epilepsy surgeries were performed at three centers since 2012. This included 81(64.8%) temporal lobe resections, 26 (20.8%) extratemporal focal resections, and 13 (10.4%) hemispherotomies. Of the 93 patients with more than 1 year of postoperative followup, 86 (92.5%) had Engel class IA outcome. There were minor complications in 5% patients. Average cost of presurgical evaluation and surgery was Rs. 92,707 (USD 1,324). CONCLUSIONS It is possible to establish successful epilepsy surgery programs in resource poor setting with reasonable costs. This low cost model can be replicated in other parts of world to reduce the surgical treatment gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anis Jukkarwala
- Department of Neurology, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Neeraj N Baheti
- Department of Neurology, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Dhakoji
- Department of Neurology, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India; Department of Neurosurgery, Sahyadri Super Speciality Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Bhagwati Salgotra
- Department of Neurosciences, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Girish Menon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Aditya Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Artemis Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Sanjay Prakash
- Department of Neurosciences, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Chaturbhuj Rathore
- Department of Neurosciences, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Watila MM, Xiao F, Keezer MR, Miserocchi A, Winkler AS, McEvoy AW, Sander JW. Epilepsy surgery in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Epilepsy Behav 2019; 92:311-326. [PMID: 30738248 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy surgery is an important treatment option for people with drug-resistant epilepsy. Surgical procedures for epilepsy are underutilized worldwide, but it is far worse in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and it is less clear as to what extent people with drug-resistant epilepsy receive such treatment at all. Here, we review the existing evidence for the availability and outcome of epilepsy surgery in LMIC and discuss some challenges and priority. METHODS We used an accepted six-stage methodological framework for scoping reviews as a guide. We searched PubMed, Embase, Global Health Archives, Index Medicus for South East Asia Region (IMSEAR), Index Medicus for Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR), Latin American & Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), African Journal Online (AJOL), and African Index Medicus (AIM) to identify the relevant literature. RESULTS We retrieved 148 articles on epilepsy surgery from 31 countries representing 22% of the 143 LMIC. Epilepsy surgery appears established in some of these centers in Asia and Latin America while some are in their embryonic stage reporting procedures in a small cohort performed mostly by motivated neurosurgeons. The commonest surgical procedure reported was temporal lobectomies. The postoperative seizure-free rates and quality of life (QOL) are comparable with those in the high-income countries (HIC). Some models have shown that epilepsy surgery can be performed within a resource-limited setting through collaboration with international partners and through the use of information and communications technology (ICT). The cost of surgery is a fraction of what is available in HIC. CONCLUSION This review has demonstrated the availability of epilepsy surgery in a few LMIC. The information available is inadequate to make any reasonable conclusion of its existence as routine practice. Collaborations with international partners can provide an opportunity to bring high-quality academic training and technological transfer directly to surgeons working in these regions and should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musa M Watila
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter SL9 0RJ, UK; Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, PMB 1414, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria
| | - Fenglai Xiao
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, Epilepsy Society, Gerrards Cross, UK
| | - Mark R Keezer
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter SL9 0RJ, UK; Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec H2L 4M1, Canada; Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, Netherlands
| | - Anna Miserocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Andrea S Winkler
- Centre for Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway; Center for Global Health, Department of Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Andrew W McEvoy
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Josemir W Sander
