Diurnal, week-to-week, and long-term variation in urine deoxypyridinoline cross-link excretion in healthy older women

Should urine pH be adjusted prior to gel-based proteome analysis?

The urine has become one of the most widely used clinical samples for biomarker discovery. The pH of human urine may vary largely from 4.5 to 8.0. Previously, it was questionable whether the urine pH would affect proteome analysis and whether the urine pH needed to be adjusted prior to proteome analysis remained unclear. We therefore performed a systematic analysis of the effect of urine pH on proteome profile. Midstream second morning and random afternoon urine samples were collected from 5 males and 5 females who were healthy and had no recent medication. After removal of cells and debris by low-speed centrifugation, pH levels of individual samples were measured and urinary proteins were isolated by 75% ethanol precipitation. Equally loaded 100 microg of proteins from individual samples were resolved in 2-DE (linear pH 3-10) and visualized with SYPRO Ruby fluorescence stain. There was no significant correlation between difference in the morning versus afternoon urine pH (DeltapH) and %match of protein spots derived from morning versus afternoon urine samples in individual samples (Pearson's r = 0.074; p = 0.839). In parallel, all individual samples with equal volume were pooled. The pH of the pooled urine was adjusted to 4-10 and urinary proteome profiles were analyzed as for individual samples. ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc multiple comparisons showed no significant differences in total number of detected spots and %match among various pH levels. Our data suggest that the urine pH has no significant effects on urinary proteome profile and thus needs no adjustment prior to gel-based proteome analysis.

Dietary protein and calcium interact to influence calcium retention: a controlled feeding study

BACKGROUND

The effect of meat protein on calcium retention at different calcium intakes is unresolved.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to test the effect of dietary protein on calcium retention at low and high intakes of calcium.

DESIGN

In a randomized controlled feeding study with a 2 x 2 factorial crossover design, healthy postmenopausal women (n = 27) consumed either approximately 675 or approximately 1510 mg Ca/d, with both low and high protein (providing 10% and 20% energy) for 7 wk each, separated by a 3-wk washout period. After 3 wk, the entire diet was extrinsically labeled with (47)Ca, and isotope retention was monitored by whole-body scintillation counting. Clinical markers of calcium and bone metabolism were measured.

RESULTS

High compared with low dietary protein significantly increased calcium retention from the low-calcium (29.5% compared with 26.0% absorbed) but not the high-calcium diet (18% absorbed). For the low-calcium diet, this effect nearly balanced a protein-related 0.5-mmol/d greater urinary calcium excretion. Protein-related calciuretic effects were independent of dietary calcium. Testing at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 wk showed no long-term adaptation in urinary acidity or urinary calcium excretion. High compared with low dietary protein decreased urinary deoxypyridinoline and increased serum insulin-like growth factor I without affecting parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, or tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy postmenopausal women, a moderate increase in dietary protein, from 10% to 20% of energy, slightly improved calcium absorption from a low-calcium diet, nearly compensating for a slight increase in urinary calcium excretion. Under practical dietary conditions, increased dietary protein from animal sources was not detrimental to calcium balance or short-term indicators of bone health.