Management of antibiotic-resistant bacteria

Comparison of the bacterial isolates and antibiotic resistance patterns of elderly nursing home and general community patients

BACKGROUND

Nursing home-acquired infections may differ from general community-acquired infections in bacteriology and antibiotic resistance. However, there are currently limited data on this topic in the Australian setting.

AIMS

To compare bacterial isolates and antibiotic resistance patterns, from pathology specimens of nursing home and community patients, and to comment on the suitability of empiric antibiotic guidelines for nursing home-acquired infection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients, aged ≥ 65 years, who resided in either nursing homes or the general community. Patients with a hospital admission in the previous 28 days were excluded. Positive specimen cultures, collected between July 2003 and June 2008 in the Emergency Department and Outpatient Clinics of the Austin Hospital (Melbourne), were examined. The main outcome measures were the bacterial isolates, and their antibiotic resistance patterns, of patients from nursing homes and the general community.

RESULTS

Specimens of blood (638), sputum (425), urine (4044) and wound cultures (785) were examined. The bacteriology of blood culture isolates did not differ between the two groups (P= 0.3). However, the bacteriology of sputum, urine and wound cultures differed significantly between the groups (P= 0.025, P < 0.001, P= 0.004 respectively). There were also higher proportions of antibiotic resistance among some bacteria in nursing home patients, especially methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates across all specimen types, and resistance to several empiric antibiotics among Enterobacteriaceae isolates in urine cultures.

CONCLUSION

Empiric antibiotic guidelines appear adequate to treat nursing home-acquired septicaemia and pneumonia. However, guidelines for urinary tract infections and wound infections may need to be refined.

Antibiotic use and resistance in long term care facilities

INTRODUCTION

The common occurrence of infectious diseases in nursing homes and residential care facilities may result in substantial antibiotic use, and consequently antibiotic resistance. Focusing on these settings, this article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature available on antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, and strategies to reduce antibiotic resistance.

METHODS

Relevant literature was identified by conducting a systematic search in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Additional articles were identified by reviewing the reference lists of included articles, by searching Google Scholar, and by searching Web sites of relevant organizations.

RESULTS

A total of 156 articles were included in the review. Antibiotic use in long term care facilities is common; reported annual prevalence rates range from 47% to 79%. Part of the prescribed antibiotics is potentially inappropriate. The occurrence of antibiotic resistance is substantial in the long term care setting. Risk factors for the acquisition of resistant pathogens include prior antibiotic use, the presence of invasive devices, such as urinary catheters and feeding tubes, lower functional status, and a variety of other resident- and facility-related factors. Infection with antibiotic-resistant pathogens is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Two general strategies to reduce antibiotic resistance in long term care facilities are the implementation of infection control measures and antibiotic stewardship.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review call for the conduction of research and the development of policies directed at reducing antibiotic resistance and its subsequent burden for long term care facilities and their residents.