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter SL9 0RJ, UK; Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Achterweg 5, 2103 SW Heemstede, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sacino MF, Huang SS, Keating RF, Gaillard WD, Oluigbo CO. An initial cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2018; 34:495-502. [PMID: 29159426 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-017-3658-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies have illustrated the clinical utility of the addition of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) to conventional microsurgical resection. While iMRI requires initial capital cost investment, long-term reduction in costly follow-up management and reoperation costs may prove economically efficacious. The objective of this study is to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the addition of iMRI utilization versus conventional microsurgical techniques in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) resection in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric subjects who underwent surgical resection of FCD at the Children's National Health System between March 2005 and April 2015. Patients were assigned to one of three cohorts: iMRI-assisted resection, conventional resection with iMRI-assisted reoperation, or conventional resection. Direct costs included preoperative, operative, postoperative, long-term follow-up, and antiepileptic drug (AED) costs. The cost-effectiveness was calculated as the sum total of all direct medical costs over the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We also performed sensitivity analysis on numerous variables to assess the validity of our results. RESULTS Fifty-six consecutive pediatric patients underwent resective surgery for medically intractable FCD. Ten patients underwent iMRI-assisted resection; 7 underwent conventional resection followed by iMRI-assisted reoperation; 39 patients underwent conventional microsurgical resection. Taken over the lifetime of the patient, the cumulative discounted QALY of patients in the iMRI-assisted resection cohort was about 2.91 years, versus 2.61 years in the conventional resection with iMRI-assisted reoperation cohort, and 1.76 years for the conventional resection cohort. Adjusting for inflation, iMRI-assisted surgeries have a cost-effectiveness ratio of $16,179 per QALY, versus $28,514 per QALY for the conventional resection with iMRI-assisted reoperation cohort, and $49,960 per QALY for the conventional resection cohort. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that no one single variable significantly altered cost-effectiveness across all three cohorts compared to the baseline results. CONCLUSION The addition of iMRI to conventional microsurgical techniques for resection of FCD in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy resulted in increased seizure freedom and reduction in long-term direct medical costs compared to conventional surgeries. Our data suggests that iMRI may be a cost-effective addition to the surgical armamentarium for epilepsy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew F Sacino
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sean S Huang
- Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Robert F Keating
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William D Gaillard
- Department of Neurology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Chima O Oluigbo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Picot MC, Jaussent A, Neveu D, Kahane P, Crespel A, Gelisse P, Hirsch E, Derambure P, Dupont S, Landré E, Chassoux F, Valton L, Vignal JP, Marchal C, Lamy C, Semah F, Biraben A, Arzimanoglou A, Petit J, Thomas P, Macioce V, Dujols P, Ryvlin P. Cost-effectiveness analysis of epilepsy surgery in a controlled cohort of adult patients with intractable partial epilepsy: A 5-year follow-up study. Epilepsia 2016; 57:1669-1679. [DOI: 10.1111/epi.13492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Christine Picot
- Clinical Research and Epidemiology Unit; CHU Montpellier; Montpellier France
- INSERM; Clinical Investigation Center 1411; Montpellier France
| | - Audrey Jaussent
- Clinical Research and Epidemiology Unit; CHU Montpellier; Montpellier France
| | - Dorine Neveu
- INSERM U 1058; Montpellier France
- University Montpellier; Montpellier France
| | - Philippe Kahane
- Department of Neurology; GIN; CHU Grenoble; Grenoble France
- INSERM U836, UJF; Grenoble Alpes University; Grenoble France
| | | | | | - Edouard Hirsch
- Department of Neurology; CHU Strasbourg; Strasbourg France
| | - Philippe Derambure
- Lille University Medical Center; CHU Lille, EA 1046; University of Lille2; Lille France
| | - Sophie Dupont
- Epileptology Unit; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; an UPMC University Paris 06; Paris France
| | - Elizabeth Landré
- Department of Neurosurgery; AP-HP and University Paris Descartes; Paris France
| | - Francine Chassoux
- Department of Neurosurgery; AP-HP and University Paris Descartes; Paris France
| | - Luc Valton
- Department of Neurology; University Hospital, and UMR 5549; CNRS; Toulouse France
| | - Jean-Pierre Vignal
- Clinical Neurophysiology and Epileptology Department; University Hospital of Nancy; Nancy France
| | | | - Catherine Lamy
- Department of Neurology; AP-HP and University Paris Descartes; Paris France
| | - Franck Semah
- Lille University Medical Center; CHU Lille, EA 1046; University of Lille2; Lille France
- Department of Neurosurgery; AP-HP and University Paris Descartes; Paris France
- Department of Neurology; AP-HP and University Paris Descartes; Paris France
| | - Arnaud Biraben
- Department of Neurology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| | - Alexis Arzimanoglou
- Epilepsy; Sleep and Paediatric Neurophysiology Department (ESEFNP); University Hospitals of Lyon (HCL) and DYCOG Team; Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL); INSERM U1028; CNRS UMR 5292; Lyon France
| | - Jérôme Petit
- La Teppe Epilepsy Center; Tain l'Hermitage France
| | - Pierre Thomas
- Department of Neurology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Valérie Macioce
- Clinical Research and Epidemiology Unit; CHU Montpellier; Montpellier France
| | - Pierre Dujols
- Clinical Research and Epidemiology Unit; CHU Montpellier; Montpellier France
- INSERM U 1058; Montpellier France
- University Montpellier; Montpellier France
| | - Philippe Ryvlin
- Department of Functional Neurology and Epileptology and the Institute of Epilepsies; Hospices Civils de Lyon; Lyon France
- Lyon 1 University; Lyon's Neuroscience Research Center; Lyon France
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV; Lausanne Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schiltz NK, Kaiboriboon K, Koroukian SM, Singer ME, Love TE. Long-term reduction of health care costs and utilization after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 2015; 57:316-24. [PMID: 26693701 DOI: 10.1111/epi.13280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term direct medical costs, health care utilization, and mortality following resective surgery in persons with uncontrolled epilepsy. METHODS Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of Medicaid beneficiaries with epilepsy from 2000 to 2008. The study population included 7,835 persons with uncontrolled focal epilepsy ages 18-64 years, with an average follow-up time of 5 years. Of these, 135 received surgery during the study period. To account for selection bias, we used risk-set optimal pairwise matching on a time-varying propensity score, and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Repeated measures generalized linear models were used to model utilization and cost outcomes. Cox proportional hazard was used to model survival. RESULTS The mean direct medical cost difference between the surgical group and control group was $6,806 after risk-set matching. The incidence rate ratio of inpatient, emergency room, and outpatient utilization was lower among the surgical group in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. There was no significant difference in mortality after adjustment. Among surgical cases, mean annual costs per subject were on average $6,484 lower, and all utilization measures were lower after surgery compared to before. SIGNIFICANCE Subjects that underwent epilepsy surgery had lower direct medical care costs and health care utilization. These findings support that epilepsy surgery yields substantial health care cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas K Schiltz
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.,Center for Child Health and Policy, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Kitti Kaiboriboon
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Epilepsy Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Siran M Koroukian
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Mendel E Singer
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Thomas E Love
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.,Department of Medicine, CWRU at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.,Center for Health Care Research and Policy, CWRU at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bridging the Gap between Evidence and Practice for Adults with Medically Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Is a Change in Funding Policy Needed to Stimulate a Shift in Practice? EPILEPSY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2015; 2015:675071. [PMID: 26770822 PMCID: PMC4685103 DOI: 10.1155/2015/675071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Surgery for medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) in adults has been shown to be effective but underutilized. Comprehensive health economic evaluations of surgery compared with continued medical management are limited. Policy changes may be necessary to influence practice shift. Methods. A critical review of the literature on health economic analyses for adults with MRE was conducted. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CRD, and EconLit databases were searched using relevant subject headings and keywords pertaining to adults, epilepsy, and health economic evaluations. The screening was conducted independently and in duplicate. Results. Four studies were identified (1 Canadian, 2 American, and 1 French). Two were cost-utility analyses and 2 were cost-effectiveness evaluations. Only one was conducted after the effectiveness of surgery was established through a randomized trial. All suggested surgery to be favorable in the medium to long term (7-8 years and beyond). The reduction of medication use was the major cost-saving parameter in favor of surgery. Conclusions. Although updated evaluations that are more generalizable across settings are necessary, surgery appears to be a favorable option from a health economic perspective. Given the limited success of knowledge translation endeavours, funder-level policy changes such as quality-based purchasing may be necessary to induce a shift in practice.
Collapse
|
22
|
Rudmik L, Smith TL, Mace JC, Schlosser RJ, Hwang PH, Soler ZM. Productivity costs decrease after endoscopic sinus surgery for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2015; 126:570-4. [PMID: 26371457 DOI: 10.1002/lary.25656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS The primary objective of this pilot study was to define the change in productivity costs following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Secondary objectives were to identify CRS-related characteristics that may influence the degree of productivity improvement after ESS. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional, observational cohort study. METHODS The human capital approach was used to define productivity costs. Annual absenteeism, presenteeism, and lost leisure time were quantified to define annual lost productive time (LPT). LPT was monetized using the annual daily wage rates obtained from the 2012 US Census and the 2013 US Department of Labor statistics. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients with refractory CRS who underwent ESS were followed for a mean of 15 months (range, 8-25 months). Following ESS, there were improvements in annual absenteeism (22 days reduced to 3 days), annual presenteeism (41 days reduced to 19 days), and annual household days lost (12 days reduced to 6 days). Overall, the preoperative productivity costs were reduced after ESS ($9,190 vs. $3,373, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Daily productivity is negatively impacted by the presence of CRS. The outcomes from this study provide the first insights into the reduced productivity costs associated with receiving ESS for refractory CRS. Future studies with larger sample sizes will need to validate the results from this pilot study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2c Laryngoscope, 126:570-574, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Rudmik
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery , Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Jess C Mace
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pillas, MSc D, Selai C. Economic aspects of epilepsy and antiepileptic treatment: a review of the literature. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 5:327-38. [DOI: 10.1586/14737167.5.3.327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
24
|
Marras CE, Canevini MP, Colicchio G, Guerrini R, Rubboli G, Scerrati M, Spreafico R, Tassi L, LoRusso G, Tinuper P. Health Technology Assessment report on the presurgical evaluation and surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013; 54 Suppl 7:49-58. [PMID: 24099055 DOI: 10.1111/epi.12309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Epilepsy is a neurologic disorder with major social impact. Surgery is a valuable option in patients who are not responding to antiepileptic drugs. The literature reports demonstrate that a proportion ranging from 40 to 100% of patients with epilepsy achieve seizure remission after surgery. A presurgical evaluation (clinical and instrumental) must be performed in all patients with drug-resistant epilepsy to assess their suitability for surgical intervention. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) represents a modern approach to the analysis of technologies used for health care. HTA could be considered a bridge between science that produces evidence and the decisions that can be taken on the basis of that evidence at different levels of the health care system. The aim of this study is the HTA of epilepsy surgery including clinical, ethical, social, and economic features. METHODS The present study includes an analysis of the diagnostic and surgical workup performed at the Italian centers for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The study includes the following issues: (1) social, ethical impact, and costs of the disease; (2) clinical results, efficacy, and safety of surgery; (3) ethics and quality of life after surgery; and (4) economic impact and productivity regained after surgery. The cost of managing a patient with DRE included in the presurgical study was estimated by the bottom-up microcosting technique that starts from a detailed collection of data on consumption of resources and full costing. The phases analyzed were (1) noninvasive diagnostic workup; (2) neurosurgical intervention; and (3) follow-up. KEY FINDINGS The literature reports indicate epilepsy surgery as an effective treatment both on clinical results and on ethical, social, and quality of life aspects. The workup including the noninvasive presurgical study followed by surgery has a total cost of €20,827. Management of short-term follow-up increases the overhead to €22,291 at the first year, and then to €23,571 after 5 years. According to the estimates made in this survey, funding based on diagnosis-related group (DRG) tariff for the noninvasive diagnostic stage involving hospital admission is not remunerative in Italy either at regional or national levels. Effectively the difference between full cost and DRG has a delta of €3,402 and €2,537 respectively. The total cost of the presurgical, surgical, and follow-up evaluation is not remunerative for €10,554 (national data). SIGNIFICANCE Economic surveys in Italy have shown that surgery for DRE is an advantageous treatment from the standpoint of third-party payers and is cost-effective for society. DRE presurgical evaluation and surgery are not remunerative either at regional or national levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Efisio Marras
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Perry MS, Duchowny M. Surgical versus medical treatment for refractory epilepsy: Outcomes beyond seizure control. Epilepsia 2013; 54:2060-70. [DOI: 10.1111/epi.12427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Scott Perry
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Program; Jane and John Justin Neuroscience Center; Cook Children's Medical Center; Fort Worth Texas U.S.A
| | - Michael Duchowny
- Department of Neurology and Brain Institute; Miami Children's Hospital; Miami Florida U.S.A
- Department of Neurology; University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine; Miami Florida U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Manuel Campos P, Eduardo Barragán P, Lilian Cuadra O. Realidad actual de las epilepsias en chile y latinoamérica. REVISTA MÉDICA CLÍNICA LAS CONDES 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s0716-8640(13)70242-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
27
|
Rocha L. Interaction between electrical modulation of the brain and pharmacotherapy to control pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Pharmacol Ther 2013; 138:211-28. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2013] [Accepted: 01/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
28
|
|
29
|
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel G Campos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Koubeissi MZ, Puwanant A, Jehi L, Alshekhlee A. In-hospital complications of epilepsy surgery: a six-year nationwide experience. Br J Neurosurg 2009; 23:524-9. [DOI: 10.1080/02688690903019589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
32
|
Wieshmann UC, Larkin D, Varma T, Eldridge P. Predictors of outcome after temporal lobectomy for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 2008; 118:306-12. [PMID: 18462478 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01043.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of outcome after epilepsy surgery in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHODS Seventy-six patients with normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or hippocampal sclerosis on MRI who underwent anterior temporal lobe resections were included. Outcome 2 years after surgery was classified as good (Engel I and II) or poor (Engel III and IV). Gender, age at onset and duration of epilepsy, history of febrile convulsions, auras, right- or left-sided TLE, memory ipsilateral to seizure onset (Wada test), hippocampal asymmetry (HA) and T2 relaxation time, amygdala, temporal lobe and hemispheral volume were tested for associations with outcome. RESULTS Sixty-seven percent had a good outcome. Of all parameters tested, only a history of febrile convulsions and HA on quantitative MRI were significantly associated with a good seizure outcome. The absence of these parameters did not exclude a good outcome, but only five of 18 patients (28%) without HA and without a history of febrile convulsions had a good outcome. CONCLUSION Febrile convulsions and HA were predictors of outcome after epilepsy surgery in TLE. Subtle volume loss in amygdala, temporal lobe or hemispheres and the memory ipsilateral to the side of resection were not associated with outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U C Wieshmann
- The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lundgren T, Dahl J, Yardi N, Melin L. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and yoga for drug-refractory epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsy Behav 2008; 13:102-8. [PMID: 18343200 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2008] [Revised: 02/07/2008] [Accepted: 02/10/2008] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a need for controlled outcome studies on behavioral treatment of epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and yoga in the treatment of epilepsy. METHODS The design consisted of a randomized controlled trial with repeated measures (N=18). All participants had an EEG-verified epilepsy diagnosis with drug-refractory seizures. Participants were randomized into one of two groups: ACT or yoga. Therapeutic effects were measured using seizure index (frequency x duration) and quality of life (Satisfaction with Life Scale, WHOQOL-BREF). The treatment protocols consisted of 12 hours of professional therapy distributed in two individual sessions, two group sessions during a 5-week period, and booster sessions at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. Seizure index was continuously assessed during the 3-month baseline and 12-month follow-up. Quality of life was measured after treatment and at the 6-month and 1-year follow-ups. RESULTS The results indicate that both ACT and yoga significantly reduce seizure index and increase quality of life over time. ACT reduced seizure index significantly more as compared with yoga. Participants in both the ACT and yoga groups improved their quality of life significantly as measured by one of two quality-of-life instruments. The ACT group increased their quality of life significantly as compared with the yoga group as measured by the WHOQOL-BREF, and the yoga group increased their quality of life significantly as compared with the ACT group as measured by the SWLS. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that complementary treatments, such as ACT and yoga, decrease seizure index and increase quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Lundgren
- Department of Psychology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Factors associated with utilization of healthcare resources among epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res 2008; 79:120-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2007] [Revised: 11/21/2007] [Accepted: 01/22/2008] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
35
|
Picot MC, Jaussent A, Kahane P, Crespel A, Gélisse P, Hirsch E, Derambure P, Dupont S, Landré E, Chassoux F, Valton L, Vignal JP, Marchal C, Rougier A, Lamy C, Semah F, Biraben A, Arzimanoglou A, Petit J, Thomas P, Neveu D, Ryvlin P. Évaluation médicoéconomique de la chirurgie des épilepsies partielles pharmacorésistantes de l’adulte. Neurochirurgie 2008; 54:484-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2008.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2008] [Accepted: 02/25/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
36
|
Kahane P, Ryvlin P, Vercueil L, Hirsch E, Arzimanoglou A. À l’heure de l’évaluation économique des pratiques hospitalières : quelle place pour la chirurgie de l’épilepsie ? Rev Neurol (Paris) 2007; 163:1151-6. [DOI: 10.1016/s0035-3787(07)78399-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2007] [Revised: 03/20/2007] [Accepted: 04/17/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
37
|
Lundgren T, Dahl J, Melin L, Kies B. Evaluation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Drug Refractory Epilepsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial in South Africa-A Pilot Study. Epilepsia 2006; 47:2173-9. [PMID: 17201719 DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00892.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Psychological interventions in the treatment of epilepsy have been developed and evaluated for many years but the amount of research has hardly made an impact on how epilepsy is treated. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a psychological treatment program consisting of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) together with some behavioral seizure control technology shown to be successful in earlier research. METHODS The method consisted of a randomized controlled trial group design with repeated measures (n=27). All participants had an EEG verified epilepsy diagnosis with drug refractory seizures. Participants were randomized into one of two conditions, ACT or supportive therapy (ST). Therapeutic effects were measured by examining changes in quality of life (SWLS and WHOQOL) and seizure index (frequency x duration). Both treatment conditions consisted of only nine hours of professional therapy distributed in two individual and two group sessions during a four-week period. RESULTS The results showed significant effects over all of the dependent variables for the ACT group as compared to the ST group at six- and twelve-month follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS The results from this study suggest that a short-term psychotherapy program combined with anticonvulsant drugs may help to prevent the long-term disability that occurs from drug refractory seizures.
Collapse
|
38
|
Knowlton RC, Elgavish R, Howell J, Blount J, Burneo JG, Faught E, Kankirawatana P, Riley K, Morawetz R, Worthington J, Kuzniecky RI. Magnetic source imaging versus intracranial electroencephalogram in epilepsy surgery: A prospective study. Ann Neurol 2006; 59:835-42. [PMID: 16634031 DOI: 10.1002/ana.20857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Noninvasive brain imaging tests can potentially supplement or even replace the use of intracranial electroencephalogram (ICEEG), an invasive, costly procedure used in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. This study prospectively examined the agreement between magnetic source imaging (MSI) and ICEEG localization in epilepsy surgery candidates. METHODS Patients completing video monitoring with scalp EEG who had intractable partial epilepsy based on ictal electro-clinico-anatomical features were screened. Forty-nine enrolled patients (mean age, 27 years; range, 1-61 years) completed MSI and ICEEG studies. Decisions about ICEEG and surgery were made at a consensus conference where MSI could only influence ICEEG coverage by indicating supplemental coverage to that already planned by an original hypothesis. RESULTS The positive predictive value of MSI for seizure localization was 82 to 90%, depending on whether computed against ICEEG alone or in combination with surgical outcome. The kappa score of agreement for MSI with ICEEG was 0.2744 (p < 0.01) INTERPRETATION MSI yields localizing information with a high positive predictive value in epilepsy surgery candidates who typically require ICEEG. This finding suggests that enough clinical validity exists for MSI to potentially replace ICEEG for seizure localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Knowlton
- Department of Neurology, UAB Epilepsy Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, 35294-0001, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
García-Contreras F, Constantino-Casas P, Castro-Ríos A, Nevárez-Sida A, Estrada Correa GDC, Carlos Rivera F, Guzmán-Caniupan J, Torres-Arreola LDP, Contreras-Hernández I, Mould-Quevedo J, Garduño-Espinosa J. Direct Medical Costs for Partial Refractory Epilepsy in Mexico. Arch Med Res 2006; 37:376-83. [PMID: 16513488 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2005] [Accepted: 07/15/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to determine the direct medical costs in patients with partial refractory epilepsy at the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) in Mexico. METHODS We carried out a multicenter, retrospective-cohort partial-economic evaluation study of partial refractory epilepsy (PRE) diagnosed patients and analyzed patient files from four secondary- and tertiary-level hospitals. PRE patients >12 years of age with two or more antiepileptic drugs and follow-up for at least 1 year were included. The perspective was institutional (IMSS). Only direct healthcare costs were considered, and the timeline was 1 year. Cost techniques were microcosting, average per-service cost, and per-day cost, all costs expressed in U.S. dollars (USD, 2004). RESULTS We reviewed 813 files of PRE patients: 133 had a correct diagnosis, and only 72 met study inclusion criteria. Fifty eight percent were females, 64% were <35 years of age, 47% were students, in 73% maximum academic level achieved was high school, and 53% were single. Fifty one percent of cases experienced simple partial seizures and 94% had more than one monthly seizure. Annual healthcare cost of the 72 patients was 190,486 USD, ambulatory healthcare contributing 76% and hospital healthcare with 24%. CONCLUSIONS Annual mean healthcare cost per PRE patient was 2,646 USD; time of disease evolution and severity of the patient's illness did not affect costs significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando García-Contreras
- Unidad de Investigación en Economía de la Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México D.F., México.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lee WC, Hoffmann MS, Arcona S, D'Souza J, Wang Q, Pashos CL. A cost comparison of alternative regimens fortreatment-refractory partial seizure disorder: An econometric analysis. Clin Ther 2005; 27:1629-38. [PMID: 16330300 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2005] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial seizure disorder is typically treated by monotherapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). However, when the condition is refractory to the initial treatment regimen, patients may be switched to monotherapy with another AED or to combination therapy with the initial AED plus a second AED. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine the economic costs associated with treatment-refractory partial seizure disorder and to compare the costs of 2 alternative approaches: a switch to oxcarbazepine (OXC) monotherapy or the addition to the regimen of another AED (AED add-on). METHODS Adult patients with a diagnosis of partial seizure disorder who received initial AED monotherapy between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2003, were identified from the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database, a health plan administrative claims database. The medical and pharmacy history of these patients was analyzed from 6 months before a change to either OXC monotherapy or AED add-on therapy through 12 months after the change in treatment. Total health care resource utilization and the associated costs were compared within each cohort before and after the change, as well as between cohorts, with statistical differences tested using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Multivariate econometric analyses were performed to examine the impact of age, sex, geographic location, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the presence of specific comorbidities. RESULTS Demographic and clinical characteristics 102 were similar between the OXC monotherapy cohort (n = 259) and the AED add-on cohort (n = 795). Annual direct treatment costs increased in both groups in the period after the failure of initial monotherapy, increasing from 10,462 US dollars to 11,360 US dollars in the OXC cohort and from 10,137 US dollars to 12,201 US dollars in the AED add on cohort (P < 0.01). Increased pharmacy costs were the primary driver behind cost increases in both cohorts. Patients in the AED add-on cohort were significantly more likely to have an emergency department visit during the period after the failure of initial monotherapy compared with the OXC monotherapy cohort (odds ratio = 1.52; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Despite limitations, the results of retrospective analysis of claims data suggest that the care of patients with treatment-refractory partial seizure disorder is costly and may vary significantly based on the pattern of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Chan Lee
- HERQuLES, Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Évaluation médico-économique de la chirurgie des épilepsies partielles pharmaco-résistantes de l’adulte. Étude coût-efficacité - Résultats préliminaires. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/s0035-3787(04)71217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|